Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 29, Number 4, October-December 2016
Article Number 402
Number of page(s) 45
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2016030
Published online 21 December 2016
  • Abascal F.J., Quintans M., et al., 2011, Movements and environmental preferences of the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, in the southeastern Pacific Ocean. Mar. Biol. 158(5), 1175–1184. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Afonso A.S., Hazin F.H.V., et al., 2011, Fishing gear modifications to reduce elasmobranch mortality in pelagic and bottom longline fisheries off Northeast Brazil. Fish. Res. 108(2-3), 336–343. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Afonso A.S., Santiago R., et al., 2012, Shark bycatch and mortality and hook bite-offs in pelagic longlines: Interactions between hook types and leader materials. Fish. Res. 131, 9–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alessandro L., Antonello S., 2010, An overview of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) bycatch and technical mitigation measures in the Mediterranean Sea. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 20(2), 141–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alverson D.L., Freeberg M.H., et al., 1994, A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 339, 233 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Andraka S., Mug M., et al., 2013, Circle hooks: Developing better fishing practices in the artisanal longline fisheries of the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Biol. Cons. 160(), 214–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous, 2007, Research on reducing shark bycatch in the tuna purse seine fishery in the EasternTropical Pacific Ocean. Document BYC-6-06. 9-10 February 2007 La Jolla, California, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous, 2010, Summary Information on Whale Shark and Cetacean Interactions in the Tropical WCPFC Purse Seine Fishery. WCPFC7-2010-IP/01Western and central Pacific Fisheries Commission. Seventh Regular session 06–10 December 2010, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous, 2013, ISSF Guide for Non-Entangling FADs, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous, 2014, HMS Commercial Compliance Guide. Guide for Complying with the Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, Sharks, and Billfish Regulations. Office of Sustainable Fisheries Highly Migratory Species Management Division. us department of commerce national oceanic and atmospheric administration. National Marine Fisheries Services, 71 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Anticamara J.A., Watson R., et al., 2011, Global fishing effort (1950–2010): Trends, gaps, and implications. Fish. Res. 107(1–3), 131–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arrizabalaga H., Ariz J., et al., 2001, Analysis of the activities of suplly vessels in the Indian Ocean from observers data WPTT01-11 IOTC Proceedings no. 4 (2001), 390–401. [Google Scholar]
  • Bach P., Hodent T., et al., 2012, Bait innovation as a new challenge in pelagic longlining. EBFMtuna-2012: Towards ecosystem-based management of tuna fisheries, mitigating impacts of fishing on pelagic ecosystems, available at http://ebfmtuna-2012.sciencesconf.org/7799. [Google Scholar]
  • Baez J.C., Macias D., et al., 2013, Bycatch frequency and size differentiation in loggerhead turtles as a function of surface longline gear type in the western Mediterranean Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93(5), 1423–1427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baulch S., W. van der Werf, et al., 2014, Illegal driftnetting in the Mediterranean.SC/65b/SM05.Scientific committee annual meeting 2014 of the International whaling commission., 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Bazilchuk N., 2005, Smart Gear Competition. Conservation in Practice 6(2), 96–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beerkircher L.R., Cortes E., et al., 2002, Characteristics of shark bycatch observed on pelagic longlines off the Southeastern United States, 1999–2000. Mar. Fish. Rev. 64(4), 40–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Bellido J., Santos M.B., et al., 2011, Fishery discards and bycatch: solutions for an ecosystem approach to fisheries management? Hydrobiologia 670(1), 317–333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berkeley S.A., Irby E.W., et al., 1983, Florida’s commercial swordfish fishery: Longline gear and methods. Univ. of Miami Sea Grant programme. Marine Advisory Bulletin, MAP 14, 23 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Beverly S., Robinson E., 2004, New deep setting technique tested in Mooloolaba, Australia. Fish. Newsl. Secr. Pac. Community (109), 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  • Bigelow K.A., Boggs C.H., et al., 1999, Environmental effects on swordfish and blue shark catch rates in the US North Pacific longline fishery. Fish. Ocean. 8(3), 178–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boggs C.H., 1992, Depth, capture time and hooked longevityof longline-caught pelagic fish- Timing bites of fish with chips. Fish. Bull. 90(4), 642–658. [Google Scholar]
