EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 31 (2018) Aquat. Living Resour., 31 (2018) 23 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 31, 2018
Article Number 23
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2018014
Published online 04 October 2018
  • Acheson JM. 1975. The lobster fiefs: economic and ecological effects of territoriality on the Maine lobster industry. Human Ecol 3: 183–207. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alban F, Le Floc'h P, Boncoeur J. 2004. The impact of economic and regulatory factors on the relative profitability of fishing boats: a case study of the seaweed harvesting fleet of Northwest Brittany (France), Aquat Living Res 17: 185–193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Allen PM, Mcglade J. 1986. Dynamics of discovery and exploitation: the case of the Scotian shelf groundfish fisheries. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 43: 1187–1200. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonyme Bilan des embarquements à bord des navires de pêche professionnelle volontaires dans le Parc naturel marin d'Iroise, Comité Départemental des pêches du Finistère, PNMI, Ifremer, 2016, p. 16. [Google Scholar]
  • Arthur WB. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1994 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arthur WB. 1989. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99: 116–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Association du Grand Littoral Atlantique (AGLIA), 2014. Concertation pour une pêche durable sur la Grande Vasière − une expérimentation d'UEGC, http://www.aglia.fr/images/Projet/article/13/pdf/78-rapport_final_cgv_internetsmall-part1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Association Française Halieutique (AFH), 2017. Fixation des quotas de pêche 2017: pour de trop nombreux stocks, les ministres ne pourront pas suivre l'avis scientifique, communication, https://www.association-francaise-halieutique.fr [Google Scholar]
  • Bastardie F, Angelini S, Bolognini L, et al. 2017. Spatial planning for fisheries in the Northern Adriatic: working toward viable and sustainable fishing. Ecosphere 8: e01696. [Google Scholar]
  • Berkes F. 2006. From community-based resource management to complex systems: the scale issue and marine commons. Ecol Soc 11: 45. [Google Scholar]
  • Berkes F, Folke C. (Eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998 [Google Scholar]
  • Berkes F, Feeny D, McCay B, Acheson J. 1989. The benefits of the commons. Nature 340: 91–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Biedron IS, Knuth BA. 2016. Toward shared understandings of ecosystem-based fisheries management among fishery management councils and stakeholders in the US Mid-Atlantic and New England regions. Mar Policy 70: 40–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Bockstael NE, Opaluch JJ. 1983. Discrete modelling of supply response under uncertainty: the case of the fishery. J Environ Econ Manag 10: 125–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boncoeur J. Un modèle de gestion halieutique spatialisée, in Boncoeur J. (coord.), Activités halieutiques et activités récréatives dans le cadre d'un espace à protéger: le cas du Parc National de la Mer d'iroise, Les publications Amure, série rapport n R-05 2005, 2005 pp. 249–275 [Google Scholar]
  • Boncoeur J, Alban F, Guyader O, Thébaud O. 2002. Fish, fishers, seals and tourists: economic consequences of creating a marine reserve in a multi-species, multi-activity context. Nat Res Modeling 15: 387–411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bousquet F, Botta A, Alinovi L., Barreteau O, Bossio D, Brown K, Caron P, Cury P, Errico M, DeClerck F, Dessard H, Kautsky EE, Fabricius C, Folke C, Fortmann L, Hubert B, Magda D, Mathevet R, Norgaard RB, Quinlan A, Staver C. 2016. Resilience and development: mobilizing for transformation. Ecol Soc 21: 40. [Google Scholar]
  • Charles AT. 1992. Fishery conflicts − a unified framework, Mar Policy 16: 379–393. [Google Scholar]
  • Chlous-Ducharme F. 2004. L'archipel de Molène et « l'autre bord », Ethnologie française 1: 113–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Churchill R, Owen D. The EC Common Fisheries Policy, Oxford EC Law Library, 2010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cope JM, Punt AE. 2009. Drawing the lines: resolving fishery management units with simple fisheries data. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 66: 1256–1273. [Google Scholar]
  • Cormier R, Kelble CR, Anderson MR, Allen JI, Grehan A, Gregersen O. 2017. Moving from ecosystem-based policy objectives to operational implementation of ecosystem-based management measures, ICES Mar Sci 74: 406–413. [Google Scholar]
  • Coulthard S. 2012. Can we be both resilient and well, and what choices do people have? Incorporating agency into the resilience debate from a fisheries perspective. Ecol Soc 17: 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Daurès F, Alban F, Frangoudes K, Le Grand C. Situation économique de la flotte de pêche professionnelle du Parc Naturel Marin de l'Iroise (PNMI), série Rapports R-24-2012, 2011, p 75 [Google Scholar]
