EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Sciengine logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 39 (2026) Aquat. Living Resour., 39 (2026) 9 References
Open Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 39, 2026
Article Number 9
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2026001
Published online 13 March 2026
  • Allan GL, Fielder DS, Fitzsimmons KM, et al. 36 - Inland saline aquaculture, in: G. Burnell, G. Allan (Eds.), New Technologies in Aquaculture, Woodhead Publishing, 2009, pp 1119–1147. [Google Scholar]
  • Anand G, dar S, Srivas PP, Varghese T, Gupta S. 2022. Rearing in hypersaline inland ground saline water affect growth and osmoregulatory responses of Common carp (Linnaeus 1758). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1164718/v2. [Google Scholar]
  • Ansal MD, Dhawan A, Singh G, Kaur K. 2016. Species selection for enhancing productivity of freshwater carps in inland saline water of Punjab—a field study. Indian J Ecol 43: 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Aslam ML, Carraro R, Sonesson AK, et al. 2020. Genetic variation, GWAS and accuracy of prediction for host resistance to sparicotyle chrysophrii in farmed gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). Front Genet 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.594770. [Google Scholar]
  • Aunsmo A, Krontveit R, Valle PS, Bohlin J. 2014. Field validation of growth models used in Atlantic salmon farming. Aquaculture 428: 249–257. [Google Scholar]
  • Balon EK. 1995. Origin and domestication of the wild carp, Cyprinus carpio: from Roman gourmets to the swimming flowers. Aquaculture 129: 3–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Belton B, Padiyar A, Ravibabu G, Gopal Rao K. 2017. Boom and bust in Andhra Pradesh: development and transformation in India's domestic aquaculture value chain. Aquaculture 470: 196–206. [Google Scholar]
  • Chandra KP, Kailasam M, Thirunavukkarasu AR, Abraham M. 2000. Genetic parameters for early growth traits in Lates calcarifer (Bloch). J Mar Biol Assoc India 42: 194–199. [Google Scholar]
  • Chandra S, Joshi Kd. 2015. Growth and survival of carps in salt-affected ponds under different treatments. J Inland Fish Soc India 47: 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen L, Xu J, Sun X, Xu P. 2022. Research advances and future perspectives of genomics and genetic improvement in allotetraploid common carp. Rev Aquac 14: 957–978. [Google Scholar]
  • Crandell PA, Gall GAE. 1993. The genetics of body weight and its effect on early maturity based on individually tagged rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 117: 77–93. [Google Scholar]
  • CSSRI. 2013. Annual Report, 2013–14, Karnal: Central Soil Salinity Research Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • De Verdal H, Komen H, Quillet E, et al. 2018. Improving feed efficiency in fish using selective breeding: a review. Rev Aquac 10: 833–851. [Google Scholar]
  • Dey MM, Kumar P, Chen OL, Khan Md A, Barik NK, Li L, Nissapa A, Pham NS. 2013. Potential impact of genetically improved carp strains in Asia. Food Policy 43: 306–320. [Google Scholar]
  • Dong Z, Nguyen NH, Zhu W. 2015. Genetic evaluation of a selective breeding program for common carp Cyprinus carpio conducted from 2004 to 2014. BMC Genetics 16:94. [Google Scholar]
  • Doupe RG, Lymbery AJ. 2005a. Additive genetic and other sources of variation in growth traits of juvenile black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri. Aquac Res 36: 621–626. [Google Scholar]
  • Doupe RG, Lymbery AJ. 2005b. Genetic covariation in production traits of sub-adult black bream Acanthopagrus butcheri after grow-out. Aquac Res 36: 1128–1132. [Google Scholar]
  • Doupé RG, Lymbery AJ, Greeff J. 2003. Genetic variation in the growth traits of straight-bred and crossbred black bream (Acanthopagrus butcheri Munro) at 90 days of age: Genetic variation in black bream growth traits. Aquac Res 34: 1297–1301. [Google Scholar]
  • El-Ibiary HM, Joyce JA. 1978. Heritability of body size traits, dressing weight and lipid content in channel catfish. J Anim Sci 47: 82–88. [Google Scholar]
