Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 31, 2018
Article Number 1
Number of page(s) 11
Published online 23 November 2017
  • Arnason R. 1998. Fisheries subsidies, overcapitalization and economic losses, in: Workshop, Presented at the Overcapacity, Overcapitalization and Subsidies in European Fisheries, Center for the Economics and Management of Aquatic Resources of the University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • Arnason R. 2000. Costs of Fisheries Management: Theoretical and Practical Implications, IIFET Proceedings. [Google Scholar]
  • Asche F, Bjørndal T, Gordon DV. 2009. Resource rent in individual quota fishery. Land Econ 85: 280–292. [Google Scholar]
  • Bhat MG, Bhatta R. 2006. Regional economic impacts of limited entry fishery management: an application of dynamic input-output model. Environ Dev Econ 11: 709–728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brady M, Waldo S. 2009. Fixing problems in fisheries − integrating ITQs, CBM and MPAs in management. Mar Policy 33: 258–263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bruvoll A, Skjelvik JM, Vennemo H. 2011. Reforming environmentally harmful subsidies: how to counteract distributional impacts, Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carvalho N, Rege S, Fortuna M, Isidro E, Edwards-Jones G. 2011. Estimating the impacts of eliminating fisheries subsidies on the small island economy of the Azores. Ecol Econ 70: 1822–1830. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clark CW, Clarke FH, Munro GR. 1979. The optimal exploitation of renewable resource stocks: problems of irreversible investment. Econometrica 47: 25–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Copes P. 1972. Factor rents, sole ownership and the optimum level of fisheries exploitation. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 40: 146–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Cordón Lagares E, García Ordaz F. 2015. Factors influencing the decision to leave a fishery and the effects of fishery subsidies: the case of the Spanish purse seine fishery. Ocean Coast Manag 116: 248–256. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • 2014. Dirección General de Pesca Marítima Asturias, Estadísticas Capturas de especies [WWW Document]. URL (accessed on: 2016/02/01). [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2013. Regulation (EU) on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC, Official Journal of the European Union. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2014. Facts and figures on the Common Fisheries Policy. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 2015. The eighth annual report on implementation of the European fisheries fund (2014), COM(2015)662 final. [Google Scholar]
  • FAO. 2014. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2014, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Franquesa R, Malouli IM, Alarcón JA. 2001. Feasibility assessment for a database in socioeconomic indicators for Mediterranean fisheries (No. 71), Studies and Reviews, General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Freire J, García AA. 2000. Socioeconomic and biological causes of management failures in European artisanal fisheries: the case of Galicia (NW Spain). Mar Policy 24: 375–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gordon HS. 1954. The economic theory of a common-property resource: the fishery. J Polit Econ 62: 124–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Grévobal D, Munro GR. 1999. Overcapitalization and excess capacity in world fisheries: underlying economics and methods of control, in: D. Grévobal (Ed.), Managing Fishing Capacity, Selected Papers on Underlying Concepts and Issues, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 386, 75-1999, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Grimsrud K, Lindholt L, Greaker M. 2015. Resource rent in Norwegian fisheries − trends and policies ( Discussion papers No. 827), Statistics Norway, Research Department. [Google Scholar]
  • Hardin G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Sci New Ser 162: 1243–1248. [Google Scholar]
  • Heymans JJ, Mackinson S, Sumaila UR, Dyck AJ, Little A. 2011. The impact of subsidies on the ecological sustainability and future profits from North Sea fisheries. PLoS ONE 6: e20239. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Holland D, Gudmundsson E, Gates J. 1999. Do fishing vessel buyback program work: a survey of the evidence. Mar Policy 23: 47–69. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICANE. 2014. Estadísticas pesca subastada Cantabria [WWW Document]. URL (accessed on: 2016/01/02). [Google Scholar]
  • ICCAT. 2013. Report of the 2013 ICCAT North and South Atlantic albacore stock assessment meeting, Sukarrieta, Spain. [Google Scholar]
  • ICES. 2014. Report of the working group on Southern Horse Mackerel, Anchovy and Sardine (WGHANSA), Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  • ICES. 2015a. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee 2015 (No. Book 7), ICES advice. [Google Scholar]
  • ICES. 2015b. Report of the ICES Advisory Committee 2015 (No. Book 9), ICES advice. [Google Scholar]
  • Instituto Gallego de Estadística (IGE). 2015. Analise do sector da pesca. Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela. [Google Scholar]
  • Instituto Gallego de Estadistica (IGE). 2017. Enquisa do poboacion activa (EPA) [WWW Document]. URL (accessed on: 2017/10/06). [Google Scholar]
  • INE. 2015. Decil de salarios del empleo principal, Encuesta de Población Activa (EPA). Año2014, 2015 [WWW Document]. URL (accessed on: 2016/03/15). [Google Scholar]
  • Joint statement regarding fisheries subsidies, 2016, by several WTO member countries. September 14, 2016. Our ocean conference, Washington. URL [Google Scholar]
  • Losada A. 2000. La política del mar. Políticas públicas y autonomía, El caso de la pesca gallega. Ed Istmo Col Fundam, p. 173. [Google Scholar]
