Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 30, 2017
Article Number 33
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 08 September 2017
  • Abdul-Muneer PM, Gopalakrishnan A, Musammilu KK, Mohindra V, Lal KK, Basheer VS, Lakra WS. 2009. Genetic variation and population structure of endemic yellow catfish, Horabagrus brachysoma (Bagridae) among three populations of Western Ghat region using RAPD and microsatellite markers. Mol Biol Rep 36: 1779–1791. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Araripe J, Rego PS, Queiroz H, Sampaio I, Schneider H. 2013. Dispersal capacity and genetic structure of Arapaima gigas on different geographic scales using microsatellite markers. PLoS ONE 8: e 54470. [Google Scholar]
  • Barletta M, Jaureguizar AJ, Baigun C, Fontoura NF, Agostinho AA, Almeida-Val V, Val A, Torres RA, Jimenes LF, Giarrizzo T, Fabre NN, Batista V, Lasso C, Taphorn DC, Costa MF, Chaves PT, Vieira JP, Correa MFM. 2010. Fish and aquatic habitat conservation in South America: a continental overview with emphasis on neotropical systems. J Fish Biol 76: 2118–2176. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barton NH, Slatkin M. 1986. A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56: 409–415. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Begg GA, Friedland KD, Pearce JB. 1999. Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: an overview. Fish Res 43: 1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruton, MN. 1995. Have fishes had their chips? The dilemma of threatened fishes. Environ Biol Fish 43: 1–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaturvedi A, Mohindra V, Singh RK, Lal KK, Punia P, Bhaskar R, Mandal A, Narain L, Lakra WS. 2011. Population genetic structure and phylogeography of cyprinid fish, Labeo dero (Hamilton, 1822) inferred from allozyme and microsatellite DNA marker analysis. Mol Biol Rep 38: 3513–3529. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chiang TY, Lee TW, Hsu KC, Kuo CH, Lin DY, Lin HD. 2011. Population structure in the endangered cyprinid fish Pararasbora moltrechti in Taiwan, based on mitochondrial and microsatellite DNAs. Zool Sci 28: 642–651. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z, Knowler DJ, Leveque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA. 2006. Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 81: 63–182. [Google Scholar]
  • Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1: 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferguson A, Taggart JB, Prodohl PA, McMeel O, Thompson C, Stone C, McGinnity P, Hynes RA. 1995. The application of molecular markers to the study and conservation of fish populations with special reference to Salmo. J Fish Biol 47: 103–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Garcez R, Calcagnotto D, De Almeida-Toledo LF. 2011. Population structure of the migratory fish Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes) from rio Grande basin (Brazil), an area fragmented by dams. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 21: 268–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gupta A, Lal KK, Punia P, Singh RK, Mohindra V, Sah RS, Kumar R, Luhariya RK, Dwivedi AK, Masih P, Mishra RM, Jena JK. 2013. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers and genetic diversity in wild bronze featherback, Notopterus notopterus (Pallas, 1769). Mol Biol Rep 40: 6625–6631. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Heithaus MR, Laushman RH. 1997. Genetic variation and conservation of stream fishes: influence of ecology, life history, and water quality. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54: 1822–1836. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilborn R, Walters CJ (Eds.). 1992. Quantitative fisheries stock assessment. Choice, dynamics and uncertainty, Chapman & Hall, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Horreo JL, Garcia-Vazquez E. 2011. Foreign brown trout in protected landscapes as a consequence of connectivity. Fish Manag Ecol 18: 431–436. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hogan ZS. 2011. Ecology and conservation of large-bodied freshwater catfish: a global perspective. Am Fish Soc Symp 77: 39–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Januchowski-Hartley SR, Pearson RG, Puschendorf R, Rayner T. 2011. Fresh waters and fish diversity: distribution, protection and disturbance in tropical Australia. PLoS ONE 6: e25846. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen JL, Bohonak AJ, Kelley ST. 2005. Isolation by distance, web service. BMC Genet 6: 13. v. 3.23, [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kathirvelpandian A, Gopalkrishnan A, Lakra WS, Krishna G, Sharma R, Musammilu KK, Basheer VS, Jena JK. 2014. Microsatellite markers to determine population genetic structure in the Golden Anchovy, Coilia dussumieri. Biochem Genet 5: 296–309. [Google Scholar]
