EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 34 (2021) Aquat. Living Resour., 34 (2021) 8 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 34, 2021
Article Number 8
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2021003
Published online 09 April 2021
  • Ahmad N. 1957. Prawn and prawn fishery of East Pakistan. Directorate of Fisheries, Government of Pakistan, p. 43. [Google Scholar]
  • Alagaraja K, George MJ, Narayana Kurup K, Suseelan C. 1986. Yield per recruit analysis on Parapenaopsis stylifera and Metapenaeus dobsoni from Kerala state, India. J Appl Ichthyol 2: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Ayub Z. 1998. A study of distribution, abundance and reproductive biology of Pakistani peaneaid shrimps, PhD thesis, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan. [Google Scholar]
  • Ayub Z, Ahmed M. 2002. Maturation and spawning of four commercially important penaeid shrimps of Pakistan. Indian J Mar Sci 31: 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertalanffy LV. 1938. A quantitative theory of organic growth. Hum Biol 10: 181–213. [Google Scholar]
  • Beverton RJH, Holt SJH. 1957. On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations, Fish Invest Minist Agric Fish Food G G (2 Sea Fish), vol. 19, pp. 553. [Google Scholar]
  • Beverton RJH, Holt SJH. 1966. Manual of methods for fish stock assessment. Part 2. Tables of yield functions. FAO Fish Technical Paper, vol. 38, pp. 67. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonfil R. 2005. Fishery stock assessment models and their application to sharks, in: Management techniques for Elasmobranch fisheries, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, Vol. 474, pp. 154–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Boschi EE. 1989. Biología pesquera del langostino del litoral patagónico de Argentina (Pleoticus muelleri). Contribuciones INIDEP 646: 1–71. [Google Scholar]
  • De Bruin GHP. 1965. Penaeid prawns of Ceylon (Crustacea Decapoda Penaeidae). Zool Meded Leiden 41: 73–104. [Google Scholar]
  • Dineshbabu AP. 2005. Growth of Kiddi shrimp Parapenaeopsis stylifera (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) along Saurashtra coast. Indian J Fish 52: 165–170. [Google Scholar]
  • Farfante IP, Kensley B. 1997. Penaeoid and Sergestoid shrimps and prawns of the world. Keys and diagnosis for the family and genera. Mus Natl Hist Nat 175: 232. [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R. 2006. Cube law, condition factor and weight length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 22: 241–253 [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Demirel N, Coro G, Kleisner KM, Winker H. 2017. Estimating fisheries reference points from catch and resilience. (John Wiley and Sons Ltd). Fish Fish 18: 506–526. [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia S. 1988. Tropical penaeid prawns, in: Fish Population Dynamics, 2nd edn, pp. 219–249. [Google Scholar]
  • Geeta V, Balakrishnan Nair N. 1992. Reproductive biology of Parapenaeopsis stylifera . J Indian Fish Assoc 22: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • George MJ, Raman K, Nair PK. 1968. Observations of the offshore prawn fishery of Cochin. Indian J Fish 10A: 460–499. [Google Scholar]
  • Gulland JA. 1971. The Fish Resources of the Ocean, Fishing News (Books) West Byfleet. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall DNF. 1962. Observations on the taxonomy and biology of some Indo West Pacific Penaeidae (Crustacea Decapoda). Fishery Publs. colon off 17: 229. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones R, Van Zalinge NP. 1981. Estimates of mortality rates and population size for shrimp in Kuwait waters. Bull Mar Sci 9: 273–288. [Google Scholar]
  • King M. 1995. Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management, Fishing News Books, Oxford, p. 341. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Cren ED. 1951. The length weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the Perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Ani Ecol 20: 201–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Lleonart J. 2002. Overview of stock assessment methods and their suitability to Mediterranean Fisheries, Fifth Session of the SAC-GFCM, Rome, pp. 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Lucofora LO, Valero JL, Garcia VB. 1999. Length at maturity of the green eye spurdog shark Squalus mitsukuii (Elasmobranchii: Squalidae) from the SW Atlantic with comparisons with other regions. Mar Freshw Res 50: 629–632. [Google Scholar]
  • McClanahan RT, Nicholas AJ, Graham M, Aaron MacNeil Nyawira A. Muthiga, Cinner JE, Bruggemann JH, Wilson SK. 2011. Critical thresholds and tangible targets for ecosystem based management of coral reef fisheries. PNAS 108: 17230–17233. [Google Scholar]