  • MAGRAMA. 2014a. Estadísticas pesqueras: Encuesta Económica de Pesca Marítima, Minist. Aliment. Agric. Medio Ambiente Gob. Esp. [Google Scholar]
  • MAGRAMA. 2014b. Informe anual de la actividad de la flota pesquera española, Minist. Aliment. Agric. Medio Ambiente Gob. Esp. [Google Scholar]
  • Merayo E, Nielsen R, Hoff A, Nielsen M. 2017. Are individual transferable quotas an adequate solution to overfishing and overcapacity? evidence from Danish fisheries. Mar Policy, forthcoming. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Minnegal M, Dwyer PD. 2008. Mixed messages: buying back Australia's fishing industry. Mar Policy 32: 1063–1071. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • NASDAQ. 2014. Pesca de bajura subastada por puertos y principales especies en País Vasco [WWW Document]. URL (accessed on 2016/01/02). [Google Scholar]
  • Natale F, Carvalho N, Harrop M, Guillen J, Frangoudes K. 2013. Contribution of fisheries to employment in EU coastal areas. Mar Policy 42: 245–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen M, Flaaten O, Waldo S. 2012. Management of and economic returns from selected fisheries in the Nordic countries. Mar Resour Econ 27: 65–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen M, Andersen P, Ravensbeck L, Laugesen F, Kristófersson D, Ellefsen H. 2017. Fisheries management and the value chain: the Northeast Atlantic pelagic fisheries case. Fish Res 186: 36–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • OECD. 2000. Transition to responsible fisheries: economic and policy implications, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • OECD. 2016. Fisheries: government financial transfers, OECD Agric. Stat. Database. [Google Scholar]
  • Pascoe S, Coglan L, Punt AE, Dichmont CM. 2012. Impacts of vessel capacity reduction programmes on efficiency in fisheries: the case of Australia's multispecies Northern prawn fishery. J Agric Econ 63: 425–443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • STECF. 2014. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). The Economic Performance Report on the EU Fish Processing (STECF-14-21), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Google Scholar]
  • STECF. 2015. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). The 2015 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet (STECF-15-07), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Google Scholar]
  • STECF. 2016a. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). Monitoring the performance of the Common Fisheries Policy (STECF-16-03), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Google Scholar]
  • STECF. 2016b. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF). The 2016 Annual Economic Report on the EU Fishing Fleet (STECF 16-11), Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. [Google Scholar]
  • Spain, Head of State. Law 38/1992 of Special Taxes, of 28 December. Official State Gazette (BOE), nr. 312, of 29 December 1992, pp. 44305–44331. [Google Scholar]
  • Spain, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Royal Decree 560/1995, of 7 April 1995, establishing minimum sizes for some fishing species. Official State Gazette (BOE) nr. 84, of 8 April 1995, pp. 10552–10554. [Google Scholar]
  • Spain, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment. Order AAA/417/2014, of 17 March 2014, modifying Order AAA/1307/2013 of 1 July, establishes a management plan for the fishing fleet operating in national waters in the Cantabrian NW. Official State Gazette (BOE), nr. 66, of 18 March 2014, pp. 23690–23698. [Google Scholar]
  • Spain, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment. Order AAA/2534/2015, of 17 November 2015, establishing a management plan for the fishing fleet operating in national waters in the Cantabrian NW. Official State Gazette (BOE), nr. 286, of 30 November 2015, pp. 113184–113217. [Google Scholar]
  • Squires D, Clarke R, Chan V. 2014. Subsidies, public goods, and external benefits in fisheries. Mar Policy 45: 222–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sumaila UR, Khan AS, Dyck AJ, Watson R, Munro GR, Tydemers P, Pauly D. 2010. A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. J Bioeconomics 12: 201–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Turvey R. 1964. Optimization and suboptimization in fishery regulation. Am Econ Rev 54: 64–76. [Google Scholar]
  • UNEP. 2004. Analyzing the resource impact of fisheries subsidies: a matrix approach, United Nations Environment Program. [Google Scholar]
  • Vieites Baptista de Sousa JM. 2014. El sector conservero de pescados y mariscos de Galicia: evolución de su impacto socioeconómico, internacionalización e innovación, ANFACO-CECOPESCA, Vigo. [Google Scholar]
  • Waldo S, Paulrud A. 2016. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in fisheries: the case of multiple regulatory instruments in Sweden. Environ Resour Econ 68: 275–295. [Google Scholar]
  • Waldo S, Jensen F, Nielsen M, Hellefsen H, Hallgrimsson J, Hammarlund C, Hermansen Ø, Isaksen J. 2016. Regulating multiple externalities: the case of Nordic fisheries. Mar Resour Econ 31: 233–257. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weber P. 1994. Net loss: fish, jobs and the marine environment, Worldwatch Inst., Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • World Bank, FAO 2009. The sunken billions: the economic justification for fisheries reform, Agriculture and rural development series, World Bank, Washington DC, Rome. [Google Scholar]
  • Xunta de Galicia. 2014. Estadísticas Pesca de Galicia, Plataforma tecnoloxíca da pesca [WWW Document]. URL (accessed on: 2016/01/02). [Google Scholar]
  • Xunta de Galicia. 2015. Ocupesca: Enquisa sobre a poboación ocupada nos sectores da pesca e da acuicultura mariña en Galicia 2013. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.