Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 33, 2020
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 6
Published online 12 June 2020
  • Ali MA, Gyulai G, Hidvegi N, Kerti B, Hemaid FMAA, Pandey AK, Lee J. 2014. The changing epitome of species identification-DNA barcoding. Saudi J Biol Sci 21: 204–231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheng QT. 1962. Fishes of South China Sea. Beijing: China Ocean Press, pp. 759–766. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen Z, Wang XY, Zhang J, Li Y, Gao TX, Lin LS. 2018. First record of the Chinese fanray, Platyrhina sinensis (Elasmobranchii: Myliobatiformes: Platyrhinidae), in the seawaters of Zhujiajian, Zhoushan, China. Acta Ichthyol Piscatoria 48: 409–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Divya PR, Mohitha C, Rahul GK, Shanis CPR, Basheer VS, Gopalakrishnan A. 2017. Molecular based phylogenetic species recognition in the genus Pampus (Perciformes: Stromateidae) reveals hidden diversity in the Indian Ocean. Mol Phylogenet Evol 109: 240–245. [Google Scholar]
  • Dolganov VN, Kharin VE, Zemnukhov VV. 2007. Species composition and distribution of butterfishes (Stromateidae) in waters of Russia. J Ichthyol 47: 579–584. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong JR, Hu CY, Shui YY, Tian K. 2017. Fish community structure and its relationships with environmental factors in the southern inshore waters of Wenzhou. J Fish Sci China 24: 209–219. [Google Scholar]
  • Dulvy NK, Rogers SI, Jennings S, Stelzenmüller V, Dye SR, Skjoldal HR. 2008. Climate change and deepening of the North Sea fish assemblage: a biotic indicator of warming seas. J Appl Ecol 45: 1029–1039. [Google Scholar]
  • Elliott NG, Haskard K, Koslow JA. 1995. Morphometric analysis of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) off the continental slope of southern Australia. J Fish Biol 46: 202 –220. [Google Scholar]
  • Guo EM, Liu Y, Liu J, Cui CX. 2010. DNA barcoding discriminates Pampus minor (Liu, et al., 1998) from Pampus species. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 28: 1266–1274. [Google Scholar]
  • Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, Dewaard JR. 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc R Soc London Ser B 270: 313–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, Dewaard JR. 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc R Soc London Ser B 270(Suppl_1), S96–S99. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoffmann AA, Sgro CM. 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470: 479–485. [Google Scholar]
  • Hua XJ, Hui X, Wei HD. 2004. DNA barcoding: new approach of biological taxonomy. Acta Zool Sin 50: 852–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y, Gao TX, Zhou YD, Lin LS. 2019a. Spatial genetic subdivision among populations of Pampus chinensis between China and Pakistan: testing the barrier effect of the Malay Peninsula. Aquat Living Resour 32: 8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y, Lin LS, Song N, Zhang Y, Gao TX. 2018. Population genetics of Pampus echinogaster along the Pacific coastline of China: insights from the mitochondrial DNA control region and microsatellite molecular markers. Mar Freshwater Res 69: 971–981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y, Zhang Y, Gao TX, Han ZQ, Lin LS, Zhang XM. 2017. Morphological characteristics and DNA barcoding of Pampus echinogaster (basilewsky, 1855). Acta Oceanol Sin 36: 18–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y, Zhou YD, Li PF, Gao TX, Lin LS. 2019b. Species identification and cryptic diversity in Pampus species as inferred from morphological and molecular characteristics. Mar Biodivers 49: 2521–2534. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu J, Li CS. 1998. A new pomfret species, Pampus minor sp. nov. (Stromateidae) from Chinese waters. Chin J Oceanol Limnol 16: 280–285. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu J, Li CS. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of Chinese pomfret fishes (Pisces: Stromateidae). Stud Mar Sin 44: 235–239. [Google Scholar]
  • Nakabo T. 2002. Fishes of Japan: With Pictorial Keys to the Species. Tokyo: Tokai University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Perry AL, Low PJ, Ellis JR, Reynolds JD. 2005. Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308: 1912–1915. [Google Scholar]
  • Shan XJ, Li ZL, Dai FQ, Jin XS. 2011. Seasonal and annual variations in biological characteristics of small yellow croaker Larimichthys polyactis in the central and southern Yellow Sea. Prog Fish Sci 32: 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vanderwal J, Murphy HT, Kutt AS, Perkins GC, Bateman BL, Perry JJ, Reside AE. 2013. Focus on poleward shifts in species' distribution underestimates the fingerprint of climate change. Nat Clim Change 3: 239–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang HG, Fan ZY. 2007. New record species of shark from seacoast of china mainland. Acta Zootaxonomica Sin 32: 490–491. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang ZQ, Yang JQ. 2006. A long-term misidentified new record species of gobiidae from china- Periopaus magnuspinnatus . Acta Zootaxonomica Sin 31: 906–910. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN. 2005. DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc B 360: 1847–1857. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wiens JJ. 2016. Climate-related local extinctions are already widespread among plant and animal species. PLoS Biol 14(12). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yamada U, Tokimura M, Hoshino K, Deng SM, Zheng YJ, Li SF, Kim YS, Kim JK. 2009. Names and Illustrations of Fishes from the East China Sea and the Yellow Sea-Japanese/Chinese/Korean. Over seas Fishery Cooperation Foundation of Japan. Tokyo, pp. 525–528. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang WT, Jian LI, Yue GH. 2006 Multiplex genotyping of novel microsatellites from silver pomfret (Pampus argenteus) and cross-amplification in other pomfret species. Mol Ecol Resour 6: 1073–1075. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.