Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 24, Number 4, October-December 2011
Page(s) 359 - 368
Section Thematic section
Published online 01 December 2011
  • Abramoff M.D., Magalhaes P.J., Ram S.J., 2004, Image Processing with Image J. Biophotonics International 11, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Ardizzone D., Cailliet G.M., Natanson L.J., Andrews A.H., Kerr L.A., Brown T.A., 2006, Application of bomb radiocarbon chronologies to shortfin mako (Isurus oxyrinchus) age validation. Environ. Biol. Fish. 77, 355–366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bass A.J., D’Aubrey J.D., Kistnasamy N., 1975, Sharks of the east coast of southern Africa, IV. The families Odontaspididae, Scaphanorhynchidae, Isuridae, Cetorhinidae, Alopiidae, Orectolobidae and Rhiniodontidae. Oceanogr. Res. Inst. (Durban) Invest. Rep. No. 39. [Google Scholar]
  • Barker M.J., Schluessel V., 2005, Managing global shark fisheries: suggestions for prioritizing management strategies. Aquat. Conserv. 15, 325–347. [Google Scholar]
  • Bigelow H.R., Shroeder W.C., 1948, Sharks. In: Parr A.E., Olsen Y.H. (Eds.). Fishes of the western North Atlantic, Part l, New Haven, CT, Mere. Sears Found. Mar. Res. Yale Univ., pp. 59–564. [Google Scholar]
  • Buencuerpo V., Rios S., Morón J., 1998, Pelagic sharks associated with the swordfish, Xiphias gladius, fishery in the eastern North Atlantic Ocean and the Strait of Gibraltar. Fish. Bull. 96, 667–685. [Google Scholar]
  • Beamish R.J., Fournier D.A., 1981, A method for comparing the precision of a set of age determinations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38, 982–983. [Google Scholar]
  • Cailliet G.M., Bedford D.W., 1983, The biology of three pelagic sharks from california waters, and their emerging fisheries: a review. CalCOFI Rep. 24, 57–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Cailliet G.M., Martin L.K., Kusher D., Wolf P., Welden B.A., 1983, Techniques for enhancing vertebral bands in age estimation of California elasmobranchs. In: Prince E.D., Pulos L.M. (Eds.). Proc. International workshop on age determination of oceanic pelagic fishes: tunas, billfishes, sharks. NOAA Tech. Rep. NMFS 8, pp. 157–165. [Google Scholar]
  • Cailliet G.M., Smith W.D., Mollet H.F., Goldman K.J., 2006, Age and growth studies of chondrichthyan fishes: the need for consistency in terminology, verification, validation, and growth function fitting. Environ. Biol. Fish. 77, 211–228. [Google Scholar]
  • Campana S.E., 2001, Accuracy, precision, and quality control in age determination, including a review of the use and abuse of age validation methods. J. Fish Biol. 59, 197–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Cao D.M, Song L.M., Zhang Yu, Lu K.K., Hu Z.X., 2011, Environmental preferences of Alopias superciliosus and Alopias vulpinus in waters near Marshall Islands. N. Z. J. Mar. Freshw. 45, 103–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang W.Y.B., 1982, A statistical method for evaluating the reproducibility of age determination. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 39, 1208–1210. [Google Scholar]
  • Cerrato R. M., 1990, Interpretable statistical tests for growth comparisons using parameters in the von Bertalanffy equation. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 47, 1416–1426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen C.T., Liu K.M., Chang Y.C., 1997, Reproductive biology of the bigeye thresher shark, Alopias superciliosus (Lowe, 1839) (Chondrichthyes: Alopiidae), in the northwestern Pacific. Ichthyol. Res. 44, 227–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen P., Yuan W., 2006, Demographic analysis based on the growth parameter of sharks. Fish. Res. 78, 374–379. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coelho R., Erzini K., 2002, Age and growth of the undulate ray, Raja undulata, in the Algarve (Southern Portugal). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 82, 987–990. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coelho R., Erzini K., 2006, Reproductive aspects of the undulate ray, Raja undulata, from the south coast of Portugal. Fish. Res. 81, 80–85. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Compagno L.J.V., 2001, Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date: bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). Rome, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Cortés E., Arocha F., Beerkircher L., Carvalho F, Domingo A., Heupel M., Holtzhausen H., Santos M.N., Ribera M., Simpfendorfer C., 2010, Ecological risk assessment of pelagic sharks caught in Atlantic pelagic longline fisheries. Aquat. Living Resour. 23, 25–34. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gelsleichter J., Piercy A., Musick J.A., 1998, Evaluation of copper, iron, and lead substitution techniques in elasmobranch age determination. J. Fish Biol. 53, 465–470. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gilmore R.G., 1993, Reproductive biology of lamnoid sharks. Environ. Biol. Fishes 38, 95–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goldman K.J., 2004, Age and growth of elasmobranch fishes. In: Musick J.A., Bonfil R. (Eds.). Elasmobranch Fisheries Management Techniques, Singapore, APEC Secretariat, pp. 97–132. [Google Scholar]
