EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 33 (2020) Aquat. Living Resour., 33 (2020) 10 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 33, 2020
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2020010
Published online 04 September 2020
  • Afonso P, Fontes J, Guedes R, Tempera F, Holland KN, Santos RS. 2009. A multi-scale study of red porgy movements and habitat use, and its application to the design of marine reserve networks. In: Nielsen JL, Arrizabalaga H, Fragoso N, Hobday A, Lutcavage M, Sibert J. (Eds.), Tagging and Tracking of Marine Animals with Electronic Devices, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 423–443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Allsop D, West S. 2004. Sex-ratio evolution in sex changing animals. Evolution 58: 1019–1027. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Aristizabal EO. 2007. Energy investment in the annual reproduction cycle of female red porgy, Pagrus pagrus (L.). Mar Biol 152: 713–724. [Google Scholar]
  • Aubone A, Wöhler OC. 2000. Aplicación del método de máxima verosimilitud a la estimación de parámetros y comparación de curvas de crecimiento de Von Bertalanffy. INDEP Informe Técnico 37: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Ávila-da-Silva AO, Haimovici M. 2006. Diagnóstico do estoque do pargo-rosa Pagurs pagrus (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Rossi-Wongtschowski CLDB, Ávila-da-Silva AO, Cergole MC. (Eds), Análise das Principais Pescarias Comerciais da Região Sudeste-Sul do Brasil: Dinâmica Populacional das Espécies em Explotação − II. São Paulo, USP, pp. 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Ávila-da-Silva AO. 1996. Idade, crescimento, mortalidade e aspectos reprodutivos do pargo, Pagrus pagrus (Teleostei: Sparidae), na costa do Estado de São Paulo e adjacências. Master thesis. Available from USP Library ftp://ftp.sp.gov.br/ftppesca/Idade_crescimento_e_mortalidade_de_Pagrus_pagrus.pdf (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Ball AO, Beal MG, Chapman RW, Sedberry GR. 2007. Population structure of red porgy, Pagrus pagrus in the Atlantic Ocean. Mar Biol 150: 1321–1332. [Google Scholar]
  • Capitoli R, Haimovici M. 1993. Alimentación del besugo, Pagrus pagrus, en el extremo sur del Brasil. Comisión Técnica Mixta del Frente Marítimo 14: 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso LG, Haimovici M. 2011. Age and changes in growth of the king weakfish Macrodon atricauda (Günther, 1880) between 1977 and 2009 in southern Brazil. Fish Res 111: 177–187. [Google Scholar]
  • Cerrato RM. 1990. Interpretable statistical tests for growth comparisons using parameters in the von Bertalanffy equation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 47: 1416–1426. [Google Scholar]
  • Ciotti AM, Odebrecht C, Fillman G, Möller O. 1995. Freshwater outflow and subtropical convergence influence on the phytoplankton biomass on the Southern Brazilian Continental Shelf. Cont Shelf Res 15: 1737–1756. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa PAS, Fagundes-Netto EB, Gaelzer LR, Lacerda PS, Monteiro-Ribas WM. 1997. Crescimento e ciclo reprodutivo do pargo-rosa (Pagrus pagrus Linnaeus, 1758) na Região do Cabo Frio, Rio de Janeiro. Nerítica 11: 139–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotrina CP, Christiansen HE. 1994. El comportamiento reproductivo del besugo (Pagrus pagrus) en el ecosistema costero bonaerense. Revista de Investigacion y Desarrollo Pesquero 9: 25–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotrina CP, Raimondo MC. 1997. Estudio de edad y crecimiento del besugo Pagrus pagrus del sector costero bonaerense. Revista de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero 11: 95–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Cotrina CP. 1977. Interpretación de las escamas del besugo del Mar Argentino. Pagrus pagrus (L). en la determinación de edades. Physis 36: 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  • CTMFM (Comisión Técnica Mixta del Frente Marítimo), 2018. Available at http://ctmfm.org/archivos-de-captura/. (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • DeVries DA. 2006. The life history, reproductive ecology, and demography of the red porgy, Pagrus pagrus, in the north eastern Gulf of Mexico. Ph.D. thesis. Available from FSU Library http://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu%3A168117 (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • DeVries DA. 2007. No evidence of bias from fish behavior in the selectivity of size and sex of the protogynous red porgy (Pagrus pagrus, Sparidae) by hook-and-line gear. Fish Bull 105: 582–587. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 2018, Avalabe at http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Francis RICC. 1990. Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review. J Fish Biol 36: 883–902. [Google Scholar]
