EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 (2026) Aquat. Living Resour., 39 (2026) 25 References
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 39, 2026
Special Issue - Interdisciplinary issues on Manila and European clams in their socio-ecosystems
Article Number 25
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2026016
Published online 28 July 2026
  • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403–410. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Andres KJ, Lodge DM, Sethi SA, Andrés J. 2023. Detecting and analysing intraspecific genetic variation with eDNA: From population genetics to species abundance. Mol Ecol 32: 4118–4132. [Google Scholar]
  • Bidegain G, Juanes JA. 2013. Does expansion of the introduced Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum cause competitive displacement of the European native clam Ruditapes decussatus? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 445: 44–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. 2019. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37: 852–857. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Borsa P, Millet B. 1992. Recruitment of the clam Ruditapes decussatus in the Lagoon of Thau, Mediterranean. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 35: 289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Bruce K, Blackman R, Bourlat SJ, Hellström AM, Bakker J, Bista I, et al. 2021. A practical guide to DNA-based methods for biodiversity assessment. Adv Books 1: e68634. [Google Scholar]
  • Caill-Milly N, Bru N, Barranger M, Gallon L, D’Amico F. 2014. Morphological trends of four Manila clam populations (Venerupis philippinarum) on the French Atlantic coast: Identified spatial patterns and their relationship to environmental variability. J Shellfish Res 33: 355–372. [Google Scholar]
  • Caill-Milly N, Sanchez F, Lissardy M, Bru N, Kermorvant C, de Montaudouin X, et al. 2025. Manila clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in France: Fishing activity, governance and present knowledge challenges regarding its biology and ecology. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 317: 109206. [Google Scholar]
  • Caill-Milly N, Sanchez F, Lissardy M, de Montaudouin X, Bru N, Kermorvant C, Ganthy F. 2021. Drawing lessons from a pluridisciplinary approach associating stakeholders for a better management of a bivalve population (French Atlantic coast)? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 251: 107194. [Google Scholar]
  • Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP. 2016. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13: 581–583. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cebrian E, Francour P, Galil B, Otero M del M, Savini D. Monitoring marine invasive species in Mediterranean marine protected areas (MPAs): a strategy and practical guide for managers. IUCN Report, 2013, 138 pages. [Google Scholar]
  • Cormier A, Durand P, Noel C, Leroi L. SAMBA: Standardized and Automated MetaBarcoding Analyses workflow. WorkflowHub Report, 2021. https://doi.org/10.48546/WORKFLOWHUB.WORKFLOW.156.1 [Google Scholar]
  • Couton M, Comtet T, Le Cam S, Corre E, Viard F. 2019. Metabarcoding on planktonic larval stages: An efficient approach for detecting and investigating life cycle dynamics of benthic aliens. Manag Biol Invasions 10: 657–689. [Google Scholar]
  • Couton M, Lévêque L, Daguin-Thiébaut C, Comtet T, Viard F. 2022. Water eDNA metabarcoding is effective in detecting non-native species in marinas, but detection errors still hinder its use for passive monitoring. Biofouling 38: 367–383. [Google Scholar]
  • Couton M, Viard F, Altermatt F. 2023. Opportunities and inherent limits of using environmental DNA for population genetics. Environ DNA 5: 1048–1064. [Google Scholar]
  • de Montaudouin X, Arzul I, Caill-Milly N, Khayati A, Labrousse JM, Lafitte C, Paillard C, Soudant P, Goulletquer P. 2016. Asari clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) in France: History of an exotic species 1972–2015. Bull Jpn Fish Res Educ Agency 42: 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2014. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match. Biol Lett 10: 20140562. [Google Scholar]
  • Derbali A. 2024. Age, growth, mortality and population structure of Polititapes aureus (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in the Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 53: 102–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Derolez V. Approche dynamique et intégrée de l’évaluation d’un socio-écosystème côtier. Application à la lagune de Thau, son état écologique et ses bouquets de services écosystémiques sur la période 1970–2018. PhD thesis, Université de Montpellier, 2020, 281 pages. [Google Scholar]
  • Drummond, A.J., Ashton, B., Cheung, M., Heled, J., Kearse, M., Moir, R., Stones-Hava, S., Thierer, T. and Wilson, A., 2009. Geneious v4.8. [software]. http://www.geneious.com [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2021. FAO Yearbook. Fishery and Aquaculture Statistics 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • Fasteris. 2025. Amplicon sequencing services. https://www.fasteris.com/en-us/NGS/DNA-sequencing/Amplicons-sequencing [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandez S, Miller DL, Holman LE, Gittenberger A, Ardura A, Rius M, Mirimin L. 2021. Environmental DNA sampling protocols for the surveillance of marine non-indigenous species in Irish coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 172: 112893. [Google Scholar]
