Free Access
Aquat. Living Resour.
Volume 18, Number 2, April-June 2005
Page(s) 187 - 192
Published online 15 July 2005
  • Allendorf F.W., Ryman N., Utter F., 1987, Genetics and fishery management: Past, present and future in population genetics and fisheries management. In: Ryman N., Utter F. (Eds.), University of Washington Press, Seattle and London, pp.1-20.
  • Begg G.A., Friedland K.D., Pearce J.B., 1999, Stock identification and its role in stock assessment and fisheries management: An overview. Fish. Res. 43, 1-8. [CrossRef]
  • Bookstein F.L., Chernoff B., Elder R.L., Humphries J.M., Smith G.R., Strauss R.E., 1985, Morphometrics in evolutionary biology: The geometry of size and shape change with examples from fishes. Spec. Publ. No 15. Academy of National Sciences, Philadelphia.
  • Burnaby T.P., 1966, Growth-invariant discriminant functions and generalized distances. Biometrics 22, 96-110. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Cadrin S.X., 2000, Advances in morphometric identification of fishery stocks. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 10, 91-112. [CrossRef]
  • Cadrin S.X., 2004, Natural marks morphological analyses. In: Cadrin S.X., Friedland K.D., Waldman J.R. (Eds.), Stock identification methods. Elsevier-Academic Press.
  • Cheng Q.T., Zheng B.S., 1987, Systematic Searches of Fishes in China. Beijing: Science Press.
  • Corti M., Thorpe R.S., Sola L., Sbordoni V., Cataudella S., 1988, Multivariate morphometrics in aquaculture: A case study of six stocks of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Italy. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 45, 1548-1554. [CrossRef]
  • Ding S.C., 1981, Multivariate analysis and its appication. Changchun: Jilin people's Publishers.
  • East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fisheries Science and Shanghai Fisheries Research Institute, 1990, The Fishes of Shanghai Area. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.
  • Elliott N.G., Haskard K., Koslow J.A., 1995, Morphometric analysis of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) off the continental slope of southern Australia. J. Fish Biol. 46, 202-220. [CrossRef]
  • Junquera S., Perez-Gandaras G., 1993, Population diversity in the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L. 1758) as revealed by multivariate analysis of morphometric and meristic characters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 50, 383-391. [CrossRef]
  • Li S.F., Wang Q., Wu L.Z., Qiu Q.R., 1990, Comprehensive genetic study on Chinese carps. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.
  • Liu W.B., 1995, Biochemical and morphological comparison and interspecific relationships of four species of the genus Coilia in China. Ocean. Limnol. Sinica 26, 558-564.
  • Marcus L.F., 1990, Traditional morphometrics. In: Rohlf F.J., Bookstein F.L. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. University of Michigan Museum of Evolution. Spec. Publ. 2, 77-122.
  • Reist J., 1985, An empirical evaluation of several univariate methods that adjust for size variation in morphometric data. Can. J. Zool. 63, 1429-1439. [CrossRef]
  • Rohlf F.J., Bookstein F.L., 1987, A comment on shearing as a method for “size correction”. Syst. Zool. 36, 356-367. [CrossRef]
  • Silva A., 2003, Morphometric variation among sardine (Sardina pilchardus) populations from the northeastern Atlantic and the western Mediterranean. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 60, 1352-1360. [CrossRef]
  • Soriano M., Tampubolon G., Widodo J., 1988, Discriminant analysis of morphometrics of Indian Mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta) in the Malaca strait and Scad (Decapterus russelli) in the Java Sea, Indonesia. FAO Fish. Rep. 389, 411-415.
  • Strauss R.E., Bookstein F.L., 1982, The truss: body form reconstruction in morphometrics. Syst. Zool. 31, 113-135. [CrossRef]
  • Strauss R.E., 1985, Evolutionary allometry and variation in body form in the South American catfish genus Corydorus (Callichthyidae). Syst. Zool. 34, 381-396. [CrossRef]
  • Thorpe R.S., 1988, Multiple group principal components analysis and population differentiation. J. Zool. Lond. 216, 37–40. [CrossRef]
  • Turan C., 2004, Stock identification of Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) using morphometric and meristic characters. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 61, 774-781. [CrossRef]
  • Turan C., Erguden D., Gurlek M., Basusta N., Turan F., 2004, Morphometric structuring of Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus L.) in the Black, Aegean and Northeastern Mediterranean Seas. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 28, 865-871.
  • Tzeng T.D., 2004, Morphological variation between populations of spotted mackerel (Scomber australasicus) off Taiwan. Fish. Res. 68, 45-55. [CrossRef]
  • Whitehead P.J.P., Nelson G.J., Wongratana T., 1988, FAO species catalogue. Vol. 7. Clupeoid fishes of the world (Suborder Clupeoidei). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the herrings, sardines, pilchards, sprats, shads, anchovies and wolf-herrings. Part 2 - Engraulidae. FAO Fish. Synop. 7 (125) Pt. 2:579.
  • Wimberger P.H., 1992, Plasticity of fish body shape-the effects of diet, development, family and age in two species of Geophagus (Pisces: Cichlidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 45, 197-218. [CrossRef]
  • Young B.A., 2001, Intraspecific Variation among Emerald Shiners (Notropis atherinoides) of the Missouri River. PhD Dissertation. South Dakota State University.
  • Yuan C.M., Lin J.B., Qin A.L., Liu H.R., 1976, On the classification history and status quo of genus Coilia in China. J. Nanjing Univ. 2, 1-12.
  • Yuan C.M., 1980, Discussion on the classification of genus Coilia below species in the lower and middle of Yangtze river and provinces along eastern and southern China sea. J. Nanjing Univ. 3, 67-82.
  • Zhang S.Y., 2001, Fauna Sinica Osteichthyes: Acipenseriformes, Elopiformes, Clupeiformes and Gonorhynchiformes. Science Press.
  • Zhang Y.T., Fang K.T., 1982, Introduction of multiple analysis. Beijing: Science Press.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.