Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 2, April-June 2009
Fish Stock Assessments Using Surveys and Indicators
Page(s) 225 - 232
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009023
Published online 17 June 2009
  • Anonymous, 2008, Report of the working party on tropical tunas. IOTC, Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles. [Google Scholar]
  • Bull B., Francis R.I.C.C., Dunn A., McKenzie A., Gilbert D.J., Smith M.H., 2005, CASAL User Manual v2.07-2005/07/06. Nat. Inst. Water Atmosph. Res. NZ, Tech. Rep. 126. [Google Scholar]
  • Butterworth D.S., Cochrane K.L., De Oliveira J.A.A., 1997, Management procedures: a better way to manage fisheries? The South African experience. In: Pikitch E.K., Huppert D.D., Sissenwine M.P. (Eds.).Global trends: fisheries management. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 20, pp. 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Butterworth D.S., Punt A.E., 1999, Experiences in the evaluation and interpretation of management procedures. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 985–998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell R.A., Dowling N.A., 2005, Evaluating harvest strategies for a rapidly expanding fishery: the Australian broadbill swordfish fishery. In: Kruse G.H, Gallucci V.F., Hay D.E., Perry R.I, Peterman R.M., Shirley T.C., Spencer P.D., Wilson B., Woodby D. (Eds.) Fisheries assessment and management in data-limited situations. University of Alaska, Fairbanks. Alaska Sea Grant College Program Report, 05–02, pp. 509–532. [Google Scholar]
  • COBECOS, 2008, Costs and benefits of fisheries control strategies. URL: https://cobecos.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ [Google Scholar]
  • Darby C.D., Flatman S., 1994, Lowestoft VPA Suite version 3.1, MAFF. [Google Scholar]
  • De Oliveira J.A.A., Butterworth D.S., 2004, Developing and refining a joint management procedure for the multispecies South African pelagic fishery. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 1432–1442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • EFIMAS, 2007, Operational evaluation tools for fisheries management options. URL: http://www.efimas.org/. [Google Scholar]
  • Hillary R.M., 2009, Assessment and tag program adaption methods for exploratory fisheries in the CCAMLR area: an example application for sub-area 58.4.3a. CCAMLR Sci. (in press) [Google Scholar]
  • Hoff A., Frost H., 2008, Modelling economic response to harvest and effort control in North Sea cod fishery. Aquat. Living. Resour. 21, 259–264. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kell L.T., Mosqueira I., Grosjean P., Fromentin J.M., Garcia D., Hillary R., Jardim E., Mardle S., Pastoors M.A., Poos J.J., Scott F., Scott R.D., 2007, FLR: an open-source framework for the evaluation and development of management strategies. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 640–646. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nash R.D.M., Dickey-Collas M., Kell, L.T., 2009, Stock and recruitment in North Sea herring (Clupea harengus); compensation and depensation in population dynamics. Fish. Res. 95, 88–97. [Google Scholar]
  • Needle C.L., 2008, Management strategy evaluation for North Sea haddock. Fish. Res. 94, 141-150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Patterson K.R., Melvin G.D., 1995, Integrated catch analysis version 1.2. - Scottish Fish. Res. Rep. N° 58. [Google Scholar]
  • Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M., 1999, Harvest strategy evaluation for the eastern stock of gemfish (Rexea solandri). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 860–875. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rademeyer R.A., Plagányi E.E., Butterworth D.S., 2007, Tips and tricks in designing management procedures. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 64, 618–625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricker W.E., 1958, Handbook of computation for biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Resour. Board Can. 119. [Google Scholar]
  • SC-CAMLR, 2008, Report of the working group on fish stock assessment. Report of the 26th Meeting of the Scientific Committee (SC-CAMLR-XXVI), Annex 5. CCAMLR, Hobart, Australia. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.