Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 26, Number 2, April-May 2013
Page(s) 179 - 185
Section Marine Protected Areas
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2012041
Published online 02 January 2013
  • Aebischer N.J., Wanless S., 1992, Relationships between colony size and environmental conditions for shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis on the Isle of May, Scotland. Bird Study 39, 43–52. [CrossRef]
  • Alvarez D., 1998, The diet of shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis L. in the Cantabrian sea (North of Spain) during the breeding season. Seabird 20, 22–30.
  • Barret R.T., 1991, Shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis L.) as potential samplers of juvenile saithe (Pollachius virens L.) stocks in Northern Norway. Sarsia 76, 153–156.
  • Barret R.T., Røv N., Loen J., Montevecchi W.A., 1990, Diets of shags Phalacrocorax aritotelis and cormorants P. carbo in Norway and possible interactions for gadoid stock recruitment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 66, 205–218. [CrossRef]
  • Bertram D.F., Harfenist A., Smith B.D., 2005, Ocean climate and El Niño impacts on survival of Cassin’s auklets from upwelling and downwelling domains of British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 62, 2841–2853. [CrossRef]
  • Campana S.E., 2004, Photographic atlas of fish otoliths of the northwest Atlantic Ocean. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 133, 1–284.
  • Camphuysen C.J., 2005, Understanding marine foodweb processes : an ecosystem approach to sustainable Sandeel fisheries in the North Sea. IMPRESS Report, Koninklijk Nederlands Instituut voor Onderzoek der Zee, Q5RS-2000-30864, Texel.
  • Caswell H., 2001, Matrix population models. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
  • Choquet R., Reboulet A.M., Pradel R., Gimenez O., Lebreton J.D., 2004, M-SURGE : new software specifically designed for multistate capture-recapture models. Anim. Biodiv. Conserv. 27, 207–215.
  • Daunt F., Afanasyev V., Silk J.R.D., Wanless S., 2006, Extrinsic and intrinsic determinants of winter foraging and breeding phenology in a temperate seabird. Behav. Ecol. Soc. 59, 381–388. [CrossRef]
  • Durant J.M., Anker-Nilssen T., Stenseth N.C., 2003, Trophic interactions under climate fluctuations : the Atlantic puffin as an example. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 270, 1461–1466. [CrossRef]
  • Durant, J.M., Hjermann, D.Ø., Frederisken, M., Charrassin, J.B., Le Maho, Y., Sabarros, P.S., Crawford, R.J.M., Stenseth, N.Chr., 2009, Pros and cons of using seabirds as ecological indicators. Clim. Res. 39, 115–119. [CrossRef]
  • Frederiksen M., Harris M.P., Daunt F., Rothery P., Wanless S., 2004, Scale-dependent climate signals drive breeding phenology of three seabird species. Global Change Biol. 10, 1214–1221. [CrossRef]
  • Frederiksen M., Mavor R.A., Wanless S., 2007, Seabirds as environmental indicators : the advantages of combining data sets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 352, 205–211. [CrossRef]
  • Frederiksen M., Daunt F., Harris M.P., Wanless S., 2008, The demographic impact of extreme events : stochastic weather drives survival and population dynamics in a long-lived species. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 1020–1029. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Furness R.W., Camphuysen K., 1997, Seabirds as monitors of the marine environment. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 54, 726–737. [CrossRef]
  • Grémillet D., Tuschy I., Kierspel M., 1998, Body temperature and insulation in diving great cormorants and European shags. Funct. Ecol. 12, 386–394. [CrossRef]
  • Guyot I., 1988, Relationships between shag feeding areas and human fishing activities in Corsica (Mediterranean Sea). In : Tasker M.L. (Ed.) Seabird food and feeding ecology. Proc. 3rd Intl. Conference of the Seabird Group, Sandy, pp. 22–23.
  • Harding A.M., Piatt J.F., Sydeman W.J., 2005, Bibliography of literature on seabirds as indicators of the marine environment. USGS Alaska Science Centre, Anchorage, available at http://alaska.usgs.gov/science/biology/seabirds_foragefish/sai/
  • Harkönen T., 1986, Guide of the bony fishes of the northeast Atlantic. Danbiu ApS. Biological consultants.
