Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 18, Number 1, January-March 2005
Page(s) 45 - 54
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2005004
Published online 15 March 2005
  • Bailey N.T.J., 1976, Statistical methods in Biology. Hodder and Stoughton, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Basuyaux O., Blin J.L., 1998, Use of maize as a food source for sea urchins in recirculating rearing systems. Aquac. Int. 6, 233-247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bell M.V., Dick J.R., Kelly M.S., 2001, Biosynthesis of Eicosapentaenoic Acid in the Sea Urchin Psammechinus miliaris. Lipids 36, 79-82. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boudouresque C.F., Verlaque M., 2001, Ecology of Paracentrotus lividus. In: Lawrence J.M. (Ed.), Edible sea urchins: biology and ecology, pp. 177-216. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Bougis P., Corre M.C., Etienne M., 1979, Sea-urchin larvae as a tool for assessment of the quality of sea water. Ann. Inst. Oceanogr. Paris 55, 21-26. [Google Scholar]
  • Cowden C., Young C.M., Chia F.S., 1984, Differential predation on marine invertebrate larvae by two benthic predators. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 14, 145-149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Crampton E.W., Harris L.E., 1969, Applied animal nutrition. 2nd edition. W.H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco. [Google Scholar]
  • Crapp G., Willis M., 1975, Age determination in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) with notes on the reproductive cycle. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 20, 157-178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fenaux L., Cellario C., Etienne M., 1985, Croissance de la larve de l'oursin Paracentrotus lividus. Mar. Biol. 86, 151-157. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez C., Dombrowski E., Caltagirone A., 1996, Gonadal growth of adult sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in rearing: the effect of different diet type. In: Emson R., Smith A.B., Campbell A. (Eds.), Echinoderm Research 1995, pp. 269-275. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Fournier R., 2001, Development of a long-term rearing and conditioning system for the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis): optimization of biological loading. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Aquaculture Association of Canada. Bull. Aquac. Assoc. Can. 4, 64-67. [Google Scholar]
  • Fransz H.G., Miquel J.C., Gonzalez S.R., 1984, Mesozooplankton composition, biomass and vertical distribution, and copepod production in the stratified Central North Sea. Neth. J. Sea Res. 18, 82-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frantzsis A., Grémare A., 1992, Ingestion, absorption, and growth rates of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) fed different macrophytes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 95, 169-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gago J., Range P., Luis O.J., 2003, Growth, reproductive biology and habitat selection of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the coastal waters of Cascais, Portugal. In: Féral J.P., David B. (Eds.), Echinoderm Research 2001, pp. 269-276. A.A. Balkema, Lisse. [Google Scholar]
  • Grosjean P., Spirlet C., Gosselin P., Vaitilingon D., Jangoux M., 1998, Land-based, closed-cycle echiniculture of Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) (Echinoidea: Echinodermata): a long-term experiment at a pilot scale. J. Shellfish Res. 17, 1523-1531. [Google Scholar]
  • Guettaf M., San Martin G.A., 1995, Étude de la variabilité de l'indice gonadique de l'oursin comestible Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinidae) en Méditerranée Nord-Occidentale. Vie Milieu 45, 129-137. [Google Scholar]
  • Hagen N.T., 2003a, KCl induced paralysis facilitates detachment of hatchery reared juvenile green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Aquaculture 216, 155-164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hagen N.T., 2003b, Evaluation of electric stimulation as a method for inducing green sea urchins to spawn. In: Féral J.P., David B. (Eds.), Echinoderm Research 2001, pp. 237-242. A.A. Balkema, Lisse. [Google Scholar]
  • His E., Heyvang I., Geffard O., Montaudouin X., 1999, A comparison between oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) larval bioassays for toxicological studies. Water Res. 33, 1706-1718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubbard R.L., Wolcott R., Baca B., 2003, Cultivation techniques for the urchin Lytechinus variegatus and potential use of its early developmental stages as larval food. World Aquaculture 34, 45-48. [Google Scholar]
