Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 22, Number 3, July-September 2009
Page(s) 255 - 264
Published online 23 October 2009
  • Baker M.A., 1998, The population structure of Orectolobidae sharks, Orectolobus ornatus and O. maculatus in Byron Bay, NSW. Lismore, Australia, School of Resource Science and Management, Southern Cross University. [Google Scholar]
  • Barrett N., Edgar G., Morton A., 2002, Monitoring of Tasmanian inshore reef ecosystems. An assessment of the potential for volunteer monitoring programs and summary of changes within the Maria Island Marine Reserve from 1992–2001. Technical Report Series. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania. [Google Scholar]
  • Brandon A., Spyreas G., Molano-Flores B., Carroll C., Ellis J., 2003, Can volunteers provide reliable data for forest vegetation surveys? Nature Areas J. 23, 254–262. [Google Scholar]
  • Carraro R., Gladstone W., 2006, Habitat preference and site fidelity of the ornate wobbegong shark (Orectolobus ornatus) on rocky reefs of New South Wales. Pac. Sci. 60, 207–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casey J.G., Kohler N.E., 1992, Tagging studies on the shortfin mako shark (Isurus oxyrinchus) in the Western North Atlantic. Aust. J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 43, 45–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cavanagh R., Kyne P., Fowler S.L., Musick J.A., Bennett M.B., 2003, The conservation status of Australasian chondrichthyans. Report of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group Australia and Oceania regional red list workshop. Queensland, Australia, 7–9 March 2003. Brisbane, The University of Queensland. [Google Scholar]
  • Compagno L.J.V., 2001, Sharks of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Volume 2. Bullhead, mackerel and carpet sharks (Heterodontiformes, Lamniformes and Orectolobiformes). Rome, FAO. [Google Scholar]
  • Corrigan S., Huveneers C., Schwartz T., Harcourt R., Beheregaray L., 2008, Genetic and reproductive evidence for two species of ornate wobbegong shark Orectolobus spp. on the Australian East Coast. J. Fish Biol. 73, 1662–1675. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Darwell W.R.T., Dulvy N.K., 1996, An evaluation of the suitability of non-specialist volunteer researchers for coral reef fish surveys. Mafia Island, Tanzania - A case study. Biol. Conserv. 18, 259–271. [Google Scholar]
  • Economakis A.E., Lobel P.S., 1998, Aggregation behavior of the grey reef shark, Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, at Johnston Atoll, Central Pacific Ocean. Environ. Biol. Fishes 51, 129–139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Evans S.M., Birchenough A.C., Fletcher H., 2000, The value and validity of communitybased research: TBT contamination of the North Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 40, 220–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fore L.S., Paulsen K., O'Laughlin K., 2001, Assessing the performance of volunteers in monitoring streams. Freshw. Biol. 46, 109–123. [Google Scholar]
  • Forster-Smith J., Evans S.M., 2003, The value of marine ecological data collected by volunteers. Biol. Conserv. 113, 119-213. [Google Scholar]
  • Goffredo S., Piccinetti C., Zaccanti F., 2005, Volunteers in marine conservation monitoring: a study of the distribution of seahorse carried out in collaboration with recreational scuba divers. Conserv. Biol. 18, 1492–1503. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Halusky J.G., Seaman W.J., Strawbridge E.W., 1994, Effectiveness of trained volunteer divers in scientific documentation of artificial aquatic habitats. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55, 939–959. [Google Scholar]
  • Heupel M.R., Carlson J.K., Simpfendorfer C.A., 2007, Shark nursery areas: concepts, definition, characterization and assumptions. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 337, 287–297. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huveneers C., 2006, Redescription of two species of wobbegongs (Chondrichthyes: Orectolobidae) with elevation of Orectolobus halei Whitley 1940 to species level. Zootaxa 1284, 29–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Huveneers C., Harcourt R.G., Otway N.M., 2006, Observations of localised movements and residence times of wobbegong sharks (Orectolobus halei) at Fish Rock, NSW, Australia. Cybium 30, 103–111. [Google Scholar]
  • Huveneers C., Otway N.M., Harcourt R.G., 2007, Morphometric relationships and catch composition of wobbegong sharks (Chondrichthyes: Orectolobus) commercially fished in New South Wales, Australia. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW 128, 243–250. [Google Scholar]
  • Huveneers C., Walker T.I., Otway N.M., Harcourt R., 2007, Reproductive synchrony of three sympatric species of wobbegong shark (genus Orectolobus) in New South Wales, Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 58, 765–777. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson J., 2001, The BDS deer distribution survey 2000. Deer 12, 265–274. [Google Scholar]
  • Last P.R., Stevens J.D., 2009, Sharks and Rays of Australia. Australia, CSIRO Australia. [Google Scholar]
  • Mims F.M., 1999, Amateur Science - strong tradition, bright future. Science 184, 55–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Morrissey J.F., Gruber S.H., 1993, Habitat selection by the juvenile lemon shark, Negaprion brevirostris. Environ. Biol. Fishes 38, 311–319. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Otway N.M., Burke A.L., Morrison N.S., Parker P.C., 2003, Monitoring and identification of NSW critical habitat sites for conservation of Grey Nurse Sharks. Sydney, NSW, Australia, NSW Fisheries. [Google Scholar]
  • Parker P., Bucher D.J., 2000, Seasonal variation in abundance and sex ratio of grey nurse (sand tigers) sharks Carcharias taurus in northern New South Wales, Australia: a survey based on observations of recreational scuba divers. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 5, 336–346. [Google Scholar]
  • Scandol J., Rowling K., Graham K., Eds., 2008, Wobbegong Sharks (Orectolobus spp.), Status of Fisheries Resources in NSW 2006/07. Cronulla, NSW, NSW Department of Primary Industries, pp. 313-315. [Google Scholar]
  • US environmental Protection Agency, 1998, Introduction to the national directory of volunteer environmental monitoring programs EPA 841-B-98-009. Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.