EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 19 / No 4 (October-December 2006) Aquat. Living Resour., 19 4 (2006) 389-402 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 19, Number 4, October-December 2006
Page(s) 389 - 402
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2007008
Published online 07 February 2007
  • Anonymous, 1885-1977, Fish. Bd. Scot. Ann. Rep. Her Majesty's Stationary Office, No. 4-65. [Google Scholar]
  • Beaumont A.R., Hoare K., 2003, Biotechnology and Genetics in Fisheries and Aquaculture, Blackwell Science, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Boudry P., Collet B., Cornette F., Hervouet V., Bonhomme F., 2002, High variance in reproductive success of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas Thunberg) revealed by microsatellite-based parentage analysis of multifactorial crosses. Aquaculture 204, 283-296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruford M.W., Wayne R.K., 1993, Microsatellites and their application to population genetic studies. Curr. Opinion Genet. Devel. 3, 939-943. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho G.R., Hauser L., 1998, Advances in the molecular analysis of fish population structure. Ital. J. Zool. 65 (suppl.) 21-33. [Google Scholar]
  • Cornuet J.M., Luikart G., 1996, Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144, 2001-2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Diaz-Almela E., Boudry P., Launey S., Bonhomme F., Lapegue S., 2004, Reduced female gene flow in the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis. J. Hered. 95, 510-516. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fulton T.W., 1895, The past and the present condition of the oyster beds in the Firth of Forth. Fish. Board Scot. Ann. Rep. 14, 244-293. [Google Scholar]
  • Gaffney P.M., 1994, Heterosis and heterozygote deficiencies in marine bivalves: more light? In: Beaumont, A. R.(ed.) Genetics and evolution of aquatic organisms, London, Chapman and Hall, pp. 146-153. [Google Scholar]
  • Goudet J. 2001. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). [Updated from Goudet, J., 1995, FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J. Hered. 86, 485-486.] Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Hedgecock D., Launey S., Pudovkin A., Naciri Y., Lapègue S., Bonhomme F., 2007, Small effective number of parents (Nb) inferred for a naturally spawned cohort of juvenile European flat oysters Ostrea edulis. Mar. Biol. 150, in press. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoare K., Beaumont A.R., 1995, Effects of an Odh null allele and GPI low activity allozyme on shell length in laboratory-reared Mytilus edulis L. Mar. Biol. 123, 775-780. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hochberg Y., 1988, A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75, 800-802. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Johannesson K., Rodstrom E.M., Aase, H., 1989, Low genetic variation in Scandinavian populations of Ostrea edulis L – possible causes and implications. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 128, 177-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karl S.A., Avise J.C., 1992, Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: implications from nuclear RFLPs. Science 256, 100-102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Laing I., Walker P., Areal F., 2005, A feasibility study of native oyster (Ostrea edulis) stock regeneration in the United Kingdom. Defra & Seafish Publication, CEFAS, Weymouth. [Google Scholar]
  • Launey S., Ledu C., Boudry P., Bonhomme F., Naciri-Graven Y., 2002, Geographic structure in the European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis L.) as revealed by microsatellite polymorphisms. J. Hered. 93, 331-351. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Magennis B.A., Gosling E., Wilkins N.P., 1983, Irish oyster populations: an historical and genetic study. Proc. R. Irish Acad. 83B, 291-299. [Google Scholar]
  • Millar R.H., 1961, Scottish oyster investigations 1946-1958. Dep. Agric. Fish. Scot. Mar. Res. 3, 5-75. [Google Scholar]
  • Millar R.H., 1963, Investigations of the oyster beds in Loch Ryan. Dep. Agric. Fish. Scot. Mar. Res. 5, 3-23. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller M., 1997, Tools for population genetic analysis: a windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. http://bioweb.usu.edu/mpmbio/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • McGoldrick D.J., Hedgecock D., English L.J., Baoprasertkul P., Ward R.D., 2000, The transmission of microsatellite alleles in Australian and North American stocks of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas): selection and null alleles. J. Shellfish Res. 19, 779-786. [Google Scholar]
  • Morgan T.S., Rogers A.D., Iyengar A., 2000, Novel microsatellite markers for the European oyster Ostrea edulis. Mol. Ecol. 9, 495-496. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Naciri Y., Vigouroux Y., Dallas J., Desmarais E., Delsert C., Bonhomme F, 1995, Identification and inheritance of (GA/TC)n and (AC/GT)n repeats in the European flat oyster. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotech. 4, 83-87. [Google Scholar]
  • Nei M., 1978, Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89, 583-590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rose C.G., Paynter K.T., Hare M.P., 2006, Isolation by distance in the eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica, in Chesapeake Bay. J. Hered. 97, 158-170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rousset F., 1997. Genetic differentiation and estimation of gene flow from F-statistics under isolation by distance. Genetics 145, 1219-1228. [Google Scholar]
  • Saavedra C., Zapata C., Alvarez G., 1995, Geographical patterns of variability at allozyme loci in the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis. Mar. Biol. 122, 95-104. [Google Scholar]
  • Saavedra C., Zapata C., Guerra A., Alvarez G., 1993, Allozyme variation in European populations of the oyster Ostrea edulis. Mar. Biol. 115, 85-95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sambrook J., Fritsch E.F., Maniatis T., 1989, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith W., 1895, Report by Mr W. Anderson Smith, a member of the Board to whom the matter was remitted, on the progress of the experiments in oyster culture carried on at Loch Sween. Appendix O, No. II, Fish. Board Scot. Ann. Rep. 13, 195-196. [Google Scholar]
  • Sobolewska H., Beaumont A.R., 2005. Genetic variation at microsatellite loci in northern populations of the European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 85, 955-960. [Google Scholar]
  • Sobolewska H., Beaumont A.R., Hamilton A., 2001, Dinucleotide microsatellites isolated from the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis. Mol. Ecol. Note 1, 79-80. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sunnucks P., 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 199-203. [Google Scholar]
  • Vercaemer B., Spence K.R., Herbinger C.M., Lapegue S., Kenchington, E. L., 2006, Genetic diversity of the European oyster (Ostrea edulis L.) in Nova Scotia: comparison with other parts of Canada, Maine and Europe and implications for broodstock management. J. Shellfish Res. 25, 543-551. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wilding C.S., Beaumont A.R., Latchford J.W., 1997, Mitochondrial DNA variation in the scallop Pecten maximus (L.), assessed by a PCR-RFLP method. Heredity 79, 178-189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C., 1984, Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358-1370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wright S., 1965, The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19, 395-420. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zane L., Bargelloni L., Paternello T., 2002, Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Mol. Ecol. 11, 1-16. [Google Scholar]
  • Zouros E., Foltz D.W., 1984, Possible explanations of heterozygote deficiency in bivalve mollusks. Malacologia 25, 583-591. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.