Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 31, 2018
Article Number 10
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2017050
Published online 15 February 2018
  • Akyol O, Sen H, Kinacigil HT. 2007. Reproductive biology of Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the Aegean Sea (Izmir Bay, Turkey). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 87: 967–970. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Altman JS. 1967. The behaviour of Octopus vulgaris Lam. in its natural habitat: a pilot study. Rep Underw Assoc Malta 1966-1976: 77–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Angeles Torres M, Vila Y, Silva L, Acosta JJ, Ramos F, Palomares MLD, Sobrino I. 2017. Length-weight relationships for 22 crustaceans and cephalopods from the Gulf of Cadiz (SW Spain). Aquat Living Res 30: 12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Appukuttan KK, Chellam A, Ramdoss K, Victor ACC, Meiyappan MM. 1989. Molluscan resources. Bull Cent Mar Fish Res Inst 43: 77–92. [Google Scholar]
  • Aronson RB. 1986. Life history and den ecology of Octopus briareus Robson, in a marine lake. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 95: 37–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Arthur R. 2000. Coral bleaching and mortality in three Indian Ocean reef regions during an El Niño Southern Oscillation event. Curr Sci 79: 1723–1729. [Google Scholar]
  • Attakoya EP. 2000. Basic statistics of the year 1998–99. Published by the Department of Planning and Statistics, Secretariat, Kavaratti, Union Territory of Lakshadweep, pp. 1–257. [Google Scholar]
  • Beasley TM, Schumacker RE. 1995. Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. J Exp Educ 64: 79–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Benbow S, Harris A. 2011. Managing Madagascar's octopus fisheries. Proceedings of the Workshop on Octopus cyanea fisheries, 5–6 April 2011, Toliara. Blue Ventures Conservation, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouth HF, Leite TS, Lima FD, Lins-Oliveira JE. 2011. Atol das Rocas: an oasis for Octopus insularis (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae). Zool 28: 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyle PR. 1990. Cephalopod biology in the fisheries context. Fish Res 8: 303–321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boyle PR, Rodhouse PG. 2005 Cephalopods: ecology and fisheries. Blackwell Publishers. [Google Scholar]
  • Carpenter KE, Niem VH. 1998. FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. Volume 2. Cephalopods, crustaceans, holothurians and sharks. FAO, Rome, pp. 687–1396. [Google Scholar]
  • Chandramohan P, Anand NM, Nayak BV. 1993. Shoreline dynamics of the Lakshadweep islands. Indian J Mar Sci 22: 198–202. [Google Scholar]
  • Coblentz BE. 1997. Subsistence consumption of coral reef fish suggests non-sustainable extraction. Conserv Biol 11: 559–561. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dalzell P. 1998. The role of archaeological and cultural-historical records in long-range coastal fisheries resources management strategies and polices in the Pacific Islands. Ocean Coast Manag 40: 237–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Defeo O, Castilla JC. 1998. Harvesting and economic patterns in the artisanal Octopus mimus (Cephalopoda) fishery in a northern Chile cove. Fish Res 38: 121–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El-Ganainy AA, Riad R. 2008. Population structure of Octopus defilippi (Verany, 1851) from the Gulf of Suez, Red Sea, Egypt. Egypt J Aquat Biol Fish 12: 81–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Marine Resources Service. 1997. Review of the state of world fisheries resources: marine fisheries. FAO Fish Circ 920: 173. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsythe JW. 1993. A working hypothesis on how seasonal temperature change may impact the field growth of young cephalopods, in: T. Okutani, R.K. O'Dor, T. Kubodera (Eds.), Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology, Tokai University Press, pp. 133–143. [Google Scholar]
  • Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT. 1997. Foraging and associated behaviour by Octopus cyanea Gray, 1849 on a coral atoll, French Polynesia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 209: 15–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gonzalez M, Barcala E, Perez-Gil JL, Carrasco MN, Garcia-Martinez MC. 2011. Fisheries and reproductive biology of Octopus vulgaris (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in the Gulf of Alicante (Northwestern Mediterranean). Mediterr Mar Sci 12: 369–389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guard M. 2003. Assessment of the artisanal fishery of Octopus cyanea Gray, 1929 in Tanzania: Catch dynamics, fisheries biology, socio-economics and implications for management, PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Scotland. [Google Scholar]