  • Harris M.P., Riddiford N.J., 1989, The food of some young seabirds on Fair Isle in 1986-88. Scottish Birds 15, 119–125.
  • Harris M.P., Wanless S., 1991, The importance of the lesser sandeel Ammodytes marinus in the diet of shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Ornis Scand. 22, 375–382. [CrossRef]
  • Harris M.P., Buckland S.T., Russell S.M., Wanless S., 1994, Year- and age-related variation in the survival of adult European shags over a 24-year period. Condor 96, 600–605. [CrossRef]
  • Harris M.P., Anker-Nilssen T., McCleery R.H., Erikstad K.E., Shaw D.N., Grosbois V., 2005, Effect of wintering area and climate on the survival of adult Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica in the eastern Atlantic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 297, 283–296. [CrossRef]
  • Johnstone I.G., Harris M.P., Wanless S., Graves J.A., 1990, The usefulness of pellets for assessing the diet of adult shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Bird Study 37, 5–11. [CrossRef]
  • Kitaysky A.S., Golubova E.G., 2000, Climate change causes contrasting trends in reproductive performance of planktivorous and piscivorous alcids. J. Anim. Ecol. 69, 248–262. [CrossRef]
  • Lombarte A., Chic Ò., Parisi-Baradad V., Olivella R., Piera J., García-Ladona E., 2006, A web-based environment from shape analysis of fish otoliths. The AFORO database. Scient. Mar. 70, 147–152.
  • Lumsden, W.H.R., Haddow, A.J., 1946, The food of the shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) in the Clyde sea area. J. Anim. Ecol. 15, 35–42. [CrossRef]
  • Mills D., 1969, The food of the shag in Loch Ewe, Ross-Shire. Scottish Birds 5, 264–268.
  • Pannekoek J., van Strien A.J., Roby D., 2004, TRIM (Trends and indicators for monitoring data). Statistics Netherlands, Vooburg.
  • Pasquet E., 1987, Relationships between Brittany shags and seawaters resources. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, Paris.
  • Pearson T.H., 1968, The feeding ecology of sea-bird species breeding on the Farne Islands, Northumberland. J. Anim.. Ecol. 37, 53–102. [CrossRef]
  • Piatt J.F., Harding A.M.A., Shultz M., Speckman S.G., van Pelt T.I., Drew G.S., Kettle A.B., 2007, Seabirds as indicators of marine food supplies : Cairns revisited. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 352, 221–235. [CrossRef]
  • Ridgway M.S., 2010, Line transect distance sampling in aerial surveys for double-crested cormorants in coastal regions of Lake Huron. J. Great Lakes Res. 36, 403–410. [CrossRef]
  • Steven J., 1933, The food consumed by shags and cormorants around shores of Cornwall (England). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 19, 277–292. [CrossRef]
  • Thomas L., Buckland S.T., Rexstad E.A., Laake J.L., Strindberg S., Hedley S.L., Bishop J.R.B., Marques T.A., Burnham K.P., 2010, Distance software : design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 5–14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Tramer E.J., 1969, Bird species diversity : components of Shannon’s formula. Ecology 50, 927–929. [CrossRef]
  • Velando A., Freire J., 1999, Intercolony and seasonal differences in the breeding diet of European shags on the Galician coast (NW Spain). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 188, 225–236. [CrossRef]
  • Velando A., Freire J., 2002, Population modelling of European shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) at their southern limit : conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 107, 59–69. [CrossRef]
  • Wanless S., Harris M.P., Morris J.A., 1991, Foraging range and feeding locations of shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis during chick rearing. Ibis 133, 30–36. [CrossRef]
  • Wanless S., Harris M.P., Russell A., 1993, Factors influencing food-lead sizes brought in by shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis during chick rearing. Ibis 135, 19–24. [CrossRef]
  • Wanless S., Harris M.P., Burger A.E., Buckland S.T., 1997, Use of time-at-depth recorders for estimating depth and diving performance of European shags. J. Field Ornithol. 68, 547–561.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.