EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 22 / No 1 (January-March 2009) Aquat. Living Resour., 22 1 (2009) 69-77 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 1, January-March 2009
Page(s) 69 - 77
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2009013
Published online 08 April 2009
  • Aglen A., Engas A., Huse I., Michalsen K., Stensholt B.K., 1999, How vertical fish distribution may affect survey results. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 345–360. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Axenrot T., Didrikas T., Danielsson C., Hansson S., 2004, Diel patterns in pelagic fish behaviour and distribution observed from a stationary, bottom-mounted, and upward-facing transducer. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 1100–1104. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Balk H., Lindem T., 2005, Sonar4 and Sonar5-Pro post processing systems (operating manual). Lindem Data Acquisition, Oslo. [Google Scholar]
  • Bohl E., 1980, Diel pattern of pelagic distribution and feeding in planktivorous fish. Oecologia 44, 368–375. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Borcherding J., Bauerfeld M., Hintzen D., Neumann S., 2002, Lateral migrations of fishes between floodplain lakes and their drainage channels at the Lower Rhine: diel and seasonal aspects. J. Fish Biol. 61, 1154–1170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Čech M., Kratochvíl M., Kubečka J., Draštík V., Matìna J., 2005, Diel vertical migrations of bathypelagic perch fry. J. Fish Biol. 66, 685–702. [Google Scholar]
  • CEN (The European Committee for Standardization or Comité Européen de Normalisation) CEN/TC 230/WG 2/TG 4 N 60, Water Quality – Guidance on the estimation of fish abundance with mobile hydroacoustic methods. A revised working draft for consideration by TG 4 Fish Monitoring (http://www.cen.eu). [Google Scholar]
  • Comeau S., Boisclair D., 1998, Day-to-day variation in fish horizontal migration and its potential consequence on estimates of trophic interactions in lakes. Fish. Res. 35, 75–81. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dörner H., Hülsmann S., Hölker F., Skov C., Wagner A. 2007, Size-dependent predator-prey relationships between pikeperch and their prey fish. Ecol. Freshw. Fish. 16, 307–314. [Google Scholar]
  • Draštík V., Kubečka J., Tušer M., Čech M., Frouzová J., Jarolím O., Prchalová M., 2008, The effect of hydropower on fish stocks: comparison between cascade and non-cascade reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 609, 25–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foote K.G., Knudsen H.P., Vestnes G., MacLennan D.N., Simmonds E.J., 1987, Calibration of acoustic instruments for fish density estimation. ICES Coop. Rep. 144, 1–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P., Gerlotto F., Soria M., 1996, Diel variability of school structure with special reference to transient periods. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 459–464. [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P., Soria M., Mullon C., Gerlotto F., 1993, Diurnal variation in fish density estimate during acoustic survey in relation to spatial distribution and avoidance reaction. Aquat. Living Resour. 6, 221–234. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Frouzová J., Kubečka J., Balk H., Frouz J., 2005, Target strength of some European fish species and its dependence on fish body parameters. Fish. Res. 75, 86–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gaudreau N., Boisclair D., 2000, Influence of moon phase on acoustic estimates of the abundance of fish performing daily horizontal migration in a small oligotrophic lake. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 581–590. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gauthier S., Boisclair D., 1997, The energetic implications of diel onshore-offshore migration by dace (Phoxinus eos × P. neogaeus) in a small oligotrophic lake. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 1996–2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerlotto F., Castillo J., Saavedra A., Barbieri M. A., Espejo M., Cotel P., 2004, Three-dimensional structure and avoidance behaviour of anchovy and common sardine schools in central southern Chile. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 1120–1126. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliwicz M.Z., Jachner A., 1992, Diel migrations of juvenile fish: a ghost of predation past or present? Arch. Hydrobiol. 124, 385–410. [Google Scholar]
