Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 34, 2021
Special Issue - Ecological intensification: A new paragon for sustainable aquaculture
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 12
Published online 05 August 2021
  • Adhikari S, Sahu BC, Mahapatra AS, Dey L. 2014. Nutrient budgets and effluent characteristics in Giant freshwater prawn (Macrobrachium rosenbergii) culture ponds. Bull Environ Contamin Toxicol 92: 509–513. [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmad I, Babitha Rani AM, Verma AK, Maqsood M. 2017. Biofloc technology: an emerging avenue in aquatic animal healthcare and nutrition. Aquac Int 25:1215–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Alexander M. 1978. Introduction to soil microbiology. 2nd Edn. Willey Eastern Limited, New Delhi. p. 467. [Google Scholar]
  • AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th edition. Gaithersburg, MD: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. [Google Scholar]
  • APHA. 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 19th edition, New York: American Public Health Association Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • Arulmoorthy MP, Karunakaran K, Vignesh R, Vasudevan S, Srinivasan M. 2014. Identification and antimicrobial potential of bioluminescent bacteria isolated from the mangrove ecosystem of the Roach Park, Tuticorin, South East coast of India. BMR Microbiol 1: 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Avnimelech Y. 1999. Carbon ⁄ nitrogen ratio as a control element in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 176: 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Avnimelech Y. 2009. Biofloc Technology − A Practical Guide Book. The World Aquaculture Society, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States. pp 182. [Google Scholar]
  • Bakhshi F, Najdegerami EH, Manaffar R, Tukmechi A, Farah KR. 2018. Use of different carbon sources for the biofloc system during the grow-out culture of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fingerlings. Aquaculture 484: 259–267. [Google Scholar]
  • Biswas K, Chattopadhyay I, Banerjee RK, Bandyopadhyay U. 2002. Biological activities and medicinal properties of neem (Azadirachta indica). Curr Sci 82: 1336–1345. [Google Scholar]
  • Cabello FC. 2006. Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environ Microbiol 8: 1137–1144. [Google Scholar]
  • Crab R, Defoirdt T, Bossier P, Verstraete W. 2012. Biofloc technology in aquaculture: beneficial effects and future challenges. Aquaculture 356–357: 351–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Das S. 2008. Effects of neem (Azadirachta indica, L.) Seed cake on certain bio-geo-chemicalcycling microbes and fish growth. Master's Thesis, West Bengal University of Animal and Fishery Sciences, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. [Google Scholar]
  • Das SK, Das S, Mandal A, Dinda R. 2018. Impact of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seed cake upon selective nutrient cycling bacterial population in fish culture. J Appl Aquac 30: 353–365. [Google Scholar]
  • Das SK, Jana BB. 2003. Pond fertilization regimen: State-of-the-art. J Appl Aquac 13: 35–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Davies SJ, Gouveia A. 2010. Response of common carp fry fed diets containing a pea seed meal (Pisum sativum) subjected to different thermal processing methods. Aquaculture 305: 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  • De Schryver P, Crab R, Defoirdt T, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2008. The basics of bio-flocs technology: the added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture 277: 125–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Dinda R, Das SK, Mandal A. 2019. Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) supplemented biofloc medium as alternative feed in common carp (Cyprinus carpio var. communis L.) culture. J Appl Aquac 00: 1–19 [Google Scholar]
  • Ekasari J, Crab R, Verstraete W. 2010. Primary nutritional content of bio-flocs cultured with different organic carbon sources and salinity. HAYATI J Biosci 17:125–130. [Google Scholar]
  • Ekasari J, Maryam S. 2012. Evaluation of biofloc technology application on water quality and production performance of red tilapia Oreochromis sp. cultured at different stocking densities. HAYATI J Biosci 19: 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Ekasari J, Rivandi DR, Firdausi AP, Surawidjaja EH, Zairin M, Bossier P. 2015. Biofloc technology positively affects Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) larvae performance. Aquaculture 441. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2020. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020. Sustainability in action. Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Gopal M, Gupta A, Arunachalam V, Magu SP. 2007. Impact of Azadirachtin, an insecticidal allelochemical from neem on soil microflora, enzyme and respiratory activities. Bioresour Technol 98: 3154–3158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Green BW, Schrader KK, Perschbacher PW. 2014. Effect of stocking biomass on solids, phytoplankton communities, common off-flavors, and production parameters in a channel catfish biofloc technology production system. Aquacult Res 45: 1442–1458. [Google Scholar]
  • Hargreaves JA. 2013. Biofloc production systems for aquaculture. Southern Regl Aquacult Center 4503: 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Halver JE. 1976. The nutritional requirements of cultivated warm water and cold water fishspecies. Paper no. 31, FAO Tech. Conf. in Aquaculture., May 26-June 2. p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson ML. 1959. Soil chemical analysis. Verlag: Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 498 S. DM 39.40 [Google Scholar]