  • Gruber S.H., Compagno L.J.V., 1981, Taxonomic status and biology of the bigeye thresher Alopias superciliosus. US Fish. Bull. 79, 617–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoening J.M., Morgan M.J., Brown C.A., 1995, Analyzing differences between two age determination methods by tests of symmetry. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 52, 364–368. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICCAT, 2008, Recommendation by ICCAT on the conservation of bigeye thresher sharks (Alopias superciliosus) caught in association with fisheries managed by ICCAT. ICCAT Recommendation 2008-07. Online document. [Google Scholar]
  • IUCN, 2009, IUCN red list of threatened species. Online document. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson A.G., 1979, A simple method for staining the centra of teleost vertebrae. NE Gulf Sci. 3, 113–115. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones B.C., Green G.H., 1977, Age determination of an elasmobranch (Squalus acanthias) by x-ray spectrometry. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34, 44–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Katsanevakis S., 2006, Modelling fish growth: Model selection, multi-model inference and model selection uncertainty. Fish. Res. 81, 229–235. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kimura D.K., 1980, Likelihood methods for the von Bertalanffy growth curve. Fish. Bull. 77, 765–773. [Google Scholar]
  • LaMarca M.S., 1966, A simple technique for demonstrating calcified annuli in the vertebrae of large elasmobranchs. Copeia 1966, 351–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu K.M., Chiang P.J., Chen C.T, 1998, Age and growth estimates of the bigeye thresher shark, Alopias superciliosus, in northeastern Taiwan waters. Fish. Bull. 96, 482–491. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu K.M., Chen C.T., Liao T.H., Joung S.J., 1999, Age, growth, and reproduction of the pelagic thresher shark, Alopias pelagicus in the Northwestern Pacific. Copeia 1999,68‐74. [Google Scholar]
  • Megalofonou P., Yannopoulos C., Damalas D., De Metrio G., Deflorio M., de la Serna J.M., Macias D., 2005, Incidental catch and estimated discards of pelagic sharks from the swordfish and tuna fisheries in the Mediterranean Sea. Fish. Bull. 103, 620–634 [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno J.A., Morón J., 1992, Reproductive biology of the bigeye thresher shark, Alopias superciliosus (Lowe, 1839). Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 43, 77–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakano H., Matsunaga H., Okamoto H., Okazaki M., 2003, Acoustic tracking of bigeye thresher shark Alopias superciliosus in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 265, 255–261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Natanson L.J., Cailliet G.M., 1990, Vertebral growth zone deposition in angel sharks. Copeia 1990, 1133–1145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Natanson L.J., Mello J.J., Campana S.E., 2002, Validated age and growth of the porbeagle shark (Lamna nasus) in the western North Atlantic Ocean. Fish. Bull. 100, 266–278. [Google Scholar]
  • Natanson L.J., Kohler N.E., Ardizzone D., Cailliet G.M., Wintner S.P., Mollet H.F., 2006, Validated age and growth estimates for the shortfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus, in the North Atlantic Ocean. Environ. Biol. Fish. 77, 367–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Neer J.A., Cailliet G.M., 2001, Aspects of the life history of the Pacific electric ray, Torpedo californica (Ayers). Copeia 2001, 842–847. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • R Development Core Team, 2010, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • Shotton R., 1999, Case studies of the management of elasmobranch fisheries. Rome, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Simpfendorfer C.A., Hueter R.E., Bergman U., Connett S.M.H., 2002, Results of a fishery-independent survey for pelagic sharks in the Western North Atlantic, 1977–1994. Fish. Res. 55, 175–192. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith S.E., Au D.W., Show C., 1998, Intrinsic rebound potentials of 26 species of Pacific sharks. Mar. Freshw. Res. 49, 663–678. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevens J.D., Bonfil R., Dulvy N.K., Walker P.A., 2000, The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (Chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 476–494. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stevens J.D., Bradford R.W., West G.J., 2010, Satellite tagging of blue sharks (Prionace glauca) and other pelagic sharks off eastern Australia: depth behaviour, temperature experience and movements. Mar. Biol. 157, 575–591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stillwell C.E., Casey J.G., 1976, Observations on the bigeye thresher shark, Alopias superciliosus, in the western north Atlantic. Fish. Bull. 74, 221–225. [Google Scholar]
  • Weng K.C., Block B.A., 2004, Diel vertical migration of the bigeye thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus), a species possessing orbital retia mirabilia. Fish. Bull. 102, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
  • Wintner S.P., Cliff G., 1999, Age and growth determination of the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, from the east coast of South Africa. Fish. Bull. 97, 153–169. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.