Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 20, Number 2, April-June 2007
Page(s) 175 - 183
Published online 25 July 2007
  • Billard R., Cosson J., Perchec G., Linhart O., 1995, Biology of sperm and artificial reproduction in carp. Aquaculture 129, 95-112. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dabrowski K., 1984, Influence of initial weight during the change from live to compound feed on the survival and growth of four cyprinids. Aquaculture 40, 27-40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fiala J., Spurný P., 2001, Intensive rearing of the common barbel (Barbus barbus L.) larvae using dry starter feeds and natural diet under controlled conditions. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 7, 320-326. [Google Scholar]
  • Hessen D.O., Taugbøl T., Fjeld E., Skurdal J., 1987, Egg development and lifecycle timing in the noble crayfish (Astacus astacus). Aquaculture 64, 77-82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hofer R., 1985, Effects of artificial diets on the digestive processes of fish larvae. In: Cowey C.B., Mackie A.M., Bell J.G. (Eds.) Nutrition and feeding in fish. Academic Press, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoff F.H., Snell T.W., 1987, Plankton Culture Manual. Florida Aqua Frams, Inc., Dade City. [Google Scholar]
  • Jurajda P., 1995, Effect of channelization and regulation on fish recruitment in a flood-plain river. Regul. Rivers Res. Manage. 10, 207-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kamler E., 1992, Early life history of fish. An energetics approach. Chapman and Hall, Fish and Fisheries Series 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamler E., Urban-Jezierska E., Stanny L.A., Lewkowicz M., Lewkowicz S., 1987, Survival, development, growth, metabolism and feeding of carp larvae receiving zooplankton or starters. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 34, 503-541. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamler E., Szlamiòska M., Przybyl A., Barska B., Jakubas M., Kuczyòski M., Raciborski K., 1990, Developmental response of carp larvae fed different foods or starved. Environ. Biol. Fish. 29, 303-313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kolkovski S., 2001, Digestive enzymes in fish larvae and juveniles – implications and applications to formulated diets. Aquaculture 200, 181-201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keckeis H., Schiemer F., 1992, Food-consumption and growth of larvae and juveniles of 3 cyprinid species at different food levels. Environ. Biol. Fish. 33, 33-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Killgore K.J., Maynord S.T., Chan M.D., Morgan R.P., 2001, Evaluation of propeller-induced mortality on early life stages of selected fish species. North Am. J. Fish. Manage. 21, 947-955. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krupka I., 1988, Early development of the barbel Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758). Prace Ústavu rybárstva hydrobiol. Bratislava 6, 115-138. [Google Scholar]
  • Labatzki P., Fuhrmann B., 1992, Satzfischaufzucht der FluFormula barbe (Barbus barbus L.). Fortschr. Fischereiwiss. 10, 69-73. [Google Scholar]
  • Linhart O., Rodina M., Gela D., Kocour M., Vandeputte M., 2005, Spermatozoal competition in common carp (Cyprinus carpio): What is the primary determinant of competition success. Reproduction 130, 705-711. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lusk S., 1996, Development and Status of Populations of Barbus barbus in the Waters of the Czech Republic. Folia Zool. 45, (Suppl. 1), 39-46. [Google Scholar]
  • Lusk S., Lusková V., Halaèka K., Šlechta V., Šlechtová V., 1998, Trends and production of a fish communities of the barbel zone. Folia Zool. 47 (Suppl. 1), 67-72. [Google Scholar]
  • Lusk S., Hanel L., Lusková V., 2004, Red List of the ichthyofauna of the Czech Republic: Development and present status. Folia Zool. 53, 215-226. [Google Scholar]
  • Penczak T., Kruk A., 2000, Threatened obligatory riverine fishes in human-modified Polish rivers. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 9, 109-117. [Google Scholar]
  • Penczak T., Sierakowska K., 2003, Anglers' records as a tool for assessing changes in fish populations. J. Appl. Aquac. 19, 250-254. [Google Scholar]
