EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 (2024) Aquat. Living Resour., 37 (2024) 16 References
Open Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 37, 2024
Article Number 16
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2024014
Published online 03 December 2024
  • Ahern M, Thilsted SH, Oenema S, Barange M, Cartmill MK, Brandstrup SC, Doumeizel V, Dyer N, Frøyland L, Garrido-Gamarro E, Kühnhold H, Mohammed E, Penarubia O, Potin P, Sharan S, UtheimA, Uyar B, Vannuccini S, Ward A, Zhou X. 2021. The role of aquatic foods in sustainable healthy diets − UN Nutrition. [Google Scholar]
  • Alfnes F, Chen X, Rickertsen K. 2018. Labeling farmed seafood: a review. Aquac Econ Manag 22: 1–26. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Almeida C, Altintzoglou T, Cabral H. 2015. Does seafood knowledge relate to more sustainable consumption? Br Food J 117: 894–914. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Annunziata A, Mariani A, Vecchio R. 2019. Effectiveness of sustainability labels in guiding food choices: analysis of visibility and understanding among young adults. Sustain Prod Consum 17: 108–115. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Banovic M, Reinders MJ, Claret A, Guerrero L, Krystallis A. 2019. A cross-cultural perspective on impact of health and nutrition claims, country-of-origin and eco-label on consumer choice of new aquaculture products. Food Res Int 123: 36–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Béné C, Oosterveer P, Lamotte L, Brouwer ID, de Haan S, Prager SD, Talsma EF, Khoury CK. 2019. When food systems meet sustainability − current narratives and implications for actions. World Dev 113: 116–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bimbo F, Viscecchia R, De Devitiis B, Seccia A, Roma R, De Boni A. 2022. How do Italian consumers value sustainable certifications on fish?—an explorative analysis. Sustainability 14: 3654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Birch D, Lawley M. 2012. Buying seafood: understanding barriers to purchase across consumption segments. Food Qual Prefer 26: 12–21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blomhoff R, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Christensen JJ, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Gudanaviciene I, Halldórsson ÞI, Schwab U, Pitsi T, Meltzer HM, Lemming EW, Høyer-Lund A, Siksna I, Þórsdóttir I, Trolle E. 2023. Nordic nutrition recommendations- 2023 − integrating environmental aspects. [Google Scholar]
  • Brécard D, Hlaimi B, Lucas S, Perraudeau Y, Salladarré F. 2009. Determinants of demand for green products: an application to eco-label demand for fish in Europe. Ecol Econ 69: 115–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brécard D, Lucas S, Pichot N, Salladarré F. 2012. Consumer preferences for eco, health and fair trade labels. An application to seafood products in France. J Agric Food Ind Organ 10: 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunsø K, Hansen KB, Scholderer J, Honkanen P, Olsen SO, Verbeke W. 2008. Consumer attitudes and seafood consumption in Europe. Improv Seaf Prod Consum, Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition. Woodhead Publishing, pp. 16–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunsø K, Verbeke W, Olsen SO, Jeppesen LF. 2009. Motives, barriers and quality evaluation in fish consumption situations: exploring and comparing heavy and light users in Spain and Belgium. Br Food J 111: 699–716. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cantillo J, Martín JC, Román C. 2021. Determinants of fishery and aquaculture products consumption at home in the EU28. Food Qual Prefer 88. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardoso C, Lourenço H, Costa S, Gonçalves S, Nunes ML. 2013. Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the Portuguese population. Gender and regional variability. Appetite 64: 20–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlucci D, Nocella G, De Devitiis B, Viscecchia R, Bimbo F, Nardone G. 2015. Consumer purchasing behavior towards fish and seafood products. Patterns and insights from a sample of international studies. Appetite 84: 212–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Claret A, Guerrero L, Aguirre E, Rincón L, Hernández MD, Martínez I, Benito Peleteiro J, Grau A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez C. 2012. Consumer preferences for sea fish using conjoint analysis: exploratory study of the importance of country of origin, obtaining method, storage conditions and purchasing price. Food Qual Prefer 26: 259–266. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clonan A, Holdsworth M, Swift JA, Leibovici D, Wilson P. 2012. The dilemma of healthy eating and environmental sustainability: the case of fish. Public Health Nutr 15: 277–284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Crippa M, Solazzo E, Guizzardi D, Monforti-Ferrario F, Tubiello FN, Leip A. 2021. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat Food 2: 198–209. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Crona BI, Wassénius E, Jonell M, Koehn JZ, Short R, Tigchelaar M, Daw TM, Golden CD, Gephart JA, Allison EH, Bush SR, Cao L, Cheung WWL, DeClerck F, Fanzo J, Gelcich S, Kishore A, Halpern BS, Hicks CC, Leape JP, Little DC, Micheli F, Naylor RL, Phillips M, Selig ER, Springmann M, Sumaila UR, Troell M, Thilsted SH, Wabnitz CCC. 2023. Four ways blue foods can help achieve food system ambitions across nations. Nature 616: 104–112. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dewals J-F, Le Floc’h P, Daurès F, Lucas S. 2024. La place des consommateurs dans les dynamiques territoriales de connaissance: le cas des produits de la mer. Rev d’économie Régionale Urbaine. 4: 533–561. [Google Scholar]
  • EUMOFA. 2017. EU consumer habits regarding fishery and aquaculture products. Annex 3, Mapping of national campaigns. [Google Scholar]
  • EUMOFA. 2022. The EU fish market − 2022 edition. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2021a. EU Agricultural Outlook For Markets And Income 2018–2030. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2021b. EU consumer habits regarding fishery and aquaculture products, Special Eurobarometer 151. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2024. Food-Based Dietary Guidelines recommendations for fish [WWW Document]. Knowledge for policy. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2022. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. 2022. The state of food security and nutrition in the World-2022. [Google Scholar]
  • Farmery AK, van Putten IE, Phillipov M, McIlgorm A. 2020. Are media messages to consume more under-utilized seafood species reliable? Fish Fish 21: 844–855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feucht Y, Zander K. 2017. Deliverable: D2 . 2 − Results on consumer preferences for sustainable seafood products from Europe. [Google Scholar]
  • FranceAgriMer. 2011. Les synthèses de FranceAgriMer − Poisson ou viande, est-ce seulement une question de prix?. Technical Report, Direction Marchés, études et prospective. [Google Scholar]
  • FranceAgriMer. 2021. Consumption of meat products in 2021. Technical Report, Direction Marchés, études et prospective. [Google Scholar]
  • FranceAgriMer. 2023a. Consommation des produits de la pêche et de l’aquaculture 2022. Technical Report, Direction Marchés, études et prospective. [Google Scholar]
  • FranceAgriMer. 2023b. The fisheries and aquaculture sector in France (2023). Technical Report, Direction Marchés, études et prospective. [Google Scholar]
  • Gephart JA, Henriksson PJG, Parker RWR, Shepon A, Gorospe KD, Bergman K, Eshel G, Golden CD, Halpern BS, Hornborg S, Jonell M, Metian M, Mifflin K, Newton R, Tyedmers P, Zhang W, Ziegler F, Troell M. 2021. Environmental performance of blue foods. Nature 597: 360–365. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Golden CD, Koehn JZ, Shepon A, Passarelli S, Free CM, Viana DF, Matthey H, Eurich JG, Gephart JA, Fluet-Chouinard E, Nyboer EA, Lynch AJ, Kjellevold M, Bromage S, Charlebois P, Barange M, Vannuccini S, Cao L, Kleisner KM, Rimm EB, Danaei G, DeSisto C, Kelahan H, Fiorella KJ, Little DC, Allison EH, Fanzo J, Thilsted SH. 2021. Aquatic foods to nourish nations. Nature 598: 315–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Govzman S, Looby S, Wang X, Butler F, Gibney ER, Timon CM. 2021, A systematic review of the determinants of seafood consumption. Br J Nutr 126: 66–80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Greene W. Econometric Analysis, 8th edn, Pearson Education Limited, New-York, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Grunert KG. 2011. Sustainability in the food sector: a consumer behavior perspective. Int J Food Syst Dyn 2: 207–218. [Google Scholar]
  • Grunert KG, Hieke S, Wills J. 2014, Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 44: 177–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hallström E, Bergman K, Mifflin K, Parker R, Tyedmers P, Troell M, Ziegler F. 2019. Combined climate and nutritional performance of seafoods. J Clean Prod 230: 402–411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICCAT. 2022. E-BFT stock assessment meeting − Madrid 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • ICES. 2024. ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Celtic Seas and Greater North Sea ecoregion Cod (Gadus morhua) in Subarea 4, divisions 6.a and 7.d, and Subdivision 20 (North Sea, West of Scotland, eastern English Channel, and Skagerrak). [Google Scholar]
