Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 2, April-June 2009
Fish Stock Assessments Using Surveys and Indicators
Page(s) 217 - 224
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009022
Published online 17 June 2009
  • Breen P.A., Kim S.W, Bentley N., Starr P.J., 2003, Preliminary evaluation of maintenance management procedures for New Zealand rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) fisheries. New Zealand Fisheries Assessment Report 2003/20, 65p.
  • Cadrin S.X., Pastoors M.A., 2008, Precautionary harvest policies and the uncertainty paradox. Fish. Res. 94, 367–372 [CrossRef]
  • Cooke J.G., 1999, Improvement of fishery-management advice through simulation testing of harvest algorithms. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 797–810. [CrossRef]
  • Constable A.J., de la Mare W.K., Agnew D.J., Everson I., Miller D., 2000, Managing fisheries to conserve the Antarctic marine ecosystem: practical implementation of the Convention on the conservation of Antarctic marine living resources (CCAMLR). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 778–791 [CrossRef]
  • Cotter J., Petitgas P., Abella A., Apostolaki P., Mesnil B., Politou C.Y., Rivoirard J., Rochet M.J., Spedicato M.T., Trenkel V.M., Woillez M., 2009, Towards an ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM) when trawl surveys provide the main source of information. Aquat. Living Resour. 22, 243–254. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Cox S.P., Kronlund A.R., 2008, Practical stakeholder-driven harvest policies for groundfish fisheries in British Columbia, Canada. Fish. Res. 94, 224–237. [CrossRef]
  • Deroba J.J., Bence J.R., 2008, A review of harvest policies: Understanding relative performance of control rules. Fish. Res. 94, 210–223 [CrossRef]
  • Dowling N.A., Smith D.C., Knuckey I., Smith A.D.M, Domaschenz P., Patterson H.M., Whitelaw W., 2008, Developing harvest strategies for low-value and data-poor fisheries: Case studies from three Australian fisheries. Fish. Res. 94, 380–390. [CrossRef]
  • FAO, 2001, Research implications of adopting the precautionary approach to management of tuna fisheries. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 963
  • Hillary R.M., Kirkwood G.P., Agnew D.J., 2006, An assessment of toothfish in subarea 48.3 using CASAL. CCAMLR Sci. 13, 65–95.
  • Hillary R.M., 2009, An introduction to FLR fisheries simulation tools. Aquat. Living Resour. 22, 225–232. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Haltuch M.A., Punt A.E, Dorn M.W., 2008, Evaluating alternative estimators of fishery management reference points. Fish. Res. 94, 290–303 [CrossRef]
  • ICES, 2007, Report of the ICES Advisory Committee on Fishery Management, Advisory Committee on the Marine Environment and Advisory Committee on Ecosystems. ICES advice 2007, Book 9.
  • Kell L.T., O'Brien C.M., Smith M.T., Stokes T. K., Rackham B.D., 1999, An evaluation of management procedures for implementing a precautionary approach in the ICES context for North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 834–845. [CrossRef]
  • Kell L.T., Pastoors M.A., Scott R.D., Smith M.T., Van Beek F.A., O'Brien C.M., Pilling G.M., 2005, Evaluation of multiple management objectives for Northeast Atlantic flatfish stocks: Sustainability vs. stability of yield ICES J. Mar. Sci. 62, 1104–1117.
  • Loehle C., 2006, Control theory and the management of ecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 957–966 [CrossRef]
  • Ludwig D., Hilborn R., 1983, Adaptive probing strategies for age-structured fish stocks. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 40, 559-569.
  • Needle C.L., 2008, Management strategy evaluation for North Sea haddock. Fish. Res. 94, 141–150. [CrossRef]
  • Nielsen J.R., Degnbol P., Viswanathan K.K., Ahmed M., Hara M., Abdullah N.M.R., 2004, Fisheries co-management-an institutional innovation? Lessons from South East Asia and Southern Africa. Mar. Policy 28, 151–160. [CrossRef]
  • Parma A.M., 2002, In search of robust harvest rules for Pacific halibut in the face of uncertain assessments and decadal changes in productivity. Bull. Mar. Sci. 70, 423–453.
  • Pilling G.M., Apostolaki P., Failler P., Floros C., Large P.A., Morales-Nin B., Reglero P., Stergiou K.I., Tsikliras A.C., 2008, Assessment and management of data poor fisheries. In: Payne A.I.L., Cotter A.J.R., Potter T. (Eds.) Advances in Fisheries Science: 50 years on from Beverton and Holt. Blackwell Publishing.
  • Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M., 1999, Harvest strategy evaluation for the eastern stock of gemfish (Rexea solandri). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 860–875. [CrossRef]
  • Punt A.E., 2003, Managing West Coast groundfish resources through simulations. Fish. Bull. 101, 860–873.
  • Punt A.E, Dorn M.W, Haltuch M.A., 2008, Evaluation of threshold management strategies for groundfish off the U.S. West Coast. Fish. Res. 94, 251–266.
  • Quinn T.J. II, Deriso R.B., 1999, Quantitative Fish Dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Restrepo V.R, Thompson G.G., Mace P.M., Gabriel W.L., Low L.L., MacCall A.D., Methot R.D., Powers J.E., Taylor B.L., Wade P.R., Witzig J.F., 1998, Technical guidance on the use of precautionary approaches to implementing national standard 1 of the Magnuson-Stevens fishery conservation and management act. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-31.
  • Rottingen I., 2003, The agreed recovery plan in the management of Norwegian spring-spawning herring. ICES CM 2003/U:01
  • Ruppert D., Reish R.L., Deriso R.B., Carroll R.J., 1984, Optimization using stochastic approximation and Monte Carlo simulation (with application to harvesting of Atlantic menhaden). Biometrics 40, 535–545. [CrossRef]
  • Sainsbury K.J., Punt A.E., Smith A.D.M., 2000, Design of operational management strategies for achieving fishery ecosystem objectives. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 731–741. [CrossRef]
  • Walters C., 1986, Adaptive management of renewable resources. MacMillan Publishing Co., New York.
  • WG-FSA, 2001, Report of the working group on fish stock assessment. Hobart, Australia. Commission for the conservation of Antarctic living marine resources.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.