EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 34 (2021) Aquat. Living Resour., 34 (2021) 17 References
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 34, 2021
Special Issue - Ecological intensification: A new paragon for sustainable aquaculture
Article Number 17
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2021016
Published online 16 June 2021
  • Abraham TJ, Palaniappan R, Dhevendaran K. 1999. Simple taxonomic key for identifying marine luminous bacteria. Indian J Mar Sci 28: 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmad I, Babitha Rani AM, Verma AK, Maqsood M. 2017. Biofloc technology: an emerging avenue in aquatic animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquacul Int 25: 1215–1226. [Google Scholar]
  • Alexander M. 1978. Introduction to soil microbiology. New Delhi: Willey Eastern Limited, p. 467. [Google Scholar]
  • Alsina M, Blanch AR. 1994. Improvement and update of a set of keys for biochemical identification of Vibrio species. J Appl Microbiol 77: 719–721. [Google Scholar]
  • Anand PS, Kohlib MPS, Kumar S, Sundarayc JK, Roy SD, Venkateshwarlub G, Sinha A, Pailanf GH. 2014. Effect of dietary supplementation of biofloc on growth performance and digestive enzyme activities in Penaeus monodon. Aquaculture 418-419: 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  • AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edition. Gaithersburg, MD: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th edition. New York: American Public Health Association Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA. 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 21st edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association. [Google Scholar]
  • Arulmoorthy MP, Karunakaran K, Vignesh R, Vasudevan S, Srinivasan M. 2014. Identification and antimicrobial potential of bioluminescent bacteria isolated from the mangrove ecosystem of the Roach Park, Tuticorin, South East coast of India. BMR Microbiol 1: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Avnimelech Y, Kochba M. 2009. Evaluation of nitrogen uptake and excretion by tilapia in biofloc tanks, using 15N tracing. Aquaculture 287: 163–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Avnimelech Y. 2009. Biofloc Technology − A Practical Guide Book. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States: The World Aquaculture Society, pp. 182. [Google Scholar]
  • Avnimelech Y. 1999. Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 176: 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Azim ME, Wahab MA, van Dam AA, van Rooij JM. 2002. The effects of artificial substrates on freshwater pond productivity and water quality and the implications for periphyton-based aquaculture. Aqu Living Resour 15: 231–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Babin A, Biard C, Moret Y. 2010. Dietary supplementation with carotenoids improves immunity without increasing its cost in a crustacean. Am Natural 176: 234–241. [Google Scholar]
  • Banerjee S, LeeMei K, Shariff M, Khatoon H, Yusoff FM. 2013. Antibacterial activity of neem (Azadirachta indica) leaves on Vibrio spp. isolated from cultured shrimp. Asian J Anim Veterin Adv 8: 355‑361. [Google Scholar]
  • Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee RK, Bandyopadhyay U. 2002. Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). Curr Sci 82: 1336‑1345. [Google Scholar]
  • Brugère C, Aguilar‐Manjarrez J, Beveridge MC, Soto D. 2018. The ecosystem approach to aquaculture 10 years on − a critical review and consideration of its future role in blue growth. Rev Aquacult 11: 493–514. [Google Scholar]
  • Cuzon G, Lawrence A, Gaxiola G, Rosas C, Guillaume J. 2004. Nutrition of Litopenaeus vannamei reared in tanks or in ponds. Aquaculture 235: 513–551. [Google Scholar]
  • Da Silva KR, Wasielesky WJ, Abreu PC. 2013. Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics in the biofloc production of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. J World Aquacult Soc 44: 30–41. [Google Scholar]
  • Das SK, Das S, Mandal A, Dinda R. 2018. Impact of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seed cake upon selective nutrient cycling bacterial population in fish culture. J Appl Aquacult 30: 353–365. [Google Scholar]
  • de Lorenzo MA, Candia EWS, Schleder DD, Rezende PC, Seiffert WQ, do Nascimento Vieira F. 2016. Intensive hatchery performance of Pacific white shrimp in the biofloc system under three different fertilization levels. Aquacult Eng 72–73: 40–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Deb S, Noori MT, Rao PS. 2017. Experimental study to evaluate the efficacy of locally available waste carbon sources on aquaculture water quality management using biofloc technology. Aquacult Int 25: 2149–2159. [Google Scholar]
  • Deb S, Noori MT, Rao PS. 2020. Application of biofloc technology for Indian major carp culture (polyculture) along with water quality management. Aquacult Eng 91: 1‑7. [Google Scholar]
