EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 4 (October-December 2009) Aquat. Living Resour., 22 4 (2009) 483-498 References
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 4, October-December 2009
Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries
Page(s) 483 - 498
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009033
Published online 20 October 2009
  • Annala J.H., Sullivan K.J., Hore A.J., 1991, Management of multispecies fisheries in New Zealand by individual transferable quotas. ICES Mar. Sci. Symp. 193, 321–329. [Google Scholar]
  • Annala J.H., Sullivan K.J., Smith N.W.M., Griffiths M.H., Todd P.R., Mace P.M., Connell A.M., 2004, Report from the Fishery Assessment Plenary, April 2004: stock assessments and yield estimates. Unpublished report, NIWA library, Wellington. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous 2007, Report from the fishery assessment plenary, May 2007: stock assessments and yield estimates. New Zealand Ministry of Fisheries science group, pp. 322–343. [Google Scholar]
  • Arnason R., 2007, Advances in property rights based fisheries management: an introduction. Mar. Resour. Econ. 22, 335–346. [Google Scholar]
  • Baird S.J., Bradford E., 2000, Factors that may have influenced the bycatch of New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri) in west coast South Island hoki fishery. NIWA Tech. Rep. 92. [Google Scholar]
  • Branch T.A., Rutherford K., Hilborn R., 2006, Replacing trip limits with individual transferable quotas: implications for discarding. Mar. Policy 30, 281–292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bremner G., Johnstone P., Bateson T., Clarke P., 2009, Unreported by-catch in the West Coast South Island hoki fishery. Mar. Policy 33, 504–512. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bull B., Francis R.I.C.C., Dunn A., McKenzie A., Gilbert D.J., Smith M.H., 2005, CASAL (C++ algorithmic stock assessment laboratory): CASAL user manual v2.07-2005/08/21. NIWA Tech. Rep. 127. [Google Scholar]
  • Caddy J.F., 1975, Spatial model for an exploited shellfish population, and its application to the Georges Bank scallop fishery. J. Fish Resour. Board Can. 32, 1305–1328. [Google Scholar]
  • Drouineau H., Mahévas S., Pelletier D., Beliaeff B., 2006, Assessing the impact of different management options using ISIS-Fish: the French Merluccius merluccius - Nephrops norvegicus mixed fishery of the Bay of Biscay. Aquat. Living Resour. 19, 15–29. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Dunn A., Ballara S.L., Phillips N.L., 2006, Stock assessment of hake (Merluccius australis) in HAK1 & 4 for the 2004-2005 fishing year. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2006/11. [Google Scholar]
  • Francis R.I.C.C., 2007, Assessment of hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) in 2007. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2008/4. [Google Scholar]
  • Hentrich S., Salomon M., 2006, Flexible management of fishing rights and a sustainable fisheries industry in Europe. Mar. Policy 30, 712–720. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilborn R., 1985, Fleet dynamics and individual variation: why some people catch more than others. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 42, 2–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilborn R., 2007, Managing fisheries is managing people: what has been learned. Fish Fish. 8, 285–296. [Google Scholar]
  • Holland D.S., 2000, A bio-economic model of marine sanctuaries on Gorges Bank. Canadian J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 1307–1319. [Google Scholar]
  • Horwood J.W., Whittle P., 1986, Optimal control in the neighbourhood of an optimal equilibrium with examples from fisheries models. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 3, 129–142. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Laurec A., Biseau A., Charuau, A., 1991, Modelling technical interactions. ICES Mar. Sci. Symp. 193, 225–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahévas S., Pelletier D., 2004, ISIS-Fish, a generic and spatially-explicit simulation tool for evaluating the impact of management measures on fisheries dynamics. Ecol. Model. 171, 65–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marchal P., 1997, Managing growth overfishing with multiannual compromise strategies. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 2255–2276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pelletier D., Mahévas S., 2005, Fisheries simulation models for evaluating the impact of management policies, with emphasis on marine protected areas. Fish Fish. 6, 307–349. [Google Scholar]
  • Punt A.E., Butterworth D.S., 1991, On an approach for comparing the implications of alternative fish stock assessments, with application to the stock of Cape hake Merluccius spp. off northern Namibia. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 10, 219–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Reeves S.A., Marchal P., Mardle S., Pascoe S., Prellezo R., Thébaud O., Travers M., 2008, From fish to fisheries : the changing focus of management advice. In: Payne A., Cotter J., Potter T. (Eds.) Advances in fisheries science 50 years on from Beverton and Holt, CEFAS, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 135–154. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchirico J.N., Holland D., Quigley K., Fina, M., 2006, Catch-quota balancing in multispecies individual fishing quotas. Mar. Policy 30, 767–785. [Google Scholar]
  • Ulrich C., Andersen B.S., Sparre P.J., Nielsen J.R., 2007, TEMAS: fleet-based bio-economic simulation software to evaluate management strategies accounting for fleet behaviour. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 647–651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Walters C., Pauly D., Christensen, V., 1999, Ecospace: prediction of mesoscale spatial patterns in trophic relationship of exploited ecosystems with emphasis on the impacts of marine protected areas. Ecosystems 2, 539–554. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.