EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 34 (2021) Aquat. Living Resour., 34 (2021) 2 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 34, 2021
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 6
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2021001
Published online 12 March 2021
  • Anderson EC, Thompson EA. 2002. A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160: 1217–1229. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Balloux F, Goudet J. 2002. Statistical properties of population differentiation estimators under stepwise mutation in a finite island model. Mol Ecol 11: 771–783. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Barluenga M, Stolting KN, Salzburger W, Muschick M, Meyer A. 2006. Sympatric speciation in Nicaraguan crater lake cichlid fish. Nature (London) 439: 719–723. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen DX, Chu WY, Liu XL, Nong XX, Li YL, Du SJ, Zhang JS. 2012. Phylogenetic studies of three sinipercid fishes (Perciformes: Sinipercidae) based on complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mitochondrial DNA 23: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Hohenlohe PA, Amish SJ, Catchen JM, Allendorf FW, Luikart G. 2011. Next-generation RAD sequencing identifies thousands of SNPs for assessing hybridization between rainbow and westslope cutthroat trout. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 117–122. [Google Scholar]
  • Kong XY. 1993. Comparative studies on the skeletal characteristics of seven sinipercinae fishes of China. J Ocean Univ China 22: 116–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamer JT, Dolan CR, Petersen JL, Chick JH, Epifanio JM. 2010. Introgressive hybridization between bighead carp and silver carp in the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers. N Am J Fish Manage 30: 1452–1461. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamer JT, Ruebush BC, Arbieva ZH, McClelland MA, Epifanio JM, Sass GG. 2015. Diagnostic SNPs reveal widespread introgressive hybridization between introduced bighead and silver carp in the Mississippi River Basin. Mol Ecol 24: 3931–3943. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li CH, Ortí G, Zhao JL. 2010. The phylogenetic placement of sinipercid fishes (“Perciformes”) revealed by 11 nuclear loci. Mol Phylogenet Evol 56: 1096–1104. [Google Scholar]
  • Li CH, Michael H, Nicolas S, Corrigan S, Naylor GJP. 2013. Capturing protein-coding genes across highly divergent species. BioTechniques 54: 321–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li D, Yang C. 1998. Biology of mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi Basilewsky) in Poyang Lake. Acta Agric Jiangxi 10: 14–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu X, Sun JJ, Wang HF, Luo D, Hou XC, Liu LZ, Li GF. 2013. Observations on embryonic development of reciprocal hybrids of Siniperca kneri Garman ♀ × Siniperca chuatsi Basilewsky ♂ and F2 of S. kneri ♀ × S. chuatsi ♂ F1 . J Fish Sci China 20: 975–981. [Google Scholar]
  • Poulet N, Berrebi P, Alain C, Lek S. 2004. Genetic and morphometric variations in the pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) of a fragmented delta. Arch Hydrobiol 159: 531–554. [Google Scholar]
  • Ren ML. 1994. The biology of mandarin fish Siniperca chuatsi Basilewsky in Heilongjiang River. Chin J Fish 7: 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Scribner KT, Page KS, Bartron ML. 2000. Hybridization in freshwater fishes: a review of case studies and cytonuclear methods of biological inference. Rev: Methods Technol Fish Biol Fish 10: 293–323. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith GR. 1992. Introgression in fishes: significance for paleontology, cladistics, and evolutionary rates. Syst Biol 41: 41–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Song SL, Zhao JL, Li CH. 2017. Species delimitation and phylogenetic reconstruction of the sinipercids (Perciformes: Sinipercidae) based on target enrichment of thousands of nuclear coding sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 111: 44–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Tian CX, Guo WJ, Liang XF, Sun LF, Lv LY, Zhao C, Song Y, He S. 2017. Identification of species-specific microsatellite markers in three Siniperca species by RNA-Seq. Biochem Syst Ecol 70: 126–131. [Google Scholar]
  • Vignal A, Milan D, Sancristobal M, Eggen A. 2002. A review on SNP and other types of molecular markers and their use in animal genetics. Genet Sel Evol 34: 275–305. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu XH, Liang XF, He S. 2014. Genetic diversity analysis in three species of Siniperca . J Jinan Univ Nat Sci Med Ed 35: 255–260. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang M. Molecular Markers and Population Genetic Structure of Siniperca chuatsi, Siniperca kneri and Siniperca scherzeri , Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • Yin WL, Yang DS. 1988. Comparative studies on mitochondrial DNA from Siniperca chuatsi and Siniperca kneri . Acta Hydrobiol Sin 22: 257–264. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu FY. Study on Genetic Diversity of Siniperca chuatsi/kneri Complex in the Yangtze River, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu XJ. Chinese Freshwater Fish Chromosomes, Science Press, Beijing, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao C, Liang XF, Tian CX, Yang M, Dou YQ, Guo WJ, Song Y. 2015. Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of five Siniperca species based on microsatellite markers. J Huazhong Agric Univ 34: 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao JL, Li SF, Cai WQ, Wang WW. 2006a. Phylogenetic relationship of sinipercine fishes in East Asia based on cytochrome b sequences. Acta Zool Sin 52: 676–680. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao JL, Wang WW, Li SF, Cai WQ. 2006b. Structure of the mitochondrial DNA control region of the sinipercine fishes and their phylogenetic relationship. Acta Genet Sin 33: 793–799. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou CW, Yang Q, Cai DL. 1988. On the classification and distribution of the Sinipercinae fishes (Family Serranidae). Zool Res 9: 113–125. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu SQ, Cao XY, Zhao JL, Tang SJ, Wu HY. 2020. Hybridization and introgression between Siniperca chuatsi and S. kneri from two lakes in the Middle Yangtze River. J Shanghai Ocean Univ 29: 1–8. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.