  • Dhayanithi NB, Kumar TTA, Kathiresan K. 2010. Effect of neem extract against the bacteria isolated from marine fish. J Environ Biol 31: 409–412. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dinda R, Das SK, Mandal A. 2019. Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) supplemented biofloc medium as alternative feed in common carp (Cyprinus carpio var. communis Linnaeus) culture. J Appl Aquacult 00: 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Edmondson WT. 1959. Freshwater Biology. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 1247. [Google Scholar]
  • Ekasari J, Rivandi DR, Firdausi AP, Surawidjaja EH, Zairin M, Bossier P. 2015. Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance. Aquaculture 441. [Google Scholar]
  • Emerenciano M, Ballester ELC, Cavalli RO, Wasielesky W. 2012. Biofloc technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeusbrasiliensis (Latreille, 1817). Aquacult Res 43: 447–457. [Google Scholar]
  • Faizullah M, Rajagopalsamy CB, Ahilan B, Francis T. 2015. Impact of biofloc technology on the growth of goldfish young ones. Indian J Sci Technol 8: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Farah MA, Ateeq B, Ahmad W. 2006. Antimutagenic effect of neem leaves extract in freshwater fish, Channa punctatus evaluated by cytogenetic tests. Sci Total Environ 364: 200–214. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fleckenstein LJ, Kring NA, Tierney TW, Fisk JC, Lawson BC, Ray AJ. 2020. The effects of artificial substrate and stocking density on Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) performance and water quality dynamics in high tunnel-based biofloc systems. Aquacult Eng 15: 102093. [Google Scholar]
  • Gopal M, Gupta A, Arunachalam V, Magu SP. 2007. Impact of Azadirachtin, an insecticidal allelochemical from neem on soil microflora, enzyme and respiratory activities. Bioresour Technol 98: 3154–3158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta NK, Srivastva N, Bubber P, Puri S. 2016. The antioxidant potential of Azadirachta indica ameliorates cardio protection following diabetic mellitus-induced microangiopathy. Pharmacogn Mag 12: S371–S378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta P, Samant K, Sahu A. 2012. Isolation of cellulose-degrading bacteria and determination of their cellulolytic potential. Int J Microbiol 2012: 578925. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Halver JE. 1976. The nutritional requirements of cultivated warmwater and coldwater fish species. In: FAO Technical Conference on Aquaculture, Kyoto (Japan) [Google Scholar]
  • Hamidoghli A, Won S, Aya FA, Yun H, Bae J, Jang IK, Bai SC. 2020. Dietary lipid requirement of white leg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles cultured in biofloc system. Aquacult Nutr 26: 603–612, https://doi.org/10.1111/anu.13021. [Google Scholar]
  • Harikrishnan R, Rani MN, Balasundaram C. 2003. Hematological and biochemical parameters in common Carp, Cyprinus carpio, following herbal treatment for Aeromonas hydrophila infection. Aquaculture 221: 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson ML. 1959. Soil chemical analysis. Verlag: Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 498 S. DM 39.40. [Google Scholar]
  • Kannahi M, Sivasankari S. 2014. Isolation and Identification of Bioluminescent Bacteria from Marine Water at Nagapattinam Sea Shore Area. Int J Pharmaceut Sci Rev Res 59: 346–351. [Google Scholar]
  • Luckstadt 2020. Dietary potassium-diformate affects growth performance and survival rates of vannamei-shrimp in hatchery and grow-out in worldwide aquaculture. Aquafeed 12: 2. [Google Scholar]
  • Mandal A, Das SK. 2018. Comparative efficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica) and non-neem supplemented biofloc media in controlling the harmful luminescent bacteria in natural pond culture of Litopenaeus vannaemei. Aquaculture 492: 157–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez SO. 2002. NIM- Azadirachta indica: natureza, usosmúltiploseprodução. Londrina, PR: Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR). [Google Scholar]
  • Megahed M. 2010. The effect of microbial biofloc on water quality, survival and growth of the green tiger shrimp (Penaeus semisulcatus) fed with different crude protein levels. J Arab Aquacult Soc. 5: 119–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Meritha WW, Suprayudi MA, Ekasari J. 2018. The growth performance and resistance to salinity stress of striped catfish Pangasius sp. juvenile in biofloc system with different feeding rates. J Akuakult Indonesia 17: 113–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Montgomery DC. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments (5th Edition). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons. Inc. 684 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Moss DR., Arce SA, Otoshi CA, Doyle RW, Moss SM. 2007. Effects of inbreeding on survival and growth of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 272: 30–37. [Google Scholar]