  • Guard M, Mgaya YD. 2002. The artisanal fishery for Octopus cyanea Gray in Tanzania. Ambio 31: 528–536. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Harford WJ, Babcock EA. 2016. Aligning monitoring design with fishery decision-making: examples of management strategy evaluation for reef-associated fisheries. Aquat Living Res 29: 205. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartwick EB, Ambrose RF, Robinson MC. 1984. Den utilization and the movements of tagged Octopus dofleini. Mar Behav Physiol 11: 95–110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hawkins JE, Roberts CM. 2004. Effects of artisanal fishing on Caribbean coral reefs. Conserv Biol 18: 215–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hernandez-Garcia V, Hernandez-Lopez JL, Castro JJ. 1998. The octopus (Octopus vulgaris) in the small-scale trap fishery off the Canary Islands (Central-East Atlantic). Fish Res 35: 183–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Herwig JN, Depczynski M, Roberts JD, Semmens JM, Gagliano M, Heyward AJ. 2012. Using age-based life history data to investigate the life cycle and vulnerability of Octopus cyanea. PloS ONE 7: e43679. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hoon V, Tamelander J. 2005 Community based monitoring of coral reef resource use, in: CORDIO status report, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoon V, Abdul Shukoor B, Moosa OG, Ayoob AE, Cheriyakoya MI, Mohammad Ali MC, Hajara A, Moosakoya B, Tajunnissa NM, Aboobacker PP. 2002. Socio-economic assessment and monitoring of coral reefs of Agatti Island − UT of Lakshadweep, Project completion report, CARESS, Chennai. [Google Scholar]
  • Humber F, Harris A, Raberinary D, Nadon M. 2006. Seasonal closures of no-take zones to promote a sustainable fishery for Octopus cyanea (Gray) in Southwest Madagascar, Blue Ventures Conservation Report, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Ivlev VS. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacquet J, Pauly D. 2008. Funding priorities: big barriers to small-scale fisheries. Consev Biol 22: 832–835. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jeyabaskaran R. 2006. Human impacts on Lakshadweep Atolls, India, Proceedings of the 10th International Coral Reef Symposium, Kinawa, Japan. [Google Scholar]
  • Katsanevakis S, Verriopoulos G. 2004. Abundance of Octopus vulgaris on soft sediment. Sci Mar 68: 553–560. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Krebs CJ. 1989. Ecological methodology, Harper and Row, New York, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Kumar ATT, Balasubramanian T. 2012. Bleaching of Corals in Agatti Lakshadweep, India: A window view, Proceedings of the 12th International Coral Reef Symposium, Cairns, Australia. [Google Scholar]
  • Leite TS, Haimovici M, Mather J, Lins-Oliveira J. 2009. Habitat, distribution, and abundance of the commercial octopus (Octopus insularis) in a tropical oceanic island, Brazil. Information for management of an artisanal fishery inside a marine protection area. Fish Res 98: 85–91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mangold K. 1987. Reproduction, in: P.R. Boyle (Ed.), Cephalopod life cycles: Comparative reviews (2) London: Academic, pp. 157–200. [Google Scholar]
  • Mangold K, Boletzky S. 1973. New data on reproductive biology and growth of Octopus vulgaris. Mar Biol 19: 7–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mather JA. 1982. Factors affecting the spatial distribution of natural populations of Octopus joubini Robson. Anim Behav 30: 1166–1170. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mather JA. 1988. Daytime activity of juvenile Octopus vulgaris in Bermuda. Malacologia 29: 69–76. [Google Scholar]
  • Nair A, Apte D. 2013. Artisanal Octopus Fishery: Socio-economics and Management, in: K. Venkataraman, C. Sivaperuman, C. Raghunathan (Eds.), Ecology and Conservation of Tropical Marine Faunal Communities, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 409–418. [Google Scholar]
  • Navarte M, Gonzalez R, Fernandez M. 2006. Comparison of Tehuelche octopus (Octopus tehuelchus) abundance between an open-access fishing ground and a marine protected area: evidence from a direct development species. Fish Res 79: 112–119. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Norman MD. 1984. Octopodidae, Benthic octopuses, in: C.F.E. Roper, M.J. Sweeney, C.E. Nauen (Eds.), Species catalogue. Cephalopods of the world. An annotated illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 125, 277 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Norman MD. 1991. Octopus cyanea Gray, 1849 (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) in Australian waters: Description, distribution and taxonomy. Bull Mar Sci 49: 20–38. [Google Scholar]
  • Oosthuizen A. 1993. A development and management framework for a new Octopus vulgaris fishery in South Africa, Ph.D. Thesis, Rhodes University. [Google Scholar]
