Open Access

Table 1

Determinants of FAP consumption.

  Factor Influence on FAP consumption Supporting studies
Consumers' socio-characteristics Age Older consumers tend to consume more FAP than younger consumers Olsen, 2003; Brunsø et al., 2008; Murray et al., 2017; Thong and Solgaard, 2017; Cantillo et al., 2021 and Govzman et al., 2021;
  Gender Female tend to consume more FAP than male No real effect Thong and Solgaard, 2017 Govzman et al., 2021
  Income Higher-income households consume more FAP than lower-income households Verbeke et al., 2005; Thong and Solgaard, 2017; Cantillo et al., 2021
  Level of education Consumers with a higher education level consume more FAP than consumers with lower education level Jahns et al., 2014; Cantillo et al., 2021; Govzman et al., 2021; Marinac Pupavac et al., 2022
  Living in a coastal area Households located in coastal areas consume more FAP than other households, notably due to better availability and familiarity Birch and Lawley, 2012; Govzman et al., 2021; Marinac Pupavac et al., 2022; Menozzi et al., 2023; Dewals et al., 2024
  Knowledge Consumers with a high knowledge (objective and subjective) of the sector consume more FAP than consumers with a low knowledge of the sector Olsen, 2008; Birch and Lawley, 2012; Pieniak et al., 2010; Almeida et al., 2015; Menozzi et al., 2023
  Household structure Households with children consume more FAP than household without children (child development reasons) Households with children consume less FAP than household without children (safety reasons) Verbeke et al., 2005; Olsen, 2008 Birch and Lawley, 2012.

  Determinants Influence on FAP consumption Supporting studies

Credence attributes Health The perceived health benefits by consumers increase FAP consumption Verbeke et al., 2005, 2007b; Brunsø et al., 2008, 2009; Pieniak et al., 2010; Carlucci et al., 2015; Béné et al., 2019; Cantillo et al., 2021; Bimbo et al., 2022; Crona et al., 2023
    The perceived safety risks by consumers decrease FAP consumption Birch and Lawley, 2012; Govzman et al., 2021
  Country of Origin Consumers prefer domestic FAP to imported ones Brécard et al., 2009; Claret et al., 2012; Uchida et al., 2014; Feucht and Zander, 2017; Rickertsen et al., 2017; Santeramo et al., 2018; Banovic et al., 2019;Maesano et al., 2020; Marinac Pupavac et al., 2022
  Environmental impact Perceived environmental impacts can reduce FAP consumption Brécard et al., 2009, 2012; Salladarré et al., 2010; Lucas et al., 2021
  Animal welfare Perceived impacts on animal welfare can reduce FAP consumption Alfnes et al., 2018; Zander and Feucht, 2018a; Maesano et al., 2020; Waley et al., 2021
  Production method Consumers tend to prefer wild products compared to farmed products Verbeke et al., 2007b; Cardoso et al., 2013; Rickertsen et al., 2017; Maesano et al., 2020; Bimbo et al., 2022

Products characteristics Sensory qualities Perceived taste increases FAP consumption Brunsø et al., 2008, 2009; Murray et al., 2017; Zander et al., 2018b; Cantillo et al., 2021
    Perceived taste decreases FAP consumption Brunsø et al., 2008
  Product presentation Consumers tend to prefer fresh FAP compared to frozen FAP Brunsø et al., 2009; Cantillo et al., 2021
  Cooking skills Difficulty in cooking FAP reduces consumption Govzman et al., 2021
  Price Increased price reduces FAP consumption Brunsø et al., 2009; Thong and Solgaard, 2017; Bimbo et al., 2022; Marinac Pupavac et al., 2022

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.