  • Bromhead D., Clarke S., et al., 2012, Identification of factors influencing shark catch and mortality in the Marshall Islands tuna longline fishery and management implications. J. Fish Biol. 80(5), 1870–1894. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cambiè G., Muiño R., et al., 2013, From surface to mid-water: Is the swordfish longline fishery “hitting rock bottom”? A case study in southern Italy. Fish. Res. 140(), 114–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Camhi M.D., Fordham S.V., et al., 2008, Domestic and international management for pelagic sharks. In: M.D. Camhi E.K.P., and E.A. Babcock (Ed.) Sharks of the open ocean: Biology, fisheries,and conservation, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 418–444. [Google Scholar]
  • Campana S.E., 2016, Transboundary movements, unmonitored fishing mortality, and ineffective international fisheries management pose risks for pelagic sharks in the Northwest Atlantic. Canadian J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 73(1), 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campana S.E., Joyce W., et al., 2009, Bycatch and discard mortality in commercially caught blue sharks Prionace glauca assessed using archival satellite pop-up tags. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 387, 241–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Capietto A., Escalle L., et al., 2014, Mortality of marine megafauna induced by fisheries: Insights from the whale shark, the world’s largest fish. Biol. Cons. 174, 147–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carruthers E.H., Neilson J.D., et al., 2011, Overlooked bycatch mitigation opportunities in pelagic longline fisheries: Soak time and temperature effects on swordfish (Xiphias gladius) and blue shark (Prionace glauca) catch. Fish. Res. 108(1), 112–120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carruthers E.H., Schneider D.C., et al., 2009, Estimating the odds of survival and identifying mitigation opportunities for common bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries. Biol. Cons. 142(11), 2620–2630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke S., 2011, A Status Snapshot of Key Shark Species in the Western and Central Pacific and Potential Management Options.WCPFC-SC7-2011/EB-WP-04, 36 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke S., Sato M., et al., 2014, Bycatch in longline fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: a global review of status and mitigation measures. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 588. Rome, FAO, 199 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke S.C., Harley S.J., et al., 2013, Population Trends in Pacific Oceanic Sharks and the Utility of Regulations on Shark Finning. Cons. Biol. 27(1), 197–209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coelho R., Fernandez-Carvalho J., et al., 2012, An overview of the hooking mortality of elasmobranchs caught in a swordfish pelagic longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. Aquat. Living Resour. 25(4), 311–319. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Coelho R., Infante P., et al., 2013, Application of Generalized Linear Models and Generalized Estimation Equations to model at-haulback mortality of blue sharks captured in a pelagic longline fishery in the Atlantic Ocean. Fish. Res. 145, 66–75. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coelho R., Santos M.N., et al., 2012, Effects of Hook and Bait on Targeted and Bycatch Fishes in an Equatorial Atlantic Pelagic Longline Fishery. Bull. Marine Sci. 88(3), 449–467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke S., Suski C., 2005, Do we need species-specific guidelines for catch-and-release recreational angling to effectively conserve diverse fishery resources? Biodiv. Cons. 14(5), 1195–1209. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke S.J., Arlinghaus R., et al., 2014, Where the waters meet: sharing ideas and experiences between inland and marine realms to promote sustainable fisheries management. Canadian J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 71(10), 1593–1601. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke S.J., Nguyen V.M., et al., 2012, Scientific and Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Circle Hooks in Recreational Fisheries. Bulletin of Marine Science 88(3), 395–410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Croxall J.P., Butchart S.H.M., et al., 2012, Seabird conservation status, threats and priority actions: a global assessment. Bird Conser. Int. 22(01), 1–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Filmalter J.D., et al., 2012, Targeting bigger schools can reduce ecosystem impacts of fisheries. Canadian J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(9), 1463–1467. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Holland K.N., et al., 2013, Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Fish Fish. 14(3), 391–415. [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Poisson F., et al., 2010, Mitigating impacts of tropical tuna purse seine fisheries on elasmobranches ICES Annual Science Conference, Nantes; France, September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • Davis B., Worm B., 2013, The International Plan of Action for Sharks: How does national implementation measure up? Mar. Pol. 38(), 312–320. [Google Scholar]
  • de Oliveira T.F., A.L.M. da Silva, et al., 2014, Luminescent threat: toxicity of light stick attractors used in pelagic fishery. Sci. Rep-Uk 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Diaz G.A., Serafy J.E., 2005, Longline-caught blue shark (Prionace glauca): factors affecting the numbers available for live release. Fish. Bull. 103(4), 720–724. [Google Scholar]