  • Gliwicz M.Z., Slon J., Szynkarczyk I., 2006, Trading safety for food: evidence from gut contents in roach and bleak captured at different distances offshore from their daytime littoral refuge. Freshw. Biol. 51, 823–839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Godlewska M., Długoszewski B., Doroszczyk L., Jóźwik A., 2009, The relationship between sampling intensity and sampling error - empirical results from acoustic surveys in Polish vendace lakes. Fish. Res. 96, 17–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillard J., Brehmer P., Colon M., Guennégan Y., 2006, Three dimensional characteristics of young–of–year pelagic fish schools in lake. Aquat. Living Resour. 19, 115–122. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Guillard J., Lebourges-Dhaussy A., Brehmer P., 2004, Simultaneous Sv and TS measurements on Young-of-the-Year (YOY) freshwater fish using three frequencies. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 267–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hanel, L. 1988, Another contribution to the knowledge of fish of Slapy Reservoir. Sborník vlastivědných prací z Podblanicka 24, 41–62 (in Czech). [Google Scholar]
  • Hölker F., Dörner H., Schulze T., Haertel-Borer S.S., Peacor S.D., Mehner T. 2007, Fresh. Biol. 52, 1793–1806. [Google Scholar]
  • Hölker F., Haertel-Borer S.S., Steiner S., Mehner T., 2002, Effects of piscivore-mediated habitat use on growth, diet and zooplankton consumption of roach: an individual-based modelling approach. Freshw. Biol. 47, 2345–2358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Horký P., Slavík O., Bartoš L., 2008, A telemetry study on the diurnal distribution and activity of adult pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), in a riverine environment. Hydrobiologia 614, 151–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Horký P., Slavík O., Bartoš L., Kolářová J., Randák T., 2006, The effect of the moon phase on the behaviour of pikeperch in the Elbe River. Folia Zool. 55, 411–417. [Google Scholar]
  • Horppila J., Malinen T., Peltonen H., 1996, Density and habitat shifts of a roach (Rutilus rutilus) stock assessed within one season by cohort analysis, depletion methods and echosounding. Fish. Res. 28, 151–161. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacobsen L., Berg S., Jepsen N., Skov C., 2004, Does roach behaviour differ between shallow lakes of different environmental state? J. Fish Biol. 65, 135–147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Järvalt A., Krause T., Palm A., 2005, Diel migration and spatial distribution of fish in a small stratified lake. Hydrobiologia 547, 197–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeppesen E., Pekcan-Hekim Z., Lauridsen T.L., Sondergaard M., Jensen J.P., 2006, Habitat distribution of fish in late summer: changes along a nutrient gradient in Danish lakes. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 15, 180–190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jůza T., Kubečka J., 2007, The efficiency of three fry trawls for sampling the freshwater pelagic fry community. Fish. Res. 85, 285–290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kubečka J., 1993, Night inshore migration and capture of adult fish by shore seining. Aquac. Fish. Manage. 24, 685–689. [Google Scholar]
  • Kubečka J., Duncan A., Duncan W.M., Sinclair D., Butterworth A.J., 1994, Brown trout populations of 3 Scottish lochs estimated by horizontal sonar and multimesh gill nets. Fish. Res. 20, 29–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kubečka J., Frouzová J., Čech M., Peterka J., Ketelaars H.A.M., Wagenwoort A.J., Papáěek M., 2000, Hydroacoustis assessment of pelagic stages of freshwater insects. Aquat. Living Resour. 13, 361–366. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kubečka J., Hohausová E., Matìna J., Peterka J., Amarasinghe U.S., Bonar S.A., Hateley J., Hickley P., Suuronen P., Tereschenko V., Welcomme R., Winfield I.J., 2009, The true picture of a lake or reservoir fish stock: A review of needs and progress. Fish. Res. 96, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Kubečka J., Wittingerová M., 1998, Horizontal beaming as crucial component of acoustic fish stock assessment in freshwater reservoirs. Fish. Res. 35, 99–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lewin W.-C., Okun N., Mehner T., 2004, Determinants of the distribution of juvenile fish in the littoral area of a shallow lake. Freshw. Biol. 49, 410–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Love R.H., 1971, Dorsal aspect of an individual fish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 816–823. [Google Scholar]
