This article has an erratum: [https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2019023]
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 29, Number 4, October-December 2016
|Number of page(s)||45|
|Published online||21 December 2016|
Technical mitigation measures for sharks and rays in fisheries for tuna and tuna-like species: turning possibility into reality
1 Institut Français de Recherche pour
l’Exploitation de la Mer (Ifremer), UMR Marbec, CS 30171, Avenue Jean Monnet, 34203
2 Instituto Español de Oceanografía, PO Box 1373, 38180 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
3 Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS), Lowestoft Laboratory, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 0HT, UK
4 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR Marbec, CS 30171, Avenue Jean Monnet, 34203 Sète Cedex, France
5 ICCAT Secretariat, Calle Corazón de Maria 8, 6 planta, 28002 Madrid, Spain
6 Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), UMR 212, Muséum national d’Histoire Naturelle Département Systématique et Evolution, CP 51, 55, rue Buffon, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
7 AZTI, Herrera Kaia, Portualde z/g, 20110 Pasaia ( Gipuzkoa), Spain
8 Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Avenida 5 de Outubro s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
a Corresponding author:
Accepted: 5 October 2016
Tuna fisheries have been identified as one of the major threats to populations of other marine vertebrates, including sea turtles, sharks, seabirds and marine mammals. The development of technical mitigation measures (MM) in fisheries is part of the code of conduct for responsible fisheries. An in-depth analysis of the available literature regarding bycatch mitigation in tuna fisheries with special reference to elasmobranchs was undertaken. Studies highlighting promising MMs were reviewed for four tuna fisheries (longline, purse seine, driftnets and gillnet, and rod and line – including recreational fisheries). The advantages and disadvantages of different MMs are discussed and assessed based on current scientific knowledge. Current management measures for sharks and rays in tuna Regional Fishery Management Organizations (t-RFMOs) are presented. A review of relevant studies examining at-vessel and postrelease mortality of elasmobranch bycatch is provided. This review aims to help fisheries managers identify pragmatic solutions to reduce mortality on pelagic elasmobranchs (and other higher vertebrates) whilst minimizing impacts on catches of target tuna species. Recent research efforts have identified several effective MMs that, if endorsed by t-RFMOs, could reduce elasmobranchs mortality rate in international tropical purse seine tuna fisheries. In the case of longline fisheries, the number of operational effective MMs is very limited. Fisheries deploying driftnets in pelagic ecosystems are suspected to have a high elasmobranchs bycatch and their discard survival is uncertain, but no effective MMs have been field validated for these fisheries. The precautionary bans of such gear by the EU and by some t-RFMOs seem therefore appropriate. Recreational tuna fisheries should be accompanied by science-based support to reduce potential negative impacts on shark populations. Priorities for research and management are identified and discussed.
Key words: Mitigation / elasmobranch / bycatch / pelagic / mortality / tuna regional fishery management organizations
Note to the reader: Error has been produced in the initial version of this article. It is described in the correction notice. This new version published on 19 November 2019 contains all the corrections.
© EDP Sciences 2016
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.