Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 17, Number 2, April-June 2004
Page(s) 175 - 183
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2004016
Published online 15 April 2004
  • Agresti A., 1990, Categorical data analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Bayliff W., Holland K., 1986, Materials and methods for tagging tuna and billfishes, recovering the tags and handling the recapture data. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 279. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger J.O., Berry D.A., 1988, Statistical analysis and the illusion of objectivity. Am. Scient. 76, 159-165. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernier J., Parent E., Boreux J.-J., 2000, Statistique pour l'environnement. Traitement bayésien de l'incertitude. Ed. Tec & Doc., Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen Y., Breen P.A., Andrew N.L., 2000, Impacts of outliers and mis-specification of priors on Bayesian fisheries-stock assessment. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 57, 2293-2305. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fonteneau A., Diouf T., 1994, An efficient way of bait fishing for tunas recently developed in Senegal. Aquat. Living Resour. 7, 139-151. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Fried S.M., Hilborn R., 1988, Inseason forecasting of Bristol Bay, Alaska, sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) abundance using Bayesian probability theory. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 850-855. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hallier J.P., Delgado de Molina A., 2000, Baitboat as a tuna aggregating device. Le canneur : un dispositif de concentration des thons. In: Le Gall J.-Y., Cayré P., Taquet M. (Eds.), Pêches thonières et dispositifs de concentration de poissons. Edn. Ifremer, Actes Colloq. 28, pp. 553-578. [Google Scholar]
  • Hallier J.P., Diouf T., Hervé A., Peignon C., 2001, Le Programme MAC : État des opérations et des analyses. Doc. multigraphié, CRODT, IRD, CNROP. [Google Scholar]
  • Hallier J.-P., Gaertner D., 2002, Comparative efficiency between Betyp tags and Conventional tags. ICCAT Coll. Vol. Sci. Pap. 54, 17-32. [Google Scholar]
  • Hilborn R., Liermann M., 1998, Standing on the shoulders of giants: learning from experience in fisheries. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 8, 273-283. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoenig J.M., Warren W.G., Stocker M. 1994, Bayesian and related approaches in fitting surplus production models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 1823-1831. [Google Scholar]
  • Holbert D., Johnson J.C., 1989, Using prior information in fisheries management: A comparison of classical and Bayesian methods for estimating population parameters. Coast. Manage. 17, 333-347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kearney R.E. 1982, Methods used by the South Pacific Commission for the survey and assessment of skipjack and baitfish resources. SPC, Tech. Rep. 7, 21-43. [Google Scholar]
  • Leonard T., Hsu J.S.J., 1999, Bayesian Methods. An analysis for statisticians and interdisciplinary researchers. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Maunder M.N., 2001, A general framework for integrating the standardization of catch per unit of effort into stock assessment models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 58, 795-803. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Maunder M.N., 2003, Paradigm shifts in fisheries stock assessment: from integrated analysis to Bayesian analysis and back again. Nat. Resour. Model. 16, 465-475. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McAllister M.K., Kirkwood G.P., 1998, Bayesian stock assessment: a review and example application using the logistic model. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 55, 1031-1060. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer R., Millar R.B., 1999, BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 56, 1078-1086. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Millar R.B., 2002, Reference priors for Bayesian fisheries models. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1492-1502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prince E.D., Ortiz M., Venizelos A., Rosenthal D.S., 2002, In-water conventional tagging techniques developed by the Cooperative Tagging Center for large, highly migratory species. Am. Fish. Symp. 30, 155-171. [Google Scholar]
  • Punt A.E., Hilborn R., 1997, Fisheries stock assessment and decision analysis: the Bayesian approach. Rev. Fish. Biol. Fish. 35-63. [Google Scholar]
  • Rivot E., Prevost E., 2002, Hierarchical Bayesian analysis of capture-mark-recapture data. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 59, 1768-1784. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schweder T., 1998, Fisherian or Bayesian methods of integrating diverse statistical information? Fish. Res. 37, 61-75. [Google Scholar]
  • Vose D., 2001, Risk analysis. A quantitative guide. 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Walters C.J., Ludwig D., 1994, Calculation of Bayes posterior probability distributions for key population parameters. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 713-722. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.