  • Matthews W.J., Gido K.B., Gelwick F.P., 2004, Fish assemblages of reservoirs, illustrated by Lake Texoma (Oklahoma – Texas, USA) as a representative system. Lake Reserv. Manage. 20, 219–239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McClatchie S., Thorne R.E., Grimes P., Hanchet S., 2000, Ground truth and target identification for fisheries acoustic. Fish. Res. 47, 173–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehner T., Schulz M., 2002, Monthly variability of hydroacoustic fish stock estimates in a deep lake and its correlation to gillnet catches. J. Fish Biol. 61, 1109–1121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mueller G., Horn M., 2004, Distribution and abundance of pelagic fish in Lake Powell, Utah, and Lake Mead, Arizona-Nevada. West. N. Am. Naturalist 64, 306–311. [Google Scholar]
  • Parker-Stetter, S.L., Rudstam, L.G., Sullivan, P.J., and Warner, D.M., 2009, Standard operating procedures for fisheries acoustics in the Great Lakes. Great Lakes Fisheries Commission Special Publication, 09–01. [Google Scholar]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Vašek M., Peterka J., Sed'a J., Jůza T., Říha M., Jarolím O., Tušer M., Kratochvíl M., Čech M., Draštík V., Frouzová J., Hohausová E., 2008, Distribution patterns of fishes in a canyon-shaped reservoir. J. Fish Biol. 73, 54–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Říha M., Kubečka J., Mrkvička T., Prchalová M., Čech M., Draštík V., Frouzová J., Hladík M., Hohausová E., Jarolím O., Jůza T., Kratochvíl M., Peterka J., Tušer M., Vašek M., 2008, Dependence of beach seine net efficiency on net length and diel period. Aquat. Living Resour. 21, 411–418. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Rudstam L.G., Sullivan P.J., Parker-Stetter S.L., Warner D.M., 2009, Towards a standard operating procedure for fisheries acoustic surveys in the Laurentian Great Lakes, North America. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 66, in press. [Google Scholar]
  • Schulz U., Berg R., 1987, The migration of ultrasonic-tagged bream, Abramis brama (L), in Lake Constance (Bodensee-Untersee). J. Fish Biol. 31, 409–414. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schulze T., Dörner H., Hölker F., Mehner T., 2006, Determinants of habitat use in large roach. J. Fish Biol. 69, 1136–1150. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simmonds E.J., MacLennan D.N., 2005, Fisheries Acoustics. Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edition, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • StatSoft Inc., 2006, STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 7.1. http://www.statsoft.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Vašek M., Kubečka J., Peterka J., Čech M., Draštík V., Hladík M., Prchalová M., Frouzová J., 2004, Longitudinal and vertical spatial gradients in the distribution of fish within a canyon-shaped reservoir. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 89, 352–362. [Google Scholar]
  • Vašek M., Kubečka J., Sed'a J., 2003, Cyprinid predation on zooplankton along the longitudinal profile of a canyon-shaped reservoir. Arch. Hydrobiol. 156, 535–550. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wanzenböck J., Mehner T., Schulz M., Gassner H., Winfield I.J., 2003, Quality assurance of hydroacoustic surveys: the repeatability of fish-abundance and biomass estimates in lakes within and between hydroacoustic systems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 486–492. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wojtal A., Frankiewicz P., Izydorczyk K., Zalewski M., 2003, Horizontal migration of zooplankton in a littoral zone of the lowland Sulejow Reservoir (Central Poland). Hydrobiologia 506-509, 339–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolter C., Freyhof J., 2004, Diel distribution patterns of fishes in a temperate large lowland river. J. Fish Biol. 64, 632–642. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yarnold J.K., 1970, The minimum expectation in χ2 goodness of fit test and the accuracy of approximations for the null distribution. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65, 864–886. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yule D.L., Adams J.V., Stockwell J.D., Gormen O.T., 2008, Factors affecting bottom trawl catches: Implication for monitoring the fishes of Lake Superior. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 28, 109–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yule D.L., Stockwell J.D., Schreiner D.R., Evrard L.M., Balge M., Hrabik T.R., 2009, Can pelagic forage fish and spawning cisco (Coregonus artedi) biomass in the western arm of Lake Superior be assessed with a single summer survey? Fish. Res. 96, 39–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Zamora L., Moreno-Amich R., 2002, Quantifying the activity and movement of perch in a temperate lake by integrating acoustic telemetry and a geographic information system. Hydrobiologia 483, 209–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.