Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 20, Number 4, October-December 2007
Fish Aggregating Devices as Instrumented Observatories of Pelagic Ecosystems
Page(s) 323 - 330
Published online 24 January 2008
  • Beardsley G.L., 1967, Age, growth and reproduction of the dolphin, Coryphaena hippurus, in the Straits of Florida. Copeia 1967, 2, 441-451. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brill R.W., Block B.A., Boggs C.H., Bigelow K.A., Freund E.V., Marcinek D.J., 1999, Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes. Mar. Biol. 133, 395–408. [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Holland K.N., Itano D.G., 2007, Behaviour of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar. Biol. 151, 595–606. [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Pincock D., Girard C., Holland K., Taquet M., Sancho G., Itano D., Aumeeruddy R. 2007. Satellite-linked acoustic receivers to observe behavior of fishes in remote areas. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  • Dempster T., Kingsford M.J., 2003, Homing of pelagic fish to fish aggregating devices (FADs): an investigation of the role of sensory cues. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 258, 213–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dempster T., Taquet M., 2004, Analysis of the literature on fish aggregation devices (FAD) research; gaps in current knowledge and future research directions for studies of FAD-associated fish. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 14, 21–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Fonteneau A., 2003, Prospects for management of FAD fisheries in the Indian Ocean. IOTC Proc. 6, 30–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Fonteneau A., Pallares P., Pianet R., 2000, A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs. In: Le Gall J.-Y., Cayré P., Taquet M. (eds.), Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. IFREMER, Actes Colloq. 28, pp. 15–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Girard C., Benhamou S., Dagorn L., 2004, FAD: Fish Aggregating Device or Fish Attracting Device? A new analysis of yellowfin tuna movements around floating objects. Anim. Behav. 67, 319–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Girard C., Dagorn L., Taquet M., Aumeeruddy R., Peignon C., Benhamou S., 2007, Homing abilities of dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) displaced from fish aggregating devices (FADs) determined using ultrasonic telemetry. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 313–321. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Heupel M.R., Simpfendorfer C.A., Hueter R.E., 2004, Estimation of shark home ranges using passive monitoring techniques. Environ. Biol. Fishes 71, 135–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holland K.N., Brill R.W., Chang R.K.C., 1990, Horizontal and vertical movements of yellowfin and bigeye tunas associated with Fish Aggregating Devices. Fish. Bull. 88, 493–507. [Google Scholar]
  • Klimley A.P., Holloway C.F., 1999, School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna Thunnus albacares. Mar. Biol. 133, 307–317. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marsac F., Cayre P., 1998, Telemetry applied to behaviour of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares, Bonnaterre, 1788) movements in a network of fish aggregating devices. Hydrobiologia 371/372, 155–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsac F., Fonteneau A., Menard F., 2000, Drifting FADs used in tuna fisheries: an ecological trap? In: Le Gall J.-Y., Cayre P. and Taquet M. (eds.), Pêche thonière et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. IFREMER, Actes Colloq. 28, pp. 537–552. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer C.G., Holland K.N., 2000, Movement patterns, habitat utilization, home range size and size fidelity in the white-saddle goatfish, Parupeneus porphyreus, in a marine reserve. Environ. Biol. Fish. 59, 235–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Ohta I., Kakuma S., 2005, Periodic behaviour and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations. Mar. Biol. 146, 581–594. [Google Scholar]
  • Ohta I, Kakuma S., Kanashiro K., 2001, Aggregating behaviour of yellowfin and bigeye tuna tagged with coded ultrasonic transmitters around FADs in Okinawa, Japan. Proc. Symp. Tagging and Tracking Marine Fish with Electronic Devices, February 7-11, 2000. University of Hawaii, pp. 131-145. [Google Scholar]
  • Pincock D.G., Voegeli F.A. 1990, Quick course in underwater telemetry system. Vemco Limited. [Google Scholar]
  • Romanov E.V., 2002, By-catch in the tuna purse-seine fisheries of the Western Indian Ocean. Fish. Bull. 100, 90–105. [Google Scholar]
  • Schaefer K.M., Fuller D.W., 2002, Movements, behaviour, and habitat selection of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the eastern equatorial Pacific, ascertained through archival tags. Fish. Bull. 100, 765–788. [Google Scholar]
  • Topping D.T., Lowe C.G., Caselle J.E., 2006, Site fidelity and seasonal movement patterns of adult California sheephead Semicossyphus pulcher (Labridae): an acoustic monitoring study. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 326, 257–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taquet M., 2004, Le comportement agrégatif de la dorade coryphène (Coryphaena hippurus) autour des objets flottants. Thèse de Doctorat, Université de Paris 6, Océanologie biologique. [Google Scholar]
  • Taquet M., Sancho G., Dagorn L., Gaertner J.C., Itano D., Aumeeruddy R., Wendling B., Peignon C., 2007, Characterization of fish aggregations associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Western Indian Ocean through underwater visual census. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 331–341. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Winger P.D., Walsh S.J., 2001, Tagging of Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua) with intragastric transmitter: effects of forced insertion and voluntary ingestion on retention, food consumption and survival. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 17, 234–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.