  • Domeier M., Nasby-Lucas N., 2013, Two-year migration of adult female white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) reveals widely separated nursery areas and conservation concerns. Animal Biotelemetry 1(1), 2. [Google Scholar]
  • Domingo A., Pons M., et al., 2012, Circle Hook Performance in the Uruguayan Pelagic Longline Fishery. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 499–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunn D.C., Boustany A.M., et al., 2011, Spatio-temporal management of fisheries to reduce bycatch and increase fishing selectivity. Fish Fish. 12(1), 110–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eddy C., Brill R., et al., 2016, Rates of at-vessel mortality and postrelease survival of pelagic sharks captured with tuna purse seines around drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean. Fish. Res. 174, 109–117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Epperly S.P., Watson J.W., et al., 2012, Anatomical Hooking Location and Condition of Animals Captured with Pelagic Longlines: The Grand Banks Experiments 2002-2003. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 513–527. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Erickson D.L., Berkeley S.A., 2008, Methods to reduce bycatch mortality in longline fisheries. In: Camhi MD P.E., Babcock EA (Eds.) Sharks of the open ocean: biology, fisheries and conservation, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp. 462–471. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 1995, Code of conduct for responsible fisheries.FAO, Rome, Italy. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, 2014, The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014. ISBN 978-92-5-108275-1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Favaro B., Côté I.M., 2015, Do bycatch reduction devices in longline fisheries reduce capture of sharks and rays? A global meta-analysis. Fish Fish. 16(2), 300-309. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez-Carvalho J., Coelho R., et al., 2015, Effects of hook and bait in a tropical northeast Atlantic pelagic longline fishery: Part II–Target, bycatch and discard fishes. Fish. Res. 164, 312–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrari L.D., Kotas J.E., 2013, Hook selectivity as a mitigating measure in the catches of the stingray Pteroplatytrygon violacea (Bonaparte, 1832) (Elasmobranchii, Dasyatidae). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 29(4), 769–774. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Filmalter J.D., Capello M., et al., 2013, Looking behind the curtain: quantifying massive shark mortality in fish aggregating devices. Front Ecol Environ 11(6), 291–296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FitzGerald W.J., 2004, Milkfish aquaculture in the Pacific: potential for the tuna longline fishery bait market. Noumea, New Caledonia: Secretariat of the Pacific Community, 62 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzsimmons L., Bunce S., 2013, The WCPFC Bycatch Mitigation Information System (BMIS). Scientific committe Ninth regular session, Pohnpei, Federated States of Micronesia, 6-14 August 2013. WCPFC-SC9-2013/EB-IP-03.Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, 8p. [Google Scholar]
  • Forney K.A., Kobayashi D.R., et al., 2011, What’s the catch? Patterns of cetacean bycatch and depredation in Hawaii-based pelagic longline fisheries. Marine Ecology 32(3), 380–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foster D.G., Epperly S.P., et al., 2012, Evaluation of Hook and Bait Type on the Catch Rates in the Western North Atlantic Ocean Pelagic Longline Fishery. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 529–545. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fowler S., Partridge E., 2012, Lignes directrices pour la pêche Récréative des requins et des raies en Méditerranée. PNUE-PAM CAR/ASP, 36 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Francis M.P., 2014, Survival and depth distribution of spinetail devilrays (Mobula japanica) released from purse-seine catches. NIWA Client Report No:WLG2014-2. 23 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Francis M.P., Griggs L.H., et al., 2001, Pelagic shark bycatch in the New Zealand tuna longline fishery. Marine and Freshwater Research 52(2), 165–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Franco J., Dagorn L., et al., 2009, Design of ecological FADS. IOTC-2009-WPEB-16. [Google Scholar]
  • Frick L.H., Walker T.I., et al., 2012, Immediate and delayed effects of gill-net capture on acid-base balance and intramuscular lactate concentration of gummy sharks, Mustelus antarcticus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology a-Molecular & Integrative Physiology 162(2), 88–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Galeana-Villasenor I., Galvan-Magana F., et al., 2008, Influence of hook type and fishing depth on longline catches of sharks and other pelagic species in the northwest Mexican Pacific. Revista De Biologia Marina Y Oceanografia 43(1), 99–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia-Cortes B., J.O. de Urbina, et al., 2009., Trials with different hook and bait types in the configuration of the surface longline gear used by the Spanish swordfish (Xiphias gladius) fishery in the Pacific Ocean. SCRS/2008/176. Collective Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT 64(7): 2469–2498. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilman E., Clarke S., et al., 2008, Shark interactions in pelagic longline fisheries. Mar. Pol. 32(1), 1–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilman E., Passfield K., et al., 2014, Performance of regional fisheries management organizations: ecosystem-based governance of bycatch and discards. Fish Fish. 15(2), 327–351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilman E.L., 2011, Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries. Mar. Pol. 35(5), 590–609. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilman E.L., Clarke S., et al., 2007, Shark depredation and unwanted bycatch in pelagic longline fisheries: Industry practices and attitudes, and shark avoidance strategies. Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council. Honolulu, HI. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilman E.L., Dalzell P., et al., 2006, Fleet communication to abate fisheries bycatch. Mar. Pol. 30(4), 360–366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gless J., Salmon M., et al., 2008, Behavioral responses of juvenile leatherbacks Dermochelys coriacea to lights used in the longline fishery. Endanger. Species Res. 5(2–3), 239–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Godin A., C. lie, et al., 2012, The Effect of Circle Hooks on Shark Catchability and At-Vessel Mortality Rates in Longlines Fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 469–483. [Google Scholar]
  • Godin A.C., Wimmer T., et al., 2013, No effect from rare-earth metal deterrent on shark bycatch in a commercial pelagic longline trial. Fish. Res. 143(), 131–135. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Graves J.E., Horodysky A.Z., 2008, Does hook choice matter? Effects of three circle hook models on postrelease survival of white marlin. North Am. J. Fish. Manag. 28(2), 471–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Graves J.E., Horodysky A.Z., et al., 2012, Incorporating Circle Hooks Into Atlantic Pelagic Fisheries: Case Studies from the Commercial Tuna/Swordfish Longline and Recreational Billfish Fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 411–422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hall M., Roman M., 2013, Bycatch and non-tuna catch in the tropical tuna purse seine fisheries of the world. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 568. Rome, FAO, 249 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hart N.S., Collin S.P., 2015, Sharks senses and shark repellents. Integ. Zool. 10(1), 38–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hazin H.G., Hazin F.H.V., et al., 2005, Effect of light-sticks and electralunie attractors on surface-longline catches of swordfish (Xiphias gladius, Linnaeus, 1959) in the southwest equatorial Atlantic. Fish. Res. 72(-3), 271–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heberer C., Aalbers S.A., et al., 2010, Insights into catch-and-release survivorship and stress-induced blood biochemistry of common thresher sharks (Alopias vulpinus) captured in the southern California recreational fishery. Fish. Res. 106(3), 495–500. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hight B.V., Holts D., et al., 2007, Plasma catecholamine levels as indicators of the postrelease survivorship of juvenile pelagic sharks caught on experimental drift longlines in the Southern California Bight. Marine and Freshwater Research 58(1), 145–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hovgård H., Lassen H., 2000, Manual on estimation of selectivity for gillnet and longline gears in abundance surveys. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 397. Rome, FAO. 2000, 84 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Huang H.W., 2011, Bycatch of high sea longline fisheries and measures taken by Taiwan: Actions and challenges. Mar. Pol. 35(5), 712–720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hueter R.E., Manire C.A., et al., 2006, Assessing mortality of released or discarded fish using a logistic model of relative survival derived from tagging data. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135(2), 500–508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hutchinson M.R., Itano D.G., et al., 2015, Postrelease survival of juvenile silky sharks captured in a tropical tuna purse seine fishery. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 521, 143–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ichii T., Nishikawa H., et al., 2015, Impacts of extensive driftnet fishery and late 1990s climate regime shift on dominant epipelagic nekton in the Transition Region and Subtropical Frontal Zone: Implications for fishery management Prog Oceanogr(0). [Google Scholar]
  • Itano D., Muir J., et al., 2012, Development-and-Testing-Release-Panel-Sharks-and-Non-target-Finfish-PS. WCPFC-SC8-2012/EB-WP-14, 6 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivar doSul J.A., Rodrigues O., et al., 2009, Skin irritation and histopathologic alterations in rats exposed to lightstick contents, UV radiation and seawater. Ecotox Environ Safe 72(7), 2020–2024. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jordan L.K., Mandelman J.W., et al., 2013, Linking sensory biology and fisheries bycatch reduction in elasmobranch fishes: a review with new directions for research. Conservation Physiology 1(1). [Google Scholar]
