EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 (2018) Aquat. Living Resour., 31 (2018) 6 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 31, 2018
Article Number 6
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2017045
Published online 19 January 2018
  • Berger WH, Parker FL. 1970. Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science 168: 1345–1347. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beverly S, Griffiths D, Lee R. 2012. Anchored fish aggregating devices for artisanal fisheries in South and Southeast Asia: Benefits and risks. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, Thailand. RAP Publication 20. [Google Scholar]
  • Bijoux JP, Dagorn L, Berke G, Cowley PD, Soria M, Gaertner J-C., Robinson J. 2013. Temporal dynamics, residency and site fidelity of spawning aggregations of a herbivorous tropical reef fish Siganus sutor. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 475: 233–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boyle TP, Smillie GM, Anderson JC, Beeson DR. 1990. A sensitivity analysis of nine diversity and seven similarity indices. Res J Water Pollut Control Fed 62: 749–762. [Google Scholar]
  • Buckley TW, Miller BS. 1994. Feeding habits of yellowfin tuna associated with fish aggregation devices in American Samoa. Bull Mar Sci 55: 445–459. [Google Scholar]
  • Castro JJ, Santiago JA, Santana-Ortega AT. 2002. A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: an alternative to the meeting point hypothesis. Rev Fish Biol Fish 11: 255–277. [Google Scholar]
  • Cayré P. 1991. Behaviour of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) and skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelarnis) around fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Comoros Islands as determined by ultrasonic tagging. Aquat Living Resour 4: 1–12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cayre P, Le Touze D, Norungee D, Williams J. 1991. Artisanal fishery of tuna around fish aggregating devices (FADs) in Comoros Islands. Preliminary estimate of FAD efficiency. RAPA Report (FAO). [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman L, Pasisi B, Bertram I, Beverly S, Sokimi W. 2005. Manual on fish aggregating devices (FADs): Lower-cost moorings and programme management, Noumea, New Caledonia. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM. 2001. A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 216: 265–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L, Fréon P. 1999. Tropical tuna associated with floating objects: a simulation study of the meeting point hypothesis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56: 984–993. [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L, Holland KN, Filmalter J. 2010. Are drifting FADs essential for testing the ecological trap hypothesis? Fish Res 106: 60–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L, Holland KN, Itano DG. 2007. Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar Biol 151: 595–606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L, Holland KN, Restrepo V, Moreno G. 2013. Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Fish Fish 14: 391–415. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Davies TK, Mees CC, Milner-Gulland E. 2014. The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian Ocean. Mar Policy 45: 163–170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dempster T, Taquet M. 2004. Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies. Rev Fish Biol Fish 14: 21–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deudero S, Merella P, Morales-Nin B, Massuti E, Alemany F. 1999. Fish communities associated with FADs. Sci Mar 63: 199–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Druce BE, Kingsford MJ. 1995. An experimental investigation on the fishes associated with drifting objects in coastal waters of temperate Australia. Bull Mar Sci 57: 378–392. [Google Scholar]
  • Fonteneau A, Chassot E, Bodin N. 2013. Global spatio-temporal patterns in tropical tuna purse seine fisheries on drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs): taking a historical perspective to inform current challenges. Aquat Living Resour 26: 37–48. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P, Dagorn L. 2000. Review of fish associative behaviour: toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Rev Fish Biol Fish 10: 183–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Pauly D. 2003. FishBase, International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, Manila, Philippines. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaertner J, Taquet M, Dagorn L, Merigot B, Aumeeruddy R, Sancho G, Itano D. 2008. Visual censuses around drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs): a new approach for assessing the diversity of fish in open-ocean waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 366: 175–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaston KJ, Spicer JI. 2013. Biodiversity: An introduction, John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, United States. [Google Scholar]
  • Gooding RM, Magnuson JJ. 1967. Ecological significance of a drifting object to pelagic fishes. Pac Sci 21: 486–497. [Google Scholar]
  • Govinden R, Jauhary R, Filmalter J, Forget F, Soria M, Adam S, Dagorn L. 2013. Movement behaviour of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna at anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Maldives, investigated by acoustic telemetry. Aquat Living Resour 26: 69–77. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Graham NAJ, Wilson SK, Jennings S, Polunin NVC, Bijoux JP, Robinson J. 2006. Dynamic fragility of oceanic coral reef ecosystems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 8425–8429. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall M, Garcia M, Lennert-Cody C, Arenas P, Miller F. 1992a. The association of tunas with floating objects and dolphins in the eastern Pacific Ocean: A review of the current purse-seine fishery, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Ecology and Fisheries for Tunas Associated with Floating Objects. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall MA, Lennert-Cody C, Garcia M, Arenas P. 1992b. Characteristics of floating objects and their attractiveness for tunas. Inter American Tropical Tuna Commission Comision Interamericana Del Atun Tropical: 396. [Google Scholar]
  • Hallier JP, Gaertner D. 2008. Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 353: 255–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heip C. 1974. A new index measuring evenness. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 54: 555–557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Helfman GS. 1981. Twilight activities and temporal structure in a freshwater fish community. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38: 1405–1420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Houbert J. 2009. Mauritius: A seafood hub. Fisheries exploitation in the Indian Ocean: threats and opportunities, ISEAS Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, 194 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hunter JR, Mitchell CT. 1967. Association of fishes with flotsam in offshore waters of Central America. US Fish Wildl Serv Fish Bull 66: 13. [Google Scholar]
