EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 37 (2024) Aquat. Living Resour., 37 (2024) 11 References
Open Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 37, 2024
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2024010
Published online 02 September 2024
  • Baetz A, Tucker TR, Debruyne RL, Gatch A, Höök T, Fischer JL, Roseman EF. 2020. Review of methods to repair and maintain lithophilic fish spawning habitat. Water 12: 2501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barouillet C, González‐Trujillo JD, Geist J, Gíslason GM, Grossart HP, Irvine K, Jähnig SC, Boon PJ. 2024. Freshwater conservation: Lost in limnology? Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 34: e 4049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barthel BL, Cooke SJ, Svec JH, Suski CD, Bunt CM, Phelan FJS, Philipp DP. 2008. Divergent life histories among smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu inhabiting a connected river-lake system. Journal of Fish Biology 73: 829–852. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bašić, T., Britton JR, Rice SP, Pledger AG. 2017. Impacts of gravel jetting on the composition of fish spawning substrates: Implications for river restoration and fisheries management. Ecological Engineering 107: 71–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beeman HM, (1924) Habits and propagation of the small-mouthed black bass, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 54 (1): 92–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Bergman JN, Beaudoin C, Mistry I, Turcotte A, Vis C, Minelga V, Neigel K, Lin HY, Bennett JR, Young N, Rennie C. 2022. Historical, contemporary, and future perspectives on a coupled social-ecological system in a changing world: Canada's historic Rideau Canal. Environmental Reviews 30: 72–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bozek MA, Short PH, Edwards CJ, Jennings MJ, Newman SP. 2002. Habitat selection of nesting smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu in two north temperate lakes. Am Fish Soc Symp 2002: 135–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman LJ, Putnam DF. 1984. The Physiography of Southern Ontario: Ontario Geological Survey. Special Volume 2: 270. [Google Scholar]
  • Conquest LL. 2000. Analysis and interpretation of ecological field data using BACI designs: discussion. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 5: 293–296. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Bennett JR, Jones HP. 2019. We have a long way to go if we want to realize the promise of the “Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.” Conserv Sci Pract 1: e129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dauwalter DC, Fisher WL. 2007. Spawning chronology, nest site selection and nest success of smallmouth bass during benign streamflow conditions. Am Midland Natural 158: 60–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Duerregger A, Pander J, Palt M, Mueller M, Nagel C, Geist J. 2018. The importance of stream interstitial conditions for the early‐life‐stage development of the European nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.). Ecol Freshw Fish 27: 920–932. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Forrest F. 2002. Reconstructing the Trophic Histories (ca. 200 Years) of Four Lakes Within the Rideau Canal System, Ontario. National Library of Canada, Ottawa. [Google Scholar]
  • Gatch AJ, Koenigbauer ST, Roseman EF, Höök TO. 2021. Assessment of two techniques for remediation of lacustrine rocky reef spawning habitat. North Am J Fish Manag 41: 484–497. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J, Hawkins SJ. 2016. Habitat recovery and restoration in aquatic ecosystems: current progress and future challenges. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 26: 942–962. [Google Scholar]
  • Geist J, Hoess R. Rytterstam J, Söderberg H. 2023. Substratum raking can restore interstitial habitat quality in Swedish freshwater pearl mussel streams. Diversity. 15: 869. [Google Scholar]
  • Gingerich AJ, Suski CD. 2011. The role of progeny quality and male size in the nesting success of smallmouth bass: integrating field and laboratory studies. Aquat. Ecol. 45: 505–515. [Google Scholar]
  • Gittman RK, Scyphers SB, Smith CS, Neylan IP, Grabowski JH. 2016. Ecological consequences of shoreline hardening: a meta-analysis. BioScience 66: 763–773. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanson KC, Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Philipp DP. 2007. Effects of different angling practices on post‐release behaviour of nest‐guarding male black bass, Micropterus spp. Fish Manag Ecol 14: 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Harrison I, Abell R, Darwall W, Thieme ML, Thickner D, Timboe I. 2018. The freshwater biodiversity crisis. Science 362: 1369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jennings MD, Møller AP. 2002. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: An empirical assessment using the “trim and fill” method. Biolog Rev 77: 211–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Kaemingk MA, Clem A, Galarowicz TL. 2011. The influence of habitat and environment on smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) nest sites and nest success in northern Lake Michigan. J Great Lakes Res 37: 380–385. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kaufmann PR, Peck DV, Paulsen SG, Seeliger CW, Hughes RM, Whittier TR, Kamman NC. 2014. Lakeshore and littoral physical habitat structure in a national lakes assessment. Lake Reserv Manag 30: 192–215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knott J, Nagel C, Geist J. 2021. Wasted effort or promising approach − does it make sense to build an engineered spawning ground for rheophilic fish in reservoir cascades? Ecolog Eng 173: 106434. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lapointe MF, Bergeron NE, Bérubé F, Pouliot MA, Johnston P. 2004. Interactive effects of substrate sand and silt contents, redd-scale hydraulic gradients, and interstitial velocities on egg-to-emergence survival of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61: 2271–2277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lapointe NWR, Cooke SJ, Imhof JG, Boisclair D, Casselman JM, Curry RA, Langer OE, McLaughlin RL, Minns CK, Post JR, Power M, Rasmussen JB, Reynolds JD, Richardson JS, Tonn WM. 2014. Principles for ensuring healthy and productive freshwater ecosystems that support sustainable fisheries. Environmental Reviews 22: 110–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawson ZJ, Gaeta JW, Carpenter SR. 2011. Coarse woody habitat, lakeshore residential development, and largemouth bass nesting behavior. North Am J Fish Manag 31: 666–670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lukas JA, Orth DJ. 1995. Factors affecting nesting success of smallmouth bass in a regulated Virginia stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 124: 726–735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mackereth RW, Noakes DLG, Ridgway MS. 1999. Size-based variation in somatic energy reserves and parental expenditure by male smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu. Environ Biol Fishes 56: 263–275. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahlum S, Cote D, Wiersma YF, Pennell C, Adams B. 2018. Does restoration work? It depends on how we measure success. Restorat Ecol 26: 952–963. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer EI, Niepagenkemper O, Molls F, Spänhoff B. 2008. An experimental assessment of the effectiveness of gravel cleaning operations in improving hyporheic water quality in potential salmonid spawning areas. River Res Appl 24: 119–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mueller M, Pander J, Geist J. 2014. The ecological value of stream restoration measures: an evaluation on ecosystem and target species scales. Ecolog Eng 62: 129–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel, C, Mueller M, Pander J, Geist JJ. 2020a. Making up the bed: gravel cleaning as a contribution to nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.) spawning and recruitment success. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 30: 2269–2283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagel C, Pander J, Mueller M, Geist JJ. 2020b. Substrate composition determines emergence success and development of European nase larvae (Chondrostoma nasus L.). Ecol Freshw Fish 29: 121–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pander J., Mueller M, Geist J. 2015. A comparison of four stream substratum restoration techniques concerning interstitial conditions and downstream effects. River Res Appl 31: 239–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Philipp DP, Toline CA, Kubacki MF, Philipp DBF, Phelan FJS. 1997. The impact of catch-and-release angling on the reproductive success of smallmouth bass and largemouth bass. North Am J Fish Manag 17: 557–567. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Piczak ML, Perry D, Cooke SJ, Harrison I, Benitez S, Koning A, Peng L, Limbu P, Moberg T, Brown AD, Smokorowski K, Midwood J, Velasquez B, Rodriguez SS, Koehn JD, Creed I, Abell R. in press Protecting and restoring habitat to bend the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss. Environ Rev. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2023-0034 [Google Scholar]
  • Pulg U, Barlaup BT, Sternecker K, Trepl L, Unfer G. 2014. Restoration of spawning habitats of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in a regulated chalk stream. River Res Appl 30: 132–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raffetto NS, Baylis JR, Serns SL. 1990. Complete estimates of reproductive success in a closed population of smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Ecology 71: 1523–1535. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Reid AJ, Carlson AK, Creed IF, et al. 2019. Emerging threats and persistent conservation challenges for freshwater biodiversity. Biolog Rev 94: 849–873. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ridgway MS. 1989. The parental response to brood size manipulation in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieui). Ethology 80: 47?54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ridgway MS, Shuter BJ, Post EE. 1991a. The relative influence of body size and territorial behaviour on nesting asynchrony in male smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieui (Pisces: Centrarchidae). J Animal Ecol 60: 665–681. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ridgway MS, MacLean JA, MacLeod CJ. 1991b. Nest-site fidelity in a centrarchid fish, the smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolornieu). Can J Zool 69: 3103–3105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ridgway MS, Shuter BJ, Middel TA, Gross ML. 2002. Spatial ecology and density-dependant processes in smallmouth bass: the juvenile transition hypothesis. In Black Bass: Ecology, Conservation, and Management, edited by D.P. Philipp, M.S. Ridgway. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society, pp. 47–60. [Google Scholar]
