Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 34, 2021
Article Number 19
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2021018
Published online 05 August 2021
  • Aprahamian M, Hickley P, Shields BA, Mawle GW. 2010. Examining changes in participation in recreational fisheries in England and Wales. Fish Manage Ecol 17: 93–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R. 2006. On the apparently striking disconnect between motivation and satisfaction in recreational fishing: the case of catch orientation of German anglers. N Am J Fish Manage 26: 592–605. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Bork M, Fladung E. 2008. Understanding the heterogeneity of recreational anglers across an urban–rural gradient in a metropolitan area (Berlin, Germany), with implications for fisheries management. Fish Res 92: 53–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ. 2009. Recreational fisheries: socioeconomic importance, conservation issues and management challenges. In: Dickson B, Hutton J, Adams MW. (Eds.), Recreational Hunting, Conservation and Rural Livelihoods: Science and Practice, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 39–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ, Sutton SG, Danylchuck AJ, Potts W, Freire K de MF, Van Anrooy R. 2016. Review. Recommendations for the future of recreational fisheries to prepare the social-ecological system to cope with change. Fish Manage Ecol 23: 177–186. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Matsumura S, Dieckmann U. 2010. The conservation and fishery benefits of protecting large pike (Esox lucius L.) by harvest regulations in recreational fishing. Biol Conserv 143: 1444–1459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Mehner T. 2003. Socio-economic characterisation of specialised common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) anglers in Germany, and implications for inland fisheries management and eutrophication control. Fish Res 61: 19–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Mehner T, Cowx IG. 2002. Reconciling traditional inland fisheries management and sustainability in industrialized countries, with emphasis on Europe. Fish Fish 3: 261–316. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bartholomew A, Bohnsack JA. 2005. A review of catch-and-release angling mortality with implications for no-take reserves. Rev Fish Biol Fish 15: 129–154. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beardmore B, Hunt LM, Haider W, Dorow M, Arlinghaus R. 2015. Effectively managing angler satisfaction in recreational fisheries requires understanding the fish species and the anglers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 72: 500–513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brownscombe JW, Danylchuk AJ, Chapman JM, Gutowsky LFG, Cooke SJ. 2017. Best practices for catch-and-release recreational fisheries − angling tools and tactics. Fish Res 186: 693–705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Burkett EM, Winkler RL. 2018. Recreational fishing participation trends in Upper Great Lakes States: an age-period-cohort analysis. Hum Dimens Wildl 24: 95–97. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Catalán IA, Alós J, Díaz-Gil C, Pérez-Mayol S, Basterretxea G., Morales-Nin B, Palmer M, 2018. Potential fishing-related effects on fish life history revealed by otolith microchemistry. Fish Res 199: 186–195. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chapman DA, Gagne TO, Ovitz KL, Griffin LP, Danylchuk AJ, Markowitz EM. 2018. Modeling intentions to sanction among anglers in a catch-and-release recreational fishery for golden dorado (Salminus brasiliensis) in Salta, Argentina. Hum Dimens Wildl 23: 391–398. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cedro A, Walczakiewicz S. 2017. Fundamentals of the meteorology and climatology of Poland. In: Świątek M, Cedro A, (Eds.), Renewable energy sources in Poland with a focus on the West Pomeranian Voivodeship, Szczecin, ZAPOL Sobczyk, pp. 29–44 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Cios S. 2007. Fish in the lives of Poles from the tenth to the nineteenth centuries, Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo IRS, pp. 1–251 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Coggins Jr LG, Catalano MJ, Allen MS, Pine WE, Walters CJ. 2007. Effects of cryptic mortality and the hidden costs of using length limits in fishery management. Fish Fish 8: 196–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Connelly NA, Brown TL, Knuth BA. 2000. Assessing the relative importance of recall bias and nonresponse bias and adjusting for those biases in statewide angler surveys. Hum Dimens Wildl 5: 19–29. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Cowx IG. 2004. The role of recreational fisheries in global fish crises. BioScience 54: 857–859. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Cowx IG. 2006. Contrasting recreational and commercial fishing: searching for common issues to promote unified conservation of fisheries resources and aquatic environments. Biol Conserv 128: 93–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Murchie KJ. 2015. Status of aboriginal, commercial and recreational inland fisheries in North America: past, present and future. Fish Manage Ecol 22: 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Suski CD, Arlinghaus R, Danylchuk AJ. 2013. Voluntary institutions and behaviours as alternatives to formal regulations in recreational fisheries management. Fish Fish 14: 439–457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Twardek WM, Lennox RJ, Zoldero AJ, Bower SD, Gutowsky LFG, Danylchuk AJ, Arlinghaus R, Beard D. 2018. The nexus of fun and nutrition: Recreational fishing is also about food. Fish Fish 19: 201–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx IG. 2015. Characterisation of inland fisheries in Europe. Fish Manage Ecol 22: 78–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cowx IG, Arlinghaus R, Cooke SJ. 2010. Harmonizing recreational fisheries and conservation objectives for aquatic biodiversity in inland waters. J Fish Biol 76: 2194–2215. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Czarkowski TK, Kupren K, Kwasiborska D, Jaczewski J. 2014. Water and fish as significant elements of rural tourism in the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship. Komun Ryb 4: 1–9 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Czarkowski TK, Kapusta A, Kupren K, Bogacka-Kapusta E, Kozłowski K. 2016. Composition and seasonal changes of litter along the shorelines of selected water bodies in Warmia and Mazury region (north-eastern Poland). Pol J Nat Sci 31: 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Czerniawski R, Domagała J, Pilecka-Rapacz M. 2010. Analysis of the intensity of angling pressure and the amount of nutrients groundbaits introduced to waters of the middle and lower Drawa River system. Rocz Nauk PZW 23: 119–130 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Czerwiński T. 2016. Comparison of commercial and recreational fisheries and recreational fisheries models. In: Mizieliński M, (Eds.), The recreational fisher 2016. The role of the recreational fisheries management in PAA waters in light of the principles of sustainable development, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo “Wieś Jutra”, pp. 94–115 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Danylchuk AJ, Clark Danylchuk S, Kosiarski A, Cooke SJ, Huskey B. 2018. Keepemwet Fishing–An emerging social brand for disseminating best practices for catch-and-release in recreational fisheries. Fish Res 205: 52–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. 2014. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. 4th Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrer OJ, Dibble ED, Jackson DC, Rundle KR. 2005. Angling assessment of the fisheries of Humacao Natural Reserve lagoon system, Puerto Rico. Fish Res 76: 81–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Francis R, Hixon MA, Clarke ME, Murawski SA, Ralston S. 2007. Ten commandments for ecosystem-based fisheries scientists. Fisheries 32: 217–233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Freire KM, Machado ML, Crepaldi D. 2012. Overview of inland recreational fisheries in Brazil. Fisheries 37: 484–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • García-Asorey MI, Escati-Peñaloza G, Parma AM, Pascual MA. 2011. Conflicting objectives in trophy trout recreational fisheries: evaluating trade-offs using an individual-based model. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 68: 1892–1904. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta N, Raghavan R, Sivakumar K, Mathur V, Pinder AC. 2015. Assessing recreational fisheries in an emerging economy: Knowledge, perceptions and attitudes of catch-and-release anglers in India. Fish Res 165: 79–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heermann L, Emmrich M, Heynen M, Dorow M, König U, Borcherding J, Arlinghaus R. 2013. Explaining recreational angling catch rates of Eurasian perch, Perca fluviatilis: the role of natural and fishing-related environmental factors. Fish Manage Ecol 20: 187–200. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt L, Haider W, Armstrong K. 2002. Understanding the fish harvesting decisions by anglers. Hum Dimens Wildl 7: 75–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hyder K, Weltersbach MS, Armstrong M, Ferter K, Townhill B, Ahvonen A, Strehlow HV. 2018. Recreational sea fishing in Europe in a global context − Participation rates, fishing effort, expenditure, and implications for monitoring and assessment. Fish Fish 19: 225–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kapusta A, Czarnecki B, Czarkowski TK, 2018. Fish size limits in terms of fish populations and ecology and angler expectations. In: Wołos A, (Eds.), Ecological measures in rational fisheries management, Wyd. IRS, Olsztyn, pp. 69– 79. [Google Scholar]
  • Kupren K, Czarkowski TK, Hakuć-Błażowska A, Świszcz B, Rogulski M, Krygel P. 2018. Socio-economic characteristics of anglers in selected counties of the Warmińsko-Mazurskie Voivodeship. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich 50: 213–226 (in Polish). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leopold M, Bnińska M, Hus M. 1980. Angling, recreation, commercial fisheries and problems of water resources allocation In: Grover JH. (Eds.), Allocation of Fishery Resources. Proceedings of the Technical Consultation on Allocation of Fishery Resources, Vichy, Auburn University, pp. 212–221. [Google Scholar]
  • Lewin WC, Arlinghaus R, Mehner T. 2006. Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing: Insights for management and conservation. Rev Fish Sci 14: 305–367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyach R, Čech M. 2017. Do otters target the same fish species and sizes as anglers? A case study from a lowland trout stream (Czech Republic). Aquat Living Resour 30, 11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyach R, Čech M. 2018. A new trend in Central European recreational fishing: More fishing visits but lower yield and catch. Fish Res 201: 131–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manfredo MJ, Driver BL, Tarrant MA. 1996. Measuring leisure motivation: A meta-analysis of the recreation experience preference scales. J Leis Res 28: 188–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehner T, Rapp T, Monk CT, Beck ME, Trudeau A, Kiljunen M, Hilt S, Arlinghaus R. 2019. Feeding aquatic ecosystems: whole-lake experimental addition of angler's ground bait strongly affects omnivorous fish despite low contribution to lake carbon budget. Ecosystems 22: 346–362. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mickiewicz M. 2019. Analysis of stocking management in 2017 and 2018 by entities entitled to conduct lake fisheries, In: Mickiewicz M, Wołos A, (Eds.), Activities of commercial and recreational fisheries enterprises in 2018. Economic and environmental conditions, Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo IRS, pp. 33–46 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Mickiewicz M, Wołos A, Trella M. 2020a. Characteristics of illegal inland fishing according to the opinions of Polish fisheries guards. Fish Aquat Life 28: 125–132. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mickiewicz M, Wołos A, Trella M, 2020b. Human dimensions: the fishery guards versus illegal fishermen in three regions of Central-Eastern Europe. Fish Aquat Life 28: 39–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Murphy MC, Donaldson WE, Zheng J, 1994. Results of a questionnaire on research and management priorities for commercial crab species in Alaska. Alaska Fishery Research Bulletin 1: 81–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Müller Z, Jakab T, Tóth A, Dévai G, Szállassy N, Kiss B, Horváth R. 2003. Effect of sports fisherman activities on dragonfly assemblages on a Hungarian river floodplain. Biodivers Conserv 12: 167–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O'Toole AC, Hanson KC, Cooke SJ. 2009. The effect of shoreline recreational angling activities on aquatic and riparian habitat within an urban environment: implications for conservation and management. Environ Manag 44: 324–334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Peixer J, Petrere M. 2009. Sport fishing in Cachoeira de Emas in Mogi-Guaçu River, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Biol 69: 1081–1090. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez-Bote JL, Roso R. 2014. Recreational fisheries in rural regions of the South-Western Iberian Peninsula: A Case Study. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci 14: 135–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Pierce RB. 2010. Long term evaluations of length limit regulations for northern pike in Minnesota. N Am J Fish Manage 30: 412–432. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Post JR, Sullivan M, Cox S, Lester NP, Walters CJ, Parkinson EA, Paul AJ, Jackson L, Shuter BJ. 2002. Canada's recreational fishery: the invisible collapse? Fisheries 27: 6–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pullen CE, Arlinghaus R, Lennox RJ, Cooke SJ. 2019. Telemetry reveals the movement, fate, and lure-shedding of northern pike (Esox lucius) that break the line and escape recreational fisheries capture. Fish Res 211: 176–182. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rogers MW, Allen MS, Brown P, Hunt T, Fulton W, Ingram BA. 2010. A simulation model to explore the relative value of stock enhancement versus harvest regulations for fishery sustainability. Ecol Model 221: 919–926. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Skłodowski J, Lipka D. 2011. Recreational fisheries and littering in shoreline ecotones as exemplified by selected segments of the middle Vistula River valley. Studia i Materiały CEPL w Rogowie 3: 181–187 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Smith CL. 1986. The life cycle of fisheries. Fisheries 11: 20–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stańczak J, Szałtys D, Waligórska M. 2018. Demographic situation of Poland by 2017. In: Hrynkiewicz J, Witkowski J, Potrykowska A. (Eds.) Demographic situation of Poland as a challenge for social and economic policy, Warszawa, The Government Population Council, pp. 37–59. [Google Scholar]
  • Tarrant MA, Manfredo MJ, Bayley PB, Hess R. 1993. Effects of recall bias and nonresponse bias on self-report estimates of angling participation. N Am J Fish Manage 13: 217–222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trapszyc A. 2015. The fisher and the angler, one of us or one of them—eternal opposition or transient stereotype? Reflections of a cultural anthropologist. In: Mickiewicz M, Wołos A, (Eds.), Sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources and their status in 2014, Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo IRS, pp. 111–123 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Treer T, Kubatov I. 2017. The co-existence of recreational and artisanal fisheries in the central parts of the Danube and Sava rivers. Croat J Fish 75: 89–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Trella M, Wołos A. 2015. Angling pressure and catches in lakes exploited by fisheries enterprises in 2009–2013. In: Mickiewicz M, Wołos A, (Eds.), Exploiting fisheries resources in 2009–2014: Status, changes, trends, Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo IRS, pp. 35–45 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Wilde GR, Ditton RB, Grimes SR, Riechers RK. 1996. Status of human dimensions surveys sponsored by state and provincial fisheries management agencies in North America. Fisheries 21: 12–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wołos A. 1984. To ground-bait or not to ground-bait. Wiadomości Wędkarskie 11: 13 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Wołos A, Draszkiewicz-Mioduszewska H, Trella M. 2015. Characteristics of angling pressure and catches in lakes exploited by fisheries enterprises in 2013. In: Mickiewicz M, Wołos A, (Eds.), Sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources and their status in 2014, Olsztyn, Wydawnictwo IRS, pp. 159–171 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Wołos A, Kapusta A, Mickiewicz M, Czerwiński T, 2016. Current problems of freshwater fisheries and angling management in questions and answers. Komunikaty Rybackie 3: 27–32. (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Wołos A, Mioduszewska H. 2003. Impact of groundbaits anglers use on angling outcomes and the balance of biogens in aquatic ecosystems. Komun Ryb 1: 23–27 (in Polish). [Google Scholar]
  • Wołos A, Teodorowicz M, Grabowska K. 1992. Effect of ground-baiting on anglers' catches and nutrient budget of water bodies as exemplified by Polish lakes. Aqua Fish Manage 23: 499–509. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.