Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 24, Number 1, January-March 2011
Page(s) 71 - 78
Section Regular Articles
Published online 17 March 2011
  • Balk H., Lindem T., 2006, Sonar 4, Sonar 5, Sonar 6 – Post-processing Systems. Operator Manual. Lindem Data Acquisition, Oslo.
  • Barange M., Hampton I., 1996, Empirical determination of in situ target strengths of three loosely aggregated pelagic fish species. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 225–232. [CrossRef]
  • CEN (European Committee for Standardization) 2009, Water quality – Guidance on the estimation of fish abundance with mobile hydroacoustic methods, prEN 1591041.
  • Djemali I., Toujani R., Guillard J., 2009, Hydroacoustic fish biomass assessment in man-made lakes in Tunisia: horizontal beaming importance and diel effect. Aquat. Ecol. 43, 1121–1131. [CrossRef]
  • Falster D.S., Warton D.I., Wright I.J., 2006, SMATR: Standardised major axis tests and routines, ver 2.0.
  • Forbes S.T., Nakken O., 1972, Manual of methods for fisheries resource survey and appraisal., Part. 2, The use of acoustic instruments for fish detection and abundance estimation. FAO Manuals in Fisheries Science, 5.
  • Foote K.G., 1987, Fish target strengths for use in echo integrator survey. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82, 981–987. [CrossRef]
  • Foote K.G., Knudsen H.P., Vestnes G., MacLennan D.N., Simmonds E.J., 1987, Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish-density estimation: a practical guide. ICES Coop. Res. Rep., 144.
  • Gauthier S., Rose G.A., 2001, Diagnostic tools for unbiased in situ target strength estimation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 2149–2155. [CrossRef]
  • Godlewska M., Swierzowski A., Winfield I.J., 2004, Hydroacoustics as a tool for studies of fish and their habitat. Ecohydrol. Hydrobiol. 4, 417–427.
  • Guillard J., Balay P., Colon M., Brehmer P., 2010, Survey boat effect on YOY fish schools in a pre-alpine lake: evidence from multibeam sonar and split-beam echosounder data. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 19, 373–380. [CrossRef]
  • Guillard J., Lebourges-Dhaussy A., Brehmer P., 2004, Simultaneous Sv and TS measurements on YOY fresh water fish using three frequencies. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 267–273. [CrossRef]
  • Guillard J., Perga M.E., Colon M., Angeli N., 2006, Hydroacoustic assessment of young-of-year perch, Perca fluviatilis, population dynamics in an oligotrophic lake (Lake Annecy, France). Fish. Manage. Ecol. 13, 319–327. [CrossRef]
  • Guillard J., Verges C., 2007, The repeatability of fish biomass and size distribution estimates obtained by hydroacoustic surveys using various sampling strategies and statistical analyses. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 92, 605–617. [CrossRef]
  • Kaartvedt S., Røstad A., Klevjer T.A., Staby A., 2009, Use of bottom-mounted echo sounders in exploring behavior of mesopelagic fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 395, 109–118. [CrossRef]
  • Knudsen F.R., Larsson P., Jakobsen P.J., 2006, Acoustic scattering from a larval insect (Chaoborus flavicans) at six echosounder frequencies: implication for acoustic estimates of fish abundance. Fish. Res. 79, 84–89. [CrossRef]
  • Kozłowski J., Poczyczyñski P., Zdanowski B., 2008, Środowisko i ichtiofauna jeziora Hañcza. IRŚ, Olsztyn.
  • Kubecka J., 1995, Effect of pulse duration and frequency bandwidth on fish target strength and echo shape in horizontal sonar applications. In: XII Symposium on Hydroacoustics, Jurata 16–19 May 1995, Polish Naval Military Academy, 913/95, pp. 187–174.
  • MacLennan D., Fernandes P.G., Dalen J., 2002, A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 365–369. [CrossRef]
  • Masson S., Angeli N., Guillard J., Pinel-Alloul B., 2001, Diel vertical and horizontal distribution of crustacean zooplankton and Y-O-Y fish in a sub alpine lake: an approach based on high frequency sampling. J. Plankton Res. 23, 1041–1060. [CrossRef]
  • Mehner T., Busch S., Helland I.P., Emmrich M., Freyhof J., 2010, Temperature related nocturnal vertical segregation of coexisting coregonids. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 19, 408–419. [CrossRef]
  • Mehner T., Kasprzak P., Hölker F., 2007, Exploring ultimate hypotheses to predict diel vertical migrations in coregonid fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 874–398. [CrossRef]
  • O’ Driscoll S., Rose G.A., 2001, In situ acoustic target strength of juvenile capelin. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 58, 342–345. [CrossRef]
  • Murphy B.R., Willis D.W., 1996, Fisheries Techniques, 2nd edn. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
  • Rose G.A., 1998, Acoustic target strength of capelin in Newfoundland waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55, 918–923. [CrossRef]
  • Rudstam L G., Parker-Stetter S. L., Sullivan P. J., Warner D.M., 2009, Towards a standard operating procedure for fishery acoustic surveys in the Laurentian Great Lakes, North America. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, 1391–1397. [CrossRef]
  • Sawada K., Furusawa M., Williamson N.J., 1993, Conditions for the precise measurement of fish target strength in situ. Fish. Sci. 20, 15–21.
  • Simmonds E.J., Gutierrez M., Chipollini A., Gerlotto F., Woillez M., Bertrand A., 2009, Optimizing the design of acoustic surveys of Peruvian anchoveta. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, 1341–1348. [CrossRef]
  • Simmonds E.J., MacLennan D.N., 2005, Fisheries acoustics: theory and practice. Wiley- Blackwell, 2nd edn., Oxford.
  • Soule M., Barange M., Hampton I., 1995, Evidence of bias in estimates of target strength obtained with a split beam echosounder. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 52, 139–144. [CrossRef]
  • Soule M., Barange M., Solli H., Hampton I., 1997, Performance of a new phase algorithm for discriminating between single and overlapping echoes in a split beam echosounder. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 54, 934–938. [CrossRef]
  • Sprent P., 1992, Pratique des Statistiques non Parametriques. INRA, Paris.
  • Trenkel V.M., Berger L., Bourguignon S., Doray M., Fablet R., Massé J., Mazauric V., Poncelet C., Quemener G., Scalabrin C., Villalobos H., 2009, Overview of recent progress in fisheries acoustics made by Ifremer with examples from the Bay of Biscay. Aquat. Living Resour. 22, 1–13. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Wanzenböck J., Mehner T., Schulz M., Gassner H., Winfield I.J., 2003, Quality assurance of hydroacoustic surveys: the repeatability of fish-abundance and biomass estimates in lakes within and between hydroacoustic systems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 486–492. [CrossRef]
  • Warner D.M., Schaeffer J.S., O’ Brien T.P., 2009, The Lake Huron pelagic fish community: persistent spatial pattern along biomass and species composition gradients. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 66, 1199–1215. [CrossRef]
  • Warton D.I., Wright I.J., Falster D.S., Westoby M., 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. 81, 259–291.
  • Winfield I.J., Fletcher J.M., James J.B., Bean C.W., 2009, Assessment of fish populations in still waters using hydroacoustics and survey gill netting: experiences with Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) in the UK. Fish. Res. 96, 30–38. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.