  • Kaplan I.C., Cox S.P., et al., 2007, Circle hooks for Pacific longliners: Not a panacea for marlin and shark bycatch, but part of the solution. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136(2), 392–401. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelleher K., 2005, Discards in the world’s marine fisheries, an update. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 470. FAO, Rome, 131 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Kirby D.S., Ward P., 2014, Standards for the effective management of fisheries bycatch. Mar. Pol. 44(), 419–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kneebone J., Chisholm J., et al., 2013, The physiological effects of capture stress, recovery, and postrelease survivorship of juvenile sand tigers (Carcharias taurus) caught on rod and reel. Fish. Res. 147, 103–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kondel J., Rusin J., 2007, Report on the second workshop on bycatch reduction in the ETP purse seiner fishery. October 3–4, 2006. Best Western – Inn by the Sea, La Jolla, CA, 60 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Leathwick J., Moilanen A., et al., 2008, Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters. Conservation Letters 1(2), 91–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewison R.L., Freeman S.A., et al., 2004, Quantifying the effects of fisheries on threatened species: the impact of pelagic longlines on loggerhead and leatherback sea turtles. Ecol. Lett. 7(3), 221–231. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewison R.L., Oro D., et al., 2012, Research priorities for seabirds: improving conservation and management in the 21st century. Endanger. Species Res. 17(2), 93–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lohmann K.J., Wang J.H., et al., 2006, Development of turtle-safe light sticks for use in longline fisheries. Swimmer Y, Brill RW (compilers and eds) Sea turtle and pelagic fish sensory biology: developing techniques to reduce sea turtle bycatch in longline fisheries. NOAA Tech Memo NMFSPIFSC-7, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Lokkeborg S., Pina T., 1997, Effects of setting time, setting direction and soak time on longline catch rates. Fish. Res. 32(3), 213–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lynch A.M.J., Sutton S.G., et al., 2010, Implications of recreational fishing for elasmobranch conservation in the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Aquatic Conservation-Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 20(3), 312–318. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Macías L., D.,Barcelona S.G., et al., 2012, Marine mammal bycatch in Spanish Mediterranean large pelagic longline fisheries, with a focus on Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus). Aquatic Living Resources 25(04), 321–331. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Mandelman J.W., Cooper P.W., et al., 2008, Shark bycatch and depredation in the US Atlantic pelagic longline fishery. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 18(4), 427–442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manire C., Hueter R., et al., 2001, Serological Changes Associated with Gill-Net Capture and Restraint in Three Species of Sharks. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130(6), 1038–1048. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McAuley R.B., Simpfendorfer C.A., et al., 2007, Gillnet mesh selectivity of the sandbar shark (Carcharhinus plumbeus): implications for fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64(9), 1702–1709. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McCutcheon S.M., Kajiura S.M., 2013, Electrochemical properties of lanthanide metals in relation to their application as shark repellents. Fish. Res. 147(), 47–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McGrath S.P., Butcher P.A., et al., 2011, Reviewing hook degradation to promote ejection after ingestion by marine fish. Marine and Freshwater Research 62(10), 1237–1247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer C.G., Holland K.N., et al., 2005, Sharks can detect changes in the geomagnetic field. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 2(2), 129–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moazzam M., Nawaz R., 2014, Bycatch of tuna gillnet fisheries of Pakistan: A serious threat to non-target, endangered and threatened species. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. India, 56 (1), 85-90, January-June 2014. doi: 10.6024/jmbai.2014.56.1.01750s-13. [Google Scholar]
  • Moyes C.D., Fragoso N., et al., 2006, Predicting postrelease survival in large pelagic fish. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 135(5), 1389–1397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MRAG, 2012, A review of bycatch in the Indian Ocean gillnet tuna fleet focussing on India and Sri Lanka. ISSF Technical Report 2012-05. International Seafood Sustainability Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Murua H., Abascal F.J., et al., 2013, Provision of scientific advice for the purpose of the implementation of the EUPOA sharks. Final Report. European Commission, Studies for Carrying out the Common Fisheries Policy (MARE/2010/11 - LOT 2). http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/documentation/studies/sharks/index_en.htm, 475 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Musyl M.K., Brill R.W., et al., 2011, Postrelease survival, vertical and horizontal movements, and thermal habitats of five species of pelagic sharks in the central Pacific Ocean. Fish. Bull. 109(4), 341–368. [Google Scholar]