  • Fostier A, Kokokiris L, LeMenn F, Mourot B, Pavlidis M, Divanach P, Kentori M. 2000. Recent advances in reproductional aspects of Pagrus pagrus . Cah Options Méditerr 47: 181–192. [Google Scholar]
  • García S, Déspos J. 2015. Crescimento y mortalidade natural del besugo (Pagrus pagrus) em aguas del Atlántico sudoccidental (34° a 42° S). INIDEP. Informe de Investigacion 96: 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  • García S, Zavatteri A, Sáez MB. 2011. Estudio de edad y crecimiento del besugo (Pagrus pagrus) en aguas del Atlántico sudoccidental (34° a 42°S). INIDEP. Informe de Investigacion 24: 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Haimovici M, Cousin JCB. 1989. Reproductive biology of the castanha Umbrina canosai (Pisces, Sciaenidae) in Southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 49: 523–537. [Google Scholar]
  • Haimovici M. 1987. Estratégia de amostragens de comprimentos de teleósteos demersais nos desembarques da pesca de arrasto no litoral sul do Brasil. Atlântica 9: 65–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Haimovici M. 1998. Present state and perspectives for the southern Brazil shelf demersal fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 5: 277–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Haimovici M. 1997. Recursos pesqueiros demersais da região sul. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: FEMAR. [Google Scholar]
  • Haimovici M, Martins AS, Vieira PC. 1996. Distribuição e abundância de teleósteos demersais sobre a plataforma continental do sul do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 56: 27–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  • Heincke F. 1908. Bericht über die Untersuchungen der Biologischen Anstalt auf Helgoland zur Naturgeschichte der Nutzfische. Die Beteil Deutschl Int Meeresforsch 67–155. [Google Scholar]
  • Holden MJ, Raitt DFS. 1975. Manual of fisheries science: Part 2. Resources to investigate methods and their application. Rome, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Hood PB, Johnson AK. 2000. Age, growth, mortality, and reproduction of red porgy, Pagrus pagrus, from the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Fish Bull 98: 723–735. [Google Scholar]
  • Ibama/Ceperg. 2011. Desembarque de pescados no Rio Grande do Sul. Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis. Centro de Pesquisa e Gestão dos Recursos Pesqueiros Lagunares e Estuarinos. Projeto Estatística Pesqueira. Available at http://www.demersais.furg.br/index.php/produção-pesqueira.html (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • İşmen A, Arslan M, Gül G, Yığın CÇ. 2013. Otolith morphometry and population parameters of red porgy, Pagrus pagrus (Linnaeus, 1758) in Saros Bay (North Aegean Sea). Su Ürünleri Dergisi 30: 31–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Juntti SA, Fernald RD. 2016. Timing reproduction in teleost fish: cues and mechanisms. Curr Opin Neurobiol 38: 57–62. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kikuchi E. 2019. Stock discrimination of Southwest Atlantic red porgy (Pagrus pagrus L.) by the otolith shape analysis and evaluation of growth changes in southern Brazil. Masters thesis. Available from FURG Library https://sistemas.furg.br/sistemas/sab/arquivos/bdtd/0000013049.pdf (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Lagos AN, Fernández Aráoz NC, Ruarte C. 2009. Estado del conocimiento biológico-pesquero del besugo (Pagrus pagrus) y caracterización de la pesquería en Ecosistema Costero Bonaerense. INIDEP Informe de Investigacion 5: 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Le-Cren ED. 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonadal weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 20: 201–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Machias A, Tsimenides N, Kokokiris L, Divanach P. 1998. Ring formation on otoliths and scales of Pagrus pagrus: a comparative study. J Fish Biol 52: 350–361. [Google Scholar]
