| Issue |
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 36, 2023
Topical Issue - NORA 4 - Native Oyster Restoration Alliance 4th Conference
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 28 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2023021 | |
| Published online | 30 August 2023 | |
- Allison S. 2019. The endangered European native oyster Ostrea edulis (L.) and creation of Marine Conservation Zones: a win – win scenario for fisheries and conservation? PhD thesis, University of Essex. [Google Scholar]
- Allison S, Hardy M, Hayward K, Cameron TC, Underwood GJC. 2020. Strongholds of Ostrea edulis populations in estuaries in Essex, SE England and their association with traditional oyster aquaculture: evidence to support a MPA designation. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 100: 27–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bergstrom P, Thorngren L, Strand A, Lindegarth M. 2021. Identifying high-density areas of oysters using species distribution modeling: lessons for conservation of the native Ostrea edulis and management of the invasive Magallana (Crassostrea) gigas in Sweden. Ecol Evol 11: 5522–5532. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cameron TC. 2022. Defining oyster beds in the Blackwater Estuary. NECR411. Natural England. [Google Scholar]
- Curtin S. 2022. Exe estuary mussel stock assessment 2022. Devon & Severn Inshre Fisheries & Conservation Authority (accessed May 8, 2023). [Google Scholar]
- Cameron TC, Baker G, Pullen J, Lown AE. 2023. Sea bed disturbance increases flat oyster recruitment for low to moderate stock densities. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.3972 [Google Scholar]
- Dyer R. 2019. Oyster survey report (draft) native oysters (Ostrea edulis) in the blackwater, crouch, roach and colne estuaries marine conservation zone: Kent and Essex Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority. Available at: https://www.kentandessex-ifca.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Appendix-A-to-Agenda-item-B5-Draft-Oyster-Report-2019.pdf (accessed December 1, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- KEIFCA. 2016. Agenda item B3 – marine protected areas update. Available at: https://www.kentandessex-ifca.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Agenda-item-B3.pdf (accessed December 2, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- Key D, Davison PE. 1981. A review of the development of the Solent oyster fishery 1972–1980. CEFAS, Lowestoft. [Google Scholar]
- Loughs A. 2020. Pre-fishery stock assessment lough foyle native oyster fishery: Loughs Agency Northern Ireland. Available at: https://www.loughs-agency.org/app/uploads/2021/04/oyster_autumn_final_low_res.pdf (accessed December 1, 2021). [Google Scholar]
- Lown AE. 2019. Community ecology and population dynamics of the European native oyster (Ostrea edulis) in Essex, UK: a baseline for the management of the Blackwater, Crouch, Roach and Colne Estuaries Marine Conservation Zone. PhD thesis, University of Essex. [Google Scholar]
- Lown AE, Hepburn LJ, Dyer R, Cameron TC. 2020. From individual vital rates to population dynamics: an integral projection model for European native oysters in a marine protected area. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 30: 2191–2206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lown AE, Hepburn LJ, Heywood JL, Cameron TC. 2021. European native oysters and associated species richness in the presence of non-native species in a southern North Sea estuary complex. Conserv Sci Pract 3. [Google Scholar]
- Mann R, Southworth M, Harding JM, Wesson J. 2004. A comparison of dredge and patent tongs for estimation of oyster populations. J Shellfish Res 23: 387–390. [Google Scholar]
- Marenghi F, Ashton-Alcox K, Wong R, Reynolds B, Ozbay G. 2017. Dredge efficiency on natural oyster grounds in Delaware Bay and its application in monitoring the Eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) stock in Delaware, USA. Fisher Res 186: 292–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Morel GM, Bossy SF. 2004. Assessment of the whelk (Buccinum undatum L.) population around the Island of Jersey, Channel Isles. Fisher Res 68: 283–291. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Morson JM, Munroe DM, Ashton-Alcox KA, Powell EN, Bushek D, Gius J. 2018. Density-dependent capture efficiency of a survey dredge and its influence on the stock assessment of eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) in Delaware Bay. Fisher Res 205: 115–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Powell EN, Ashton-Alcox KA, Kraeuter JN. 2007. Reevaluation of eastern oyster dredge efficiency in survey mode: application in stock assessment. North Am J Fisher Manage 27: 492–511. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Schulte DM, Lipcius RN, Burke RP. 2018. Gear and survey efficiency of patent tongs for oyster populations on restoration reefs. PLoS One 13. [Google Scholar]
- SIFCA. 2017. Solent Oyster Fishery Survey. Southern Inshore Fisheries and Conservation Authority. Available at: https://secure.toolkitfiles.co.uk/clients/25364/sitedata/Redesign/Solent-Dredge-Fisheries/Solent-Oyster-Survey-2017.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- SIFCA. 2019. Solent Oyster Stock Assessment. Southern Inshore fisheries and Conservation Authority, Poole, Dorset. [Google Scholar]
- Thorngren L, Bergstrom P, Holthuis TD, Lindegarth M. 2019. Assessment of the population of Ostrea edulis in Sweden: a marginal population of significance? Ecol Evol 9: 13877–13888. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Walker ND, Maxwell DL, Le Quesne WJF, Jennings S. 2017. Estimating efficiency of survey and commercial trawl gears from comparisons of catch-ratios. ICES J Mar Sci 74: 1448–1457. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- zu Ermgassen PSE, Bonacic K, Boudry P, Bromley CA, Cameron TC, Colsoul B, Coolen JWP, Frankic A, Hancock B, van der Have TM, Holbrook Z, Kamermans P, Laugen AT, Nevejan N, Pogoda B, Pouvreau S, Preston J, Ranger CJ, Sanderson WG, Sas H, Strand A, Sutherland WJ. 2020. Forty questions of importance to the policy and practice of native oyster reef restoration in Europe. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 30: 2038–2049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.