Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 33, 2020
Article Number 2
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2020001
Published online 09 March 2020
  • Baqueiro E, Aldana-Aranda D. 2003. Patrones en la biología poblacional de moluscos de importancia comercial en México. Rev Biol Trop 51: 97–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brealey RA, Myers SC, Allen F. 2013. Principles of corporate finance (11th edn.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill/Irwin Series in Finance, Insurance and Real Estate. [Google Scholar]
  • Carreon-Palau A, Uria-Galicia E, Espinosa-Chavez F, Martinez-Jeronimo F. 2003. Desarrollo morfológico e histológico del sistema reproductor de Pomacea patula catemacensis (Baker 1922) (Mollusca, Caenogastropoda: Ampullariidae). Rev Chil Hist Nat 76: 665–680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen JQ, Haws MC, Fong QSW, Leung PS. 2017. Economic Feasibility of producing Oysters using a small-scale Hawaiian Fishpond model. Aquacult Rep 5: 41–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • de Graaf G, Latif A. 2002. Development of freshwater fish farming and poverty alleviation: a case study from Bangladesh. Aquacult. Asia VII (5/7). [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards P. 2000. Aquaculture, poverty impacts, and livelihoods. Natural resource perspectives (56). London: Overseas Development Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • Engle C. 2007. Investment and farm modeling for feasibility assessment and decision-making in aquaculture. In: Leung P, Lee CS, Bryen PJO (Eds.), Species & System Selection for Sustainable Aquaculture. 1st edm. USA: Blackwell Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  • Engle CR, Neira I. 2005. Tilapia farm business management and economics: a training manual. Pine Bluff, University of Arkansas 41pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Espinoza-Chávez F, Martínez-Jerónimo F. 2005. Growth and fecundity of Pomacea patula catemacensis (Caenogastropoda: Ampulariidae) when fed on gel diets of Scenedesmus incrassatulus (Chlorophyceae). The Veliger 43: 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia-Trejo F, Hurtado-Gonzalez S, Soto-Zarazua GM, Gutierrez PJ. 2014. Development of freshwater native species with aquaculture potential. In: Hernandez-Vergara MP, Perez-Rostro CI (Eds.), Sustainable aquaculture techniques, Intechopen, http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/57215, available at https://www.intechopen.com/books/sustainable-aquaculture-techniques [Google Scholar]
  • Garcia-Ulloa M, Gallo-Garcia MC, Rodriguez-Gonzales H, Góngora-Gomez A, Ponce-Palafox J. 2008. Morphometric relationship of weight and length of cultured freshwater snail, Pomacea patula (Baker, 1922), at three different life stages. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 39: 842–846. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • García-Ulloa M, Ramnarine I, Gallo-García M, Ponce-Palafox J, Góngora-Gómez A. 2007. Spawning and hatching of the edible snail Pomacea patula (Baker 1922) (Gastropoda: Ampullaridae) in the laboratory. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 38: 50–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Kam LE, Leung P. 2008. Financial risk analysis in aquaculture. In: Bondad-Reantaso MG, Arthur, JR Subasinghe RG (Eds.), Understanding risk analysis in Aquaculture. Rome, FAO: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture No. 19. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar G, Engle C. 2017. Economics of Intensively Aerated Catfish Ponds. J. World Aquacult. Soc. 48: 320–332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lagunes B. 1997. Aprovechamiento de los cuerpos de aguas tropicales para la crianza intensiva del caracol dulceacuícola Pomacea sp. (Mollusca, Gastrópoda) en corrales flotantes, para su integración en programas acuícolas. Tesis que para obtener el título de Ingeniero en Acuacultura. Secretaría de Educación Pública, Subsecretaría de Educación e Investigación Tecnológica. Unidad de Educación en Ciencias y Tecnologías del Mar. Instituto Tecnológico del Mar. [Google Scholar]