  • Rosa F. 1985. Sedimentation and sediment resuspension in Lake Ontario. J Great Lakes Res 11: 13–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rytwinski T, Elmer LK, Taylor JJ, Donaldson LA, Bennett JR, Smokorowski KE, Winegardner AK, Cooke SJ. 2019. How effective are spawning-habitat creation or enhancement measures for substrate-spawning fish? A synthesis. Can Tech Rep Fish Aquat Sci 3333: viii + 183 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Sepulveda AJ, Layhee M, Sutphin ZA, Sechrist JD. 2015. Evaluation of a fine sediment removal tool in spring-fed and snowmelt driven streams. Ecol Restorat 33: 303–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shackle VJ, Hughes S, Lewis VT. 1999. The influence of three methods of gravel cleaning on brown trout, Salmo trutta, egg survival. Hydrolog Process 13: 477–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith EP. 2014. BACI Design. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online 1: 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Smokorowski KE, Randall RG. 2017. Cautions on using the Before-After-Control-Impact design in environmental effects monitoring programs. Facets 2: 212–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sternecker K, Geist J. 2010. The effects of stream substratum composition on the emergence of salmonid fry. Ecol Freshw Fish 19: 537–544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sternecker K, Wild R, Geist J. 2013. Effects of substratum restoration on salmonid habitat quality in a subalpine stream. Environ Biol Fishes 96: 1341–1351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sternecker K, Denic M, Geist J. 2014. Timing matters: species-specific interactions between spawning time, substrate quality, and recruitment success in three salmonid species. Ecol Evolut 4: 2749–2758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suding K, Higgs E, Palmer M, Callicott JB, Anderson CB, Baker M, Gutrich JJ, Hondula KL, LaFevor MC, Larson BMH, Randall A, Ruhl JB, Schwartz KZS. 2015. Committing to ecological restoration. Science 348: 638–640. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Suski CD, Svec JH, Ludden JB, Phelan FJS, Philipp DP. 2003. The effect of catch-and-release angling on the parental care behavior of male smallmouth bass. Trans Am Fish Soc 132: 210–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suski CD, Ridgway MS. 2007. Climate and body size influence nest survival in a fish with parental care. J Animal Ecol 76: 730–739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tang RWK, Doka SE, Gertzen EL, Neigum LM. 2020. Dissolved oxygen tolerance guilds of adult and juvenile Great Lakes fish species. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 3193: viii + 69 p [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor JJ, Rytwinski T, Bennett JR, Smokorowski KE, Lapointe NWR, Janusz R, Clarke K, Tonn B, Walsh JC, Cooke SJ. 2019. The effectiveness of spawning habitat creation or enhancement for substrate-spawning temperate fish: a systematic review. Environ Evid 8: 1–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tickner D, Opperman JJ, Abell R, Acreman M, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Cooke SJ, Dalton J, Darwall W, Edwards G, Harrison I, Hughes K, Jones T, Leclère D, Lynch AJ, Leonard P, McClain ME, Muruven D, Olden JD, Ormerod SJ, Robinson J, Tharme RE, Thieme M, Tockner K, Wright M, Young L. 2020. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: an emergency recovery plan. BioScience 70: 330–342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tufts BL, Holden J, DeMille M. 2015. Benefits arising from sustainable use of North America's fishery resources: economic and conservation impacts of recreational angling. Int J Environ Stud 72: 850–868. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Underwood AJ. 1992. Beyond BACI: The detection of environmental impacts on populations in the real, but variable, world. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 161: 145–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiegmann DD, Baylis JR. 1995. Male body size and paternal behaviour in smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieui (Pisces: Centrarchidae). Animal Behav 50: 1543–1555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wortley L, Hero JM, Howes M. 2013. Evaluating ecological restoration success: a review of the literature. Restorat Ecol 21: 537–543. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.