Highlight
Free Access
Review
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 26, Number 1, January-March 2013
Page(s) 49 - 61
Section Thematic Section
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2012033
Published online 28 November 2012
  • Allain V., 2010, Trophic structure of the pelagic ecosystems of the western and central Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC6-2010/EB-IP-10.
  • Allain V., Griffiths S. P., Polovina J. Nicol S., 2012, WCPO ecosystem indicator trends and results from ecopath simulations. WCPFC-SC8-2012/EB-IP-12.
  • Arrizabalaga H., de Bruyn P., Diaz G. A., Murua H., Chavance P., de Molina A. D., Gaertner D., Ariz J., Ruiz J., Kell L. T., 2011, Productivity and susceptibility analysis for species caught in Atlantic tuna fisheries. Aquat. Living Resour. 24, 1–12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Brill R.W., Block B.A., Boggs C.H., Bigelow K.A., Freund E.V., Marcinek D.J., 1999, Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry : implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes. Mar. Biol. 133, 395–408. [CrossRef]
  • Bromhead D., Foster J., Attard R., Findlay J., Kalish J., 2003, A review of the impact of fish aggregating devices (FADs) on tuna fisheries. Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra.
  • Buckley T., Miller B., 1994, Feeding habits of yellowfin tuna associated with fish aggregation devices in American Samoa. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55, 445–459.
  • Clarke S., Harley S., Hoyle S., Rice J., 2011, An indicator-based analysis of key shark species based on data held by SPC-OFP WCPFC-SC7-2011/EB-WP-01.
  • Cury P.A., Christensen V., 2005, Quantitative ecosystem indicators for fisheries management, Introduction. ICES. J. Mar. Sci. 62, 307–310. [CrossRef]
  • Dagorn L., Fréon P., 1999, Tropical tuna associated with floating objects : a simulation study of the meeting point hypothesis. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 984–993.
  • Dagorn L., Menczer F., Bach P., Olson R.J., 2000, Co-evolution of movement behaviours by tropical pelagic predatory fishes in response to prey environment : a simulation model. Ecol. Mod. 134, 325–341. [CrossRef]
  • Dagorn L., Bertrand A., Bach P., Petit M., Josse E., 2001, Improving our understanding of tropical tuna movements from small to large scales. In : Electronic tagging and tracking in marine fisheries : Proc. Symp. Tagging and Tracking Marine Fish with Electronic Devices, USA, Kluwer Academic Publ., University of Hawaii.
  • Dagorn L., Holland K. N., Itano D. G., 2007, Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar. Biol. 151, 595–606. [CrossRef]
  • Dagorn L., Holland K.N., Filmalter J., 2010, Are drifting FADs essential for testing the ecological trap hypothesis? Fish. Res. 106, 60–63.
  • Dagorn L., Holland K. N., Restrepo V., Moreno G., 2012, Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Fish. Fish. DOI : 10.1111/j. 1467-2979.2012.00478.x.
  • Davies N., Hoyle S., Harley S., Langley A., Kleiber P., Hampton J., 2011, Stock assessment of bigeye tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC7-2011/SA-WP-02.
  • Dempster T., Kingsford M., 2003, Homing of pelagic fish to fish aggregation devices (FADs) : the role of sensory cues. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 258, 213–222. [CrossRef]
  • Dempster T., Taquet M., 2004, Fish aggregation device (FAD) research : gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 14, 21–42. [CrossRef]
  • Doray M., Josse E., Gervain P., Reynal L., Chantrel J., 2006, Acoustic characterization of pelagic fish aggregations around moored fish aggregating devices in Martinique (Lesser Antilles). Fish. Res. 82, 162–175. [CrossRef]
  • FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2010, Guidelines to reduce sea turtle mortality in fishing operations. Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, FAO, Rome.
  • FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2011, Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Atlas of tuna and billfish catches, http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/tuna-atlas/query/en, accessed 25 November 2011.
  • Fonteneau A., Pallares P., Pianet R., 2000, A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs. In : Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poisons, Actes Coll.-IFREMER 28, pp. 15–35.