  • Lorán-Núñez RM, Martínez-Izunza FR, Valdéz-Guzmán AJ, Gaspar-Dillanes MT. 2005. Lago de CATEMACO. In: Gaspar-Dillanes MT, Aguilar-Montaño D (Eds.), Pesquerías Continentales de México, 1st Edition, Instituto Nacional de Pesca, 93–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer-Willerer AO, Santos-Soto A. 2006. Temperature and light intensity affecting egg production and growth performance of the Apple Snail Pomacea patula (Baker, 1922). Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria, 10: 41–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Moss SM, Leung PS. 2006. Comparative cost of shrimp production: earthen ponds versus recirculating aquaculture systems. In: Leung PS, Engle (Eds). Shrimp culture: economics, market, & trade. Blackwell Publishing: Ames. [Google Scholar]
  • Mejia-Ramirez MA. 2018. Productive Performance and Bacterial Profile of Freshwater Snail Pomacea patula Catemacensis (Baker, 1922) Cultivated in Biofloc. Instituto Tecnologico de Boca del Río, Veracruz, Mexico (in Spanish). [Google Scholar]
  • Moss SM, Leung PS. 2006. Comparative cost of shrimp production: earthen ponds versus recirculating aquaculture systems. In: Leung PS, Engle C (Eds). Shrimp culture: economics, market, & trade. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 291–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Muir J. 2005. Managing to harvest? Perspectives on the potential of aquaculture. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 360: 191–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mun J. 2010. Modeling risk: Applying Monte Carlo, risk simulation, strategic real options, stochastic forecasting, and portfolio optimization, 2nd edn, Wiley & Sons. ISBN: 978-0-470-59221–2. [Google Scholar]
  • Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MCM, Clay J, Folke, C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M. 2000. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405: 1017–1024. [Google Scholar]
  • NOM-041-PESC-2004. Available at: http://www.dof.gob.mx/normasOficiales/1943/sagarpa/sagarpa.htm [Google Scholar]
  • Rhodes R, Hanson TR, Dasgupta S. 2009. Economics and Business Management. In: New MB, Valenti JH, Tidwell LR, D'Abramo LR, Kutty MN (Eds.), Freshwater Prawns: Biology and Management. USA: John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • Ross LG, Martinez Palacios CA, Morales EJ. 2008. Developing native fish species for aquaculture: the interacting demands of biodiversity, sustainable aquaculture, and livelihoods. Aquacult Res 39: 675–683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz-Ramirez R, Espinosa-Chávez F, Martínez-Jerónimo F. 2005. Growth and reproduction of Pomacea patula catemacensis Baker, 1922 (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae) when fed calothrix sp. (Cyanobacteria). Jour World Aquacult Soc 36: 87–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saint-Paul U. 1986. Potential for aquaculture of South American freshwater fishes: a review. Aquaculture 54: 205–240. [Google Scholar]
  • Saint-Paul U. 1991. The potential for Colossoma culture in Latin America. Infofish Int 2: 49–53. [Google Scholar]
  • Sullivan WG, Wicks EM, Luxhoj JT. 2006. Eng Econ. 13th edn. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Van der Meer MB. 1997. Foods and feeding strategies for Colossoma macropomum (Cuvier 1818). Fish growth as related to dietary protein. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University. Ponsen & Louijen, Wageningen. [Google Scholar]
  • Vázquez G, Castro T, Castro J, Mendoza G. 2012. Effect commercial diets on growth, survival and chemical composition of the edible freshwater snail Pomacea patula catemacensis. J Agric Technol 8: 1901–1912. [Google Scholar]
  • Watanabe WO, Dumas CF, Carroll PM. 2015. Production economic analysis of black sea bass juveniles to support finfish mariculture grow out industry development in the southeastern US. Aquacult Econ Manag 19: 1–25 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Young JA, Muir JF. 1995. Diversity in adversity? The case of the UK aquaculture sector. In: International Cooperation for Fisheries and Aquatic Development. 7 th Bien.Conf. Int. Inst. of Fisheries Economics and Trade. Taiwan, July 1994, vol. 11, pp. 82–95. [Google Scholar]
  • Zuñiga-Jara S, Ruiz S. 2017. Reviewing capital cost estimations in Aquaculture. Aquacult Econ Manag 22: 72–93. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.