Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 20, Number 4, October-December 2007
Fish Aggregating Devices as Instrumented Observatories of Pelagic Ecosystems
Page(s) 343 - 356
Published online 26 February 2008
  • Adam M.S., Sibert J., Itano D., Holland K., 2003, Dynamics of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin (T. albacares) tuna in Hawaii's pelagic fisheries: analysis of tagging data with a bulk transfer model incorporating size-specific attrition. Fish. Bull. 101, 215-228. [Google Scholar]
  • Barange M., Hampton I., Pillar S.C., Soule M.A., 1994, Determination of composition and vertical structure of fish communities using in situ measurements of acoustic target strength. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 51, 99-109. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berger L., 2006, Multifrequency analysis using Movies+. Ifremer, Brest. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger L., Durand C., Marchalot C., 2001, Movies+ User Manual version 3.3. Ifremer, Brest. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertrand A., 1999, Le système {thon-environnement} en Polynésie Française: caractérisation de l'habitat pélagique, étude de la distribution et de la capturabilité des thons par méthodes acoustiques et halieutiques. Thèse Doct. ENSAR, Rennes. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertrand A., Josse E., 2000, Tuna target-strength related to fish length and swimbladder volume. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 1143-1146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bertrand A., Josse E., Massé J., 1999a, In situ acoustic target strength measurements of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) by coupling split-beam echosounder observations and sonic tracking. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 56, 51-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bertrand A., Le Borgne R., Josse E., 1999b, Acoustic characterisation of micronekton distribution in French Polynesia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 191, 127-140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brehmer P., Lafont T., Georgakarakos S., Josse E., Gerlotto F., Collet C., 2006, Omnidirectional multibeam sonar monitoring: Applications in fisheries science. Fish Fish. 7, 165-179. [Google Scholar]
  • Brehmer P., Gerlotto F., Laurent C., Cotel P., Achury A., Samb B., 2007, Schooling behavior of small pelagic fish: phenotypic expression of independent stimuli. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 334, 263-272. [Google Scholar]
  • Brill R.W., Block B.A., Boggs C.H., Bigelow K.A., Freund E.V., Marcinek D.J., 1999, Horizontal movements and depth distribution of large adult yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) near the Hawaiian Islands, recorded using ultrasonic telemetry: Implications for the physiological ecology of pelagic fishes. Mar. Biol. 133, 395-408. [Google Scholar]
  • Castro J.J., Santiago J.A., Santana-Ortega A.T. 2002, A general theory on fish aggregation to floating objects: An alternative to the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 11, 255-277. [Google Scholar]
  • Cayré P., Chabanne J., 1986, Marquage acoustique et comportement des thons tropicaux (albacore : Thunnus albacares, et listao : Katsuwonus pelamis) au voisinage d'un dispositif concentrateur de poissons. Océanogr. Trop. 21, 167-183. [Google Scholar]
  • Cillaurren E., 1994, Daily fluctuations in the presence of Thunnus albacares and Katsuwonus pelamis around fish aggregating devices anchored in Vanuatu, Oceania. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55, 581–591. [Google Scholar]
  • Dagorn L., Holland K.N., Itano D.G., 2007, Behavior of yellowfin (Thunnus albacares) and bigeye (T. obesus) tuna in a network of fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar. Biol. 151, 595-606. [Google Scholar]
  • Dempster T., 2004, Biology of fish associated with moored fish aggregation devices (FADs): implications for the development of a FAD fishery in New South Wales, Australia. Fish. Res. 68, 1-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dempster T., 2005, Temporal variability of pelagic fish assemblages around fish aggregation devices: biological and physical influences. J. Fish Biol. 66, 1237-1260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diner N., 2001, Correction on school geometry and density: approach based on acoustic image simulation. Aquat. Living Resour. 14, 211-222. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Diner N., 2007, Evaluating uncertainty in measurements of fish shoal aggregate backscattering cross-section caused by small shoal size relative to beam width. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 117-121. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Diner N., Berger L., 2004, TS data analysis using Movies+ software. Version 4.2. Ifremer, Brest. [Google Scholar]
  • Diner N., Marchallot C., Berger L., 2006, Echo-integration by shoal using Movies+ software. Version 4.3. Ifremer, Brest. [Google Scholar]
  • Doonan I.J., Bull B., Coombs R.F., 2003, Star acoustic surveys of localized fish aggregations. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 132-146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doray M., 2006, Sub-surface tuna aggregation within the [moored FAD-large pelagics- environment - fishing] system in Martinique: hierarchical study by acoustic, optic and fishing methods. Thèse doct. ENSAR, Rennes. [Google Scholar]
  • Doray M., Josse E., Gervain P., Reynal L., Chantrel J., 2006, Acoustic characterisation of pelagic fish aggregations around moored fish aggregating devices in Martinique (Lesser Antilles). Fish. Res. 82, 162-175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fernandes P.G., Korneliussen R.J., Lebourges-Dhaussy A., Massé J., Iglesias M., Diner N., Ona E., Knutsen T., Gajate J., Ponce R.,2006, The SIMFAMI project: Species Identification Methods from Acoustic Multifrequency Information. Final report to the EC No. Q5RS-2001-02054. [Google Scholar]
  • Fonteneau A., Pallarés P., Pianet R., 2000, A worldwide review of purse seine fisheries on FADs. In: Le Gall J.Y., Cayré P., Taquet M. (Eds.), Tuna Fishing and Fish Aggregating Devices Symposium. Actes Colloq. Ifremer 28, 15-35. [Google Scholar]