  • Fiandrino A, Ouisse V, Dumas F, Lagarde F, Pete R, Malet N, Le Noc S, de Wit R. 2017. Spatial patterns in coastal lagoons related to the hydrodynamics of seawater intrusion. Mar Pollut Bull 119: 132–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Ficetola GF, Coissac E, Zundel S, Riaz T, Shehzad W, Bessière J, Taberlet P, Pompanon F. 2010. An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC Genomics 11: 434. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2008. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett 4: 423–425. [Google Scholar]
  • Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn LA, Salling AB, Galatius A, Orlando L, Gilbert MTP. 2012. Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. PLoS One 7: e41781. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Galan M, Razzauti M, Bard E, Bernard M, Brouat C, Charbonnel N, et al. 2016. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing for epidemiological surveys of bacteria in wildlife. mSystems 1: e00032-16. [Google Scholar]
  • Goldberg CS, Turner CR, Deiner K, Klymus KE, Thomsen PF, Murphy MA, et al. 2016. Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods Ecol Evol 7: 1299–1307. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hurtado NS, Pérez-García C, Morán P, Pasantes JJ. 2011. Genetic and cytological evidence of hybridization between native Ruditapes decussatus and introduced Ruditapes philippinarum in NW Spain. Aquaculture 311: 123–128. [Google Scholar]
  • Inkscape Project. 2020. Inkscape v1.3.2 [software]. https://Inkscape.org [Google Scholar]
  • Jaquier M, Albouy C, Bach W, Waldock C, Marques V, Maire E, et al. 2024. Environmental DNA recovers fish composition turnover of coral reefs of West Indian Ocean islands. Ecol Evol 14: e11337. [Google Scholar]
  • Kandeel KE-S. 2018. Population dynamics of Venerupis aurea in two different clam beds in Lake Timsah, Suez Canal, Egypt. Thalassia Salentina 40: 67–94. [Google Scholar]
  • Klymus KE, Marshall NT, Stepien CA. 2017. Environmental DNA metabarcoding assays to detect invasive invertebrate species in the Great Lakes. PLoS One 12: e0177643. [Google Scholar]
  • Lagarde F, Fiandrino A, Ubertini M, d’Orbcastel ER, Mortreux S, Chiantella C, et al. 2019. Duality of trophic supply and hydrodynamic connectivity drives spatial patterns of Pacific oyster recruitment. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 632: 81–100. [Google Scholar]
  • Lapègue S, Fortunato H, Bouvier C, Violette H, Cornette F, Bonin A, et al. 2025. Clam sequences from eDNA and tissue samples. https://doi.org/10.17882/105470 [Google Scholar]
  • Leigh JW, Bryant D. 2015. Popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 6: 1110–1116. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Fur I, de Wit R, Plus M, Oheix J, Derolez V, Simier M, et al. 2019. Re-oligotrophication trajectories of macrophyte assemblages in Mediterranean coastal lagoons based on 17-year time-series. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 608: 13–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Leray M, Knowlton N, Machida RJ. 2022. MIDORI2: a collection of quality controlled, preformatted, and regularly updated reference databases for taxonomic assignment of eukaryotic mitochondrial sequences. Environ DNA 4: 894–907. [Google Scholar]
  • Leray M, Yang JY, Meyer CP, Mills SC, Agudelo N, Ranwez V, et al. 2013. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front Zool 10: 34. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Longmire J, Maltbie M, Baker RJ. 1997. Use of lysis buffer in DNA isolation and its implications for museum collections. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University, Vol. 163. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.143318 [Google Scholar]
  • Mahé M, Aurelle D, Poggiale JC, Mayot N. 2022. Assessment of the distribution of Ruditapes spp. in northern Mediterranean sites using morphological and genetic data. J Molluscan Stud 88: eyac029. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahé M, Delanghe D, Grisel R, Poggiale JC, Mayot N. 2020. Distribution of Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum into Berre Lagoon according to the environmental condition. Vie Milieu 70: 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  • Mahon AR, Jerde CL, Galaska M, Bergner JL, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM, et al. 2013. Validation of eDNA surveillance sensitivity for detection of Asian carps in controlled and field experiments. PLoS One 8: e58316. [Google Scholar]
  • Maître-Allain T. Suivi d’un essai de repeuplement de palourdes dans l’étang de Thau (Hérault): croissance, mortalité, reproduction. PhD thesis, Université Paris 6, 1983, 136 pages. [Google Scholar]
  • Marin MG, Moschino V, Deppieri M, Lucchetta L. 2003. Variations in gross biochemical composition, energy value and condition index of T. philippinarum from the Lagoon of Venice. Aquaculture 219: 859–871. [Google Scholar]
  • Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17: 10–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, 2019. https://doi.org/10.7312/nei-92038 [Google Scholar]
  • Ogram A, Sayler GS, Barkay T. 1987. The extraction and purification of microbial DNA from sediments. J Microbiol Methods 7: 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  • Olesen SW, Duvallet C, Alm EJ. 2017. dbOTU3: a new implementation of distribution-based OTU calling. PLoS One 12: e0176335. [Google Scholar]
