Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 24, Number 1, January-March 2011
Page(s) 1 - 12
Section Thematic section
Published online 03 March 2011
  • Amande J.M., Ariz J., Chassot E., Delgado de Molina A., Gaertner D., Murua H., Pianet R., Ruiz J., Chavance P., 2010, Bycatch of the European purse seine tuna fishery in the Atlantic ocean for the 2003-2007 period. Aquat. Living Resour. 23, 353–364. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Astles K.L., 2008, A systematic approach to estimating ecological risks in marine fisheries. CABI Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 3, 16.
  • Astles K.L., Holloway M.G., Steffe A., Green M., Ganassin C., Gibbs P.J., 2006, An ecological method for qualitative risk assessment and its use in the management of fisheries in New South Wales, Australia. Fish. Res. 82, 290–303. [CrossRef]
  • Braccini J.M., Gillanders B.M., Walker T.I., 2006, Hierarchical approach to the assessment of fishing effects on non-target Chondrichthyans: case study of Squalus megalops in southeastern Australia. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 63, 2456-2466. [CrossRef]
  • Cheung W., Pitcher T., Pauly D., 2005, A fuzzy logic expert system to estimate intrinsic extinction vulnerability of marine fishes to fishing. Biol. Conserv. 124, 97–111. [CrossRef]
  • Cheung W.W.L., Watson R., Morato T., Pitcher T.J., Pauly D., 2007, Intrinsic vulnerability in the global fish catch. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 331, 1–12. [CrossRef]
  • Compagno L.J.V., 2001, Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Volume 2. Bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes. No. 1, Vol. 2. Rome, FAO.
  • Cortés E., Arocha F., Beerkircher L., Carvalho F., Domingo A., Heupel M., Holtzhausen H., Santos M.N., Ribera M., Simpfendorfer C., 2010, Ecological risk assessment of pelagic sharks caught in Atlantic pelagic longline fisheries. Aquat. Living Resour. 23, 25–34. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Diaz G.A., Beerkircher L.R., Restrepo V.R., 2009, Description of the U.S. Pelagic Observer Program (POP). Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 64, 2415–2426.
  • Dulvy N.K., Ellis J.R., Goodwin N.B., Grant A., Reynolds J.D., Jennings S., 2004, Methods of assessing extinction risk in marine fishes. Fish Fish. 5, 255–276.
  • Fletcher W.J., 2005, The application of qualitative risk assessment methodology to prioritize issues for fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 1576–1587. [CrossRef]
  • Fletcher W.J., Chesson J., Sainsbury K.J., Hundloe T.J., Fisher M., 2005, A flexible and practical framework for reporting on ecologically sustainable development for wild capture fisheries. Fish. Res. 71, 175–183. [CrossRef]
  • Fonteneau A., Pallarés, P. 2005, Tuna natural mortality as a function of their age: the bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) case. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 57, 127–141.
  • Francis R.I.C.C., Shotten R., 1997, “Risk” in fisheries management: a review. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 1699–1715.
  • Froese R., Pauly D. (Eds.), 2010, FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication.
  • Furness R.W., Tasker M.L., 2000, Seabird-fishery interactions: Quantifying the sensitivity of seabirds to reductions in sandeel abundance, and identification of key areas for sensitive seabirds in the North Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 202, 253–264. [CrossRef]
  • Goldsworthy S.D., Page B., 2007, A risk-assessment approach to evaluating the significance of seal bycatch in two Australian fisheries. Biol. Conserv. 139, 269–285. [CrossRef]
  • Griffiths S.P., C D.T.B., Heales D.S., Milton D.A., Stobutzki I.C., 2006, Validating ecological risk assessments for fisheries: assessing the impacts of turtle excluder devices on elasmobranch bycatch populations in an Australian trawl fishery. Mar. Freshw. Res. 57, 395–401. [CrossRef]
  • Hobday A.J., Smith A.D.M., Stobutzki I.C., Bulman C., Daley R., Dambacher J.M., Deng R.A., Dowdney J., Fuller M., Furlani D., Griffiths S.P., Johnson D., Kenyon R., Knuckey I.A., Ling S.D., Pitcher R., Sainsbury K.J., Sporcic M., Smith T., Turnbull C., Walker T.I., Wayte S.E., Webb H., Williams A., Wise B.S., Zhou S., 2011, Ecological Risk Assessment for the effects of fishing. Fish Res., in press.