  • Myrberg A.A., 2001, The acoustical biology of elasmobranchs. Environmental Biology of Fishes 60(1-3), 31–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Myrberg A.A., Banner A., et al., 1969, Shark attraction using a video-acoustic system. Mar. Biol. 2, 264–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson D.R., 1976, Ultrasonic Telemetry of Shark Behavior. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59(4), 1004–1007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson D.R., Gruber S.H., 1963, Sharks: attraction by low-frequency sounds. Science 142, 975–977. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NMFS, 2008, Report of the US longline bycatch reduction assessment and planning workshop. NOAA Tech Memo NMFS-OPR-41, Southeast Regional Office, St. Petersburg, FL. [Google Scholar]
  • NMFS, 2009, project report update Gulf of Mexico pelagic longline bluefin tuna mitigation research, 27 p. [Google Scholar]
  • NOAA., 2009, Best fishing practices for safe handling:common thresher (Alopias vulpinus). In: Centre S.F.S. (Ed.), http://www.pier.org/flyers/BREP_thresher_brochure.pdf4. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Connell C.P., Abel D.C., et al., 2010, Responses of the southern stingray (Dasyatis americana) and the nurse shark (Ginglymostoma cirratum) to permanent magnets. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Phy. 43(1), 63–73. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Connell C.P., Abel D.C., et al., 2011, Analysis of permanent magnets as elasmobranch bycatch reduction devices in hook-and-line and longline trials. Fish. Bull. 109(4), 394–401. [Google Scholar]
  • Pacheco J.C., Kerstetter D.W., et al., 2011, A comparison of circle hook and J hook performance in a western equatorial Atlantic Ocean pelagic longline fishery. Fish. Res. 107(1-3), 39–45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson H.M., Tudman M.J., 2009, Chondrichthyan guide for fisheries managers: A practical guide to mitigating chondrichthyan bycatch. Bureau of Rural Sciences and Australian Fisheries Management Authority, Canberra. [Google Scholar]
  • Pepperell J.G., Davis T.L.O., 1999, Postrelease behaviour of black marlin, Makaira indica, caught off the Great Barrier Reef with sportfishing gear. Mar. Biol. 135(2), 369–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pinho G.L.L., Ihara P.M., et al., 2009, Does light-stick content pose any threat to marine organisms? Environ Toxicol Phar 27(1), 155–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Piovano S., Swimmer Y., Giacoma C., 2009, Are circle hooks effective in reducing incidental captures of loggerhead sea turtles in a Mediterranean longline fishery? Aquat. Conser. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 19(7), 779–785. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poisson F., Filmalter J.D., et al., 2014, Mortality rate of silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis) caught in the tropical tuna purse seine fishery in the Indian Ocean. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 71(6), 795–798. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poisson F., Gaertner J.C., et al., 2010, Effects of lunar cycle and fishing operations on longline-caught pelagic fish: fishing performance, capture time, and survival of fish. Fish. Bull. 108(3), 268–281. [Google Scholar]
  • Poisson F., Seret B., et al., 2014, Collaborative research: Development of a manual on elasmobranch handling and release best practices in tropical tuna purse-seine fisheries. Mar. Pol. 44(), 312–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Poisson F., Séret B., et al., 2012, Good practices to reduce the mortality of sharks and rays caught incidentally by the tropical tuna purse seiners. Mitigating impacts of fishing on pelagic ecosystems: towards ecosystem-based management of tuna fisheries 15-18 October 2012 Aquarium Mare Nostrum, Montpellier, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Prince E.D., Ortiz M., et al., 2002, A comparison of circle hook and “J” hook performance in recreational catch-and-release fisheries for billfish. Catch Rel. Mar. Recreat. Fish. 30, 66-79. [Google Scholar]
  • Prince E.D., Snodgrass D., et al., 2007, Circle hooks, “J” hooks and drop-back time: a hook performance study of the south Florida recreational live-bait fishery for sailfish, Istiophorus platypterus. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 14(2), 173–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Queiroz N., Humphries N.E., et al., 2012, Spatial Dynamics and Expanded Vertical Niche of Blue Sharks in Oceanographic Fronts Reveal Habitat Targets for Conservation. PLoS ONE 7(2), e32374. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Read A.J., 2007, Do circle hooks reduce the mortality of sea turtles in pelagic longlines? A review of recent experiments. Biol. Cons. 135(2), 155–169. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rice P.H., Serafy J.E., et al., 2012, Performance of Non-Offset and 10° Offset 18/0 Circle Hooks in the United States Pelagic Longline Fishery. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 571–587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richards P.M., Epperly S.P., et al., 2012, Can Circle Hook Offset Combined with Baiting Technique Affect Catch and Bycatch in Pelagic Longline Fisheries? Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 589–603. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rigg D.P., Peverell S.C., et al., 2009, Do elasmobranch reactions to magnetic fields in water show promise for bycatch mitigation? Mar. Freshwater Res. 60(9), 942–948. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robbins W.D., Peddemors V.M., et al., 2011, Assessment of permanent magnets and electropositive metals to reduce the line-based capture of Galapagos sharks, Carcharhinus galapagensis. Fish. Res. 109(1), 100–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson J.L., Jones I.L., 2014, An experimental study measuring the effects of a tarsus-mounted tracking device on the behaviour of a small pursuit-diving seabird. Behaviour 151(12-13), 1799–1826. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roe J.H., Morreale S.J., et al., 2014, Predicting bycatch hotspots for endangered leatherback turtles on longlines in the Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281(1777). [Google Scholar]
  • Rogan E., Mackey M., 2007, Megafauna bycatch in drift nets for albacore tuna (Thunnus alalunga) in the NE Atlantic. Fish. Res. 86(1), 6–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rudershausen P.J., Buckel J.A., et al., 2012, A comparison between circle hook and J hook performance in the dolphinfish, yellowfish tuna, and wahoo troll fishery off the coast of North Carolina. Fish. Bull. 110(2), 156–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Sales G., Giffoni B.B., et al., 2010, Circle hook effectiveness for the mitigation of sea turtle bycatch and capture of target species in a Brazilian pelagic longline fishery. Aquat. Conser. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst. 20(4), 428–436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Santos I., Friedrich A., et al., 2009, Marine debris contamination along undeveloped tropical beaches from northeast Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 148(1-4), 455–462. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sauls B., Ayala O., 2012, Circle Hook Requirements in the Gulf of Mexico: Application in Recreational Fisheries and Effectiveness for Conservation of Reef Fishes. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 667–679. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., 2011, An overview of the 2011 ISSF/IATTC research cruise for investigating potential solutions for reducing fishing mortality of undesirable sizes of bigeye and yellowfin tunas and sharks in purse-seine sets on drifting FADs. Scientific Committee Seventh Regular Session, August 9-17, 2011, Federated States of Micronesia. WCPFC-SC7-2011/EB-WP-13. 5 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott M.D., 2007, IATTC Research on Reducing Shark Bycatch in the Tuna Purse Seine Fishery in the Eastern Tropical Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC3-EB SWG/IP-3. Third Regular Session of the Scientific Committee, 13-24 August 2007, Honolulu, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Sempo G., Dagorn L., et al., 2013, Impact of increasing deployment of artificial floating objects on the spatial distribution of social fish species. J. Appl. Ecol. 50(5), 1081–1092. [Google Scholar]
  • Senko J., White E.R., et al., 2014, Comparing bycatch mitigation strategies for vulnerable marine megafauna. Animal Conser. 17(1), 5–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sepulveda C.A., Heberer C., et al., 2015, Postrelease survivorship studies on common thresher sharks (Alopias vulpinus) captured in the southern California recreational fishery. Fish. Res. 161(), 102–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Serafy J.E., Cooke S.J., et al., 2012, Circle Hooks in Commercial, Recreational, and Artisanal Fisheries: Research Status and Needs for Improved Conservation and Management. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 371–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Serafy J.E., Kerstetter D.W., et al., 2009, Can circle hook use benefit billfishes? Fish Fish. 10(2), 132–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sisneros J.A., Nelson D.R., 2001, Surfactants as chemical shark repellents: Past, present, and future. Environ. Biol. Fish. 60(1–3), 117–129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Southwood A., Fritsches K., et al., 2008, Sound, chemical, and light detection in sea turtles and pelagic fishes: sensory-based approaches to bycatch reduction in longline fisheries. Endanger. Species Res. 5(2–3), 225–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soykan C.U., Moore J.E., et al., 2008, Why study bycatch? An introduction to the Theme Section on fisheries bycatch. Endanger. Species Res. 5(2–3), 91–102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SPC-OFP, 2013, Preliminary analysis of potential impacts of wire traces on shark catches in WCPO tuna longline fisheries. WCPFC-SC9-2013/ SC9-WCPFC9-09, 4 p. [Google Scholar]
