Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 20, Number 3, July-September 2007
Page(s) 257 - 262
Published online 27 October 2007
  • Adcock G.J., Bernal Ramirez J.H., Hauser L., Smith P., Carvalho G.R., 2000, Screening of DNA polymorphisms in samples of archived scales from New Zealand snapper. J. Fish Biol. 56, 1283-1287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown R.C., Tsalavouta M., Terzoglou V., Magoulas A., McAndrew B.J., 2005, Additional microsatellites for Sparus aurata and cross-species amplification within the Sparidae family. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 605-607. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang C.F., Yueh W.S., 1990, Annual cycle of gonadal histology and steroid proWles in the juvenile males and adult females of the protandrous black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli. Aquaculture 91, 179-196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen S.L., Liu Y.G., Xu M.Y., Li J., 2005, Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci from an EST-library of red sea bream (Chrysophrys major) and cross-species amplification. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 215-217. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • D'Amato M.E., Lunt D.H., Carvalho G.R., 1999, Microsatellite markers for the hake Macruronus magellanicus amplify other gadoid fish. Mol. Ecol. 8, 1086-1087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jean C.T., Lee S.C., Hui C.F., Chen C.T., 1996, Genetic variation of black porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli (Perciformes: Sparidae) in the coastal waters of Taiwan. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 24, 211-219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jean C.T., Lee S.C., Hui C.F., Chen C.T., 1998, Variation in Mitochondrial DNA Sequences of Black Porgy, Acanthopagrus schlegeli, in the Coastal Waters of Taiwan. Zool. Stud. 37, 22-30. [Google Scholar]
  • Launey S., Krieg F., Haffray P., Bruant J.S., Vannier A., Guyomard R., 2003, Twelve new microsatellite markers for gilted seabream (Sparus aurata L.): characterization, polymorphism and linkage. Mol. Ecol. Notes 3, 457-459. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Y.G., Zheng M.G., Liu L.X., Lin H., Wang D.F., Li B.F., Sun X.Q., 2006, Five new microsatellite loci for Oliver flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) from an EST-library and cross-species amplification. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 371-373. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Y.G., Chen S.L., Li B.F., 2005a, Assessing the genetic structure of three Japanese flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) stocks by microsatellite markers. Aquaculture 243, 103-111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Y.G., Chen S.L., Li B.F., Wang Z.J., Liu Z.J., 2005b, Analysis of genetic variation in selected stocks of hatchery flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, using AFLP markers. Biochem. System. Ecol. 33, 993-1005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu Y.G., Wang X.Y., Liu L.X., 2004, Analysis of genetic variation in surviving apple shoots following cryopreservation by vitrification. Plant Sci. 166, 677-685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moore S.S., Sargeant L.L., King T.J., Mattick J.S., Georges M., Hetzel D.J.S., 1991, The conservation of dinucleotide microsatellites among mammalian genomes allows the use of heterologous PCR primer pairs in closely related species. Genomics 10, 654-660. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Morin P.A., Mahboubi P., Wedel S., Rogers J., 1998, Rapid screening and comparison of human microsatellite markers in baboons: allele size is conserved, but allele number is not. Genomics 53,12-20. [Google Scholar]
  • Peakall R., Gilmore S., Keys W., Morgante M., Rafalski A., 1998, Cross-species amplification of soybean (Glycine max) simple sequence repeats within the genus and other legume genera: Implications for the transferability of SSRs in plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 1275-1287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Primmer C.R., Merila J., 2002, A low rate of crossspecies microsatellite amplification success in Ranid frogs. Conserv. Genet. 3, 445-449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • RamSak A., Garoia F., Guarniero I., Mannini P., Tinti F., 2003, Novel polymorphic microsatellite markers for the common pandora (Pagellus erythrinus) Mol. Ecol. Notes 3, 553-555. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rice W.R., 1989, Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43, 223-225. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rico C., Rico I., Hewitt G., 1996, 470 million years of conservation of microsatellite loci among fish species. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 263, 549-557. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider S., Roessli D., Excoffier L., 2000, ARLEQUIN: A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory. University of Geneva, Geneva. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott L.J., Shepherd M., Henry R.J., 2003, Characterization of highly conserved microsatellite loci in Araucaria cunninghamii and related species. Plant System. Evol. 236, 115-123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith K.L., Alberts S.C., Bayes M.K., Bruford M.W., Altmann J., Ober C., 2000, Crossspecies amplification, non-invasive genotyping, and non-Mendelian inheritance of human STRPs in Savannah baboons. Am. J. Primatol. 51, 219-227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Stockley B.M., Rogers A.D., Iyengar A., Menezes G., Santos R., Long A., 2000, Ten microsatellite loci isolated and developed for the blackspot seabream, Pagellus bogaraveo (Brunnich 1768). Mol. Ecol. 9, 999-1000. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Takagi M., Taniguchi N., Cook D., Doyle R.W., 1997, Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from red sea bream Pagrus major and detection in closely related species. Fish. Sci. 63, 199-204. [Google Scholar]
  • Tautz D., Trick M., Dover G., 1986, Cryptic simplicity in DNA is a major source of genetic variation. Nature 322, 652-656. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yap E.S., Spencer P.B., Chaplin J.A., Potter I.C., 2000, The estuarine teleost, Acanthopagrus butcheri (Sparidae), shows low levels of polymorphism at five microsatellite loci. Mol. Ecol. 9, 2225-2226. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zane L., Bargelloni L., Patarnello T., 2002, Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 11, 1-16. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.