  • Mehanna SF. 2000. Population dynamics of Penaeus semisulcatus in the Gulf of Suez, Egypt. Asian J Fish 13: 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Menon MK. 1953. Notes on the bionomics and fishery of the prawn Parapenaeopsis stylifera (M. Edw) on the Malabar coast. J Zool Soc India 5: 153–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Mohsin M, Mu Y, Memon AM, Kalharo MT, Shah SB, Hussain. 2017. Fishery stock assessment of Kiddi shrimp (Parapenaeopsis stylifera) in the Northern Arabian Sea Coast of Pakistan by using surplus production models. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 35: 936–946 . [Google Scholar]
  • Mohsen S. 2017. Population dynamics of Kiddi shrimp Parapenaeopsis stylifera (H. Milne Edwards, 1837) in the north west of Qeshm Island, Iran. Tropical Zool 30: 13–27 . [Google Scholar]
  • Myers AR. 2007. Stock and recruitment: generalizations about maximum reproductive rate, density dependence and variability using meta analytic approach. ICES J Mar Sci 58: 937–951 . [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D. 1980. On the interrelationships between natural mortality, growth parameters and mean environmental temperature in 175 fish stocks. J Cons CIEM 39: 175–192. [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D. 1983. Length converted catch curves: a powerful tool for fisheries research in the tropics (Part I): ICLARM Fishbyte 1: 9–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D, Munro JL. 1984. Once more on growth comparison in fish and invertebrates. Fishbyte 2: 21. [Google Scholar]
  • Pauly D, Soriano M. 1986. Some practical extensions to Beverton and Holts relative yield per recruit model, in: J.L. Mclean, L. Dizon, L. Hosillos (Eds.), The First Asian Fisheries Forum, Asian Fisheries Society, Manila, pp. 491– 495. [Google Scholar]
  • Penn JW. 1980. Spawning and fecundity of the western King prawn Penaeus latisulcatus, Kishinouye, in Western Australian waters. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 31: 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  • Petriella AM, Boschi EE. 1997. Growth of decapod crustaceans: Results of research made on Argentine species. Investig Mar 25: 135–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Radhakrishnan EV, Deshmukh V.D, Maheswarudu G, Josileen Jose, Dineshbabu AP, Philippose KK, Sarada PT, Lakshmi Pillai S, Saleela KN, Chakraborthy Rekha D, Gyanranjan Dash, Sajeev CK, Thirumilu P, Sreedhara B, Muniyappa Y, Sawant AD, Vaidya NG, Johny Dias R, Verma JB, Baby PK, Unnikrishnan C, Ramachandran NP, Vairamani A, Palanichamy A, Radhakrishnan M, Raju B. 2012. Prawn fauna (Crustacea:Decapoda) of India: An annotated checklist of the penaeoid, sergestoid, stenopodid and caridean prawns. J Mar Biol Assoc India 54: 50–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramamurthy S. 1980. Resource characteristics of the penaeid prawn Parapenaeopsis stylifera (Milne Edwards) in the Mangalore coast. Indian J Fish 27: 161–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Rao PV. 1968. Maturation and spawning of the penaeid prawns of the southwest coast of India. FAO Fish Report 57: 285–304. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarada PT. 2002. Fishery, biology and population dynamics of Parapenaeopsis stylifera at Calicut. Indian J Fish 49: 351–360. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva EF, Calazans, N, Nole L, Soares R, Fredou LF, Peixoto S. 2019. Population dynamics of the white shrimp Litopenaeus Schmitti (Burkenroad, 1936) on the southeastern coast of Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 99: 1–7 [Google Scholar]
  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WC. 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th edn, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi, India, p. 593. [Google Scholar]
  • Sparre P, Venema SC. 1998. Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. FAO FisheriesTechnical Paper, 306/1. [Google Scholar]
  • Suseelan C, Rajan KN, Nandakumar G. 1989. The Karikkadi fishery of Kerala. Mar Fish Infor Serv T E Ser 102: 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Suseelan C, Rajan KN. 1989. Stock assessment of the kiddi shrimp Parapenaeopsis stylifera off Cochin, India, in: S.C. Venema, N.P. van Zalinge (Eds.), Contributions to tropical fish stock assessment in India, FAO/DANIDA/ICAR National follow up training course on fish stock assessment pp. 15–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson WF, Bell FH. 1934. Biological statistics of the Pacific halibut fishery 2. Effect of changes in intensity upon total yield per unit of gear. Rep Int Fish (Pacific Halibut) Comm 8: 49. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.