Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 26, Number 1, January-March 2013
Page(s) 63 - 68
Section Thematic Section
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2012025
Published online 26 September 2012
  • Almeida P., Quintella B., Costa M., Moore A., 2007, Developments in Fish Telemetry. Proc. the 6th Conference on Fish Telemetry held in Europe. Springer-Verlag New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Capello M., Soria M., Cotel P., Deneubourg J.L., Dagorn L., 2011, Quantifying the interplay between environmental and social effects on aggregated-fish dynamics. PLoS One 6(12) : e28109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Capello M., Soria M., Cotel P., Potin G., Dagorn L., 2012, The heterogeneous spatial and temporal patterns of behavior of small pelagic fish in an array of Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. (in press). [Google Scholar]
  • Castro J.J., Santiago J.A., Santana-Ortega A.T., 2002, A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects : an alternative to the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 11, 255–277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavagna A., Cimarelli A., Giardina I., Orlandi A., Parisi G., et al., 2008, New statistical tools for analyzing the structure of animal groups. Math. Biosci. 214, 32–37. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavagna A., Cimarelli A., Giardina I., Parisi G., Santagati R., Stefanini F., Tavarone R., 2010, From empirical data to inter-individual interactions : unveiling the rules of collective animal behaviour. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20, 1491–1510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Holland K.N., Itano D.G., 2007, Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FAD). Mar. Biol. 151, 595–606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dempster T., Taquet M., 2004, Fish aggregation device (FAD) research : gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 14, 21–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doray M., Josse E., Gervain P., Reynal L., Chantrel J., 2006, Acoustic characterisation of pelagic fish aggregations around moored fish aggregating devices in Martinique (Lesser Antilles). Fish. Res. 82, 162–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P., Gerlotto F., Soria M., 1996, Diel variability of school structure with special attention on transition periods. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 459–464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon, P., Dagorn, L., 2000, Review of fish associative behaviour : toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10, 183–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hallier J.P., Gartner D., 2008, Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 353, 255–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hitt S., Pittman S.J., Brown K. A., 2011, Tracking and mapping sun-synchronous migrations and diel space use patterns of Haemulon sciurus and Lutjanus apodus in the US Virgin Islands. Environ. Biol. Fish 92, 525–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunter J.R., Mitchell C.T., 1967, Field experiments on the attraction of fish to floating objects. J. Cons. Perm. Int. Explor. Mer 31, 427–434. [Google Scholar]
  • Josse E., Dagorn L., Bertrand A., 2000, Typology and behaviour of tuna aggregations around fish aggregating devices from acoustic surveys in French Polynesia. Aquat. Living Resour. 13, 183–192. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Klimley A.P., Holloway C.F., 1999, School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar. Biol. 133, 307–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindquist D.G., Pietrafesa L.J., 1989, Current vortices and fish aggregations : the current field and associated fishes around a tugboat wreck in Onslow Bay, North Carolina. Bull. Mar. Sci. 44, 533–544. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsac F., Fonteneau A., Ménard F., 2000, Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries : an ecological trap? In : Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. Le Gall J.-Y., P. Cayré, M. Taquet (eds). Ed. Ifremer, Actes Colloq. 28, 537–552. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno G., Josse E., Brehmer P., Nøttestad L., 2007, Echotrace classification and spatial distribution of pelagic fish aggregations around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFAD). Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 343–356. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ohta I., Kakuma S., 2005, Periodic behavior and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations. Mar. Biol. 146, 581–594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pitcher T.J., Partridge B.L., Wardle C.S., 1976, A blind fish can school. Science 194, 963–965. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2011, R : A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Roos D., Roux O., Conand F., 2007, Notes on the biology of the bigeye scad, Selar crumenophthalmus (Carangidae) around Reunion Island, southwest Indian Ocean. Sci. Mar. 71, 137–144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roux, O., Conand, F., 2000, Feeding habits of the bigeye scad, Selar crumenophthalmus (Carangidae), in La Réunion Island waters (south-western Indian Ocean). Cybium 24, 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Soria M., Fréon P., Chabanet P., 2007, Schooling properties of an obligate and a facultative fish species. J. Fish Biol. 71, 1257–1269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Soria M., Dagorn L., Potin G., Fréon P., 2009, First field-based experiment supporting the meeting point hypothesis for schooling in pelagic fish. Anim. Behav. 78, 1441–1446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.