  • Hollowed A.B., Bax N., Beamish R., Collie J., Fogarty M., Livingston P., Pope J.G., Rice J.C., 2000, Are multispecies models an improvement on single-species models for measuring fishing impacts on marine ecosystems? ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 707–719.
  • Hope B.K., 2006, An examination of ecological risk assessment and management practices. Environ. Int. 32, 983–995. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • ICCAT, 2008, Report of the 2007 meeting of the Sub-Committee on Ecosystems. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT 62, 1671–1720.
  • ICCAT, 2009, Report of the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. Madrid, October 2009.
  • ICCAT, 2010, ICCAT Manual. Chapter 2, Description of species. First edition, January 2010.
  • IUCN 2010, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
  • Jefferson T.A., Leatherwood S., Webber M.A., 1994, FAO species identification guide. Marine mammals of the world. Rome, FAO.
  • Kirby D.S., 2006, Ecological risk assessment for species caught in WCPO tuna fisheries: inherent risk as determined by productivity-susceptibility analysis WCPFC-SC2-2006/EB WP-1, 24 p.
  • Márquez M.R., 1990, FAO species catalogue. Vol.11: Sea turtles of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of sea turtle species known to date. FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 125, Vol. 11. Rome, FAO.
  • Morato T., Cheung W.W.L., Pitcher T.J., 2006, Vulnerability of seamount fish to fishing: fuzzy analysis of life-history attributes. J. Fish Biol. 67, 1–13.
  • Murawski S.A., 2000, Definitions of overfishing from an ecosystem perspective. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 649–658. [CrossRef]
  • Murua H., Arrizabalaga H., Huang J.J.H.-W., Romanov E., Bach P., Bruyn P. de, Chavance P., Molina A.D.d., Pianed R., Ariz J., Ruiz J., 2009, Ecological Risk Assessment (ERA) for species caught in fisheries managed by the Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (IOTC): a first attempt. IOTC-2009-WP-20.
  • Palomares M.L.D., Pauly D. (Eds.), 2010, SeaLifeBase. World Wide Web electronic publication.
  • Patrick W.S., Spencer P., Link J., Cope J., Field J., Kobayashi D., Lawson P., Gedamke T., Cortés E., Ormseth O., Bigelow K., Overholtz W., 2010, Using productivity and susceptibility indices to assess the vulnerability of United States fish stocks to overfishing. Fish. Bull. 108, 305–322.
  • Scandol J.P., Ives M.C., Lockett M., 2009, Development of national guidelines to improve the application of risk-based methods in the scope, implementation and interpretation of stock assessments for data-poor species (Final Draft). FRDC Project No. 2007/016, NSW Department of Primary Industries.
  • Smith A.D.M., Fulton E.J., Hobday A.J., Smith D.C., Shoulder P., 2007, Scientific tools to support the practical implementation of ecosystem-based fisheries management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 633–639. [CrossRef]
  • Stelzenmüller V., Ellisa J.R., Rogers S.I., 2010, Towards a spatially explicit risk assessment for marine management: Assessing the vulnerability of fish to aggregate extraction. Biol. Conserv. 143, 230–238. [CrossRef]
  • Stobutzki I.C., Miller M.J., Brewer D.T., 2001a, Sustainability of fishery bycatch: a process for assessing highly diverse and numerous bycatch. Environ. Conserv. 28, 167–181.
  • Stobutzki I.C., Miller M.J., Heales D.S., Brewer D.T., 2001b, Sustainability of Elasmobranchs caught as bycatch in a tropical prawn (shrimp) trawl fishery. Fish. Bull. 100, 800–821.
  • Zhou S., Griffiths S.P., 2008, Sustainability Assessment for Fishing Effects (SAFE): A new quantitative ecological risk assessment method and its application to Elasmobranch bycatch in an Australian trawl fishery. Fish. Res. 91, 56–68. [CrossRef]
  • Zhou S., Griffiths S.P., Miller M., 2009, Sustainability assessment for fishing effects (SAFE) on highly diverse and data-limited fish bycatch in a tropical prawn trawl fishery. Mar. Fresh. Res. 60, 563–570. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.