  • Fréon P., Dagorn L., 2000, Review of fish associative behaviour : toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10, 183–207. [CrossRef]
  • Gilman E., 2011, Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries. Mar. Policy 35, 590–609. [CrossRef]
  • Girard C., 2004, FAD : Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects. Anim. Behav. 67, 319–326. [CrossRef]
  • Graham B.S., Grubbs D., Holland K., Popp B.N., 2006, A rapid ontogenetic shift in the diet of juvenile yellowfin tuna from Hawaii. Mar. Biol. 150, 647–658. [CrossRef]
  • Hall M., 1998, An ecological view of the tuna-dolphin problem : impacts and trade-offs. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 8, 1–34. [CrossRef]
  • Hall M.A., Alverson D., Metuzals I., 2000, By-catch : problems and solutions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 41, 204–219. [CrossRef]
  • Hallier J., Gaertner D., 2008, Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 353, 255–264. [CrossRef]
  • Harley S.J., Williams P., Nicol S., Hampton J., 2011, The western and central Pacific tuna fishery : 2010 overview and status of stocks. Tuna Fisheries Assessment Rep. 11. Noumea, Secretariat of the Pacific Community.
  • Holland K.N., 1996, Biological aspects of the association of tunas with FADs. SPC FAD (Fish Aggregating Device). Inf. Bull. 2, 2–7.
  • Hoyle S., Kleiber P., Davies N., Langley A., Hampton J., 2011, Stock assessment of skipjack tuna in the western and central Pacific Ocean, WCPFC-SC7-2011/SA-WP-04.
  • Humphries N.E., Queiroz N., Dyer J.R.M., Pade N.G., Musyl M.K., Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., Brunnschweiler J.M., Doyle T.K., Houghton J.D.R., Hays G.C., Jones C.S., Noble L.R., Wearmouth V.J., Southall E.J., Sims D.W., 2010, Environmental context explains Levy and Brownian movement patterns of marine predators. Nature 465, 1066–1069. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Hutchinson M., Itano D., Muir J., Leroy B., Holland K., 2012, The post-release condition of FAD associated silky sharks (Carcharhinus falciformis) caught in tuna purse seine gear. WCPFC-SC8-2012/ EB-WP-12 Rev 1.
  • IATTC, Inter American Tropical Tuna Commission, 2008, FAD related Research WCPFC-SC4-2008/FT-IP-3.
  • Jaquemet S., Potier M., Ménard F., 2011, Do drifting and anchored Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) similarly influence tuna feeding habits? A case study from the western Indian Ocean. Fish. Res. 107, 283–290. [CrossRef]
  • Josse E., Bach P., Dagorn L., 1998, Simultaneous observations of tuna movements and their prey by sonic tracking and acoustic surveys. Hydrobiologia 371, 61–69. [CrossRef]
  • Kirby D., 2001, On the integrated study of tuna behaviour and spatial dynamics : tagging and modeling as complementary tools. In : Electronic tagging and tracking in marine fisheries. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 407–420.
  • Kirby D.S., 2006, Ecological risk assessment for species caught in WCPO tuna fisheries : inherent risk as determined by productivity-susceptibility analysis. WCPFC-SC2-2006/EB-WP-1.
  • Klimley A., Holloway C., 1999, School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar. Biol. 133, 307–317. [CrossRef]
  • Langley A., Hoyle S., Hampton J., 2011, Stock assessment of yellowfin tuna in the western and central Pacific Ocean, WCPFC-SC7-2011/SA- WP-03.
  • Langley A., Williams P., Hampton J., 2008, The Western and Central Pacific tuna fishery : 2006 overview and status of stocks. Tuna Fisheries Assessment. Technical Report 8, Secretariat of the Pacific Community, Noumea, New Caledonia.
  • Lawson T., 2010, Update on the estimation of selectivity bias based on paired spill and grab samples collected by observers on purse seiners in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean WCPFC-SC6-2010/ST-WP–2.
  • Leroy B., Itano D.G., Usu T., Nicol S.J., Holland K.N., Hampton J., 2009, Vertical Behavior and the Observation of FAD Effects on tropical tuna in the warm-pool of the Western Pacific Ocean. In : Tagging and tracking of marine animals with electronic Devices. Springer, Part 1, pp. 161–179.
  • Majkowski J., 2007,Global fishery resources of tuna and tuna-like species. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. FAO Fish. Techn. Pap. 483.
  • Marsac F., Cayré P., 1998, Telemetry applies to behaviour of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) movements in a network of fish aggregating devices. Hydrobiologia 371, 155–171. [CrossRef]
  • Marsac F, Fonteneau A, Ménard F., 2000, Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries : an ecological trap? In : Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poisons, Actes Colloques-IFREMER 28, pp. 537–552.