  • Fishback AG, Danzmann RG, Ferguson MM, Gibson JP. 2002. Estimates of genetic parameters and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as inferred using molecular pedigrees. Aquaculture 206: 137–150. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2021. Global map of salt-affected soils. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title = Global%20Map%20of%20Salt% 20Affected%20Soils%20Version%201.0&publication_year = 2021&author = FAO (Accessed 29 Apr 2024) [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2022, in: Towards Blue Transformation, FAO, Rome, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en. [Google Scholar]
  • Freitas MV, Lira LVG, Ariede RB, et al. 2021. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic parameters for growth traits in the Neotropical fish pacu (Piaractus mesopotamicus). Aquaculture 530: 735933. [Google Scholar]
  • Fu J, Shen Y, Xu X, Li J. 2016. Genetic parameter estimates for growth of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella, at 10 and 18 months of age. Aquaculture 450: 342–348. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fu J, Shen Y, Xu X, Liu C, Li J. 2015. Genetic parameter estimates and genotype by environment interaction analyses for early growth traits in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquacult Int 23: 1427–1441. [Google Scholar]
  • Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R. Asreml user guide release 4.1 functional specification, VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead, 2015. www.vsni.co.uk. Accessed 29 Apr 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • Gjerde B, Simianer H, Refstie T. 1994. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for body weight, growth rate and sexual maturity in Atlantic salmon. Livestock Prod Sci 38: 133–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Gunnes K, Gjedrem T. 1978. Selection experiments with salmon: IV. Growth of Atlantic salmon during two years in the sea. Aquaculture 15: 19–33. [Google Scholar]
  • Hamilton MG, Mekkawy W, Alam MdB, Benzie JAH. 2022. Early selection to enhance genetic gain in a rohu (Labeo rohita) genetic improvement program. Aquaculture 553: 738058. [Google Scholar]
  • Hopkins KD. 1992. Reporting fish growth: a review of the basics. J World Aquac Soc 23: 173–179. [Google Scholar]
  • Hu X, Li C, Shang M, et al. 2017. Inheritance of growth traits in Songpu mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) cultured in Northeast China. Aquaculture 477: 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  • Hume DJ, Fletcher AR, Morison AK. 1983. Interspecific hybridization between carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) and golfish (Carassius auratus L.) from Victorian Waters. Mar Freshw Res 34: 915–919. [Google Scholar]
  • Iffat J, Tiwari VK, Pavan-Kumar A, Verma AK, Harikrishna V, Babitha Rani AM, Chadha NK, Anand G. 2021. The effect of inland saline groundwater on growth, maturation, and osmoregulation of common carp. North Am J Aquac 83: 15–25. [Google Scholar]
  • Kocour M, Mauger S, Rodina M, Gela D, Linhart O, Vandeputte M. 2007. Heritability estimates for processing and quality traits in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) using a molecular pedigree. Aquaculture 270: 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar P, Sharma PK. 2020. Soil salinity and food security in India. Front Sustain Food Syst 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.533781. [Google Scholar]
  • Lalramnunsanga, Mishra A, Singh AL, Prakash S, Salvi A, Kumar AP, Pathan MA. 2024. Genetic diversity of common carp Cyprinus carpio in the base population of a selective breeding programme in India. Discov Anim 1: 3. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee-Montero I, Navarro A, Negrín-Báez D, et al. 2015. Genetic parameters and genotype–environment interactions for skeleton deformities and growth traits at different ages on gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) in four Spanish regions. Anim Genet 46: 164–174. [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y, Zhang B, Yang Y, Chen S. 2019. Estimation of genetic parameters for juvenile growth performance traits in oliveflounder (Paralichthys olivaceus). Aquac Fish 4: 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Y-X, Wang G-X, Wang Y-F, Si, F Sun, Z-H, Zhang X-Y, Wang J-D, Liu H-J. 2011. Estimation of genetic parameters for growth traits of Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus using an animal model. Fish Sci 77: 87–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Luan TD, Olesen I, Kolstad K. Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interaction for growth of Nile tilapia in low and optimal temperature, in: Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Leipzig, Germany, 2010 [Google Scholar]