  • Foote K.G. 1982, Optimizing copper sphere for precision calibration of hydroacoustic equipment. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 71, 745-747. [Google Scholar]
  • Fréon P., Dagorn L., 2000, Review of fish associate behaviour: toward a generalisation of the meeting point hypothesis. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10, 183-207. [Google Scholar]
  • Gerlotto F., 1993, Identification and spatial stratification of tropical fish concentrations using acoustic populations, Aquat. Living Resour. 6, 243-254. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerlotto F., Marchal E., 1987, The concept of acoustic populations: its use for analyzing the results of acoustic cruises. Internat. Symp. Fish. Acoustic, Seattle WA. [Google Scholar]
  • Greene C.H., Wiebe P.H., Pelkie C., Popp J.M., Benfield M.C., 1998, Three-dimensional acoustic visualization of zooplankton patchiness. Deep Sea Res. II 45, 1201-1217 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Holland K.N., Brill R.W., Chang R.K.C., 1990, Horizontal and vertical movements of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices. Fish. Bull. 88, 493-507. [Google Scholar]
  • Josse E., Bertrand A., 2000, In situ acoustic target strength measurements of tuna associated with a fish aggregating device. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 911-918. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Josse E., Bertrand A., Dagorn L., 1999, An acoustic approach to study tuna aggregated around fish aggregating devices in French Polynesia: methods and validation. Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 303-313. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Josse E., Dagorn L., Bertrand A., 2000, Typology and Behaviour of tuna aggregations around fish aggregating devices from acoustic surveys in French Polynesia. Aquat. Living Resour. 12, 303-313. [Google Scholar]
  • Kakuma S., 2000, Current, catch and weight composition of yellowfin tuna with FADs off Okinawa island, Japan. In: Le Gall J.Y., Cayré P., Taquet M. (Eds.), Tuna Fishing and Fish Aggregating Devices Symposium. Actes Colloq. Ifremer 28, pp. 492-501. [Google Scholar]
  • Klimley A.P., Holloway C.F., 1999, School fidelity and homing synchronicity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares. Mar. Biol. 133, 307-317. [Google Scholar]
  • MacLennan D.N., Fernandes P., 2000, Acoustical definitions, units and symbols. ICES-FAST working group meeting, Haarlem , 10-14 April 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • MacLennan D.N., Fernandes P.G., Dalen, J., 2002, A consistent approach to definitions and symbols in fisheries acoustics. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59, 365-369. [Google Scholar]
  • Marsac F., Cayré P., 1998, Telemetry applied to behaviour analysis of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares Bonnaterre, 1788) movements in a network of fish aggregating devices. Hydrobiologia 371/372, 155-171. [Google Scholar]
  • Moreno G., Dagorn L., Sancho G., Itano D., 2007, Fish behaviour from fishers' knowledge: the case study of tropical tuna around drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 1517-1528. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ona E.,1999, Methodology for target strength measurements. (1999) ICES Coop. Res. Rep. 235, Copenhagen. [Google Scholar]
  • Ohta I., Kakuma S., 2005, Periodic behavior and residence time of yellowfin and bigeye tuna associated with fish aggregating devices around Okinawa Islands, as identified with automated listening stations. Mar. Biol. 146, 581-594. [Google Scholar]
  • Parin N.V., Fedoryako B.I., 1992, Pelagic fish communities around floating objects in the open ocean. Fishing for Tunas associated with floating Objects, International workshop. Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, San Diego, pp. 447-458. [Google Scholar]
  • Petitgas P., Levenez J.J., 1996, Spatial organization of pelagic fish: echogram structure, spatio-temporal condition, and biomass in Senegalese waters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 147-153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rose G.A., Leggett W.C., 1988, Hydroacoustic signal classification of fish schools by species. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 597-604. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Scalabrin C., 1997, Identification acoustique des espèces pélagiques à partir d'attributs discriminants des bancs de poissons monospécifiques. Thèse Doct. Océanogr. biol. Univ. Bretagne occidentale, Brest. [Google Scholar]
  • Scalabrin C., Massé J., 1993, Acoustic detection of the spatial and temporal distribution of fish shoals in the Bay of Biscay. Aquat. Living Resour. 6, 269-283. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Simmonds E.J., MacLennan D.N., 2005, Fisheries Acoustics. Theory and Practice. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Simard Y., McQuinn I., Montminy M., Lang C., Miller D., Stevens C., Wiggins D. Marchalot C., 1997, Description of the HAC standard format for raw and edited hydroacoustic data, Version 1.0. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2174, 65 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Simrad 2001, Simrad EK60 Scientific echo sounder Instruction manual. Simrad AS, Horten, Norway. [Google Scholar]
  • Taquet M., Guillou A., Reynal L., Lagin A., 2000, The large pelagic fish of Martinique: biology and exploitation. In: Creswell R.L. (Ed.), 51st Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 51, pp. 375-389. [Google Scholar]
  • Taquet M., Sancho G., Dagorn L., Gaertner J.C., Itano D., Aumeeruddy R., Wendling B., Peignon P., 2007, Characterization of fish aggregations associated with drifting fish aggregating devices (DFADs) in the Western Indian Ocean through underwater visual census. Aquat. Living Resour. 20, 331-341. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tichy F.E., Solli H., Klaveness H., 2003, Non-linear effects in a 200-kHz sound beam and the consequences for target-strength measurement. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 571-574. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Weill A., Scalabrin C., Diner N., 1993, MOVIES-B: an acoustic detection description software. Application to shoal species' classification. Aquat. Living Resour. 6, 255-267. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.