Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 21, Number 4, October-December 2008
Page(s) 411 - 418
Section Regular articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2008061
Published online 03 December 2008
  • Allen D.M., Service S.K., Ogburnmatthews M.V., 1992, Factors influencing the collection efficiency of estuarine fishes. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 121, 234–244. [CrossRef]
  • Anderson C.S., 1998, Partitioning total size selectivity of gill nets for walleye (Stizostedion vitreum) into encounter, contact, and retention components. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 55, 1854–1864. [CrossRef]
  • Bayley P.B., Herendeen R.A., 2000, The efficiency of a seine net. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 129, 901–923. [CrossRef]
  • Charles-Dominique E., 1989, Catch efficiencies of purse and beach seines in Ivory Coast lagoons. Fish. Bull. 87, 911–921.
  • DeLacy A.C., English T.S., 1954, Variations in beach seine samples caused by net length and repeated hauls. Ecology 35, 18–20. [CrossRef]
  • Fischer P., Eckmann R., 1997, Spatial distribution of littoral fish species in a large European lake, Lake Constance, Germany. Arch. Hydrobiol. 140, 91–116.
  • Forthofer R.N., Lee E.S., Hernandez M., 2007, Biostatistics: A guide to design, analysis, and discovery. 2nd edition, Burlington, Elsevier.
  • Gray C.A., Larsen R.B., Kennelly S.J., 2000, Use of transparent netting to improve size selectivity and reduce bycatch in fish seine nets. Fish. Res. 45, 155–166. [CrossRef]
  • Hayes D.B, Ferreri C.P., Taylor W.W., 1996, Active fish capture methods. In: Murphy B.R, Willis D.W. (Eds.) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edition, Bethesda, American Fisheries Society, pp. 193–220.
  • Holland-Bartels L.E., Dewey M.R., 1997, The influence of seine capture efficiency on fish abundance estimates in the upper Mississippi River. J. Freshw. Ecol. 12, 101–111. [CrossRef]
  • Jepsen N., Koed A., Okland F., 1999, The movements of pikeperch in a shallow reservoir. J. Fish Biol. 54, 1083–1093. [CrossRef]
  • Kubečka J., Bohm M., 1991, The fish fauna of the Jordan reservoir, one of the oldest man-made lakes in central Europe. J. Fish Biol. 38, 935–950. [CrossRef]
  • Kubečka J., 1993, Night inshore migration and capture of adult fish by shore seining. Aquac. Fish. Manage. 24, 685–689.
  • Kubečka J., Čech M., Říha M., JFormula za T., Frouzová J., Draštík V., Hladík M., Kratochvíl M., Prchalová M., Tušer M., Vašek M., 2006, Fish stock of the Orlík reservoir after first years of operation of Temelín nuclear power plant (in Czech). In: Hanslík E., Miller B. (Eds.), Radionuklidy a ionizující záření ve vedním hospodářství, sborník XIX. conference. Česká vědeckotechnická vodohospodářská spoleènost, Praha, pp. 85–96.
  • Lewin W.C., Okun N., Mehner T., 2004, Determinants of the distribution of juvenile fish in the littoral area of a shallow lake. Freshw. Biol. 49, 410–424. [CrossRef]
  • Lyons J., 1986, Capture efficiency of a beach seine net for seven freshwater fishes in a north-temperate lake. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 6, 288–289. [CrossRef]
  • Manly B.F.J., 1997, Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology. London, Chapman & Hall.
  • Mrkvička T., Petrášková V., 2006, Introduction to statistic (in Czech). České Budějovice, University of South Bohemia.
  • Olin M., Rask M., Ruuhijarvi J., Kurkilahti M., Ala-Opas P., Ylonen O., 2002, Fish community structure in mesotrophic and eutrophic lakes of southern Finland: the relative abundances of percids and cyprinids along a trophic gradient. J. Fish Biol. 60, 593–612. [CrossRef]
  • Parsley M.J., Palmer D.E., Burkhardt R.W., 1989, Variation in capture efficiency of a beach seine for small fishes. N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 9, 239–244. [CrossRef]
  • Pierce C.L., Rasmussen J.B., Leggett W.C., 1990, Sampling littoral fish with a seine - corrections for variable capture efficiency. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 1004–1010. [CrossRef]
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Říha M., Mrkvička T., Vašek M., JFormula za T., Kratochvíl M., Peterka J., Draštík V., Křížek J., 2008a, Size selectivity of standardized multimesh gillnets in sampling coarse European species. Fish. Res., 95.
  • Prchalová M., Kubečka J., Vašek M., Peterka J., Seïa J., JFormula za T., Říha M., Jarolím O., Tušer M., Kratochvíl M., Čech M., Draštík V., Frouzová J., Hohausová E., 2008b, Patterns of fish distribution in a canyon-shaped reservoir. J. Fish Biol. 73, 54–78. [CrossRef]
  • Poos M.S., Mandrak N.E., McLaughlin. R.L., 2007, The effectiveness of two common sampling methods for assessing imperiled freshwater fishes. J. Fish Biol. 70, 691–708. [CrossRef]
  • Rudstam L.G., Magnuson J., Tonn W.M., 1984, Size selectivity of passive fishing gear: a correction for encounter probability applied to gill nets. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 1252–1255. [CrossRef]
  • Schulz U., Berg R., 1987, The migration of ultrasonic-tagged bream, Abramis brama (L), in Lake Constance (Bodensee-Untersee). J. Fish Biol. 31, 409–414. [CrossRef]
  • Steele M.A, Schroeter S.C., Page H.M., 2006, Experimental evaluation of biases associated with sampling estuarine fishes with seines. Estuar. Coasts 29, 1172–1184.
  • Vašek M., Kubečka J., Seïa J., 2003, Cyprinid predation on zooplankton along the longitudinal profile of a canyon-shaped reservoir. Arch. Hydrobiol. 156, 535–550. [CrossRef]
  • Wardle C.S., 1993, Fish behaviour and fishing gear. In: Pitcher T.J. (Ed.) Behaviour of teleost fishes, 2nd edition, London, Chapman & Hall, pp. 463–495.
  • Winfield I.J., 2004, Fish in the littoral zone: ecology, threats and management. Limnologica 34, 124–131.
  • Zamora L., Moreno-Amich R., 2002, Quantifying the activity and movement of perch in a temperate lake by integrating acoustic telemetry and a geographic information system. Hydrobiologia 483, 209–218. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.