Open Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 38, 2025
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2024016
Published online 14 January 2025
  • Alam MF, Khan MA, Huq AA. 2012. Technical efficiency in tilapia farming of Bangladesh: a stochastic frontier production approach. Aquac Int 20: 619–634. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alam MA, Guttormsen AG, Roll KH. 2019. Production risk and technical efficiency of tilapia aquaculture in Bangladesh. Mar Resour Econ 34: 123–141. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Altaie K. 2022. Did Jackknife Works? Testing Stability of Technical Efficiency in Biggest Tomato Producers in MENA Region. Him J Econ Bus Manag 3: 1–11 [Google Scholar]
  • Anh Ngoc PT, Gaitán-Cremaschi D, Meuwissen MP, Le TC, Bosma RH, Verreth J, Lansink AO. 2018. Technical inefficiency of Vietnamese pangasius farming: a data envelopment analysis. Aquac Econ Manag 22: 229–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Banker RD. 1984. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 17: 35–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Belton B, Bush SR, Little DC. 2018. Not just for the wealthy: rethinking farmed fish consumption in the Global South. Glob Food Secur 16: 85–92. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. 1979. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res 3: 339. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chertkov G. 2020. Quantifying pond and labor productivity of small-holder aquaculture farmers in the central dry-zone of Myanmar (Master's thesis). [University of Hohenheim]. [Google Scholar]
  • Da Silva AV, Costa MA, Lopes ALM, do Carmo GM. 2019. A close look at second stage data envelopment analysis using compound error models and the Tobit model. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 65: 111–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Das SK, Mandal A, Khairnar SO. 2022. Aquaculture resources and practices in a changing environment. Sustain Agric Syst Technol 169–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119808565.ch8 [Google Scholar]
  • Dey MM, Paraguas FJ, Bimbao GB, Regaspi PB. 2000. Technical efficiency of tilapia growout pond operations in the Philippines. Aquac Econ Manag 4: 33–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DOF. 2022a. Annual Report 2020 – 21 Department of Fisheries, Bangladesh. [Google Scholar]
  • DoF. 2022b. Yearbook of Fisheries Statistics of Bangladesh, 2021 – 22. Fisheries Resoureces Survey System (FRSS). Department of Fisheries; Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock, 2022. Volume 39;139p. [Google Scholar]
  • E‐Jahan KM, Ahmed M, Belton B. 2010. The impacts of aquaculture development on food security: lessons from Bangladesh. Aquac Res 41: 481–495. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2022. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022. Towards Blue Transformation. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc0461en [Google Scholar]
  • Ferdous Alam M, Murshed-e-Jahan K. 2008. Resource allocation efficiency of the prawn-carp farmers of Bangladesh. Aquac Econ Manag 12: 188–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzsimmons K, Martinez-Garcia R, Gonzalez-Alanis P. 2011. Why tilapia is becoming the most important food fish on the planet. In L. Liu & K. Fitzsimmons (Eds.), Better science, better fish, better life: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture (ISTA 9) (pp. 1–8). Shanghai Ocean University. ISBN: 9781888807196. [Google Scholar]
  • Haynes KE, Dinc M. 2005. Data envelopment analysis (DEA). In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social measurement Elsevier. pp. 609–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00348-0 [Google Scholar]
  • Hoff A. 2007. Second stage DEA: comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score. Eur J Oper Res 181: 425–435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holloway G, Nicholson C, Delgado C, Staal S, Ehui S. 2004. A revised Tobit procedure for mitigating bias in the presence of non‐zero censoring with an application to milk‐market participation in the Ethiopian highlands. Agric Econ 31: 97–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Huguenin J-M. 2012. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): A Pedagogical Guide for Decision Makers in the Public Sector, Vol. 276, Institut de hautes études en administration publique. [Google Scholar]
  • Hunter MC, Smith RG, Schipanski ME, Atwood LW, Mortensen DA. 2017. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67: 386–391. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khan MA, Alam MF, Islam KJ. 2012. The impact of co-management on household income and expenditure: an empirical analysis of common property fishery resource management in Bangladesh. Ocean Coast Manag 65: 67–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manurung FG, Supriana T, Sebayang T. 2021. Analysis factors affecting the production of tilapia pond cultivation (case: Belawan Sicanang Village, Medan Belawan District, Medan City), in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 782, No. 2, IOP Publishing, p. 022023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitra S, Khan MA, Nielsen R. 2019. Credit constraints and aquaculture productivity. Aquac Econ Manag 23: 410–427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nguyen LA, Pham TB, Bosma R, Verreth J, Leemans R, De Silva S, Lansink AO. 2018. Impact of climate change on the technical efficiency of striped catfish, Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, farming in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. J World Aquac Soc 49: 570–581. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Phiri F, Yuan X. 2018. Technical efficiency of tilapia production in Malawi and China: application of stochastic frontier production approach. J Aquac Res Dev 9: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahman ML, Shahjahan M, Ahmed N. 2021. Tilapia farming in Bangladesh: adaptation to climate change. Sustainability 13: 7657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rahman MT, Nielsen R, Khan MA. 2020. Agglomeration externalities and technical efficiency: an empirical application to the pond aquaculture of Pangas and Tilapia in Bangladesh. Aquac Econ Manag 23: 158–187. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahman MT, Nielsen R, Khan MA, Asmild M. 2019. Efficiency and production environmental heterogeneity in aquaculture: a meta-frontier DEA approach. Aquaculture 509: 140–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rayos JCC, Macaraeg NA. 2024. Determinants of production and technical efficiency of Tilapia farming in the Philippines. Asian J Fish Aquat Res 26: 1–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Simar L, Wilson PW. 2007. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. J Econ 136: 31–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sumon SM, Hasan AAT, Hossain MS, Islam MT, Arifin Z, Afroz N. 2022. Profitability analysis of small-scale pangas fish farming in some selected areas of Patuakhali district of Bangladesh. J Patuakhali Sci Tech Uni 12: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Tobin J. 1958. Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econ J Econ Soc 26: 24–36. [Google Scholar]
  • Tan RL, Garcia YT, Dator MAL, Tan IMA, Pemsl DE. 2011. Technical efficiency of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) cage culture operations in the lakes of Laguna and Batangas, Philippines. J ISSAAS (International Society for Southeast Asian Agricultural Sciences) 17: 194–207. [Google Scholar]
  • Uddin MN, Kabir KH, Roy D, Hasan MT, Sarker MA, Dunn ES. 2021. Understanding the constraints and its related factors in tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) fish culture at farm level: a case from Bangladesh. Aquaculture 530: 735927. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wati LA, Harahab N, Riniwati H, Utami TN. Development of Tilapia cultivation strategy based local economy: case study in Wonogiri, Central Java, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, Vol. 493, No. 1, IOP Publishing, p. 012042. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wooldridge JM. 2012. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 5th edn, South-Western. [Google Scholar]
  • Young JA, Muir JF. 2002. Tilapia: both fish and fowl. Marine Resour Econ 17: 163–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yuan Y, Yuan Y, Dai Y, Zhang Z, Gong Y, Yuan Y. 2020. Technical efficiency of different farm sizes for tilapia farming in China. Aquac Res 51: 307–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zongli Z, Yanan Z, Feifan L, Hui Y, Yongming Y, Xinhua Y. 2017. Economic efficiency of small-scale tilapia farms in Guangxi, China. Aquac Econ Manag 21: 283–294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.