  • Menard F., 2000, Exploitation of small tunas by a purse-seine fishery with fish aggregating devices and their feeding ecology in an eastern tropical Atlantic ecosystem. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 525–530. [CrossRef]
  • Molony B., 2005, Estimates of the mortality of non-target species with an initial focus on seabirds, turtles and sharks. WCPFC-SC1-2005/EB-WP-1.
  • Moreno G., Dagorn L., Sancho G., Itano D., 2007, Fish behaviour from fishers’ knowledge : the case study of tropical tuna around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 1517–1528. [CrossRef]
  • Musyl M.K., Brill R.W., Boggs C.H., Curran D.S., Kazama T.K., Seki M.P., 2003, Vertical movements of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) associated with islands, buoys, and seamounts near the main Hawaiian Islands from archival tagging data. Fish. Oceanogr. 12, 152–169. [CrossRef]
  • Nicol S., Lawson T., Briand K., Kirby D., Molony B., Bromhead D., Williams P., Schneiter E., Ludwig L., John Hampton J., 2009, Characterisation of the tuna purse seine fishery in Papua New Guinea. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra.
  • Ohta I., Kakuma S., 2005, Periodic behavior and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations. Mar. Biol. 146, 581–594. [CrossRef]
  • Parrish J., 1991, Do predators ’shape’ fish schools : interactions between predators and their schooling prey. Neth. J. Zool. 42, 358–370. [CrossRef]
  • PNA, Parties to the Nauru Agreement, 2010, A third arrangement implementing the Nauru Agreement setting fourth additional terms and conditions of access to the fisheries zones of the parties.
  • Rice J., Harley S., 2012, Stock assessment of oceanic whitetip sharks in the western and central Pacific Ocean. WCPFC-SC8-2012/SA-WP-06.
  • Romanov E., 2002, Bycatch in the Tuna Purse-Seine fisheries of the Western Indian Ocean. Fish. Bull. 100, 90–105.
  • Roman-Verdesoto M, Orozco-Zoller M., 2005, Bycatches of sharks in the tuna purse-seine fishery of the eastern Pacific Ocean reported by observers of the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, 1993–2004. Data Rep. 11. Inter-Am. Trop. Tuna Comm., La Jolla, CA.
  • Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., 2002, Movements, behavior, and habitat selection of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the eastern equatorial pacific, ascertained through archival tags. Fish. Bull. 100, 765–788.
  • Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., 2005, Behavior of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) tunas within aggregations associated with floating objects in the equatorial eastern Pacific. Mar. Biol. 146, 781–792. [CrossRef]
  • Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., Block B.A., 2007, Movements, behavior, and habitat utilization of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in the northeastern Pacific Ocean, ascertained through archival tag data. Mar. Biol. 152, 502–525. [CrossRef]
  • Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., 2010, Vertical movements, behavior, and habitat of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the equatorial eastern Pacific Ocean, ascertained from archival tag data. Mar. Biol. 157, 2625–2642. [CrossRef]
  • Soria M., Dagorn L., Potin G., Fréon P., 2009, First field-based experiment supporting the meeting point hypothesis for schooling in pelagic fish. Anim. Behav. 78, 1441–1446. [CrossRef]
  • Suuronen P., Chopin F; Glass C; Lokkeborg S; Matsushita Y; Queirolo D; Rihan D., 2012, Low impact and fuel efficient fishing-Looking beyond the horizon. Fish. Res. 119, 135–146. [CrossRef]
  • Taquet M., Dagorn L., Gaertner J.-C., Girard C., Aumerruddy R., Sancho G., Itano D., 2007, Behaviour of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) around drifting FADs as observed from automated acoustic receivers. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 323–330. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • WCPFC, The Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, 2008, Conservation and management measure for bigeye and yellowfin tuna in the western and central Pacific Ocean, Conservation and Management Measure 2008-01 WCPFC5.
  • WCPFC, The Commission for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, 2009, Conservation and management measure on the application of high seas FAD closures and catch retention, Conservation and Management Measure 2009-02 WCPFC6.
  • WCPFC, The Commission for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean, 2012, 7th regular session of the Scientific Committee : summary report with executive summary (8 Oct 2012). Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, Kolonia, Pohnpei Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission.
  • Williams P., Terawasi P., 2011, Overview of tuna fisheries in the western and central Pacific Ocean, including economic conditions – 2010. WCPFC-SC7-2011/GN-WP-01.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.