  • Lugert V, Thaller G, Tetens J, et al. 2016. A review on fish growth calculation: multiple functions in fish production and their specific application. Rev Aquac 8: 30–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Ma L, Saillant E, Gatlin DM, Gold JR. 2008. Estimates of heritability of larval and early juvenile growth traits in red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). J Appl Aquac 20: 134–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Mandal S, Raju R, Kumar A, Kumar P, Sharma PC. Current status of research, technology response and policy needs of salt-affected soils in India – a review, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  • Mas-Muñoz J, Blonk R, Schrama JW, et al. 2013 Genotype by environment interaction for growth of sole (Solea solea) reared in an intensive aquaculture system and in a semi-natural environment. Aquaculture 410–411: 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen HM, Ødegård J, Olesen I, Gjerde B, Ardo L, Jeney G, Jeney Z. 2010. Genetic analysis of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) strains: I: Genetic parameters and heterosis for growth traits and survival. Aquaculture 304: 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Nilsson J. 1994. Genetics of growth of juvenile arctic char. Trans Am Fish Soc 123: 430–434. [Google Scholar]
  • Ninh NH, Ponzoni RW, Nguyen NH, et al. 2011. A comparison of communal and separate rearing of families in selective breeding of common carp (Cyprinus carpio): estimation of genetic parameters. Aquaculture 322–323: 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Ninh NH, Ponzoni RW, Nguyen NH, Woolliams JA, Taggart JB, McAndrew BJ, et al. 2013. A comparison of communal and separate rearing of families in selective breeding of common carp (Cyprinus carpio): responses to selection. Aquaculture 40: 152–159. [Google Scholar]
  • Palaiokostas C, Kocour M, Prchal M, Houston RD. 2018. Accuracy of genomic evaluations of juvenile growth rate in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) using genotyping by sequencing. Front Genet 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00082. [Google Scholar]
  • Phibi Philip Naduvathu. 2017. Performance Comparison of Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758) Populations Reared in Inland Saline Waters at Varying Salinities. M.F.Sc. Dissertation, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education (Deemed to be University Established Under Section 3 of UGC Act 1956) Panch Marg, Off Yari Road, Versova, Andheri (W), Mumbai – 400 061. [Google Scholar]
  • Ponzoni RW, Hamzah A, Tan S, Kamaruzzaman N. 2005. Genetic parameters and response to selection for live weight in the GIFT strain of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 247: 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  • Prchal M, Kause A, Vandeputte M, Gela D, Allamellou J-M, Kumar G, Bestin A, Bugeon J, Zhao J, Kocour M. 2018. The genetics of overwintering performance in two-year old common carp and its relation to performance until market size. PLOS ONE 13: e0191624. [Google Scholar]
  • Rajanand S. 2016. A Study on Acclimatization and Survival Analysis of Cyprinus Carpio (Linnaeus,1758) Reared at Different Salinities, M.F.Sc. Dissertation, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education (University Established Under Section 3 of UGC Act 1956) Panch Marg, Off Yari Road, Versova, Andheri (W), Mumbai – 400 061 [Google Scholar]
  • Rezk MA, Ponzoni RW, Khaw HL, et al. 2009 Selective breeding for increased body weight in a synthetic breed of Egyptian Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: response to selection and genetic parameters. Aquaculture 293: 187–194. [Google Scholar]
  • Rossignoli CM, Obi C, Ali SA, et al. 2023. Production system and challenges of saline aquaculture in Punjab and Sindh provinces of Pakistan. Front Aquac 2: 1302571. [Google Scholar]