  • Oosthuizen A, Smale MJ. 2003. Population biology of Octopus vulgaris on the temperate south-eastern coast of South Africa. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83: 535–541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Polunin NVC, Roberts CM. 1996. Reef fisheries, Chapman and Hall, London. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Quetglas A, Alemany F, Carbonell A, Merella P, Sanchez P. 1998. Biology and fishery of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797, caught by trawlers in Mallorca (Balearic Sea, Western Mediterranean). Fish Res 36: 237–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Raberinary D, Benbow S. 2012. The reproductive cycle of Octopus cyanea in southwest Madagascar and implications for fisheries management. Fish Res 125-126: 190–197. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ravinesh AR, Bijukumar A. 2015. A checklist of the marine molluscs of Lakshadweep. India J Aquat Biol Fish 3: 15–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Reddy CS, Debnath B, Harikrishna P, Jha CS. 2013. Landscape level assessment of critically endangered vegetation of Lakshadweep Islands using Geo-spatial techniques. J Earth Syst Sci 122: 271–281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roberts CM, Hawkins JP. 1999. Extinction risk in the sea. Trends Ecol Evolut 14: 241–246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robson GC. 1929. A Monograph of the Recent Cephalopoda. Part I. Octopodinae, 1: British Museum of Natural History, 236 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Russ G.R. 2002. Yet another review of marine reserves as reef fisheries management tools. in: P.F. Sale (Ed.), Coral Reef Fishes: Dynamics and Diversity in a Complex Ecosystem, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 421–443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchez P, Obarti R. 1993. The Biology and Fishery of Octopus vulgaris caught with Clay Pots on the Spanish Mediterranean Coast, in: T. Okutani, R.K. O'Dor, T. Kubodera (Eds.), Recent advances in fisheries biology, Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp. 477–487. [Google Scholar]
  • Seijo JC, Defeo O, Salas S. 1998. Fisheries bioeconomics: theory, modelling and management. FAO Fish Tech Pap No 368, 108 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Semmens JM, Pecl GT, Villanueva R, Jouffre D, Sobrino I. 2004. Understanding octopus growth: patterns, variability and physiology. Mar Freshwater Res 55: 367–377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shankar D, Shetye, SR. 1997. On the dynamics of the Lakshadweep high and low in the southeastern Arabian Sea, J Geophys Res Oceans 102: 12551–12562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sifner SK, Vrgoc N. 2009. Reproductive cycle and sexual maturation of the musky octopus Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the northern and central Adriatic Sea, Sci Mar 73: 439–447. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Silas EG, Sarvesan R, Rao KS. 1985. Octopod Resources, in: E.G. Silas (Ed.), Cephalopod bionomics, fisheries and resources of the Exclusive Economic Zone of India. Bull Cent mar Fish Res Inst 37: 137–139. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva L, Ramos F, Sobrino I. 2004. Reproductive biology of Eledone moschata (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the Gulf of Cádiz south-western Spain. ICES J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84: 1221–1226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sims MA, Stimson J. 1998. Population Density of Octopus cyanea in Kaneohe Bay. Aquasearch Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program Report. [Google Scholar]
  • Singh V. 2016. Bleaching of corals in Lakshadweep a major concern, DNA, Retrieved from http://www.dnaindia.com [Google Scholar]
  • Smale MJ, Buchan PR. 1981. Biology of Octopus vulgaris off the east coast of South Africa. Mar Biol 65: 1–12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Solís-Ramírez M. 1997. Octopus maya: Biology and fishery in Mexico, in: M.A. Lang, F.G. Hochberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the workshop on: The fishery and market potential of Octopus in California. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp. 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  • Tripathy B. 2002. Marine biodiversity of Lakshadweep: An overview. Kachhapa 7, 14–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsangridis A, Sanchez P, Ioannidou D. 2002. Exploitation patterns of Octopus vulgaris in two Mediterranean areas. Sci Mar 66: 59–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Heukelem WF. 1973. Growth and lifespan of Octopus cyanea (Mollusca: Cephalopoda). J Zool 169: 299–315. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Van Heukelem WF. 1976. Growth, Bioenergetics and life-span of Octopus cyanea and Octopus maya. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Heukelem WF. 1983. Octopus cyanea, in: Boyle P.R. (Ed.), Cephalopod Life Cycles, Vol 1: Species Accounts, London, Academic Press, pp. 267–276. [Google Scholar]
  • Whitaker JD, Delancey LB, Jenkins JE. 1991. Aspects of the biology and fishery potential for Octopus vulgaris off the coast of South Carolina. Bull Mar Sci 49: 482–493. [Google Scholar]
  • Wells MJ, Wells J. 1970. Observations on the feeding, growth rate and habits of newly settled Octopus cyanea. ‎J Zool 161: 65–74. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yarnall JL. 1969. Aspects of the behaviour of Octopus cyanea Gray. Anim Behav 17: 747–754. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • . Yedukondala Rao P, Mohana Rao M. 2013. Observations on some aspects of biology of webfoot octopus, Octopus membranaceus, Quoy and Gaimard, 1832 off Visakhapatnam, east coast of India. Int J Env Sci 4: 6–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Zar J. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edition, Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.