Issue |
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 26, Number 1, January-March 2013
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 69 - 77 | |
Section | Thematic Section | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2012022 | |
Published online | 03 September 2012 |
Movement behaviour of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna at anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Maldives, investigated by acoustic telemetry
1
Seychelles Fishing Authority (SFA), PO Box 449, Victoria, Mahé,
Seychelles
2
Marine Research Centre, Ministry of Fisheries and Agriculture,
Maldives
3
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR
212, PO Box 570,
Victoria, Mahé, Seychelles
4
South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity (SAIAB),
Private Bag 1015,
6140
Grahamstown, South
Africa
5
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR 212, Parc
Technologique Universitaire, PO Box
172, 97492, Sainte Clotilde Cedex, La Réunion, France
a Corresponding author:
laurent.dagorn@ird.fr
Received:
12
March
2012
Accepted:
14
June
2012
The pole and line tuna fishery in the Maldives relies heavily on an array of 45 anchored fish aggregating devices (FADs), making it one of the largest anchored FAD-based tuna fisheries in the world. We examined the behaviour of skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) and yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) tuna around anchored FADs (1 000 to 2 000 m deep) in the Maldives using passive acoustic telemetry. Eight neighbouring FADs (distance range: 30 to 95 km, average: 50 km) were equipped with automated acoustic receivers in January 2009, for a period of 13 months. A total of 40 skipjack (37−54 cm FL) and 21 yellowfin (35−53 cm FL) tuna were tagged with Vemco V13 transmitters in January (start of the northeast monsoon, dry season) and November (end of the southwest monsoon, wet season) 2009 and released at the two central FADs within this instrumented array. No movement between FADs was observed for any acoustically-tagged tuna in the instrumented FAD array. These results suggest that FADs in the Maldives may act independently. The maximum time a tagged skipjack remained associated with a FAD was 12.8 days in January but only one day in November. In addition, residence times at FADs were found to differ with time (month) and space (FAD location) for skipjack tuna, suggesting that external biotic factors (e.g., prey, conspecifics or predators) might influence the time this species spends at FADs. In November, the residence times of yellowfin tuna (maximum observed time: 2.8 days) were three times greater than those of skipjack tuna at the same FADs. This specific difference could be explained either by the two species responding to different factors or by the species’ responses being dependent on the same factor but with different thresholds. No particular preference for time of departure from the FADs was observed. Some monospecific and multispecific pairs of acoustically-tagged individuals were observed leaving the FADs simultaneously. Thus, this study indicates a high degree of complexity in the behavioural processes driving FAD associations.
Key words: Behaviour / Fish Aggregating Devices / Passive acoustic telemetry / Skipjack tuna / Yellowfin tuna / Indian Ocean
© EDP Sciences, IFREMER, IRD 2012
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.