  • IFREMER. 2024. Bilan 2023 du statut des ressources halieutiques débarquées par la pêche française hexagonale en 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. [Google Scholar]
  • Irz X, Leroy P, Réquillart V, Soler LG. 2018. Fish in climate-friendly and healthy diets. Mar Resour Econ 33: 319–330. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobs S, Sioen I, Marques A, Verbeke W. 2018. Consumer response to health and environmental sustainability information regarding seafood consumption. Environ Res 161: 492–504. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacquet JL, Pauly D. 2007. The rise of seafood awareness campaigns in an era of collapsing fisheries. Mar Policy 31: 308–313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jahns L, Raatz SK, Johnson LAK, Kranz S, Silverstein JT, Picklo MJ. 2014. Intake of seafood in the US varies by age, income, and education level but not by race-ethnicity. Nutrients 6: 6060–6075. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Janßen D, Langen N. 2017. The bunch of sustainability labels − do consumers differentiate? J Clean Prod 143: 1233–1245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koehn JZ, Quinn EL, Otten JJ, Allison EH, Anderson CM. 2020. Making seafood accessible to low-income and nutritionally vulnerable populations on the U.S. West Coast. J Agric Food Syst Commun Dev 10: 171–189. [Google Scholar]
  • Koehn JZ, Allison EH, Golden CD, Hilborn R. 2022. The role of seafood in sustainable diets. Environ Res Lett 17. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucas S, Soler L-G., Revoredo-Giha C. 2021. Trend analysis of sustainability claims: the European fisheries and aquaculture markets case. Food Policy 104: 102141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maesano G, Di Vita G, Chinnici G, Pappalardo G, D’Amico M. 2020. The role of credence attributes in consumer choices of sustainable fish products: a review. Sustainability 12: 10008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marinac Pupavac S, KenÐel Jovanovic G, Linšak Ž, Glad M, Traven L, Pavičić Žeželj S. 2022. The influence on fish and seafood consumption, and the attitudes and reasons for its consumption in the Croatian population. Front Sustain Food Syst 6: 945186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marquès M, Torres CM, García-fern F, Mantur-vierendeel A, Roe M, Wilson AM, Reuver M, Nadal M. 2021. FishChoice 2 . 0: Information on health benefits / risks and sustainability for seafood consumers. Food Chem Toxicol 155. [Google Scholar]
  • Menozzi D, Wongprawmas R, Sogari G, Gai F, Parisi G, Mora C. 2023. The role of objective and subjective knowledge on the attitude and intention of Italian consumers to purchase farmed and wild fish. Agric Food Econ 11: 1–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Milford AB, Muiruri SW. 2024. The impact of consumers’ preferences for domestic food on dietary sustainability. Appetite 195: 107206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ministry of Labour, Health and Solidarity. 2019. Programme national nutrition santé. 2019–2023. [Google Scholar]
  • Murray G, Wolff K, Patterson M. 2017. Why eat fish? Factors influencing seafood consumer choices in British Columbia, Canada. Ocean Coast Manag 144: 16–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olsen SO. 2003. Understanding the relationship between age and seafood consumption: the mediating role of attitude, health and involvement and convenience. Food Qual Prefer 14: 199–209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Olsen SO. 2008. Antecedents of seafood consumption behavior. J Aquat Food Prod Technol 13: 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Perignon M, Vieux F, Soler LG, Masset G, Darmon N. 2017. Improving diet sustainability through evolution of food choices: review of epidemiological studies on the environmental impact of diets. Nutr Rev 75: 2–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pieniak Z, Verbeke W, Olsen SO, Hansen KB, Brunsø K. 2010. Health-related attitudes as a basis for segmenting European fish consumers. Food Policy 35: 448–455. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pieniak Z, Vanhonacker F, Verbeke W. 2013. Consumer knowledge and use of information about fish and aquaculture. Food Policy 40: 25–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • RéseauActionClimat. Comment Concilier Nutrition et Climat? 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • Reynolds CJ, Buckley JD, Weinstein P, Boland J. 2014. Are the dietary guidelines for meat, fat, fruit and vegetable consumption appropriate for environmental sustainability? A review of the literature. Nutrients 6: 2251–2265. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rickertsen K, Alfnes F, Combris P, Enderli G, Issanchou S, Shogren JF. 2017. French consumers’ attitudes and preferences toward wild and farmed fish. Mar Resour Econ 32: 59–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Salladarré F, Guillotreau P, Perraudeau Y, Monfort MC. 2010. The demand for seafood eco-labels in France. J Agric Food Ind Organ 8. [Google Scholar]
