Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 18, Number 1, January-March 2005
Page(s) 77 - 81
Published online 15 March 2005
  • Alfei L., Cavallo D., Eleuteri P., Grollino M.G., Colombari P.T., Ferri A., Onali A., De Vita R., 1996, Nuclear DNA content in Salmo fibreni in Lake Posta Fibreno, Italy. J. Fish Biol. 48, 1051-1058.
  • Birstein V.J., Poletaev A.I., Goncharov B.F., 1993, DNA content in Eurasian sturgeon species determined by flow cytometry. Cytometry 14, 377-383. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Cano J., Thode G., Alvarez M.C., 1981, Analisis cariologico de seis especies de esparidos del Mediterraneo. Genet. Iber. 33, 181-188.
  • Cano J., Pretel A., Melendez S., Garcia F., Caputo V., Fenocchio A.S., Bertollo L.A.C., 1996, Determination of early stages of sex chromosome differentiation in the sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax L. (Pisces: Perciformes). Cytobios 87, 45-59.
  • Carvalho M.L., Oliveira C., Foresti F., 1998, Nuclear DNA content of thirty species of neotropical fishes. Genet. Mol. Biol. 21, 47-54.
  • Castaño A., Sanchez P., Llorente M.T., Carballo M., de la Torre A., Muñoz M.J., 2000, The use of alternative systems for the ecotoxicological screening of complex mixtures on fish populations. Sci. Total Environ. 247, 337-348. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Cataudella S., Civitelli M.V., Capanna E., 1973, The chromosomes of some Mediterranean teleosts: Scorpaenidae, Serranidae, Labridae, Blenniidae, Gobiidae (Pisces-Scorpaeniformes, Perciformes). Boll. Zool. 40, 385-389.
  • Chiarelli B., Ferrantelli O., Cucchi C., 1969, The karyotype of some teleostean fish obtained by tissue culture in vitro. Experientia 25, 426-427. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Ciudad J., Cid E., Velasco A., Lara J.M., Aijón J., Orfao A., 2002, Flow cytometry measurement of the DNA contents of G0/G1 diploid cells from three different teleost fish species. Cytometry 48, 20-25. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Cui J., Ren X., Yu Q., 1991, Nuclear DNA content variation in fishes. Cytologia 56, 425-429.
  • Galetti Jr. P.M., Aguilar C.T., Molina W.F., 2000, An overview of marine fish cytogenetics. Hydrobiologia 420, 55-62. [CrossRef]
  • Guerrero R.D., Shelton W.L., 1974, An aceto-carmine squash method of sexing juveniles fishes. Progress. Fish Cult. 36, 56. [CrossRef]
  • Hardie D.C., Hebert P.D.N., 2003, The nucleotypic effects of cellular DNA content in cartilaginous and ray-finned fishes. Genome 46, 683-706. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Harrell R.M., Van Heukelem W., Kerby J.H., 1995, Triploid induction validation techniques: A comparison of karyotyping, flow cytometry, particle size analysis and staining nucleolar organizer regions. Aquaculture 137, 159-160. [CrossRef]
  • Hinegardner R., 1968, Evolution of cellular DNA content in Teleost fishes. Am. Nat. 102 (928), 517-523.
  • Hinegardner R., Rosen D.E., 1972, Cellular DNA content and the evolution of Teleostean fishes. Am. Nat. 106 (951), 621-644.
  • Jenner N.K., Ostrander G.K., Kavanagh T.J., Livesey J.C., Shen M.W., Kim S.C., Holmes E.H., 1990, A flow cytometric comparison of DNA content and glutathione levels in hepatocytes of English sole (Parophyrs vetulus) from areas of differing water quality. Arch. Environ. Contamin. Toxicol. 19, 807-815. [CrossRef]
  • Lamatsch D.K., Steinlein C., Schmid M., Schartl M., 2000, Non-invasive determination of genome size and ploidy level in fishes by flow cytometry: detection of triploid Poecilia formosa. Cytometry 39, 91-95. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lockwood S.F., Bickham J.W., 1991, Genetic stock assessment of spawning arctic cisco (Coregonus autumnalis) populations by flow cytometric determination of DNA content. Cytometry 12, 260-267. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lockwood S.F., Derr J.N., 1992, Intra and inter-specific genome-size variation in the Salmonidae. Cytogen. Cell Genet. 59, 303-306. [CrossRef]
  • Peruzzi S., Chatain B., 2000, Pressure and cold shock induction of meiotic gynogenesis and triploidy in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Aquaculture 189, 23-37. [CrossRef]
  • Peruzzi S., Chatain B., 2003, Induction of tetraploid gynogenesis in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Genetica 119, 225-228. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Quéro J.C., Vayne J.J., 1997, Les poissons de mer des pêches françaises. Delachaux et Niestlé Edn., Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • Rossi A.R., Gornung E., Crosetti D., 1997, Cytogenetic analysis of Liza ramada (Pisces, Perciformes) by different staining techniques and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Heredity 79, 83-87. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Sola L., Cataudella S., 1978, Prime osservazioni sulla cariologia degli sparidi Mediterranei. Boll. Zool. 45, 242.
  • Sola L., Camerini B., Cataudella S., 1984, Cytogenetics of Atlantic eels: C- and G-banding, nucleolus organizer regions, and DNA content. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 38, 206-210. [CrossRef]
  • Tiersch T.R., Chandler R.W., Wachtel S.S., Elias S., 1989a, Reference standards for flow cytometry and application in comparative studies of nuclear DNA content. Cytometry 10, 706-710. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Tiersch T.R., Chandler R.W., Kallman K., Wachtel S.S., 1989b, Estimation of nuclear DNA content by flow cytometry in fishes of the genus Xiphophorus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 94, 465-468. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Van Eenennaam A.L., Van Eenennaam J.P., Medrano J.F., Doroshov S.I., 1996, Rapid verification of meiotic gynogenesis and polyploidy in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus Richardson). Aquaculture 147, 177-189. [CrossRef]
  • Wiberg U.H., 1983, Sex determination in the European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 36, 589-598. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Zanuy S., Carrillo M., Felip A., Rodríguez L., Blázquez M., Ramos J., Piferrer F., 2001, Genetic, hormonal and environmental approaches for the control of reproduction in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Aquaculture 202, 187-203. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.