  • Janssen J, Harbison G. 1981. Fish in salps: the association of squaretails (Tetragonurus spp.) with pelagic tunicates. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 61: 917–927. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kawaka JA, Samoilys MA, Murunga M, Church J, Abunge C, Maina GW. 2017. Developing locally managed marine areas: lessons learnt from Kenya. Ocean Coast Manag 135: 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kingsford, M. 1993. Biotic and abiotic structure in the pelagic environment: importance to small fishes. Bull Mar Sci 53: 393–415. [Google Scholar]
  • Kingsford M, Choat J. 1985. The fauna associated with drift algae captured with a plankton-mesh purse seine net. Limnol Oceanogr 30: 618–630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kojima S. 1956. Fishing for dolphins in the western part of the Japan Sea. II. Why do the fish take shelter under floating materials. Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 21: 1049–1052. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lieske E, Myers R. 1994. Reef fishes: A comprehensive identification guide to over 2, 000 species with 2, 500 colour illustrations. Periplus Editions. [Google Scholar]
  • Margalef R. 1958. Trophic' typology versus biotic typology, as exemplified in the regional limnology of northern Spain. Verh Int Verein Theor Angew Limnol 13: 339–349. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsac F, Fonteneau A, Ménard F. 2000. Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap? in Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons, Caribbean-Martinique, 15–19 October, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • Massutí E, Morales-Nin B. 1997. Reproductive biology of dolphin-fish (Coryphaena hippurus L.) off the island of Majorca (western Mediterranean). Fish Res 30: 57–65. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Massutí E, Morales-Nin B, Deudero S. 1999. Fish fauna associated with floating objects sampled by experimental and commercial purse nets. Sci Mar 63: 219–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mbaru EK. 2012. An assessment of the Kenyan coastal artisanal fishery and implications for the introduction of FADs, MSc Thesis, Rhodes University, South Africa. [Google Scholar]
  • McClanahan TR, Hicks CC, Darling ES. 2008. Malthusian overfishing and efforts to overcome it on Kenyan coral reefs. Ecol Appl 18: 1516–1529. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McGill BJ, Etienne RS, Gray JS, Alonso D, Anderson MJ, Benecha HK, Dornelas M, Enquist BJ, Green JL, He F. 2007. Species abundance distributions: moving beyond single prediction theories to integration within an ecological framework. Ecol Lett 10: 995–1015. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mérigot B, Bertrand JA, Mazouni N, Manté C, Durbec J-P., Gaertner J-C. 2007. A multi-component analysis of species diversity of groundfish assemblages on the continental shelf of the Gulf of Lions (north-western Mediterranean Sea). Estuarine Coastal Shelf Sci 73: 123–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Purvis A, Hector A. 2000. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405: 212–219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramos M, Delgado de Molina A, Ariz J. 2010. Analysis of activity data obtained from supply vessels' logbooks implemented by the Spanish fleet and associated in Indian Ocean. IOTC Proceedings. IOTC, Victoria, Seychelles, pp. 18–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Rey-Valette H, Cillaurren E, David G. 2000. Évaluation pluridisciplinaire de la durabilité des pêcheries artisanales autour des dispositifs de concentration de poissons: Multidisciplinary assessment of the sustainability of small-scale fishery around anchored FADs. Aquat Living Resour 13: 241–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robert M, Dagorn L, Deneubourg JL, Itano D, Holland K. 2012. Size-dependent behavior of tuna in an array of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar Biol 159: 907–914. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rosenzweig ML. 1995. Species diversity in space and time, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rountree RA. 1989. Association of fishes with fish aggregation devices: effects of structure size on fish abundance. Bull Mar Sci 44: 960–972. [Google Scholar]
  • Ruttenberg BI. 2001. Effects of artisanal fishing on marine communities in the Galapagos Islands. Conserv Biol 15: 1691–1699. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of information, The University of Illinois Press, Urbana. [Google Scholar]
  • Simpson EH. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soria M, Dagorn L, Potin G, Fréon P. 2009. First field-based experiment supporting the meeting point hypothesis for schooling in pelagic fish. Anim Behav 78: 1441–1446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taquet M, Diringer A. 2007. Fish of the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea, Versailles, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Taquet, M, Sancho G, Dagorn L, Gaertner J-C., Itano D, Aumeeruddy R, Wendling B, Peignon C. 2007. Characterizing fish communities associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Western Indian Ocean using underwater visual surveys. Aquat Living Resour 20: 331–341. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ushioda M. 2015. Estimating the use of FADS around the world. [Google Scholar]
  • Vassilopoulou V, Siapatis A, Christides G, Bekas P. 2005. The biology and ecology of juvenile pilotfish (Naucrates ductor) associated with Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) in eastern Mediterranean waters. Medit Mar Sci 5: 61–70. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Warwick R, Clarke K. 1995. New 'biodiversity' measures reveal a decrease in taxonomic distinctness with increasing stress. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 129: 301–305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wickham DA, Russell GM. 1974. An evaluation of mid-water artificial structures for attracting coastal pelagic fishes. Fish Bull 72: 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  • Yabe H, Mori T. 1950. An observation on the habit of bonito, Katsuwonus vagans, and yellow fin, Neothunnus macropterus, school under the drifting timber on the surface of ocean. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 16: 35–39. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.