  • Khan MA, Nazir A, Khan S. 2016. Assessment of growth zones on whole and thin-sectioned otoliths in Sperata aor (Bagridae) inhabiting the river Ganga, India. J Ichthyol 56: 242–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim KS, Lee HR, Park SY, Ko MH, Bang C. 2014. Development and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite marker for an endangered freshwater fish in Korea, Gobiobotia brevibarba. Conserv Genet Resour 6: 91–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lakra WS, Sarkar UK, Gopalakrishnan A, Kathirvelpandian A. 2010. Threatened freshwater fishes of India, National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Lucknow, India. [Google Scholar]
  • Menon AGK. 1954. Further observation of the fish fauna of the Manipur state. Rec Indian Mus 52: 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Musammilu KK, Muneer PMA, Gopalakrishnan A, Basheer VS, Gupta H, Mohindra V, Lal KK, Ponniah AG. 2014. Identification and characterization of microsatellite markers for the population genetic structure in endemic red-tailed barb Gonoproktopterus curmuca. Mol Biol Rep 41: 3051–3062. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nei M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89: 583–590. [Google Scholar]
  • Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. Genalex 6: genetic analysis in excel, population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pilgrim BL, Perry RC, Keefe DG, Perry EA, Marshall HD. 2012. Microsatellite variation and genetic structure of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations in Labrador and neighboring Atlantic Canada: evidence for ongoing gene flow and dual routes of post-Wisconsinan colonization. Ecol Evol 2: 885–898. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945–959. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rahman MA, Uddin KMA, Zaher M. 2005. Development of artificial breeding techniques for long-whiskered catfish, Sperata aor and giant river catfish, Sperata seenghala of Bangladesh. Bangladesh J Fish Res 9: 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramakrishniah M. 1992. Studies on the breeding and feeding biology of Mystus aor (Hamilton) of Nagarjunasagar Reservoir. Proc Natl Acad Sci India (B) 62: 357–364. [Google Scholar]
  • Raymond M, Rousset F. 1998. Genepop (ver. 3.3d): population genetics software for exact test and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248–249. [Google Scholar]
  • Rema-Devi KR, Raghavan R. 2011. Sperata aor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011, (downloaded on 2017/25/03). [Google Scholar]
  • Rousset F. 2008. Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103–106. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rice WR. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saigal BN. 1964. Studies on the fishery and biology of the commercial catfishes of the Ganga River system. II. Maturity, spawning and food of Mystus (Osteobagrus) aor (Hamilton). Indian J Fish 11A(1): 1–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarkar UK, Pathak AK, Lakra WS. 2008. Conservation of freshwater fish resources of India: new approaches, assessment and challenges. Biodivers Conserv 17: 2495–2511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarkar UK, Pathak AK, Sinha RK, Sivakumar K, Pandian AK, Panday A, Dubey VK, Lakra WS. 2012. Freshwater fish biodiversity in the River Ganga (India): changing pattern, threats, and conservation perspectives. Rev Fish Biol Fish 22: 251–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simbine L, Silva JV, Hilsdorf AWS. 2014. The genetic diversity of wild Oreochromis mossambicus populations from the Mozambique southern watersheds as evaluated by microsatellites. J Appl Ichthyol 30: 272–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suski CD, Cooke SJ. 2007. Conservation of aquatic resources through the use of freshwater protected areas: opportunities and challenges. Biodivers Conserv 16: 2015–2029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Talwar PK, Jhingran AG. 1991. Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries, Vol. 2, Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New Delhi. [Google Scholar]
  • Tian C, Yang M, Liang XF, Cao L, Zheng H, Zhao C, Zhu K, Yuan Y. 2013. Population genetic structure of Siniperca chuatsi in the middle reach of the Yangtze River inferred from mitochondrial DNA and microsatellite loci. Mitochondr DNA 26: 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P. 2004. Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 535–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weir BS, Cockerham CC. 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358–1370. [Google Scholar]
  • Wright S. 1978. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Variability within and among natural populations, Vol. 4, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T. 2002. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol Ecol 11: 1–16. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.