Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 24, Number 2, April-June 2011
Page(s) 107 - 112
Section Thematic section
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr/2011133
Published online 05 August 2011
  • Adbel-Aziz Y.I., Karara H.M., 1971, Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space in close-range photogrammetry. ASP Symp. Proc. on Close-Range Photogrammetry, American Society of Photogrammetry, Falls Church, pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  • Costa C., Loy A., Cataudella S., Davis D., Scardi M., 2006, Extracting fish size using dual underwater cameras. Aquac. Eng. 35, 218–227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Costa C., Scardi M., Vitalini V., Cataudella S., 2009, A dual camera system for counting and sizing Northern Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus Linnaeus, 1758) stock, during transfer to aquaculture cages, with a semi automatic Artificial Neural Network tool. Aquaculture 291, 161–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hartley R., Zisserman A., 2004, The Direct Linear Transformation (DLT) algorithm, Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey E., Fletcher D., Shortis M., 2002, Estimation of reef fish length by divers and by stereo-video A first comparison of the accuracy and precision in the field on living fish under operational conditions. Fish. Res. 57, 255–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harvey E., Cappo M., Shortis M., Robson S., Buchanan J., Speare P., 2003, The accuracy and precision of underwater measurements of length and maximum body depth of southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii) with a stereo-video camera system. Fish. Res. 63, 315–326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hsieh CL., Chang HY., Chen FH., Liou JH., Chang SK., Lin TT., 2011, A simple and effective digital imaging approach for tuna fish length measurement compatible with fishing operations. Comput. Electron. Agric. 75, 44–51. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ikegami Y., Sakurai S., Yabe K., 1991, Direct Linear Transformation method. J. Sports Sci. 10, 191–195. [Google Scholar]
  • Takahashi H., Matsuda A., Akamatsu T., 2006, Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Measurement Accuracy of FISCHOM Stereo Camera System. Tech. Rep. Nat. Res. Inst. Fish. Eng. 28, 87–93. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang X.F., Tang, Y., Zhang, Z.Z., Liu, H.Y., 2008, Feasibility of using digital photography for environmental monitoring of animals in an artificial reef. Int. Arch. Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 37, 339–342. [Google Scholar]
  • Watson D.L., Harvey E.S., Anderson M.J., Kendrick G.A., 2005, A comparison of temperate reef fish assemblages recorded by three underwater stereo-video techniques. Mar. Biol. 448, 415–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Watson D.L., Harvey E.S., Kendrick G.A., Nardi K., Anderson M.J., 2007, Protection from fishing alters the species composition of fish assemblages in a temperate-tropical transition zone. Mar. Biol. 152, 1197–1206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Williams K., Rooper C.N., Towler R., 2010, Use of stereo camera systems for ssessment of rockfish abundance in untrawlable areas and for recording pollock behavior during midwater trawls. Fish. Bull. 108, 352–362 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.