Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 32, 2019
Article Number 11
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 01 May 2019
  • Alós J, Arlinghaus R. 2013. Impacts of partial marine protected areas on coastal fish communities exploited by recreational angling. Fish Res 137: 88–96. [Google Scholar]
  • Arlinghaus R, Matsumura S, Dieckman U. 2010. The conservation and fishery benefits of protecting large pike (Esox lucius L.) by harvest regulations in recreational fishing. Biol Conserv 143: 1444–1459. [Google Scholar]
  • Askey PJ. 2016. Managing dynamic fisheries with static regulations: an assessment of size-graded bag limits for recreational Kokanee fisheries. N Am J Fish Manag 36: 241–253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67: 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  • Beard TD, Cox SP, Carpenter SR. 2003. Impact of daily bag limit reductions on angler effort in Wisconsin walleye lakes. N Am J Fish Manag 23: 1283–1293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boukal DS, Jankovsky M, Kubecka J, Heino M. 2012. Stock-catch analysis of carp recreational fisheries in Czech reservoirs: insights into fish survival, water body productivity and impact of extreme events. Fish Res 119: 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Bray GS, Schramm HL. 2001. Evaluation of a statewide volunteer angler diary program for use as a fishery assessment tool. N Am J Fish Manag 21: 606–615. [Google Scholar]
  • Caroffino DC. 2013. Angler compliance with lake trout length limit regulations in Great Lakes waters. N Am J Fish Manag 33: 1203–1209. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cha W, Melstrom RT. 2018. Catch-and-release regulations and paddlefish angler preferences. J Environ Manage 214: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Cowx IG. 2004. The role of recreational fishing in global fish crises. Bioscience 54: 857–859. [Google Scholar]
  • Cooke SJ, Dunlop WI, McLennan DM, Power G. 2000. Applications and characteristics of angler diary programs in Ontario, Canada. Fish Manag Ecol 7: 473–487. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Duftner N, Koblmuller S, Weiss S, Medgyesy N, Sturmbauer C. 2005. The impact of stocking on the genetic structure of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus, Salmonidae) in two alpine rivers. Hydrobiologia 542: 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  • Essig RJ, Holliday MC. 1991. Development of a recreational fishing survey: the marine recreational fishery statistics survey case study. Am Fish Soc Symp 12: 245–254. [Google Scholar]
  • Froese R, Thorson JT, Reyes RB. 2014. A Bayesian approach for estimating length-weight relationships in fishes. J Appl Ichthyol 30: 78–85. [Google Scholar]
  • Fulton EA, Smith ADM, Smith DC, van Putten IE. 2011. Human behaviour: they key source of uncertainty in fisheries management. Fish Fish 12: 2–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gigliotti LM, Taylor WW. 1990. The effect of illegal harvest on recreational fisheries. N Am J Fish Manag 10: 106–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gum B, Gros R, Geist J. 2009. Conservation genetics and management implications for European grayling, Thymallus thymallus: synthesis of phylogeography and population genetics. Fish Manag Ecol 16: 37–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hadfield JD. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33: 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Humpl M, Pivnička K, Jankovský M. 2009. Sport fishery statistics, water quality, and fish assemblages in the Berounka River in 1975–2005. Folia Zool 58: 457–465. [Google Scholar]
  • Jankovský M, Boukal DS, Pivnička K, Kubečka J. 2011. Tracing possible drivers of synchronously fluctuating species catches in individual logbook data. Fish Manag Ecol 18: 297–306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston FD, Arlinghaus R, Stelfox J, Post JR. 2011. Decline in angler use despite increased catch rates: anglers' response to the implementation of a total catch-and-release regulation. Fish Res 110: 189–197. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston FD, Arlinghaus R, Dieckmann U. 2013. Fish life history, angler behaviour and optimal management of recreational fisheries. Fish Fish 14: 554–579. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kottelat M, Freyhof J. Handbook of European Freshwater Fishes, Publications Kottelat, Cornol and Freyhof, Berlin, 2007, 646 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Lenker MA, Weidel BC, Jensen OP, Solomon CT. 2016. Developing recreational harvest regulations for an unexploited lake trout population. N Am J Fish Manag 36: 385–397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lenox RJ, Mayer I, Havn TB, Johansen MR, Whoriskey K, Cooke SJ, Thorstad EB, Uglem I. 2016. Effects of recreational angling and air exposure on the physiological status and reflex impairment of European grayling (Thymallus thymallus). Boreal Environ Res 21: 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  • Lewin WC, Arlinghaus R, Mehner T. 2006. Documented and potential biological impacts of recreational fishing: insights for management and conservation. Rev Fish Sci 14: 305–367. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyach R, Čech M. 2017a. Do otters target the same fish species and sizes as anglers? A case study from a lowland trout stream (Czech Republic). Aquat Living Resour 30: 11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyach R, Čech M. 2017b. The effect of cormorant predation on newly established Atlantic salmon population. Folia Zool 66: 167–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyach R, Čech M. 2018a. Do recreational fisheries metrics vary on differently sized fishing sites? Fish Manag Ecol 25: 356–365. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lyach R, Čech M. 2018b. A new trend in Central European recreational fishing: more fishing visits but lower yield and catch. Fish Res 201: 131–137. [Google Scholar]
