Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 1, January-March 2009
Page(s) 11 - 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009004
Published online 08 April 2009
  • Allen Y.C., Wilson C.A., Roberts H.H., Supan J., 2005, High resolution mapping classification of oyster habitats in nearshore Louisiana using sidescan sonar. Estuaries 28, 435–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arenas F., Bishop J.D.D., Carlton J.T., Dyrynda P.J., Farnham W.F., Gonzalez D.J., Jacobs M.W., Lambert C., Lambert G., Nielsen S.E., Pederson J.A., Porter J.S., Ward S., Wood C.A., 2006, Alien species and other notable records from a rapid assessment survey of marinas on the south coast of England. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 86, 1329–1337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arbach-Leloup F., Desroy N., Le Mao P., Pauly D., Le Pape O., 2008, Interractions between a natural food web, shellfish farming and exotic species; case of the Bay of the Mont Saint Michel. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 76, 111–120. [Google Scholar]
  • Augris C., Bonnot-Courtois C., Ehrhold A., Mazé J.P., Le Vot M., Blanchard M., Simplet L., 2008, Carte des formations superficielles du domaine marin côtier de Saint-Malo à Granville, 1/50 000e , IFREMER-CNRS-EPHE, Quae editions. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchard M., 1995, Origine et état de la population de crépidule (Crepidula fornicata) sur le littoral français. Haliotis 24, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchard M., 1997, Spread of the slipper-limpet (Crepidula fornicata) in Europe. Current state and consequences. Scient. Mar. 61, 109–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanchard M., Ehrhold A., 1999, Cartographie et évaluation du stock de crépidules (Crepidula fornicata) en baie du Mont Saint-Michel. Haliotis 28, 11–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Carlton J.T., Geller J., 1993, The ecological roulette; the global transport and invasion of non-indigenous marine organisms. Science 261, 78–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Decottignies P., Beninger P., Rince Y., Riera P., 2006, Trophic interactions, between two introduced suspension feeders Crepidula fornicata and Crassostrea gigas, are influenced by seasonal effects and qualitative selection capacity. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 342, 231–241. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Decottignies P., Beninger P., Rincé Y., Robins R., Riera P., 2007, Exploitation of natural food sources by two sympatric invasive suspension feeders Crassostrea gigas and Crepidula fornicata. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 334, 179–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrhold A., 1999, Dynamique de comblement d'un bassin sédimentaire soumis à un régime mégatidal : exemple de la baie du Mont Saint-Michel. Thèse Univ. Caen. [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrhold A., Blanchard M., Auffret J.P., Garlan T., 1998, Conséquences de la prolifération de la crépidule (Crepidula fornicata) sur l'évolution sédimentaire de la baie du Mont Saint-Michel (Manche, France). C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris 327, 583–587. [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrhold A., Hamon D., Guillaumont B., 2006, The REBENT monitoring network, a spatially integrated, acoustic approach to surveying nearshore macrobenthic habitats: application to the Bay of Concarneau (South Brittany, France). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 63, 1604–1615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feunten E., Lafaille P., 1997, Les peuplements piscicoles de la baie du Mont Saint-Michel. Penn Ar Bed 164, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  • Frontier S., 1983, Stratégies d'échantillonnage en écologie. Collection d'écologie vol. 17. Presse Universitaire de France, Masson, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Goulletquer P., Bachelet G., Sauriau P.G., Noel P., 2002, Open Atlantic coast of Europe; A century of introduced species into French waters. In: Invasive Aquatic Species of Europe ; distribution, impacts and management. Leppäkoski E., Gollasch S., Olenin S. (Eds.) Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 276–290. [Google Scholar]
  • Garreau P., 1993, Hydrodynamics of the north Brittany coast; a synoptic study. Oceanol. Acta 16, 469–477. [Google Scholar]
  • Guérin L., 2004, La crépidule en rade de Brest; un modèle d'espèce introduite proliférante, en réponse aux fluctuations de l'environnement. Thèse UBO Brest. [Google Scholar]
  • Hiscock K., Southward A., Tittley I., Hawkins S., 2004, Effects of changing temperature on benthic marine life in Britain and Ireland. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 14, 333–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holme N.A., 1961, The bottom fauna of the English Channel. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 41, 397–461. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelley D.F., 1987, Food of bass in UK waters. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 67, 275–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kenny A.J., Cato I., Desprez M., Fader G., Schüttenhelm R.T.E., Side J., 2003, An overview of seabed mapping technologies in the context of marine habitat classification. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 411–418. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kergariou G. de, Latrouite D., Claude S., Perrodou D., 1979, Extension de la crépidule en Manche orientale. Rapp. CIEM CM 1979/K15, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Gall P., 1980, Étude expérimentale de l'association en chaîne et de son influence sur la croissance et la sexualité chez la crépidule (Crepidula fornicata). Thèse Univ. Caen. [Google Scholar]