  • SPC, 2009, FAD Management and monitoring. Scientific Committe fifth regular session. Port Vila, Vanuatu 10-21 August 2009. WCPFC-SC5-2009/FT-WP-1, 20 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Speed C.W., Meekan M.G., et al., 2008, Scarring patterns and relative mortality rates of Indian Ocean whale sharks. Journal of Fish Biology 72(6), 1488–1503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevens J.D., Bradford R.W., et al., 2010, Satellite tagging of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and other pelagic sharks off eastern Australia: depth behaviour, temperature experience and movements. Mar. Biol. 157(3), 575–591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stokes L.W., Hataway D., et al., 2011, Hook ingestion rates in loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta as a function of animal size, hook size, and bait. Endanger. Species Res. 14(1), 1–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stone H.H., Dixon L.K., 2001, A comparison of catches of swordfish, Xiphias gladius, and other pelagic species from Canadian longline gear configured with alternating monofilament and multifilament nylon gangions. Fish. Bull. 99(1), 210–216. [Google Scholar]
  • Stoner A.W., Kaimmer S.M., 2008, Reducing elasmobranch bycatch: Laboratory investigation of rare earth metal and magnetic deterrents with spiny dogfish and Pacific halibut. Fish. Res. 92(2-3), 162–168. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stroud E.M., O’Connell C.P., et al., 2014, Chemical shark repellent: Myth or fact? The effect of a shark necromone on shark feeding behavior. Ocean Coast Manage 97(), 50–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swimmer Y., Wang J.H., et al., 2008, Shark Deterrent and Incidental Capture Workshop. [Google Scholar]
  • Tallack S.M.L., Mandelman J.W., 2009, Do rare-earth metals deter spiny dogfish? A feasibility study on the use of electropositive "mischmetal" to reduce the bycatch of Squalus acanthias by hook gear in the Gulf of Maine. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66(2), 315–322. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorpe T., Frierson D., 2009, Bycatch mitigation assessment for sharks caught in coastal anchored gillnets. Fish. Res. 98(1–3), 102–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorpe T., Frierson D., 2009, Bycatch mitigation assessment for sharks caught in coastal anchored gillnets. Fish. Res. 98(1-3), 102–112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tryggvadottir S.V., Jonsson G.P., et al., 2002., Artificial bait alternatives mainly based on fish waste – Artibait. Progress report March 2000 to March 2001, Partner B3 – Icelandic Fisheries Laboratories, Reykjavik, Iceland. EU Project CRAFT Q5CR-2000–70427. [Google Scholar]
  • Tudela S., Kai A.K., et al., 2005, Driftnet fishing and biodiversity conservation: the case study of the large-scale Moroccan driftnet feet operating in the Alboran Sea (SW Mediterranean). Biol. Cons. 121, 65–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh W.A., Bigelow K.A., et al., 2009, Decreases in Shark Catches and Mortality in the Hawaii-Based Longline Fishery as Documented by Fishery Observers. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Dynamics, Management, and Ecosystem Science, 270–282. [Google Scholar]
  • Walsh W.A., Ito R.Y., et al., 2005, Analysis of logbook accuracy for blue marlin (Makaira nigricans) in the Hawaii-based longline fishery with a generalized additive model and commercial sales data. Fish. Res. 75(1-3), 175–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang J.H., Boles L.C., et al., 2007, Behavioral responses of sea turtles to lightsticks used in longline fisheries. Animal Conservation 10(2), 176–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward P., Epe S., et al., 2009, The effects of circle hooks on bycatch and target catches in Australia’s pelagic longline fishery. Fish. Res. 97(3), 253–262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward P., Lawrence E., et al., 2008, Large-scale experiment shows that nylon leaders reduce shark bycatch and benefit pelagic longline fishers. Fish. Res. 90(1-3), 100–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward P., Myers R.A., 2007, Bait loss and its potential effects on fishing power in pelagic longline fisheries. Fish. Res. 86(1), 69–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watson J.T., Bigelow K.A., 2014, Trade-offs among Catch, Bycatch, and Landed Value in the American Samoa Longline Fishery. Conser. Biol. 28(4), 1012–1022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watson J.W., Epperly S.P., et al., 2005, Fishing methods to reduce sea turtle mortality associated with pelagic longlines. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62(5), 965–981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Werry J.M., Planes S., et al., 2014, Reef-Fidelity and Migration of Tiger Sharks, Galeocerdo cuvier, across the Coral Sea. PLoS ONE 9(1). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilson J.A., Diaz G.A., 2012, An Overview of Circle Hook Use and Management Measures in United States Marine Fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 771–788. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Worm B., Davis B., et al., 2013, Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar. Pol. 40(), 194–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yokota K., Kiyota M., et al., 2006, Shark catch in a pelagic longline fishery: Comparison of circle and tuna hooks. Fish. Res. 81(2–3), 337–341. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yokota K., Mituhasi T., et al., 2012, Perspectives on the Morphological Elements of Circle Hooks and Their Performance in Pelagic Longline Fisheries. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88(3), 623–629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.