  • Mosindy TE, Duffy MJ. 2007. The use of angler diary surveys to evaluate long-term changes in muskellunge populations on Lake of the Woods, Ontario. Environ Biol Fish 79: 71–83. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mueller M, Pander J, Geist J. 2018. Comprehensive analysis of >30 years of data on stream fish population trends and conservation status in Bavaria, Germany. Biol Conserv 226: 311–320. [Google Scholar]
  • Mullon C, Field JG, Thebaud O, Cury P, Chaboud C. 2012. Keeping the big fish: economic and ecological tradeoffs in size-based fisheries management. J Bioecon 14: 267–285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol 4: 133–142. [Google Scholar]
  • Naslund I, Nordwall F, Eriksson T, Hannersjo D, Eriksson LO. 2005. Long-term responses of a stream-dwelling grayling population to restrictive fishing regulations. Fish Res 72: 323–332. [Google Scholar]
  • Naslund I, Eriksson T, Hannersjo D, Bergwall L, Jacobsson G, Leonardsson K. 2010. Time trends in angler compliance with harvest regulations in stream fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 17: 52–62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Northcote TG. 1995. Comparative biology and management of arctic and European grayling (salmonidae, thymallus). Rev Fish Biol Fish 5: 141–194. [Google Scholar]
  • Persat H. Threatened populations and conservation of the European grayling, Thymallus thymallus (L., 1758), in: A. Kirchhofer, D. Hefti (Eds.), Conservation of Endangered Freshwater Fish in Europe, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, 1996, pp. 233–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Persat H, Mattersdorfer K, Charlat S, Schenekar T, Weiss S. 2016. Genetic integrity of the European grayling (Thymallus thymallus) populations within the Vienne River drainage basin after five decades of stockings. Cybium 40: 7–20. [Google Scholar]
  • Pinder A, Harrison AJ, Britton JR. 2019. Temperature effects on the physiological status and reflex impairment in European grayling Thymallus thymallus from catch-and release angling. Fish Res 211: 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  • Pollock KH, Jones CM, Brown TL. Angler Survey Methods and their Applications in Fisheries Management, American Fisheries Society Special Publication 25. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, 1994, 371 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Powell EN, Bochenek EA, DePersenaire J. 2010. Evaluation of bag-and-size-limit options in the management of summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus. Fish Res 105: 215–227. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahel FJ. 2016. Changing philosophies of fisheries management as illustrated by the history of fishing regulations in Wyoming. Fisheries 41: 38–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schill DJ, Kline PA. 1995. Use of random response to estimate angler noncompliance with fishing regulations. N Am J Fish Manag 15: 721–731. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tetzlaff JC, Pine WE, Allen MS, Ahrens RNM. 2013. Effectiveness of size limits and bag limits for managing recreational fisheries: a case study of the Gulf of Mexico recreational gag fishery. Bull Mar Sci 89: 483–502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Thorfve S. 2002. Impacts of in-stream acclimatization in post-stocking behaviour of European grayling in a Swedish stream. Fish Manag Ecol 9: 253–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Uiblein F, Jagsch A, Honsig-Erlenburg W, Weiss S. 2001. Status, habitat use, and vulnerability of the European grayling in Austrian waters. J Fish Biol 59: 223–247. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Poorten BT, Cox SP, Cooper AB. 2013. Efficacy of harvest and minimum size limit regulations for controlling short-term harvest in recreational fisheries. Fish Manag Ecol 20: 258–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Veiga P, Pita C, Leite L, Ribeiro J, Ditton RB, Gonclaves JMS, Erzini K. 2013. From a traditionally open access fishery to modern restrictions: Portuguese anglers' perceptions about newly implemented recreational fishing regulations. Mar Policy 40: 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  • Weiss SJ, Kopun T, Bajec SS. 2013. Assessing natural and disturbed population structure in European grayling Thymallus thymallus: melding phylogeographic, population genetic and jurisdictional perspectives for conservation planning. J Fish Biol 82: 505–521. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.