  • Santeramo FG, Carlucci D, De Devitiis B, Seccia A, Stasi A, Viscecchia R, Nardone G. 2018. Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry. Food Res Int 104: 39–47. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sonntag WI, Lemken D, Spiller A, Schulze M. 2023. Welcome to the (label) jungle? Analyzing how consumers deal with intra-sustainability label trade-offs on food. Food Qual Prefer 104: 104746. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Springmann M. 2020. Valuation of the health and climate-change benefits of healthy diets, FAO Agricultural Development Economics Working Paper 20–03. Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Szolnoki G, Hoffmann D. 2014. Consumer segmentation based on usage of sales channels in the German wine market. Int J Wine Bus Res 26: 27–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Teixeira CM, Silva PM. 2024. The huge dilemma: how to increase seafood consumption for health benefits without impacting fisheries’ sustainability? Int J Food Sci Technol 59: 661–672. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thong NT, Solgaard HS. 2017. Consumer’s food motives and seafood consumption. Food Qual Prefer 56: 181–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tigchelaar M, Leape J, Micheli F, Allison EH, Basurto X, Bennett A, Bush SR, Cao L, Cheung WWL, Crona B, DeClerck F, Fanzo J, Gelcich S, Gephart JA, Golden CD, Halpern BS, Hicks CC, Jonell M, Kishore A, Koehn JZ, Little DC, Naylor RL, Phillips MJ, Selig ER, Short RE, Sumaila UR, Thilsted SH, Troell M, Wabnitz CCC. 2022. The vital roles of blue foods in the global food system. Glob Food Sec 33: 100637. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Uchida H, Onozaka Y, Morita T, Managi S. 2014. Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: a conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels. Food Policy 44: 68–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verbeke W, Sioen I, Pieniak Z, Van Camp J, De Henauw S. 2005. Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption. Public Health Nutr 8: 422–429. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Verbeke W, Vanhonacker F, Sioen I, Van Camp J, De Henauw S. 2007a. Perceived importance of sustainability and ethics related to fish: a consumer behavior perspective. Ambio 36: 580–585. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Verbeke W, Sioen I, Brunsø K, Henauw S, Camp J. 2007b. Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish: exploratory insights from Belgium. Aquac Int 15: 121–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vieux F, Perignon M, Gazan R, Darmon N. 2018. Dietary changes needed to improve diet sustainability: are they similar across Europe? Eur J Clin Nutr 72: 951–960. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Waley D, Harris M, Goudling I, Correira M. Catching up: Fish Welfare in Wild Capture Fisheries, Eurogroup for Animals, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • Wulff JN. 2015. Interpreting results from the multinomial logit model: demonstrated by foreign market entry. Organ Res Methods 18: 300–325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, Garnett T, Tilman D, DeClerck F, Wood A, Jonell M, Clark M, Gordon LJ, Fanzo J, Hawkes C, Zurayk R, Rivera JA, De Vries W, Majele Sibanda L, Afshin A, Chaudhary A, Herrero M, Agustina R, Branca F, Lartey A, Fan S, Crona B, Fox E, Bignet V, Troell M, Lindahl T, Singh S, Cornell SE, Srinath Reddy K, Narain S, Nishtar S, Murray CJL. 2019. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393: 447–492. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zander K, Feucht Y. 2018a. Consumers’ Willingness to pay for sustainable seafood made in Europe. J Int Food Agribus Mark 30: 251–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zander K, Risius A, Feucht Y, Janssen M, Hamm U. 2018b. Sustainable aquaculture products: implications of consumer awareness and of consumer preferences for promising market communication in Germany. J Aquat Food Prod Technol 27: 5–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ziegler F, Hilborn R. 2023. Fished or farmed: life cycle impacts of salmon consumer decisions and opportunities for reducing impacts. Sci Total Environ 854: 158591. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.