  • Leppäkoski E., Gollasch S., Olenin S., 2002, Alien species in European waters. In Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  • McMillan N.F., 1938, Early records of Crepidula fornicata in English waters. Proc. Malac. Soc. London 23, 236. [Google Scholar]
  • Marchand Y., Auffret J.P., Deroin J.P., 1998, Dynamique sédimentaire de la baie du Mont Saint-Michel (Ouest France) depuis 1986 à partir de données satellitales. C.R. Acad. Sci Paris 327, 155–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Mazurié J., Bouget J.F., 2003, Estimation du stock d'huîtres creuses Crassostrea gigas en élevage, en baie de Cancale, en octobre 2002. Rapp. int. Ifremer, La Trinité. [Google Scholar]
  • Montaudouin X. de, Audemard C., Labour P.J., 1999, Does the slipper limpet (Crepidula fornicata) impair oyster growth and zoobenthos diversity ? A revisited hypothesis. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 135, 105–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nehls G., Diederich S., Thieltges D.W., Strasser M., 2006, Wadden Sea mussel beds invaded by oysters and slipper limpets: competition or climate control? Helgol. Mar. Res. 60, 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Panov V., Gollasch S., 2004, Information resources on aquatic alien species in Europe on the internet; present development and future perspectives. The Colour of Ocean Data. Int. Symp. Oceanographic Data and Information Management with special attention to biological data, Brussels, Nov. 25–27, 2002. Workshop Rep. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission 188, pp. 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Pechenik J., 1984, The relashionship between temperature, growth rate and duration of phytoplankton life for larvae of the gastropod Crepidula fornicata (L). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 74, 241–257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pechenik J., Blanchard M., Rotjan R., 2004, Susceptibility of larval Crepidula fornicata to predation by suspension feeding adults. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 306, 75–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quiniou F., Blanchard M., 1987, Etat de la prolifération de la crépidule (Crepidula fornicata) dans le secteur de Granville. Haliotis 16, 513–526. [Google Scholar]
  • Reise K., Gollasch S., Wolff W.J., 1999, Introduced marine species of the North Sea coasts. Helgol. Meeresunters. 52, 219–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reise K., Olenin S., Thielges D.W., 2006, Are aliens threatening European aquatic coastal ecosystems? Helgol. Mar. Res. 60, 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Richard J., Huet M., Thouzeau G., Paulet Y.M., 2006, Reproduction of the invasive slipper-limpet Crepidula fornicata in the bay of Brest (France). Mar. Biol. 149, 789–801. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riera P., 2007, Trophic subsidies of Crassostrea gigas, Mytilus edulis and Crepidula fornicata in the bay of Mont Saint-Michel (France); a Formula C and Formula N investigation. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 72, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Sauriau P.G., Pichoki-Seyfreid C., Walker P., Montaudouin X. de, Palud C., Héral M., 2002, Crepidula fornicata (mollusque gastéropode) en baie de Marennes-Oléron : cartographie des fonds par sonar à balayage latéral et estimation du stock. Oceanol. Acta 21, 353–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thieltges D.W., Strasser M., Van Beusekom J.E.E., Reise K., 2004, Too cold to prosper; winter mortality prevents population increase of the introduced American slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in Northern Europe. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 11, 375–391. [Google Scholar]
  • Utting S.D., Spencer B.E., 1992, Introductions of marine bivalve mollusks into the United Kingdom for commercial culture, case histories. ICES Mar. Sci. Symp. 194, 84–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Vaslet D., Larsonneur C., Auffret J.P., 1978, Carte des sédiments superficiels de la Manche au 1/500 000e et notice. BRGM, Orléans. [Google Scholar]
  • Viard F., Ellien C., Dupont L., 2006, Dispersal ability and invasion success of Crepidula fornicata in a single gulf; insights from genetic markers and larval dispersal model. Helgol. Mar. Res. 60, 144–152. [Google Scholar]
  • Walne P.R., 1951, The biology and distribution of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in Essex rivers. Fish. Invest. Ser. 2, 20, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Wildish D.J., Fader G.B.J., Lawton P., Mac Donald A.J., 1998, The acoustic detection and characteristics of sublittoral bivalve reefs in the bay of Fundy. Cont. Shelf Res. 18, 105–113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolff W.J., Reise K., 2002, Oyster imports as a vector for the introduction of alien species into northern and western Europe coastal waters. In: Invasive aquatic species of Europe: distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 193–205. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.