  • MAGyP. 2017. Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganaderia y Pesca. Available at http://www.agroindustria.gob.ar/sitio/areas/pesca_maritima/desembarques/ (last accessed 14 January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Manooch CS. III, Hassler WW. 1978. Synopsis of the biological data on the red porgy Pagrus pagrus (Linneaus). NOAA Technical report NMFS Circular 412, Rome, FAO Fisheries Synopsis. [Google Scholar]
  • Manooch CS. III, Huntsman GR. 1977. Age, growth, and mortality of the red porgy, Pagrus pagrus. Trans Am Fish Soc 106: 26–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Manooch CS. III. 1976. Reproductive cycle, fecundity, and sex ratios of the red porgy, Pagrus pagrus (Pisces: Sparidae) in North Carolina. Fish Bull 74: 775–781. [Google Scholar]
  • Mariani S, Sala-Bozano M, Chopelet J, Benvenuto C. 2013. Spatial and temporal patterns of size-at-sex-change in two exploited coastal fish. Environ Biol Fishes 96: 535–541. [Google Scholar]
  • Militelli MI, López S, Rodrigues KA, García S, Macchi GJ. 2017. Reproductive potential of Pagrus pagrus (Perciformes: Sparidae) in coastal waters of Buenos Aires Province (Argentina) and Uruguay (34°-39°S). Neotrop Ichthyol 15: e160127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Möller O, Piola A, Freitas A, Campos E. 2008. The effects of river discharge and seasonal winds on the shelf off southeastern South America. Cont Shelf Res 28: 1607–1624. [Google Scholar]
  • MPA-FURG. 2018. Boletim Estatístico da Pesca Marinha do sul do Rio Grande do Sul Convenio No 00350.001799/2010-61. Unpublished Report. [Google Scholar]
  • Pajuelo JG, Lorenzo JM. 1996. Life history of the red porgy Pagrus pagrus (Teleostei: Sparidae) off the Canary Islands, central east Atlantic. Fish Res 28: 163–177. [Google Scholar]
  • Piola AR, Campos EJ, Möller Jr, OO, Charo M, Martinez C. 2000. Subtropical shelf front off eastern South America. J Geophys Res: Oceans 105(C3): 6565–6578. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Porrini LP, Iriarte PJF, Iudica CM, Abud EA. 2015. Population genetic structure and body shape assessment of Pagrus pagrus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Perciformes: Sparidae) from the Buenos Aires coast of the Argentine Sea. Neotrop Ichthyol 13: 431–438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Potts JC, Manooch CS. III. 2002. Estimated ages of red porgy from fishery-dependent and fishery-independent data and comparison of growth parameters. Fish Bull 100: 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  • Ricker WE. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Canada, Department of the Environment Fisheries and Marine Service Office of the Editor. [Google Scholar]
  • Soares IA, Lanfranchi AL, Luque JL, Haimovici M, Timi TJ. 2018. Are different parasite guilds of Pagrus pagrus equally suitable sources of information on host zoogeography? Parasitol Res 17: 1865–1875. [Google Scholar]
  • Then AY, Hoenig JM, Hall NG, Hewitt DA. 2015. Evaluating the predictive performance of empirical estimators of natural mortality rate using information on over 200 fish species. ICES J Mar Sci 72: 82–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Vassilopoulou V, Papaconstantinou C. 1992. Age, growth and mortality of the red porgy, Pagrus pagrus, in the eastern Mediterranean Sea (Dodecanese, Greece). Vie et Milieu 42: 51–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Vooren CM. 1997. Demersal elasmobranchs. In: Seeliger U, Odebrecht U, Castelo J.P. (Eds.), Subtropical Convergence Environments: The coast and sea in the Southwestern Atlantic, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 141–146. [Google Scholar]
  • Wootton RJ. 1998. Ecology of teleost fishes. 2nd edition, Dordrecht, Kluver Academic Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Yesaki M, Barcellos BN. 1974. Desenvolvimento da pesca do pargo-róseo ao longo da costa sul do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Serie Documentos Ocasionais SUDEPE-PDP. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.