EDP Sciences logo
Submit your paper
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 20 / No 3 (July-September 2007) Aquat. Living Resour., 20 3 (2007) 205-212 References
Highlight
Free Access
Issue
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 20, Number 3, July-September 2007
Page(s) 205 - 212
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/alr:2007033
Published online 27 October 2007
  • Abramowitz M., Stegun I.A. (Eds.), 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. 9th printing, New York, Dover. [Google Scholar]
  • Blackman S.S., 1986, Multiple-target tracking with radar applications. Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA, 449 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Burwen D.L., Bosch D., 1996, Estimates of Chinook salmon abundance in the Kenai River using split-beam sonar, 1995, Alaska Dept. Fish and Game, Fishery Data Ser. Anchorage AK, No. 96-9. [Google Scholar]
  • Burwen D.L., Bosch D.E., Fleischman S.J., 1995, Evaluation of hydroacoustic assessment techniques for Chinook salmon on the Kenai River using split-beam sonar. Alaska Dept. Fish and Game, Fishery Data Ser. Anchorage AK, No. 95-45. [Google Scholar]
  • Cronkite G.M.W., Enzenhofer H.J., 2002, Observations of controlled moving targets with split-beam sonar and implications for detection of migrating adult salmon in rivers. Aquat. Living Resour. 15, 1-11. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cronkite G., VanWill P., Noon D, Bachen S., 2003, Wannock River Hydroacoustic Study. Can. Manuscr. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2632, 20. [Google Scholar]
  • Carlson T.J., Jackson D.R., 1980, Empirical evaluation of the feasibility of split-beam methods for direct in situ target strength measurement of single fish. Rep. Appl. Phys. Lab. Univ. Wash. APL-UW 8006. [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrenberg J.E., Torkelson T.C., 1996, The application of dual-beam and split-beam target tracking in fisheries acoustics. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 329-334. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Enzenhofer H.J., Olsen N., Mulligan T.J., 1998, Fixed-location riverine hydroacoustics as a method of enumerating migrating adult Pacific salmon: comparison of split-beam acoustics vs. visual counting. Aquat. Living Resour. 11, 61-74. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Enzenhofer H.J., Cronkite G., 2000, Fixed location hydroacoustic estimation of fish migration in the riverine environment: An operational manual. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2313, 46. [Google Scholar]
  • Hydroacoustic Technology Inc., 2000, Model 241/243/244 split-beam digital echo sounder system operator's manual, version 1.8. Hydroacoustic Technology Inc., Seattle, WA. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasco Research Ltd. 1995, Underwater attitude measurement sensor package operator's manual, TCM2 electronic compass user's manual, Jasco Research Ltd., Brentwood Bay Canada, website http://www.jasco.com. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston S.V., Ransom B.H., 1994, Feasibility of using hydroacoustics to enumerate adult Atlantic salmon escapement in the River Spey, Scotland. Rep. Hydroacoustic Technology, Inc., Seattle, Wash. Spey District Fishery Board, Scotland. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnston S.V., Ransom B.H., Kumagai K.K., 1993, Hydroacoustic evaluation of adult Chinook and chum salmon migrations in the Yukon river during 1992. Rep. Hydroacoustic Technology, Inc., Seattle, Wash. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fairbanks, Alaska. [Google Scholar]
  • Legendre L., Legendre P., 1983, Numerical Ecology. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam. [Google Scholar]
  • MacLennan D.N., Simmonds E.J., 1992, Fisheries Acoustics. Chapman and Hall, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Mulligan T.J., Kieser R., 1996, A split-beam echo counting model for riverine use. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 53, 403-406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Osborne B.M., Daum D.W., 1997, Enumeration of Chandalar River fall chum salmon using split-beam sonar, Alaska Fish. Tech. Rep. 42. [Google Scholar]
  • Pacific Eumetrics, 2002, Users Manuals for ABTrack and Polaris Software Packages. [Google Scholar]
  • Racca R., 1999, Operational Notes for UWINSTRU systems with NMEA0183 interface. JASCO Research Ltd., Victoria, BC. [Google Scholar]
  • Romakkaniemi A., Marjomaki T., Jurvelius J., 1996, Hydroacoustic estimation of salmon (Salmo salar) spawning run in the Tornio River, project results 1995-1996, Rep. Finnish Fame and Fisheries Research Institute 89, 17. [Google Scholar]
  • S-PLUS 2000, 1999, Programmer's Guide. Data Analysis Products Division. MathSoft Inc., Seattle WA, 868. [Google Scholar]
  • Traynor J.J., 1986, Some preliminary results using a new split-beam/dual-beam target strength measurement system. ICES, CM1986/B: Fish capture Committee. [Google Scholar]
  • Traynor J.J., Ehrenberg J.E., 1990, Fish and standard sphere measurements obtained with a split-beam/dual-beam system. Int. Symp. Fish. Acoustic, June 22-26, 1990 Seattle, WA, USA. Rapp. P.-v. Réun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer 189, 325-335. [Google Scholar]
  • Xie Y., Mulligan T.J., Cronkite G.M.W., Gray A.P., 2002, Assessment of potential bias in hydroacoustic estimation of Fraser River sockeye and pink salmon at Mission, B.C. Pacific Salmon Comm. Tech. Rep. 11, 42. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.