  • Passamonti M, Boore JL, Scali V. 2003. Molecular evolution and recombination in gender-associated mitochondrial DNAs of the Manila clam Tapes philippinarum. Genetics 164: 603–611. [Google Scholar]
  • Passamonti M, Plazzi F. 2020. Doubly uniparental inheritance and beyond: the contribution of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum. J Zool Syst Evol Res 58: 529–540. [Google Scholar]
  • Patrissi M, Bernard I, Hugo F, Limonet J, Violette H, Sanchez F, Caill-Milly N, Bouvier C, Lapègue S, Holley JF, Lagarde F. 2023. Projet PALTEVA: diagnostic de l’état de la population de palourdes européennes (Ruditapes decussatus) dans la lagune de Thau. Suivi 2023. https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00877/98910 [Google Scholar]
  • Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP. 2013. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70: 1123–1130. [Google Scholar]
  • Prié V, Puillandre N. 2014. Molecular phylogeny, taxonomy, and distribution of French Unio species. Hydrobiologia 735: 95–110. [Google Scholar]
  • Prié V, Valentini A, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Rocle M, Poulet N, Taberlet P, Dejean T. 2021. Environmental DNA metabarcoding for freshwater bivalves biodiversity assessment. Hydrobiologia 848: 2931–2950 [Google Scholar]
  • R Core Team. 2023. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • Rees HC, Maddison BC, Middleditch DJ, Patmore JRM, Gough KC. 2014. The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA − a review. J Appl Ecol 51: 1450–1459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Riquet F, Sanchez F, Antajan E, Bru N, Caill-Milly N. 2026. The International Manila and European Clams Conference: Euro-Mediterranean overview and future directions to support sustainable clam fisheries. Aquat Living Resour 39: 4. [Google Scholar]
  • Rourke ML, Fowler AM, Hughes JM, Broadhurst MK, DiBattista JD, Fielder S, et al.. 2022. Environmental DNA as a tool for assessing fish biomass: a review. Environ DNA 4: 9–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Savini D, Occhipinti-Ambrogi A, Marchini A, Tricarico E, Gherardi F, Olenin S, et al. 2010. The top 27 animal alien species introduced into Europe for aquaculture and related activities. J Appl Ichthyol 26: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Schnell IB, Bohmann K, Gilbert MTP. 2015. Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence-to-sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies. Mol Ecol Resour 15: 1289–1303. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi X, Jiang Y, Cao L, Zeng C. 2024. Development of environmental DNA metabarcoding primers for marine mollusks and comparison with published primers. BMC Ecol Evol 24: 73. [Google Scholar]
  • Sigsgaard EE, Nielsen IB, Bach SS, Lorenzen ED, Robinson DP, Knudsen SW, et al. 2016. Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA. Nat Ecol Evol 1: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Skibinski DOF, Gallagher C, Beynon CM. 1994. Sex-limited mitochondrial DNA transmission in the marine mussel Mytilus edulis. Genetics 138: 801–809. [Google Scholar]
  • Taberlet P, Bonin A, Zinger L, Coissac E. Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research and Monitoring, Oxford University Press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767220.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  • Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH. 2012. Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21: 1789–1793. [Google Scholar]
  • Templeton AR, Crandall KA, Sing CF. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132: 619–633. [Google Scholar]
  • Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, et al. 2016. Next-generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol 25: 929–942. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Colen C, Ong EZ, Briffa M, Wethey DS, Abatih E, Moens T, et al. 2020. Clam feeding plasticity reduces herbivore vulnerability to ocean warming and acidification. Nat Clim Chang 10: 162–166. [Google Scholar]
  • Velez C, Figueira E, Soares AMVM, Freitas R. 2017. Effects of seawater temperature increase on economically relevant native and introduced clam species. Mar Environ Res 123: 62–70. [Google Scholar]
  • Wagih O. 2017. ggseqlogo: a versatile R package for drawing sequence logos. Bioinformatics 33: 3645–3647. [Google Scholar]
  • Wares JP, Pappalardo P. 2016. Can theory improve the scope of quantitative metazoan metabarcoding? Diversity 8: 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu T, He C, Han X, Kong L, Li Q. 2024. Comparative mitogenomic analysis and phylogeny of Veneridae with doubly uniparental inheritance. Open Biol 14: 240186. [Google Scholar]
  • Yates MC, Fraser DJ, Derry AM. 2019. Meat-analysis supports further refinement of eDNA for monitoring aquatic species-specific abundance in nature. Environ DNA 1: 5–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zinger L, Bonin A, Alsos IG, Bálint M, Bik H, Boyer F, et al. 2019. DNA metabarcoding – need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions. Mol Ecol 28: 1857–1862. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zouros E, Oberhauser Ball A, Saavedra C, Freeman KR. 1994. An unusual type of mitochondrial DNA inheritance in the blue mussel Mytilus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 7463–7467. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.