  • Olier BS, Tubin JS, de Mello GL, Martínez-Porchas M, Emerenciano MG. 2020. Does vertical substrate could influence the dietary protein level and zootechnical performance of the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei reared in a biofloc system? Aquacult Int. 21: 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-020-00521-4. [Google Scholar]
  • Panigrahi A, Sundaram M, Chakrapani S, Rajasekar S, SyamaDayal J, Chavali G. 2019. Effect of carbon and nitrogen ratio (C: N) manipulation on the production performance and immunity of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a biofloc‐based rearing system. Aquacult Res. 50: 29–41, https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13857. [Google Scholar]
  • Panigrahi A, Saranya C, Sundaram M, Kannan SV, Das RR, Kumar RS, Rajesh P., Otta SK. 2018. Carbon: Nitrogen (C: N) ratio level variation influences microbial community of the system and growth as well as immunity of shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in biofloc based culture system. Fish Shellfish Immunol 81: 329–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Panjaitan P. 2004. Field and laboratory study of Penaeus monodon culture with zero water exchange and limited water exchange model using molasses as a carbon source. Ph.D. Thesis, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson DJ. 1992. Free living freshwater protozoa: A colour guide. London: Wolf Publishing Ltd. p. 223 [Google Scholar]
  • Pattukumar V, Sahu MK, Murugan M, Sethubathi GV, Sivakumar K, Arul V. 2010. Population of Vibrio Parahaemolyticus (Pathogen) and Bacillus (Beneficial Bacteria) in Penaeus Monodon (Fabricus, 1798) Culture. On Line J Biol Sci. 10: 142–150. [Google Scholar]
  • Phuoc LH, Corteel M, Thanh NC, Nauwynck H, Pensaert M, Alday-Sanz V, Van den Broeck W, Sorgeloos P. 2009. Effect of dose and challenge routes of Vibrio spp. On co-infection with white syndrome virus in Penaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 290, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  • Rajkumar M, Pandey PK, Aravind R, Vennila A, Bharti V, Purushothaman CS. 2016. Effect of different biofloc system on water quality, biofloc composition and growth performance in Litopenaeusvannamei (Boone, 1931). Aquacult Res 47: 3432–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Rao S. 1977. Soil microorganisms and plant growth. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. [Google Scholar]
  • Ray AJ, Dillon KS, Lotz JM. 2011. Water quality dynamics and shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production in intensive, mesohaline culture systems with two levels of biofloc management. Aquacult Eng 45: 127–136. [Google Scholar]
  • Schveitzer R, Arantes R, Costódio PFS, do Espírito Santo CM, Arana LV, Seiffert WQ, Andreatta ER. 2013. Effect of different biofloc levels on microbial activity, water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a tank system operated with no water exchange. Aquacult Eng 56: 59–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Shan H, Obbard J. 2001. Ammonia removal from prawn aquaculture water using immobilized nitrifying bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 57: 791–798. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: The principles and practices of statistics in biological research, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel RG, Likens GE. 1991. Limnological Analysis. 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, New York. p. 391. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu W-J, Morris TC, Samocha TM. 2016. Effects of C/N ratio on biofloc development, water quality, and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles in a biofloc-based, high-density, zero-exchange, outdoor tank system. Aquaculture 453: 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu WJ, Pan LQ. 2012. Effects of bioflocs on growth performance, digestive enzyme activity and body composition of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei in zero-water exchange tanks manipulating C/N ratio in feed. Aquaculture. 356–357: 147–152 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.05.022. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu WJ, Pan LQ. 2013. Enhancement of immune response and antioxidant status of Litopenaeus vannamei juvenile in biofloc-based culture tanks manipulating high C/N ratio of feed input. Aquaculture 412–413: 117–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu WJ, Pan LQ. 2014. Evaluation of dietary protein level on selected parameters of immune and antioxidant systems, and growth performance of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei reared in zero-water exchange biofloc-based culture tanks. Aquaculture 426: 181–188. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao ZG, Xu QY, Luo L, Wang CA, Li JN, Wang LS. 2014. Effect of feed C/N ratio promoted bioflocs on water quality and production performance of bottom and filter feeder carp in minimum-water exchanged pond polyculture system. Aquaculture 434: 442–448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.09.006. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.