EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 26 / No 2 (April-May 2013) Aquat. Living Resour., 26 2 (2013) 133-145 References
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 26, Number 2, April-May 2013
Page(s) 133 - 145
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2013055
Published online 01 July 2013
  • Agatonovic-Krustin S., Morton D.W., 2012, The use of UV-visible reflectance spectroscopy as an objective tool to evaluate pearl quality. Mar. Drugs 10, 1459–1475. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arnaud-Haond S., Goyard E., Vonau V., Herbaut C., Prou J., Saulnier D., 2007, Pearl formation: persistence of the graft during the entire process of biomineralization. Mar. Biotechnol. 9, 113–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cochennec-Laureau N., Montagnani C., Saulnier D., Fougerouse A., Levy P., Lo C., 2010, A histological examination of grafting success in pearl oyster Pinctada margaritifera in French Polynesia. Aquat. Living. Resour. 23, 131–140. [Google Scholar]
  • Croux C., Joossens K., 2005, Influence of observations on the misclassification probability in quadratic discriminant analysis. J. Multivariate Anal. 96, 384–403. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Dagnelie P., 2007, statistique théorique et appliquée, 3rd edn. De Boeck Université, Bruxelles. [Google Scholar]
  • Elen S., 2001, Spectral reflectance and fluorescence characteristics of natural-color and heat-treated “golden” south sea cultured pearls. Gems Gemol. 37, 114–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ellis S., Haws M., 1999, Producing pearls using the black-lip pearl oyster (Pinctada margaritifera), Aquafarmer Information Sheet, 141. [Google Scholar]
  • Gervis M.H., Sims N.A., 1992, The biology and culture of pearl oysters (Bivalvia: Pteriidae). International Centre for Living Aquatic resources management (ICLARM). Stud. Rev. 21. [Google Scholar]
  • He M., Guan Y., Yuan T., Zhang H., 2008, Realized heritability and response to selection for shell height in the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata (Gould). Aquac. Res. 39, 801–805. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hui B., Vonau V., Moriceau J., Tetumu R., Vanaa V., Demoy-Schneider M., Suquet M., Le Moullac G., 2011, Hatchery-scale trials using cryopreserved spermatozoa of black-lip pearl oyster (Pinctada margaritifera). Aquat. Living Resour. 24, 219–223. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Jerry D.R., Kvingedal R., Lind C.E., Evans B.S., Taylor J.U., Safari A.E., 2012, Donor oyster derived heritability estimates and the effect of genotype x environment interaction on the production of pearl quality traits in the silver-lip pearl oyster, Pinctada maxima. Aquaculture 338, 66–71. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Karampelas S., Fritsch E., Gauthier J.-P., Hainschwang T., 2011, UV-Vis-NIR reflectance spectroscopy of natural-color saltwater cultured pearls from Pinctada margaritifera. Gems Gemol. 47, 31–37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Komatsu H., Akamatsu S., 1978, Studies on differentiation of true and artificially coloured black and blue pearls. J. Gemmol. Soc. Jpn 5, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Kvingedal R., Evans B.S., Lind C.E., Taylor J.J.U., Dupont-Nivet M., Jerry D.R., 2010, Population and family growth response to different rearing location, heritability estimates and genotype × environment interaction in the silver-lip pearl oyster (Pinctada maxima). Aquaculture 304, 1–6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Landman N.H., Mikkelsen P.M., Bieler R., Bronson B., 2001, Pearls, a natural history. American Museum of Natural History and Harry N. Abrams Inc., New York, pp. 32–54. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Moullac G., Tiapari J., Tessier H., Martinez E., Cochard J.C., 2011, Growth and gonad development of the tropical blacklip pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera (L.), in the Gambier archipelago (French Polynesia). Aquac. Interntl. 20, 305–315. [Google Scholar]
  • Lynch M., Walsh B., 1998, Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits.Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. [Google Scholar]
  • Mamangkey N.G.F., Agatonovic S., Southgate P.C., 2010, Assessing pearl quality using reflectance UV-Vis spectroscopy: does the same donor produce consistent pearl quality. Mar. Drugs 8, 2517–2525. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McGinty E.L., Evans B.S., Taylor J.U.U., Jerry D.R., 2010, Xenografts and pearl production in two pearl oyster species, Pinctada maxima and P. margaritifera: effect on pearl quality and a key to understanding genetic contribution. Aquaculture 302, 175–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McGinty E.L., Zenger K.R., Taylor J.U.U., Evans B.S., Jerry D.R., 2011, Diagnostic genetic marker unravel the interplay between host and donor oyster contribution in cultured pearl formation. Aquaculture 304, 20–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McGinty E.L., Zenger K.R., Jones D.B., Jerry D.R., 2012, Transcriptome analysis of biomineralisation-related genes within the pearl sac: host and donor oyster contribution. Mar. Genom. 5, 27–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarikaya M., Liu J., Aksay IA., 1995, Nacre: properties, crystallography, morphology, and formation. In: Sarikaya M., Aksay I.A. (eds.) Biomimetics: design and processing of materials. New York: Woodbury, pp. 35–90. [Google Scholar]
  • Siegel S., Castellan N.J., 1988, Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, second edition, McGraw-Hill, New-York. [Google Scholar]
  • Snow M.R., Pring A., Self P., Losic D., Shapter J., 2004, The origin of the color of pearls in iridescence from nano-composite structures of the nacre. Am. Mineral. 89, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar]
  • Talvard C., 2010, La perliculture en 2009, Points Forts de la Polynésie Française - Institut de la Statistique de la Polynésie Française n° 8/2010, pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Tayale A., Gueguen Y., Treguier C., Le Grand J., Cochennec-Laureau N., Montagnani C., Ky C.L., 2012, Evidence of donor effect on cultured pearl quality from a duplicated grafting experiment on Pinctada margaritifera using wild donors. Aquat. Living Resour. 25, 269–280. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Velayudan T.S., Chellam A., Dharmaraj S., Victor A.C.C., Kasim H.M., 1996, Comparison of growth and shell attributes for four generations of pearl oyster Pinctada fucata (Gould) produced in the hatchery. Ind. J. Fish. 43, 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Verrier E., Rognon X., Leroy G., Heams T., 2009, Amélioration génétique des animaux. Bloc Technologies – Filières des produits Animaux. Polycopié AgroParisTech. [Google Scholar]
  • Wada K.T., 1972, Relationship between calcium metabolism of pearl sac and pearl quality. Bull. Natl. Pearl Res. Lab. 16, 1949–2027. [Google Scholar]
  • Wada K.T., 1984, Breeding study of the pearl oyster Pinctada fucata. Bull. Natl. Res. Inst. Aquac. 6, 79–157. [Google Scholar]
  • Wada K.T., 1986, Genetic selection for shell traits in the Japanese pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata martensii. Aquaculture 57, 171–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wada K.T., Komaru A., 1996, Color and weight of pearls produced by grafting the mantle tissue from a selected population for white shell color of the Japanese pearl oyster Pinctada fucata martensii (Dunker). Aquaculture 142, 25–32. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wada K.T., 1986, Genetic selection for shell traits in the Japanese pearl oyster, Pinctada fucata martensii. Aquaculture 57, 171–176. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ward F., 1995, Pearls. Gem Book Publishers, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • Wane G., 2013, Les problèmes réels de l’industrie de la perle de Tahiti, Tahiti Pacifique, No. 260, pp. 15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • Winer B.J., Brown D.R., Michels K.M., 1991, Statistical principles in experimental design, McGraw-Hill, New-York. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.