  • Daurès F, Rohet M-J, Van Iseghem S, Trenkel VM. 2009. Fishing fleet typology, economic dependence, and species landing profiles of the French fleets in the Bay of Biscay, 2000–2006. Aquat Living Res 22: 535–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Daurès F, Trenkel VM, Guyader O. 2013. Modelling the fishing costs of French commercial vessels in the Bay of Biscay. Fish Res 146: 74–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Delage N, Le Pape O. Inventaire des zones fonctionnelles pour les ressources halieutiques dans les eaux sous souveraineté française − Première partie: définitions, critères d'importance et méthode pour déterminer des zones d'importance à protéger en priorité, Les publications du Pôle halieutique Agrocampus Ouest, Rennes, 44, 2016, p 36 [Google Scholar]
  • Ducharme-Barth ND, Shertzer KW, Ahrens RNM. 2018. Indices of abundance in the Gulf of Mexico reef fish complex: a comparative approach using spatial data from vessel monitoring systems. Fish Res 198: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Duhamel E, Laspougeas C, Fry A. Rapport final du programme d'embarquements à bord des bolincheurs travaillant dans le Parc naturel marin d'Iroise, Ifremer, Plouzané, 2011 p 41 [Google Scholar]
  • Durrenberger EP, Palsson G. 1987. Ownership at sea: fishing territories and access to sea resources. Am Ethnol 14: 508–522. [Google Scholar]
  • Eliasen SQ, Hegland TJ, Raakjaer J. 2015. Decentralising: the implementation of regionalisation and co-management under the post-2013 common fisheries policy. Mar Policy 62: 224–232. [Google Scholar]
  • European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) no. 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) no. 1594/2003 and (EC) no. 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) no. 2371/2002 and (EC) no. 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC, 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • European Parliament and Council. Directive 2014/89/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning, Official Journal of the European Union, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  • European Parliament and Council. Regulation (EU) 2016/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 Jult 2016 establishing a multiannual plan for the stocks of cod, herring and sprat in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks, amending Council Regulation (EC) no. 2187/2005 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) no. 1098/2007, 2016 [Google Scholar]
  • Fletcher WJ, Shaw J., Metcalf SJ, Gaugham DJ. 2010. An ecosystem based fisheries management framework: the efficient, regional-level planning tool for management agencies. Mar Policy 34: 1226–1238. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilliland PM, Laffoley D. 2008. Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Mar Policy 32: 787–796. [Google Scholar]
  • Grafton Q. 2005. Social capital and fisheries governance. Ocean Coast Manag 48: 753–766. [Google Scholar]
  • Guyader O, Berthou P, Koutsikopoulos C et al. 2013. Small scale fisheries in Europe: a comparative analysis based on a selection of case studies. Fish Resh 140: 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gutierrez NL, Hilborn R, Defeo O. 2011. Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470: 386–389. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hily C, Chlous-Ducharme F. Le parc national marin de la mer d'Iroise, un exemple inédit de conservation et de gestion durable de l'espace maritime, in: Dauvin J-C. (coord.), Gestion intégrée des zones côtières: outils et perspectives pour la préservation du patrimoine naturel, Patrimoines naturels, 57, 2002, pp. 258–265. [Google Scholar]
  • Holling CS. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4: 390–405. [Google Scholar]
  • Jentoft S. 1989. Fisheries co-management: delegating government responsibility to fishermen's organizations. Mar Policy 13: 137–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Lefeuvre C, Laspougeas C, Mariat-Roy E, Geistdoerfer A, Hassani S, Jung J-C, Méheust E. Interactions pêche mammifères marins − INPECMAM Iroise, rapport final, octobre 2014, 2015 http://www.parc-marin-iroise.fr/Peche-Economie/Peche-durable/Peche-et-mammiferes-marins/Interactions-entre-peche-et-mammiferes-marins [Google Scholar]
  • Le Floc'h P, Murillas A, Aranda M, Daurès F, Fitzpatrick M, Guyader O, Hatcher A, Macher C, Marchal P. 2015. The regional management of fisheries in European Western Waters. Mar Policy 51: 375–384. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Floc'h P, Wilson JR. 2017. Les pêches maritimes françaises − 1983–2013, Presses universitaires de Rennes, Rennes, 213p [Google Scholar]
  • Leonardi S, Begot E, Le Grand C, Pitel-Roudaut M, Laurans M, Daurès F, Berthou P, Alban F, Frangoudes K, Leblond E, Demanèche S. Etude sur l'état des lieux de la pêche professionnelle dans le Parc Naturel Marin d'Iroise, Plouzané, 2010, 119 p [Google Scholar]
  • Leslie HM, McLeod KL. 2007. Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem-based management. Front Ecol Environ 5: 540–548. [Google Scholar]
  • Levin SA. 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptative systems. Ecosystems 1: 431–436. [Google Scholar]
  • Levin SA, Barett S, Anuyar S et al. 1998. Resilience in natural and socioeconomic systems. Environ Dev Econ 3: 221–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Levin SA. 2000. Multiple scales and the maintenance of biodiversity. Ecosystems 3: 498–506. [Google Scholar]
  • Link JS, Browman HI. 2014. Integrating what? Levels of marine ecosystem-based assessment and management. ICES J Mar Sci 71: 1170–1173. [Google Scholar]