  • Kamilya D, Debbarma M, Pal P, Kheti B, Sarkar S, Singh ST. 2017. Biofloc technology application in indoor culture of Labeo rohita (Hamilton, 1822) fingerlings: the effects on inorganic nitrogen control, growth and immunity. Chemosphere 182: 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahanand SS, Moulick S, Rao PS. 2013. Water quality and growth of Rohu, Labeo rohita, in a biofloc system. J Appl Aquac 25: 121–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Mandal A, Das SK. 2018. Comparative efficacy of neem (Azadirachta indica) and non-neem supplemented biofloc media in controlling the harmful luminescent bacteria in natural pond culture of Litopenaeus vannaemei. Aquaculture 492: 157–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Martínez FC, Cansino AT, García MAA, Kalashnikov V, Rojas RL. 2014. Mathematical analysis for the optimization of a design in a facultative pond: indicator organism and organic matter. Math Probl Eng 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Martinez SO. 2002. NIM-Azadirachta indica: natureza, usos múltiplose, produção. Londrina, PR: Instituto Agronômico do Paraná (IAPAR). [Google Scholar]
  • Martins GB, Tarouco F, Rosa CE, Robaldo RB. 2017. The utilization of sodium bicarbonate, calcium carbonate or hydroxide in biofloc system: water quality, growth performance and oxidative stress of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 468: 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Mirzakhani N, Ebrahimi E, Jalali SAH, Ekasari J. 2019. Growth performance, intestinal morphology and nonspecific immunity response of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry cultured in biofloc systems with different carbon sources and input C:N ratios. Aquaculture 512: 734235. [Google Scholar]
  • Montgomery DC. 2001. Design and Analysis of Experiments, 5th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc. p. 748. [Google Scholar]
  • Mpeza P, Mavraganis T, Nathanailides C. 2013. Dispersal and variability of chemical and biological indices of aquaculture pollution in Igoumenitsa Bay (NW Greece). Annu Rev Res Biol 3: 873–880. [Google Scholar]
  • Najdegerami EH, Bakhshi F, Lakani FB. 2016. Effects of biofloc on growth performance, digestive enzyme activities and liver histology of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) fingerlings in zero-water exchange system. Fish Physiol Biochem 42: 457–465. [Google Scholar]
  • Pérez-Fuentes JA, Hernández-Vergara MP, Pérez-Rostro CI, Fogel I. 2016. C:N ratios affect nitrogen removal and production of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus raised in a biofloc system under high density cultivation. Aquaculture 452: 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarkhel C, Das SK. 2005. Impact of three piscicides on nitrogen-mineralizing and cellulose-decomposing bacterial populations. J Appl Aquacult 16: 167–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider O, Sereti V, Eding EH, Verreth JAJ. 2005. Analysis of nutrient flows in integrated intensive aquaculture systems. Aquac Eng 32: 379–401. [Google Scholar]
  • Schryver DP, Crab R, Defoirdt T, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2008. The basics of bio-flocs technology: the added value for aquaculture. Aquaculture 277: 125–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Subba-Rao NS. 1977. Soil Microorganisms and Plant Growth. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. p. 289. [Google Scholar]
  • Tavakol M, Arjmandi R, Shayeghi M, Monavari SM, Karbassi A. 2017. Determining multivariate analysis sampling frequency for monitoring contamination caused by trout farms. Polish J Environ Stud 26: 337–346. [Google Scholar]
  • Vinaygam S, Dupare BU, Joshi OP. 2006. Traditional technologies in soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh. Indian J Trad Knowl 5: 25–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Wei YF, Liao SA, Wang AL. 2016. The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional composition, microbial community and structure of bioflocs. Aquaculture 465: 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Wetzel RG, Likens GE. 1991. Limnological Analysis. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer–Verlag. p 391. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu JT, Chou TL. 2003. Silicate as the limiting nutrient for phytoplankton in a subtropical eutrophic estuary of Taiwan. Estuar Coastal Shelf Sci 58: 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  • Xie C, Li J, Li D, Shen Y, Gao Y, Zhang Z. 2018. Grass carp: the fish that feeds half of China. In: Gui JF, Tang Q, Li Z, Liu J, De Silva SS. (Eds.), Aquaculture in China: Success Stories and Modern Trends. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 93–115. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu WJ, Morris TC, Samocha TM. 2018. Effects of two commercial feeds for semi-intensive and hyper-intensive culture and four C/N ratios on water quality and performance of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles at high density in biofloc-based, zero-exchange outdoor tanks. Aquaculture 490: 194–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu WJ, Pan LQ, Zhao DH, Huang J. 2012. Preliminary investigation into the contribution of bioflocs on protein nutrition of Litopenaeus vannamei fed with different dietary protein levels in zero-water exchange culture tanks. Aquaculture 350: 147–153. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.