  • Jimmy R.A., Kelly M.S., Beaumont A.R., 2003, The effect of diet type and quantity on the development of common sea urchin larvae Echinus esculentus. Aquaculture 220, 261-275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly M.S., Hunter A.J., Scholfield C.L., McKenzie J.D., 2000, Morphology and survivorship of larval Psammechinus miliaris (Gmelin) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in response to varying food quantity and quality. Aquaculture 183, 223-240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kennedy E.J., Robinson S.M.C., Parsons G.J., Castell J.D., 1999, Somatic growth trials for juvenile green sea urchins fed prepared and natural diets. Bull. Aquac. Assoc. Can. 99, 52-54. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence J.M., Régis M.B., Delmas P., Gras G., Klinger T., 1989, The effect of quality of food on feeding and digestion in Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Mar. Behav. Physiol. 15, 137-144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence J.M., Fenaux L., Corre M.C., Lawrence A., 1992, The effect of quantity and quality of prepared diets on production in Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). In: Scalera-Liaci L., Canicatti C. (Eds.), Echinoderm Research 1991, pp. 107-110. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence J.M., Olave S., Otaiza R., Lawrence A.L., Bustos, E., 1997, Enhancement of gonad production in the sea urchin Loxechinus albus in Chile fed prepared feeds. World. Aquac. Soc. 28, 91-96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence J.M., Lawrence A.L., McBride S.C., George S.B., Watts S.A., Plank L.R., 2001, Developments in the use of prepared feeds in sea-urchin aquaculture. J. World Aquac. 32, 34-39. [Google Scholar]
  • Lindley J.A., Gamble J.C., Hunt H.G., 1995, A change in the zooplankton of the central North Sea (55 degree to 58 degree N): A possible consequence of changes in the benthos. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 119, 299-303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • López S., Turon X., Montero E., Palacín C., Duarte C.M., Tarjuelo I., 1998, Larval abundance, recruitment and early mortality in Paracentrotus lividus (Echinoidea). Interannual variability and plankton-benthos coupling. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 172, 239-251. [Google Scholar]
  • McBride S.C., Pinnix W.D., Lawrence J.M., Lawrence A.L., Mulligan T.M., 1997, The effect of temperature on production of gonads by the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus fed natural and prepared diets. J. World Aquac. Soc. 28, 357-365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McEdward L.R., Miner B.G., 2001, Echinoid larval ecology. In: Lawrence, J.M. (Ed.), Edible sea urchins: Biology and ecology, pp. 59-78. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • Otero-Villanueva M.M., Kelly M.S., Burnell G., 2004, How diet influences energy partitioning in regular echinoid Psammechinus miliaris; constructing an energy budget. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 304, 159-181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pantazis P.A., Kelly M.S., Connolly J.G., Black K.D., 2000, Effect of artificial diets on growth, lipid utilization, and gonad biochemistry in the adult sea urchin Psammechinus miliaris. J. Shellfish. Res. 19, 995-1001. [Google Scholar]
  • Pennington J.T., Rumrill S.S., Chia F.S., 1986, Stage-specific predation upon embryos and larvae of the Pacific sand dollar, Dendraster excentricus, by eleven species of common zooplanktonic predators. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39, 234-240. [Google Scholar]
  • Radenac G., Fichet D., Miramand P., 2001, Bioaccumulation and toxicity of four dissolved metals in Paracentrotus lividus sea-urchin embryo. Mar. Environ. Res. 51, 151-166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rassoulzadegan F., Fenaux L., 1979, Grazing of echinoderm larvae (Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula) on naturally occurring particulate matter. J. Plankton Res. 1, 215-223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rumrill S.S., 1990, Natural mortality of marine invertebrate larvae. Ophelia 32, 163-198. [Google Scholar]
  • Rumrill S.S., Pennington J.T., Chia F.S., 1985, Differential susceptibility of marine invertebrate larvae: Laboratory predation of sand dollar, Dendraster excentricus (Eschscholtz), embryos and larvae by zoeae of the red crab, Cancer productus Randall. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 90, 193-208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sáa C.F., 2002, Algas de Galicia. Alimento y salud. Algamar, Pontevedra. [Google Scholar]
  • Shpigel M, McBride S.C., Marciano S., Lupatsch I., 2004, The effect of photoperiod and temperature on the reproduction of European sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Aquaculture 232, 343-355. [Google Scholar]
  • Snell T.W., Carrillo K., 1984, Body size variation among strains of the rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Aquaculture 37, 359-367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spirlet C., Grosjean P., Jangoux M., 1998, Optimizing food distribution in closed-circuit cultivation of edible sea urchins (Paracentrotus lividus: Echinoidea). Aquat. Living Resour. 11, 273-277. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Spirlet C., Grosjean P., Jangoux M., 2000, Optimization of gonad growth by manipulation of temperature and photoperiod in cultivated sea urchins, Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) (Echinodermata). Aquaculture 185, 85-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stottrup J., 2000, The elusive copepods: Their production and suitability in marine aquaculture. Aquac. Res. 31, 703-711. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Verlaque M., Nédelec H., 1983, Biologie de Pracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) sur substrat rocheux en Corse (Méditerranée, France) : alimentation des adultes. Vie Milieu 33, 191-201. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.