  • Sae-Lim P, Komen H, Kause A, et al. 2013. Enhancing selective breeding for growth, slaughter traits and overall survival in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 372–375: 89–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Saillant E, Dupont-Nivet M, Haffray P, Chatain B. 2006. Estimates of heritability and genotype–environment interactions for body weight in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) raised under communal rearing conditions. Aquaculture 254: 139–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Saillant E, Ma L, Wang X, et al. 2007. Heritability of juvenile growth traits in red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus L.). Aquac Res 38: 781–788. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma DK, Chaudhari SK. 2012. Agronomic research in salt affected soils of India: an overview. Indian J Agron 57: 175–185. [Google Scholar]
  • Singh G, Ansal MD, Kaur VI. 2018. Salinity tolerance and survival of freshwater carp, Cyprinus carpio Linn. in inland saline water. Indian J Ecol 45: 598–601. [Google Scholar]
  • Spasić MM, Poleksić V, Stanković M, et al. 2010. Selective breeding programme of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in Serbia: preliminary results. J Agric Sci (Belgrade) 55: 243–251. [Google Scholar]
  • Tave D, Smitherman RO. 1980. Predicted response to selection for early growth in Tilapia nilotica. Trans Am Fish Soc 109: 439–445. [Google Scholar]
  • Thodesen (Da-Yong Ma) J, Rye M, Wang Y-X, Li S-J, Bentsen HB, Gjedrem T. 2013. Genetic improvement of tilapias in China: Genetic parameters and selection responses in growth, pond survival and cold-water tolerance of blue tilapia (Oreochromis aureus) after four generations of multi-trait selection. Aquaculture 396–399: 32–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandeputte M, Quillet E, Chevassus B. 2002. Early development and survival in brown trout (Salmo trutta fario L.): indirect effects of selection for growth rate and estimation of genetic parameters. Aquaculture 204: 435–445. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandeputte M, Haffray P. 2014. Parentage assignment with genomic markers: a major advance for understanding and exploiting genetic variation of quantitative traits in farmed aquatic animals. Front Genet 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00432. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandeputte M, Kocour M, Mauger S, Dupont-Nivet M, De Guerry D, Rodina M, Gela D, Vallod D, Chevassus B, Linhart O. 2004. Heritability estimates for growth-related traits using microsatellite parentage assignment in juvenile common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Aquaculture 235: 223–236. [Google Scholar]
  • Vandeputte M, Kocour M, Mauger S, Rodina M, Launay A, Gela D, Dupont-Nivet M, Hulak M, Linhart O. 2008. Genetic variation for growth at one and two summers of age in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): heritability estimates and response to selection. Aquaculture 277: 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang C, Li S, Xiang S, Wang J, Liu Z, Pang Z, Duan J, Xu Z. 2006. Genetic parameter estimates for growth-related traits in Oujiang color common carp (Cyprinus carpio var. color). Aquaculture 259: 103–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang J-Q, Lui H, Po H, Fan L. 1997. Influence of salinity on food consumption, growth and energy conversion efficiency of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fingerlings. Aquaculture 148: 115–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang X, Ross KE, Saillant E, et al. 2006. Quantitative genetics and heritability of growth-related traits in hybrid striped bass (Morone chrysops♀\times Morone saxatilis♂). Aquaculture 261: 535–545. [Google Scholar]
  • Winkelman AM, Peterson RG. 1994. Heritabilities, dominance variation, common environmental effects and genotype by environment interactions for weight and length in chinook salmon. Aquaculture 125: 17–30. [Google Scholar]
  • Wohlfarth GW. 1993. Heterosis for growth rate in common carp. Aquaculture 113: 31–46. [Google Scholar]
  • Wohlfarth GW, Moav R. 1972. The regression of weight gain on initial weight in carp: I. Methods and results. Aquaculture 1: 7–28. [Google Scholar]
  • Yousefian M, Sharifrohani M, Hosseinzadeh- Sahafi H, et al. 2011. Heritability estimation for growth-related traits in juvenile wild common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) in the south of Caspian Sea. Iranian J Fish Sci 10: 740–748. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu X, Adnoy T, Lv Z, et al. 2020. Phenotypic and genetic parameter estimation for growth traits in juvenile large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea). Fish Aquac J 11: 1–6. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.