  • Peňáz M., 1973, Embryonic development of the barb, Barbus barbus (Linnaeus, 1758). Zoologické listy 22, 363-374. [Google Scholar]
  • Peňáz M., Baruš V., Prokeš M., 1999, Changes in the structure of fish assemblages in a river used for energy production. Regul. Rivers: Res. Manage. 15, 169-180. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Philippart J.C., 1982, Mise au point de l'alevinage contrôlé du barbeau Barbus barbus (L.) en Belgique. Perspectives pour le rempoissinnement des rivières. Cah. Ethol. Appl. 2, 173-202. [Google Scholar]
  • Philippart J.C., Mélard Ch., 1983, A first operation of restoring Belgian rivers with hatchery reared fry and fingerlings of the barbel, Barbus barbus, and the chub, Leuciscus leuciscus. Cah. Ethol. Appl. 3, 223-230. [Google Scholar]
  • Philippart J.C., Mélard Ch., Poncin P., 1989, Intensive culture of the common barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) for restocking. In: De Pauw N., Jaspers E., Ackefors H., Wilkins N. (Eds.) Aquaculture - a biotechnology in progress, Proc. Internat. Conf. Aquaculture Europe'87, 2-5 June 1987, Bredene, Belgium, Eur. Aquac. Soc., pp. 483-491. [Google Scholar]
  • Policar T., Simon V., Kozák P., 2004, Egg incubation in the Noble crayfish (Astacus astacus L.): the effect of controlled laboratory and outdoor ambient condition on hatching success, growth and survival rate of juveniles. Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 372-373, 411-423. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Poncin P., Mélard Ch., Philippart J., 1987, Use of temperature and photoperiod in the control of the reproduction of 3 European cyprinids: Barbus barbus (L.) Leuciscus cephalus (L.) and Tinca tinca (L.), reared in captivity. Preliminary results, Bull. Fr. Pêche Piscic. 304, 1-12. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Poncin P., 1989, Effects of different photoperiods on the reproduction of the barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) reared at constant temperature. J. Fish Biol. 35, 395-400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pyka J., Bartel R., Szczerbowski J.A., Epler P., 2001, Reproduction of Gattan (Barbus xanthopterus Heckel), Shabbout (Barbus grypus Heckel) and Bunni (Barbus sharpeyi Gunther) and rearing stocking material of these species. Arch. Pol. Fish. 9, (Suppl.1), 235-246. [Google Scholar]
  • Rust M.B., 2002, Nutritional Physiology. In: Halver J.E., Hardy R.W. (Eds.) Fish Nutrition, Academic Press, pp. 367-452. [Google Scholar]
  • Sorgeloos P., Dhert P., Candreva P., 2001, Use of the brine shrimp, Artemia spp., in marine fish larviculture. Aquaculture 200, 147-159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor A.A., Britton J.R., Cowx I.G., 2004, Does the stock density of stillwater catch and release fisheries affect the growth performance of introduced cultured barbel ? J. Fish Biol. 65 (Suppl. A), 308-313. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilizzi L., 2002, Modelling preference curves for the study of fish habitat use. Arch. Hydrobiol. 155, 615-626. [Google Scholar]
  • Vilizzi L., Copp G.H., 2001, Behavioural responses of juvenile barbel in an artificial channel: distribution and velocity use. Anim. Behav. 61, 645-654. [Google Scholar]
  • Wheeler A., Jordan D.R., 1990, The status of the barbel, Barbus barbus (L.) (Teleostei, Cyprinidae), in the United Kingdom. J. Fish Biol. 37, 393-399. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolnicki J., Górny W., 1995a, Survival and growth of larval and juvenile barbel (Barbus barbus L.) reared under controlled conditions. Aquaculture 129, 258-259. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolnicki J., Górny W., 1995b, Suitability of two commercial dry diets for intensive rearing of larval tench (Tinca tinca L.) under controlled conditions. Aquaculture 129, 256-258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolnicki J., Górny W., 1995c, Controlled rearing of ide (Leuciscus leuciscus L) larvae using live food and dry feed. Aquaculture 129, 255-256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wolnicki J., 1996, Intensive rearing of larval and juvenile vimba, Vimba vimba (L.), fed natural and formulated diets. Pol. Arch. Hydrobiol. 43, 447-454. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.