Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 23, Number 1, January-March 2010
Page(s) 103 - 107
Section Regular articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2010008
Published online 17 March 2010
  • Ball A.O., Chapman R.W., 2003, Population genetic analysis of white shrimp, Litopenaeus setiferus, using microsatellite genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. 12, 2319–2330. [Google Scholar]
  • Belkhir K., Borsa P., Chikhi L., Raufaste N., Bonhomme, F., 2001, GENETIX 4.02, logiciel sous Windows ™ pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, populations, interactions. CNRS UMR 5000, Univ. Montpellier II, Montpellier. [Google Scholar]
  • Benzie J.A.H., 2000, Population genetic structure in penaeid prawns. Aquac. Res. 31, 95–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brooker A.L., Benzie J.A.H., Blair D., Versini J.J., 2000, Population structure of the giant tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon, in Australian waters using microsatellite markers. Mar. Biol. 136, 149–157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Castric V., Bernatchez L., Belkhiri K., Bonhomme F., 2002, Heterozygote deficiencies in small lacustrine populations of brook charr Salvelinus fontinalis Mitchill (Pisces, Salmonidae): a test of alternative hypotesis. Heredity 89, 27–35. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Conides A., Glamuzina B., Jug-Dujakovic J., Papaconstantinou C., Kapiris K., 2006, Age, growth and mortality of the kamarote shrimp, Melicertus kerathurus (Forskal, 1775), in the east Ionian Sea (Western Greece). Crustaceana 79, 33–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO 2008, FAO Yearbook. Fishery and aquaculture statistics 2006, pp. 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia S., Le Reste L., 1981, Cycles vitaux, dynamique, exploitation et aménagement des stocks de crevettes pénaeides côtières. FAO Doc. Tech. Pêches 203, pp. 1–210. [Google Scholar]
  • Hamilton M.B., Pincus E.L., Di Fiore A., Fleischer R.C., 1999, Unversal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. Biotechniques 27, 500–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hare M.P., 2001, Prospects for nuclear gene phylogeography. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16,700–706. [Google Scholar]
  • Hedrick P.W., 1999, Perspective: highly variable loci and their interpretation in evolution and conservation. Evolution 53, 313–318. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holthius L.B., 1980, FAO species catalogue. Shrimp and prawns of the world. An annotated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fish Synopsis, 1, 125. [Google Scholar]
  • Kandpal R.P., Kandpal G., Weissman S.M., 1994, Construction of libraries enriched for sequence repeats and jumping clones, and hybridisation selection for region –specific markers. Proc. Nat. Acad. USA 91, 88–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kijas J.M., Fowler J.C., Garbett C.A., Thomas M.R., 1994, Enrichment of microsatellites from the Citrus genome using biotinylated oligonucleotide sequences bound to streptavidin – coated magnetic particles. Biotechniques 16, 656 –662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lumare F., 1976, Research on the reproduction and culture of shrimp Penaeus kerathurus in Italy. General Fisheries Council for the Mediterranean. Stud.Rev. 55, 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Lumare F., Palmegiano G.B., 1980, Acclimatazione di Penaeus japonicus nella laguna di Lesina (Italia Sud Orientale). Rivi. Ital. Pisc. Ittiopatol. 15, 53–58 (in Italian). [Google Scholar]
  • Mattoccia M., La Rosa G., De Mattheis E., Coboldi-Sbordoni M., Sbordoni V., 1987, Patterns of genetic variabilità in Mediterranean populations of Penaeus kerathurus (Crustacea Decapoda). In: K. Tiews (Ed.), Selection, Hybridization and Genetic Engineering in Aquaculture. Heenemann-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 131–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Oosterhout C.V., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P., Shiply P., 2004, Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 535–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pellerito R., Arculeo M., Bonhomme F., 2009, Recent expansion of Northeast Atlantic and Mediterranean populations of Melicertus (Penaeus) kerathurus (Crustacea: Decapoda). Fish. Sci. 75,1089–1095. [Google Scholar]
  • Raymond M., Rousset F., 2004, GENEPOP version 3.4: population genetics software for exact test and ecumuenicism, Available at: http://wbiomed.curtin.edu.au/genepop/html. [Google Scholar]
  • Tassanakajon A., Pongsomboon S., Jarayabhand P., Klibunga S., Boonsaeng V.V., 1998, Structure in wild populations of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J. Mar. Biotechnol. 6, 249–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valles-Jimenez R., Cruz P., Perez-Enriquez R., 2005, Population genetic structure of Pacific withe shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) from Mexico to Panama : Microsatellite DNA variation. Mar. Biotechnol. 6, 475–484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu Z., Primavera J.H., de la Pena L.D., Pettit P., Belak J., Alcivar-Warren A., 2001, Genetic diversity of wild and cultured black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) in the Philippines using microsatellites. Aquaculture 199, 13–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zane L, Bargelloni L., Patarnello T., 2002, Stategies for microsatellites isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 11, 1–16. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zitari-Chatti R., Chatti N., Elouaer A., Said K., 2008, Genetic variation and population structure of the camarote prawn Penaeus kerathurus (Forskal) from the eastern and western Mediterranean coasts in Tunisia. Aquac. Res. 39, 70–76. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zitari-Chatti R., Chatti N., Fulgione D., Chiazza I., Aprea G., Elouaer, A., Said K., Capriglione T., 2009, Mitochondrial DNA variation in the camarote prawn Penaeus (Melicertus) kerathurus across a transition zone in the Mediterranean Sea. Genetica 3, 439–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.