  • Long RD, Charles A, Stephenson RL. 2017. Key principles of ecosystem-based management: the fishermen's perspective. Fish Fish 18: 244–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lorance P, Bertrand JA, Brind'Amour A, Rochet M-J, Trenkel VM. 2009. Assessment of impacts from human activities on ecosystem components in the Bay of Biscaye in the early 1990s. Aquat Living Res 22: 409–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mariat-Roy E. 2014. When fishing means resilience. The evolution of small boat fishing practices in Iceland since 1990 and the new development of long-line fishing. Polar Records 50: 421–429. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mazé C, Dahou T, Ragueneau O, Danto A, Mariat-Roy E, Raimonet M, Wiesbein O. 2017. Knowledge and power in integrated coastal management. For a political anthropology of the sea combined with the sciences of the marine environment. Géoscience 349: 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CRTE2017.09.008 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ministère de l'écologie, 2009. Le livre Bleu des engagements du Grenelle de la Mer, 10 et 15 juillet 2009, 71p, http://www.ladocumentationfrancaise.fr/rapports-publics/094000356/index.shtml [Google Scholar]
  • Nelson R, Winter SG. An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, 1982 [Google Scholar]
  • North D. 1991. Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5: 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  • North DC. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ommer RE, Perry I, Cochrane K, Cury P. World fisheries: a social-ecological analysis. Fish Aquat Res Series, West, Wiley, Sussex, 2011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1990 [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. Polycentric systems as one for solving collective-action problems, 2008 http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/4417/W08-6_Ostrom_DLC.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • Ostrom E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Am Econ Rev 100: 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer C, Sinclair P. When the Fish are Gone: Ecological Disaster and Fishers in Northwest Newfoundland, Fernwood Publishing, Halifax, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  • Parsons SL. La gestion des pêches maritimes au Canada, Ottawa, Conseil National de Recherches, 1995 [Google Scholar]
  • Pascoe S, Coglan L, Mardle S. 2001. Physical versus harvest-based measures of capacity: the case of the United Kingdom vessel capacity unit system. ICES J Mar Sci 58: 1243–1252. [Google Scholar]
  • Pierson P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. Am Politi Sci Rev 94: 251–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pikitch EK, Santora C, Babcock EA. et al. 2004. Ecosystem-based fishery management, Science, 305: 346–347. [Google Scholar]
  • Platteau, J-P. 2004. Monitoring elite capture in community-driven development, Dev Chang 35: 223–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, NY, 1966 [Google Scholar]
  • Poulard J-C, Blanchard F. 2005. The impact of climate change on the fish community structure of the eastern continental shelf of the Bay of Biscay. ICES J Mar Sci 62: 1436–1443. [Google Scholar]
  • Regimbart A, Guitton J, Le Pape O. Inventaire des zones fonctionnelles pour les ressources halieutiques dns les eaux sous souveraineté française − Deuxième partie: Inventaire des zones fonctionnelles halieutiques, Agrocampus Ouest no. 46, Rennes, 2017, p. 171 [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchirico JN, Smith MD, Lipton DW. 2008. An empirical approach to ecosystem-based fishery management. Ecol Econ 63: 586–596. [Google Scholar]
  • Schrank WE. 2005. The Newfoundland fishery: ten years after the moratorium. Mar Policy 29: 407–420. [Google Scholar]
  • Sen S, Nielsen JR. 1996. Fisheries co-management: a comparative analysis. Mar Policy 20: 405–418. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith ADM, Fulton EJ, Hobday AJ, Smith DC, Shoulder P. 2007. Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES J Mar Sci 64: 633–639. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun J, Hinton MG, Webster DG. 2016. Modeling the spatial dynamics of international tuna fleets. PLoS ONE 11(8): 0159626. [Google Scholar]
  • Trawick PB. 2001. Successfully governing the commons: principles of social organization in an Andean irrigation system. Human Ecol 29: 1–25. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Hoof L. 2015. Fisheries management, the ecosystem approach, regionalization and the elephants in the room. Mar Policy 60: 20–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Tilbeurgh V. Quand la gestion intégrée redessine les contours d'une aire protégée : le cas du parc marin en mer d'Iroise, Vertigo, 7, 2006, 3 [Google Scholar]
  • Vermard Y, Marchal P, Mahévas S, Thébaud O, 2008. A dynamic model of the Bay of Biscay pelagic fleet simulating fishing trip choice: the response to the closure of the European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) fishery in 2005. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65: 2444–2453. [Google Scholar]
  • Villasante S, Macho G, Antelo M, Rodriguez-Gonzalez D, Kaiser MJ. 2013. Resilience and challenges of marine social-ecological systems under complex and interconnected drivers. Ambio 42: 905–909. [Google Scholar]
  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9: 5. [Google Scholar]
  • Ward JM, Sutinen JG. 1994. Vessel entry-exit behavior in the Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishery. Am J Agricl Econ 76: 916–923. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.